« first day (3593 days earlier)      last day (1636 days later) » 

00:34
@DavidCarlisle @UlrikeFischer @JosephWright tex.stackexchange.com/a/560921/134574
It seems like the trivial definition of \NoCaseChange is problematic if the case-changing code looks for it using \ifx. It should probably be redefined to something different (even if redundant, like \def\NoCaseChange#1{\@firstofone{#1}}), or the case changing code should look for exactly \NoCaseChange
 
4 hours later…
cis
cis
04:31
17 hours ago, by Paulo Cereda
user image
I saw a cat like that, then I crawled its belly. Then it attacked me with all 4 paws because it tickled her. :(
 
2 hours later…
Anonymous
06:36
Thank you @cis I will look at your code tonight.

I guess I can make the two sets of rulers work, by doing a lot of copy and paste, but it might be neat if we could find a good loop for that. Such that, if somebody else would like to have 3 images, each inside a set of ruler, next to eachother, they can also achieve that.
06:55
@PhelypeOleinik Isn't the issue that acro is passing some 'text' to the case changer before it's fully expanded it? So you'd see incorrect output anyway with the 'fix' of a more complex definition of \NoCaseChange? That said, I could tighten up the test so it's not \ifx but rather checks the name of the command (so it has to be \NoChangeCase or whatever)
07:20
@JosephWright It seems to rely on \text_titlecase_first:n to do the expansion (which makes for a rather large \tracingall :-). However this does the same, once \NoChangeCase is added:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\ExplSyntaxOn
\tl_put_right:Nn \l_text_expand_exclude_tl { \NoCaseChange }
\tl_put_right:Nn \l_text_case_exclude_arg_tl { \NoCaseChange }
\cs_set_eq:NN \NoCaseChange \use:n

\text_uppercase:n
  {
    \tl_map_tokens:nn
      { {abc} {def} }
      { tokens }
  }
\ExplSyntaxOff
\end{document}
07:53
phelype@phelype ~> latex-dev '\ShowCommand\textbf'
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.21 (TeX Live 2020) (preloaded format=latex-dev)
 restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
LaTeX2e <2020-10-01> pre-release-8 (develop 2020-9-1 branch)
L3 programming layer <2020-08-07> xparse <2020-03-03>
> \textbf=robust macro:
->\protect \textbf  .

> \textbf =\long macro:
#1->\ifmmode \nfss@text {\bfseries #1}\else \hmode@bgroup \text@command {#1}\bf
series \check@icl #1\check@icr \expandafter \egroup \fi .
@UlrikeFischer @DavidCarlisle @JosephWright ^^^
@PhelypeOleinik I know that, I already used it ;-). It is really a nice extension!
@UlrikeFischer /blush :)
@PhelypeOleinik fix in hand, just setting up tests
@JosephWright Oh, nice!
@JosephWright Oh, I should add \ShowCommand support to etoolbox as well...
 
