The question is more whether Dobby only guided him to the destination (Shell Cottage that he's just been to) when Harry was really unsure he could direct the Apparition there, or he was also quick enough to help with the “Let your yearning to enter it flood from your mind to every particle of your body.” part? If Harry messes up the former, then they arrive somewhere else. If he messes up the latter, then Griphook gets splinched.
It doesn't look like Harry hesitated about the part where he has to carry Griphook and Dobby, but (1) it was a genuine emergency, (2) Harry can be a bit stupid when taking risks.
But Dobby also announces that “Dobby has come to save Harry Potter and his friends!”.
@Jenayah Even with concentration checks for advanced magic he's never tried before? I thought Hermione was the one who's got the bonus there.
I'm not even sure it's a Concentration check. It's clearly not the ordinary Concentration check you need for casting spells, the one Harry keeps failing for silent spells in his combat with Snape.
That one just fizzles the spell if Harry fails it; failing the "every particle of your body" will Splinch.
For using the Cruciatus Curse, the caster must really feel hate towards the recipient.
Is there such a requirement for using the Imperius Curse?
Is it available to only dark and powerful wizards?
Although I think the Splinching doesn't always happen, you get a Fortitude save, and I think both Harry and Griphook has high bonuses for that.
As in, even if Harry fails to concentrate on some particle of Griphook's body, the Fortitude save lets keep the body together, grabbing it by the other particles rather than tearing it apart.
There's also the question of how exactly Ron and Hermione got out. Did even Ron do Side-Along Apparition? Or Hermione could still Apparate in her damaged state and without a wand?
This too … this is all evidence that Side-Along Apparition is not as hard as I assume. I might need to figure out a good question to ask here. I could ask how difficult Side-Along Apparition is; or I might ask how the Apparitions out from Malfoy Manor happened exactly.
I'll have to think about a good question and readjusting my opinion.
The former question, as in how difficult it is (and what the difficulty depends on), has the advantage that it tries to challenge my existing opinion, but the drawback that it's one of those rules questions where the real answer is that we have no clue, read the roolbook.
The latter question has the drawback that the part about Ron and Hermione might need a separate question from the side about Harry and Griphook and Dobby, the first one might be hard to answer because at this point they aren't focus characters, they're just assumed to be plot-warped to the hero when they're too far off-screen, and the question about Harry and Griphook and Dobby feels... dangerous.
And unless there's some convenient JKR interview, these will have to devolve to speculation based on rules of Apparition, so effectively a rules question.
I expect to complete the first season of Arrow today after purchasing it on BD and would appreciate some tips on where to go next.
I am aware that a similar question has been asked and answered with regards to those seasons first broadcast in 2017 here: What is the correct watch order of Arrowve...
@Jenayah Yes, that's a valid point. So an answer could potentially come from there too. I can't tell, I only saw that film once, whereas you can probably guess I've read the seven core books many times.
@Alex There is a goblin character who has a secondary character role in that film actually, and a house-elf at least appears and I think even has a line of dialog or two. See scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/145632/…
This question was closed as per the FWP.
The question was about a scenario which has not occurred yet, but is extremely likely to occur in the upcoming season.
One of our Mods, Rand al'Thor, took the position that it should not be closed, as per the clarification to the FWP:
Per this clari...
I get a lot of gold Famous Question badges these days. Is that only because I'm slowly reaping the rewards of having written questions years before? Or has something changed on Sci Fi SE so that everyone gets more of those badges now, such as much more real visitors than previously, or counting unique visitors differently, just like how it's much easier to get bronze Announcer badges?
@TheLethalCarrot There's some anecdotal evidence on Meta that multiple people have seen a spike in the bronze Announcer badges at a certain time. There's a question on Meta SE, I'll try to find it, the reason why is not clear though there were some alleged explanations.
There has been a recent spike in the number of Announcer badges being awarded on TeX.SE. A query on SEDE highlights this:
The last four months saw the occasional awarding of more than one-a-day, with April 2017 shooting up to 3+ per day.
Similar increases or spikes seem to have occurred on SO...
@TheLethalCarrot Well yes, but it's also possible that it's recently touched (active) questions that get more visits. We'd have to test that with a Data SE query and some statistics, but I'm lazy to do that.
Although you're right, because four of my gold Famous Question badges predate the date of the Famous Question jump given in that Meta post. Let me see when my Announcer badges start.
@TheLethalCarrot Yes, but that's just a hypothesis that's even more difficult to verify, unless you have access to the full Referee logs to check how many visits are from links, and I think even diamond moderators don't have access to that log, only community moderators or developers do.
@Jenayah And there a re a few picky users who don't want to click on referee SE links, but will click to non-referee ones, and they claim they can often rewrite the link themselves but not when they browse from their mobile phone.
Or at least one IT guy told this to me.
So when he complains, I give him a non-referee link.
@Jenayah No no. They don't want the title. They are fine with the short link without the userid, and want a link without userid even if I describe what the link points to.
@Jenayah I have a four-digit userid 4918 on Sci Fi. Jenayah has a five digit userid 98028 on Sci Fi, and the current newbies on Sci Fi get a six digit userid, because the five digit decimal ones ran out.
I could be wrong here, but the badge descriptions are always very brief and imprecise and don't give the full rule. Meta SE is full of questions of the form "What is the actual rule for the badge X?"
According to the "Recent feature changes" Q/A, since 2012-01-10 "[s]haring direct links to answers now also counts towards [the Announcer, Booster, and Publicist] badges".
The userid part should be encrypted, but it's too late to change now, they won't break the existing link format and everyone knows how to create that, unless perhaps they put the restriction only for posts after the change.
@Jenayah They answer more, but I don't bother with the tag. I focus primarily on TL. However I review the most, and really started the whole "link to the guide" trend after Valorum suggested it to me.
(though I agree that I prefer the "hi there, see that guide, for instance XYZ, more chances of IDing successfully, cheers smiley" approach than the "look at the guide" one - I tend to do the former)
@b_jonas 200. That's the only requirement. One can get a gold tag badge in the-silmarillion and given that it gets about 3 questions a year, it's effectively useless
@Jenayah Too bad they don't aware the one consecutive year badge.
I'm stating the obvious and it has been said but you can very well be an expert on stuff that has 3 questions without even being part of the big tags like TL
@Jenayah True but gold tag badge is more for "question expert" in that they're more likely to recognise a dupe and are trusted in doing so, not much point in that power if there are only 3 questions
@Edlothiad Sorry. There were multiple threads of complicated conversation going and I'm also talking with my coworkers IRL. And the SE chat interface really sucks.
I should improve it a bit with the Stylish plugin, but I can't get that to work at home, only at work.
@Jenayah The problem is that the chat lines have a partly transparent background, and there's a background image behind the whole chat part except the right sidebar. I don't like seeing text on non-uniform colored background. This is worse on Sci Fi chat than the other SE chats I've seen because the packground image is a particularly distracting one with too high local contrast.
But on machines where the Stylish Firefox plugin works, that is, currently at work but this changes like yearly, I can fix this when I really want.
I don't see the background as a problem it's mostly black and the odd grey star doesn't really provide much of an issue, at least on the machines I've used
@Jenayah No, it's that the image has high contrast edges, so it's particularly distracting that the background behind the text is not of a uniform color.
@Alex as I said didn't read the book, but funny, given how wizards look down on elves and goblins you'd expect them to list the species in a Fantastic Beasts book...
@Jenayah The book has a preface which discusses how things are classified as beasts or beings. (That's actually the part where goblins are tangentially mentioned.)