I don't want to count chickens before they hatch - RC could come back and say that we are proceeding, but on a slower pace to see if we can keep dialing up activity
@BenI. Considering the time of year relative to the profession, that might not be so bad. Increase the likelihood of a successful Public Beta. Public Beta is virtually an eventually graduated site, but I wouldn't want to end up being the exception to the rule either.
It seems significant to me that mod nominations didn't open late, in fact they opened early. It wasn't supposed to happen until tomorrow according to the CMs prior answer.
I suspect that RC has a checklist of touchstones. Official, or merely what he's found useful. As we reach each touchstone he'll take the next step in the process. The calendar dates may just be either "typical" progress, or deadlines, and maybe both in different cases.
Also, I hope our fraud wasnt as bad as the refrenced payumoney proposal. I checked and payumoney reached committment in a month. That's a lot of fake users.
Other than possibly watching IP addresses a little closer as we move on, I doubt that the incident will have much impact on us. Our progress iwll be based on our actions, not the actions of others who are now gone.
Think of RC as the instructor in a creative class, and new sites as the students. Provide the guidelines of "art" but let the students find their own expression
@thesecretmaster It occurs to me that, even if you're still a HS student, the training your getting towards being a classroom teacher right now is amazing. While nothing is the same as running your own classroom, you are getting a really heavy dose of teacher perspective
And on this site, it is all from teachers who really want to be good - there are no dinosaurs here
(Dinosaurs are what I call the teachers who check out)
Mike Zamansky isn't posting here much, but he's still watching the site. He's an incredible leader in the field, so I am honored that he replied to my post on his blog!!
I'm looking at a lot of our recent "users" that have been created, and we're getting small batches of users with 1 point and no other connected sites, and they don't post.
It makes me livid. How can we assess our viability if our numbers don't mean anything?
... I suppose they could all be real, if our promotional efforts have just been doing a great job
Thinking through it, they started appearing at around the same time as I was sending out my emails and Peter was starting to tweet, so they could just be folks who want to check us out but otherwise have no SE accounts
With no other site affiliation, they don't have the rep to comment, and may be unsure of how to ask/answer yet. Some, maybe a lot, will be lookers that decide no. Since they must register to even preview, that's to be expected.
Compare the "join" date with the "last seen" metric, and that will help weed out some.
I don't think they're frauds because they have pictures. My guess is they came from one of the other SE sites (maybe though ads) and simply signed up to be able to see what we had.
@BenI. I also get to do a lot of teaching because of what I do at school. Not only teaching web development in a club and java for FIRST in another, but mostly in a different class.
@thesecretmaster There's nothing wrong with getting experience early. My first gig was teacher's aid in a programming class my during my HS Junior year. They were learning Fortran, and I'd been using it for 8 years by then. I only took the class so I'd have access to the system, not to learn anything from the class. Professor saw that and tagged be to help rather than study.
Depending on where you're likely to go, start by trying to figure out where your passion lies. Then look at the programs, and their specializations to see where that might fit.
Then find the road to that, even if it means getting the degree in something else that makes that better, or more fun.
Nothing says you have to be a professional in the field that is your hobby. Likewise, nothing says you can't have professional abilities, just because it is a hobby.
Well, there are a number of things that turn me away from persuing this hobby despite that I already am very close to the professional level. CS is much more attractive as a profession to me.
You gave away your school when you linked to your web page ;P Why can't you do the theater scene as hobby and passion, and do the CS (web?) for "profession" at the same time? I'm sure that your contacts, eventually, in the theater realms can also lead to web/CS work, maybe as freelance.
@GypsySpellweaver I can't do CS and tech at the same time because I'd have to disappear from my CS job for weeks at a time fairly often because theater is basically 1 week of 12 hour days then a couple hours every night.
@GypsySpellweaver A thing that happened today: 2 used to be working things, 1 broke. How did we fix it? Swapped the working and not working ones and suddenly both worked. "Don't touch it! It works."
Odds are that there's been a few from "the scene" who've been around, maybe unnoticed, that have seen who does what in productions. I bet the instructor know a few as well.
I guess so. Also, tech has been useful because I've learned a whole lot of stuff "the hard way." I learned that by not asking questions to look competent, you can kill someone. If you don't test the things you make, you can kill someone. If you don't do it right the first time it'll never get done right, and you can kill someone. Also workplace etiquette, interviewing, advocating for myself, budgeting, etc. Also, I almost forgot listening.