1 hour later…
09:11
@PhelypeOleinik Would be good
@PhelypeOleinik Do you plan to extend for xparse-type commands so one sees the 'internal' definition?
@PhelypeOleinik, @UlrikeFischer, @DavidCarlisle I'll do a release today, bringing in the text case fix plus the colour updates and the backend file name changes
@DavidCarlisle Will you do graphics-def? The dev release is out so it should be 'safe'
@UlrikeFischer We should work out a request for dvipdfmx: I was thinking pdf:sc, pdf:fc (stroke and fill), pdf:cs X ... (color stack X, to take a 'raw' PDF string) - would that work?
@MarcelKrüger @JosephWright I'm just trying to prepare the luaotfload update (but travis wasn't happy yesterday, I hope they got the new dev now and unicode-math behaves again). Some of the tests only work with dev, and imho we will get this more often in the future and should keep track here, so I changed the build.lua, to run tests with both and moved the tests which works only for one in a dedicated folder. I hope this will work out as expected ;-)
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz could you please point to a tutorial on how to write userscripts? For example, I struggled quite a bit (as a greasemonkey n00b) to make tex.meta.stackexchange.com/a/8653/38080 work...
09:27
@UlrikeFischer :)
@JosephWright yes I'll do it today, as you may have seen I did some cosmetic updates yesterday to get it all in to shape
@PhelypeOleinik a machine name with your name... hm
@Rmano For the line height change, there is already a ready-to-use user script at github.com/CertainPerformance/Stack-Exchange-Userscripts/tree/…
(more extensions can be found at meta.stackexchange.com/questions/353525/…)
@JosephWright stats for learnlatex (or at least latexcgi) seemed quite healthy over the weekend, regularly over 200 documents a day it seems.
@DavidCarlisle Cool: certainly rising
09:44
@DavidCarlisle it can't run dvilualatex and show the log ;-(. (I wanted to check one question on the main site).
@DavidCarlisle Looks good
@UlrikeFischer blurg I could add it but it's a bit "specialist" :-) If there was a working dvips then....
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz Thanks!
@DavidCarlisle no not really needed ;-) (but it is nice side effect to have a "pure" system at hand for tests).
@UlrikeFischer but it is up to date with texlive as of this morning
09:53
@DavidCarlisle that is nice too ;-). I'm using overleaf to check against "outdated" code and learnlatex for the newest.
@JosephWright Yes, I will, but I won't have time to do it for today's release
@JosephWright Unless you postpone it a day or two, but that's not pressing, so I think it can wait for the next one
@PhelypeOleinik Sure: no urgency
@PhelypeOleinik Probably can go in when we move most of xparse to l3kernel
@JosephWright Ah, yes, there's that. I can work on it over the weekend
@JosephWright I already have some code for xparse \NewCommandCopy, but it's not quite done yet... I think I'll goo the lazy way and just read the command definition and do a \DeclareDocumentCommand...
@PauloCereda Maybe I am the machine!
/plot twist intensifies
10:11
@PhelypeOleinik ooh BORG
@PauloCereda You will be... Exterminated? :-)
@PhelypeOleinik ooh a dalek
@PauloCereda Oh, no, wrong again :)
@JosephWright do you think it would be worth having an l3build boolean variable to skip the binary zip stage so you don't get zip error: Nothing to do! (graphics-def-ctan.zip) You could automatically detect that no files are being zipped in l3build but it's a bit inconvenient as you need to file glob for the include and exclude lists and check there is nothing left, so having a user-settable flag to skip this might be nice.
@JosephWright It's a bit disconcerting when the last line of the terminal output from l3build ctan is an error
@DavidCarlisle why is there no zip?
10:22
@UlrikeFischer it's not that there is no zip it's that there are no pdf or other binary files, so the zip gets made with the def files then zip is called again in binary mode but passed an empty list of files to add.
@DavidCarlisle Do you want to answer Yannis' question, should I, should we do a joint answer, ...?
@JosephWright I answered as comment feel free to make a fuller answer as an answer:-)
@DavidCarlisle OK, I'll start on one
10:39
@DavidCarlisle ah yes. You could add a pdf-documentation saying "look in the code".
@UlrikeFischer it could say "these were fine in 1993, if Ulrike broke them since then it's not my fault"
@DavidCarlisle Sure, nice and easy to do
10:54
@DavidCarlisle with a nice picture?
@UlrikeFischer ooh two ducks in a chess tower
@UlrikeFischer no but a nice coloured page background
@DavidCarlisle ooh
11:08
hello, i have a too long theorem how to display it into multiple frame ?
I trye \begin{frame}[allowframebreaks,allowdisplaybreaks]
but it doesn't do anything
@lindaOiladali Can you make a minimal working example? Probably overlays are easier then framebreaks (which are evil :) )
11:34
@DavidCarlisle Ended up as something of an essay: I'll add some comments back to our sources too!
@JosephWright yes was just reading it
 
1 hour later…
12:48
getting the damned annoyed "undefined control sequence" when using the solution here tex.stackexchange.com/a/11072/63097 in a beamer
ideas??
Here's the code
```

\def\imageA#1{\adjustbox{valign=m}{\includegraphics[width=#1em]{figures/inputs/input1.pdf}}}

\def\imagea{{% mathord
\mathchoice
{\imageA{4}}%
{\imageA{4}}%
{\imageA\defaultscriptratio}%
{\imageA\defaultscriptscriptratio}}}

\def\imageB#1{\adjustbox{valign=m}{\includegraphics[width=#1em]{figures/inputs/input2.pdf}}}

\def\imageb{{% mathord
\mathchoice
{\imageB{4}}%
{\imageB{4}}%
{\imageB\defaultscriptratio}%
{\imageB\defaultscriptscriptratio}}}

\def\labelA#1{\adjustbox{valign=m}{\includegraphics[width=#1em]{figures/inputs/label1.pdf}}}
I used this exact same code in another document and it worked...
@nbro not in a form anyone can use or test.
@nbro you have not said which command is undefined or provided code that shows the problem.
It's even annoying to copy and paste the error from the editor I am using
@DavidCarlisle I'm having an interesting time reading the dvipdfmx sources (@UlrikeFischer might enjoy it too)
@nbro Pick another editor
! Undefined control sequence.\imageA #1->\adjustbox{valign=m}{\includegraphics [width=#1em]{figures/inpu... $\imagea
@nbro then use a better editor but don't waste everyone's time by complaining here and posting unusable code fragments,
3
12:52
...
@nbro post the error in multi-line form so we can see which command is undefined,
@nbro WE need the formatting: copy-paste from the .log file
should I say the same too so that we are three?
@JosephWright I was looking there the other day for the page color white = no page color test:-)
@UlrikeFischer no, you should say, "sorry it's my fault"
```
! Undefined control sequence.
\imageA #1->\adjustbox
{valign=m}{\includegraphics [width=#1em]{figures/inpu...
l.2 $\imagea
$
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.

