« first day (9 days earlier)      last day (78 days later) » 
00:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

bwoebi
bwoebi
22:08
@El'endiaStarman Hmm, lichess is saying 3. c4 is an inaccuracy … but it's at the same time a not that uncommon opening…
or 3... Nf6
I'm not sure about why 6... Bf5 was that inaccurate … but uh … that's computer analysis…
El'endia Starman
El'endia Starman
22:46
@bwoebi Perhaps people do statistically worse with that move?
bwoebi
bwoebi
@El'endiaStarman dunno, the opening databases I've found seem to contradict
El'endia Starman
El'endia Starman
I think that computer analysis is primarily weird in that it cannot properly take potential mistakes into account.
I've seen a couple situations where a local Stockfish analysis got stuck in some local extrema so it couldn't suggest anything outside a particular small set of moves.
bwoebi
bwoebi
I don't know how exactly the heuristics work… but yeah, might happen
(which is why we ultimately have opening databases and have the computers do middle game analysis)
PhiNotPi
PhiNotPi
23:02
Right now I'm reading up on "universal opening systems" AKA chess openings that have a minimal dependence on what the other player is doing.
bwoebi
bwoebi
@PhiNotPi g3, Nf3, Bg2, O-O usually is pretty independent
00:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (9 days earlier)      last day (78 days later) »