What is this "fixing" you speak of? I only know of "working around the broken part".
In terms of my future career, I think I'm just going to take it one step at a time. I'll try to go to a good college that has decent CS/Engineering departments but also has an OK theater program. In college, I'll figure out what I want to do within CS/Engineering and if I want to do tech. Then I'll be all set.
Speaking of tech and CS, the eOS CLI for programming lights is so un-*nix that I really dislike working with it. If any *nix wizards have extra time, a CLI for the DMX protocol would be amazing.
@thesecretmaster Looks like something to watch. At least the OLA project. Once you're more proficient at writing programs, you could use that to "abstract" the equipment, and write programs, or modules, to control the equipment.
That's examples of how well you understand the community and it's standards.
IoT would be a lot less work, I imagine. Smaller is easier. Bonus is you get to help it grow and keep it nice instead of trying to clean up so many messes in a large site.
Proposed Q&A site for questions relating to products such as the HTC Vive, Oculus Rift, Microsoft HoloLens, and other Virtual / Augmented Reality devices.
Currently in definition.
Or maybe I can become a mod on my own proposed Area51.SE site.
Proposed Q&A site for weapon experts and enthusiasts to ask Questions and get Answers about any type of weapon, from ancient edged weapons and archery to guns and modern tactical or strategic military systems.
I agree with @Aurora0001. We can guide with comments, but they also look like posts you'd find at the bottom of a SO question: they simply stay at the bottom based on votes or lack thereof. That's the SE model at work.
The 'anyone can edit' model is quite powerful as a training tool. I intentionally put lots of typos in my posts to encourage others to edit them for me :)
Aurora doesn't want it, and Sean and Gypsy haven't indicated any interest in moderating so far. I could be forgetting someone, but it seems like a lot of the heavy-hitters have been accounted for.
Oh. I feel like the SE overlords will reject me because it'd be a bit wierd to have a HS student moderating teachers, so that would leave it as Ben, Peter and Itamar.
Not being an educator means to me that your answers will likely not receive as many votes as someone who has been an educator for decades. But, if the purpose of moderators is to make sure that the site itself remains healthy, then lack of experience as a classroom teacher is not at all a disqualifyer
If you care about the site, and will tend to the site, and will watch the review queues and help with promotions and put your efforts into tending whatever needs tending to, then you are doing the work to keep the resource strong
This question seems to be on the edge of being primarily opinion based. I haven't close voted because I like the idea of the question, but does it need to be narrowed a bit?
I would think that there is enough context to give a specific answer. It's a precise enough issue, and I'm sure there is research/experience that can be added. It's on the edge, but I think it leans "Good Subjective"
Wow. We've gotten a hundred new users since Saturday. Either there's new fake accounts, or our promotion efforts are really working. (And by "our" I mean "your" because I haven't been able to do much.) I honestly think it's the latter. If everyone reached 25 people, that's 100.
Earlier I went through our user list and found some interesting things. 70 users from other sites with rep>500 did hit and run (registered and haven't been back) in the first 10 days. An additional 23 of the same category haven't been seen since the first of the month. I started to count the low rep, or this site only users that did hit and run, but it was too large.
2
On the flip side, almost all the newer users - presumably in response to the marketing efforts - have been regular visitors, if not contributors at the moment. Additionally, from what is given in the profiles, most of the hit and runs probably won't be back since the site isn't really a fit for them. There were a few that looked promising, which I would really like to see come back, but not sure how to reach them.
Thanks for that insight. That's great to hear. It will make our marketing efforts much easier when we can link directly to a topic without the barrier of a log-in.
We are up 424 total users. That means around 75 have joined just today.
That's why I used a cutoff of the first. That's after the marketing began. Prior to that it's mostly people from other SE sites, or Area 51 visitors. I didn't attempt to connect users to committers.
I don't get anything in the header bar. I can see, and use, the queues. Most of them anyway. I just don't have any visual clue that there is something there that needs attention.
Viewing a profile increments a counter, just like viewing a question does, that's displayed with the profile. Most of the profiles I viewed had only been viewed 1 or 2 times before. Many hadn't been viewed at all before I did.
I was surprised how many users were uni level students. Self-directed students showing up here makes sense, the rest don't. I suspect that they were mostly early followers of the proposal, and that now that it's in beta and doesn't fit their use case, they will never return.
Once we are public beta, the ghost users should show up a lot less. Now they have to register just to browse. In public beta they can browse at will, and only have to register to participate.