File: figures/inputs/input1.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
<use figures/inputs/input1.pdf>
! Undefined control sequence.
12:54
@nbro well you have not defined adjustbox (by the package of that name)
@nbro and now guess which command is undefined and so which package is missing.
@nbro so you are "damned annoyed" by your user error of using package commands without loading the package.
It's still very annoying
very very annoying
It could simply tell me "You're missing this package"
@nbro why ???? You expect commands to work without being defined???
@nbro how could it tell you that. You might just have typed \lksadlakalkalkda why should it be assumed that there is a package?
@nbro LaTeX can't tell which package(s) define which commands
12:57
the problem was the package \usepackage{adjustbox} missing
not the command not being defined
@nbro You know that. LaTeX can not possibly now that.
if latex was aware of packages, the message could be more direct
rather than "undefined control sequence", which is misleading
@nbro No.
@nbro if you had read the error messages instead of swearing here you would immediately have seen which command is undefined, and you would have known how to define it. It is an accurate error message that pinpointed your error.
6
It could. For example, every programming language could be aware of the "official" packages/libraries that are available for it, then search for the package that possibly fixes the issue, this could be done, although I don't think many languages do it
I don't even know what all these files that latex produces are meant for
@nbro in some theoretical non existing world where the language compiler knows about every program written by every user of the language, I suppose that is possible, yes.
13:01
In the future, this will be possible, I think
at least approximately
it won't always work, but it will work in many cases
it will be possible thanks to ML learning algorithms that learn from error messages, etc.
@nbro not even close. The current messag eis accurate and never misleading. If you mistype \documentclass as \documentklass and it suggests that you load a missing package to define it, how would that help?
anyway, thanks, now I know that I have to look into the .log file to see the full error message
The current message is not explicit enough
I'd like it to say "Maybe you are missing a package?"
that would be more helpful
@nbro yes it is explicit about the exact location and cause of teh error.
@nbro tex does not even know about packages that is something that latex defines. What you are suggesting really makes no sense at all, sorry.
13:04
but even the error in the log file is not very descriptive
it says
"The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined."
there is not \adjustbox is undefined
only a general "control sequence", whatever that means
@nbro oh for goodness sake, that is a fixed help text explaining that you have an undefined command. The actual error message shows you which command is undefined and where you have used it.
2
Ok, we have different opinions then
you want to say that this error message is clear enough?
ok
@nbro you posted it above, and everyone reading it new in a second that you had used \adjustbox without defining it, so yes more than clear enough.
can anyone tell me how to get listings and only to work together? As in :
13:07
\documentclass{beamer}
\beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty
\setbeamersize{text margin left=10mm,text margin right=5mm}
\setbeamertemplate{frametitle}[default][center]
\usepackage[many]{tcolorbox}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage{calc}

