I may be entirely wrong (about it being US-centric; just my experience of not hearing it over here), but I feel like it'd be good to have tags that don't require explanation (because people don't read tag descriptions anyway :P)
And I suspect the definitions of them varies from place to place
@BenI. It depends what kind of site you want to build. If you want a site with mainly US educators, then tailoring the tags to a US audience might make sense, but if the system seems designed for US-only questions, perhaps a more international audience will just think the site is not meant for them
If you are suggesting that having them will give us fewer international academics, then I'm not sure where to go with that. We want the resource to be useful for all CS educators, regardless of level or nationality.
That's where we basically are now
When those tags have come around, they've largely been removed (so far)
If they're going to be used sparingly, it's probably OK, but even then, using cs0 without a clear definition makes those questions inaccessible to those who don't know the usage of it anyway
I suppose it's hard to avoid with course-specific questions
Are you sure that they're not used internationally? I'm in the US, but I never heard of them before I came to.this site, so it might just be collegiate-level designators.
(meaning that they might be used internationally, but non academics would be unlikely to have run across the designators)
No, not sure at all, but I couldn't find much reference to CS1 over here (or anywhere on Google) which led me to think it was US-specific. Maybe it's just jargon from university lecturers instead.
But I don't think there's such a tradition of numbering courses over here anyway.
I think that cs0 and cs1 might have been created as designators to get around the fact that every institution does it's own numbering. But this is purely speculation on my part.
Basic result is that there's no agreement what CS1/CS2 is or students know after finishing
I was thinking that the tags would be ok if we had a solid description in the tag wiki. Seems we can't create such a definition that is generally accepted. :(
@Aurora0001 oh, and thank you! It appears I do (though I got no notification on my top bar, which is odd. Perhaps because I already had the privilege during private beta?)
@thesecretmaster from the body of the question? That makes me uncomfortable, because none of us are from that world. We haven't even resolved the tag discussion for those designators yet.
Got a question of perceptions. Is 100% answered good or bad. Think it's good for people looking for answers, they think yes, I can get a answer here. Not so good for experts, they think, well, I guess they don't need my help.
In browsing the site today I noticed a number of questions where the first comment was "what level of education" (or similar).
We should add tags to help answer that question and further categorize the question. We'd have to come up with something that was culture agnostic (E.g. US folks may no...
In browsing the site today I noticed a number of questions where the first comment was "what level of education" (or similar).
We should add tags to help answer that question and further categorize the question. We'd have to come up with something that was culture agnostic (E.g. US folks may no...
That was a very busy weekend. And I was only one of the editors as well. It was a massive, coordinated effort to do some significant clean up on Super User.
One of the steps on Stack Exchange's road to HTTPS is the replacing of embedded http:// images with secure ones. This has been done automatically for a lot of images, but there are some that can't be automatically fixed. These were rewritten in the HTML (but not the Markdown source) to be text li...