00:11
2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e5fc/3e5fceecbd910756ab6c0911acf37021548ce1de" alt="Artificial Intelligence"
I'm looking into using PPO implementations like OpenAi's SpinningUp and Baselines. However, I fear that these implementations require packages which are not available for Windows. So I'm wondering if in general Linux should be used for working with DRL algorithms. Also, I'm not planing on using O...
@DukeZhou No, you should not leave this question opened: https://ai.stackexchange.com/q/16697/2444. It is clearly off-topic. It asking us to analyze a speech for homework.
1 hour later…
6 hours later…
07:20
@DukeZhou Perhaps you have recognized the massive recent downvotes in my account earlier than i, but if external users are pressing buttons on the website it's their right to do so. The only thing what i'd like to criticize is, that I'm the only one who has received so much downvotes. I think, that other users here in the forum have also shown, that they are able to resist against conflicts.
6 hours later…
14:04
Let us imagine a scenario. Suppose, i didn't have discovered SE.AI around 2 years ago. That means, in the scenario, not a single posting was written by me. Would this change the development of the website so great? My guess is, that the individual influence is low and the more important reason for the increase or decrease of the
overall traffic is located outside SE.AI. Which means, it's origin is the education system, the technological level in the world and in the amount of people who are interested in Artificial Intelligence. Sure, it's possible to play the blame game and criticize if the last answer of a user was well enough to receive 2 upvotes,
or if the fair judgment would be only -1 downvotes. But, the more interesting question is, why are only 4 people here in the chat but not 40 or 400? I think, that most of the quality problems are solved automatically with a larger user base. It seems, that all the programmers and computer experts are feeling comfortable at Stackoverflow and nobody is motivated to look for something which is more relevant.
1 hour later…
15:22
@ManuelRodriguez The site would have fewer low-quality answers and questions if you hadn't discovered this site. This is for sure.
@ManuelRodriguez I am not the only one thinking that you often provide only nonsensical and random junk, which makes me think you are a TROLL or BOT. If you do this on purpose or not, I don't know, but if you want the site to prosper, you should stop giving answers and asking questions. Your questions and answers bring no benefit to the community. Your content has no value and can even be harmful.
16:22
The term for banning all the users and closing all the question is “complete shutdown” of a website. In the history of Wikipedia, there is a myth available about a power admin who was drunk from his power. He has deleted all the content, and stopped all other users to login. The best strategy to prevent such behavior is to lower the tasks of an admin to a minimum. That means, he will become the elected king without a kingdom.
From a technical perspective this is possible by reducing the reputation of an admin to 1, similar to the community user. meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19738/…
2 hours later…
18:36
The following question needs to be converted to latex. If someone wants to do it, I would appreciate it.
« first day (1207 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1916 days later) »