I just finished reading Louise Penny's mystery novel, The Madness of Crowds, and found this as the very last sentence of the acknowledgments. Remind you of anyone here? "All this to say, if you didn't like the book, it's their fault."
I'm currently using forest as it's the one I found it easier to use
Let me know if this should be an actual question, the other similar ones does not cover infinite trees like this one (to be the best of my knowledge, at least)
I've been asked to work out how to script some data analysis up. The basics are easy (read CSVs, plot, extract info, plot the result of that, do regression). However, the info bit is not.
We have some data where there's a 'flatish' bit that we need the midpoint for - how does one sort out a 'flatish' bit of a curve from 'the curvey bit' other than by eye?
@JosephWright Without much thought, I'd compute the derivative of that curve, then define a threshold of values for the derivative that are "close enough for it to be flat". That threshold depends then on how flat 'flatish' is
Different approach: fit both a constant and a slope to intervals of the data, compare test statistics if the addition of the additional parameter significantly improves the results. (determining the sizes of the intervals might be a pain though)
@samcarter I guess the derivative approach is like the by-eye one
@PhelypeOleinik Basically I'm trying to automate what we do anyway - the approach is not novel, it's just it's boring, and the group want to make it easier (we have the data in CSV from our hardware)
@JosephWright I know a collegue of mine here used algorithms designed to fit piecewise-linear function to data. I am unable to find the paper now, but I can ask
@JosephWright I'm not using origin, doing all my fitting with root. I would make piecewise definition of the function, e.g. f(x) = mx+t if x<z, h if x>z and then let the fit algorithm determine the parameters.
@PhelypeOleinik yes, that would be interesting to read
Unfortunately by my experience (although I don't have much experience) for any "real life" "loosely defined" things you need either a lot of trial error (classical approach) or a lot of labeled data (AI stuff)
The developer of cleveref has not responded to e-mails to toby at dr-qubit dot org since 2021-10-22. His last cleveref version is from 2018. Any idea on whether he still has the chance to develop/debug cleveref and is interested in this? Any other active e-mail address to reach him?
@GeekestGeek you'd need to wait months rather than weeks before assuming it was dropped, I note it says you need to verify your email the first time, did the verification work OK?
I quote (replacing @ and . with words) <toby-cleveref at dr-qubit dot org>: host mail.protonmail.ch[185.70.42.128] said: 550 5.1.1 <toby-cleveref at dr-qubit dot org>: Recipient address rejected: Address does not exist (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Exactly. That's why it seems to me like the developer is not available any longer.
@DavidCarlisle Exactly. That's why it seems to me like the developer is not available any longer. A few minutes ago I re-asked him about tex.stackexchange.com/questions/619875 (to have a more permanent workaround than the suggestions of you, egreg, and Javier). I received no verification e-mail so far.
@DavidCarlisle By the way, in your opinion, is the current TeX Live stable so far for local (non system-wide) Linux installation? Or are there any nasty bugs around?
@DavidCarlisle And I've just received an automated reply from Toby now. This is a new thing. In short, 1 year or more. :-(((((((((((((((((((
@GeekestGeek I got an answer in july after I contacted him through the university (which he didn't like, but as he never answered ...). He wrote "I do still maintain cleveref", but gave no date when he will address the bugs, but only "when I find some spare time".
@UlrikeFischer Thanks for answering. The automated reply I got and the answer to you together would mean “never” in practice for the folks around me. So, a real letter is a good hint! However, I don't see a real landline address anywhere. Is the university address ucl.ac.uk/quantum/people/dr-toby-cubitt correct (though no office is mentioned)?
@GeekestGeek yes as far as I know (any texlive is really) especially if you are in a situation where you can do tlmgr updates. It's a harder choice for systems like overleaf (or arxiv etc) that take a snapshot of texlive on a specific day and are then more or less stuck with it for a year
@GeekestGeek most people here are using the version from tug (or compiling from source) but we are tex insiders, the linux-shipped texlives are perfectly fine for the vast majority of uses.
All generalisations are dangerous, including this one.
[paulo@ferrara ~] $ uname -a
Linux ferrara 5.14.14-300.fc35.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 20 16:14:50 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
@JosephWright a friend of mine did something along those lines as well (fitting multiple linear segments). We did that for a simple gesture recognition. He found the algorithm to do that in some book. I can ask him if you want (and probably send you C code if he allows it and still has it)
@samcarter If you are forced to interact with Windows yes: there is now a kernel-integrated NTFS driver which implements the full spec (in contrast to the fuse-3g ntfs driver).
@samcarter Understandable. And Mac won't like it in the future. But Linux is improving. For me it matters as I support some laptops with dual-boot and there better NTFS support (especially concerning crash recovery) is immensely valuable.
@TeXnician yes, mac got a lot worse. On the previous machine I was using fuse-3g without problems, but on big sure it is a) painful to install and b) would randomly crash the whole system from time to time.
Moderator election #2 on TeX - LaTeX has come to a close, the votes have been tallied, and the new moderator is:
They will be joining the existing crew shortly — please thank them for volunteering and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes!
Also, please join me in tha...