\begin{document}

\begin{frame}[fragile]{The tidemark algorithm}
\only<1>{
\begin{lstlisting}[ mathescape, name=tidemark, basewidth = {.3em}]
text
\end{lstlisting}
}
\end{frame}
\end{document}
@PauloCereda I have no idea what an RESTful API is, but a sloth as logo sounds fitting.
@UlrikeFischer ooh :)
@UlrikeFischer also, some users are lazy to look up documentation, which also sounds fitting. :)
Of course I used longtable as example. :)
the answer seems to be \begin{onlyenv} .. \end{onlyenv}. Now trying to see which manual that is in
beamer it seems. What is written is incomprehensible to me
but it works
@Anush You must have fragile content inside macros, that's why \only won't work
what is fragile in my example above?
@Anush The code listing
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz it is just that the frame has "fragile" as an argument?
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz how would you know in advance that it was fragile?
@PauloCereda ^
@Anush No, the fragile frame options just allows you to have fragile content in the frame
@Anush rule of thumb: source listings are fragile
ok.. what does fragile mean?
maybe that was a better question
13:20
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz although the beamer terminology is unfortunate as it mostly means verb-like rather than fragile in the sense of latex \protect
@DavidCarlisle Who would choose to speak latex, if one can speak beamer?
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz people of refinement and good taste?
@DavidCarlisle Are there such people? We already know from your pineapple pizza stories that good taste is not your strength :)
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz so you get to answer @Anush's question as to what fragile means.
@DavidCarlisle That's easy: everything that causes an error without the fragile option but works with the option :)
13:24
@DavidCarlisle <3
solved! :)
@Anush In beamer terms: the major use cases for the fragile option are code listings and some tikz stuff
ok thanks
@Anush Do you want to write an answer yourself?
I would rather not as I don't understand the words on page 85 of the beamer manual
13:31
I have an equation as follows $$ \text{{\Large f }}\left( \imagea \right) = \labela $$, where \imagea and \labela are commands that include an image in the equation. Now, this equation has a certain size. I would like to dynamically remove \imagea or \labela, but maintain the size of the equation as if they were included
how can I do that?
"If the ⟨overlay specification⟩ is given, the contents of the environment is inserted into the text only on the
specified slides. The difference to \only is, that the text is actually typeset inside a box that is then thrown
away, whereas \only immediately throws away its contents. If the text is not “typesettable,” the onlyenv
may produce an error where \only would not."
which seems to be the only explanation of onlyenv in the manual
I am using `\only<1>{
EQUATION
}` to create the animations
but I don't know how to keep the dimensions of the equations even if I remove \imagea
@Anush I think for a user, the more important thing to know is the paragraph above this:
> For each of the basic commands \only, \alt, \visible, \uncover, and \invisible there exists “envi- ronment versions” onlyenv, altenv, visibleenv, uncoverenv, and invisibleenv. Except for altenv and onlyenv, these environments do the same as the commands.
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz but how would a user know that the obscure error message you see needs an "environment" to fix it?
(there is really not much more one needs to know about the onlyenv)
@Anush That's not beamer specific. You would have the same problem if you would try to place the listing in a \parbox{...} or similar
13:38
" Except for altenv and onlyenv, these environments do the same as the commands." implies they do something different but it doesn't way what
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz ok.. I look forward to your answer :)
@Anush You mean look backward?
aha :)
@nbro Check the documentation for overlayarea and don't use $$...$$
"the argument of a macor."
is macor a typo for macro?
13:43
I fixed the other typo :)
@Anush ... and I destroyed by editing at the same time, sorry. I'll fix it
I would like to show a 3d 20 sided die with the number at the top chosen at random. Can anyone think of a simple way to do that?
@Anush A simple way is to ask a question mentioning tikz in the title and I'm sure some rodent will post some brilliant answer
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz :) thanks! on topanswers there is a 50% chance it will be you :)
@Anush No, I'm a duck not a rodent :)
13:46
ah!
@nbro \phantom{\imagea}
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz ducks taste better
@DavidCarlisle That sounds dangerous :)
actually, I wasn't clear enough. I would like to start from f(x) = y, i.e. a general description of a function, and then include the image that corresponds to x and y
@nbro as already said: overlayarea
ok, let me check
14:42
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz depending on the situation he can maybe use \uncover, or am I wrong? I use it in align* and it works...
With a bit of care...
@Rmano Sure, but they persistently refuse to show some mwe of what they do, so overlayarea seems to be the safest bet
15:33
hmm. I have
\only<2>{

\begin{itemize}[<+->]
\setlength\itemsep{0.3cm}
\item Stream: 5, 4, 5, 7, 4, 5, 7, 4. Length of stream is $m = 8$
\item Number of distinct symbols $d=3$.
\item $\epsilon = \delta = 0.1$, estimate $\hat{d}$ so that \[
\Pr\left(\left|\frac{\hat{d}}{3} - 1\right| > 0.1\right) \leq 0.1
\]
\end{itemize}
}
my hope was that from transition 2 this would start but what actually happens is that you see two items and then none
what's the right way to do that?
You can add an offset, wait a sec
@Anush no idea what's right but having [<+->] inside an \only<2> seems like it is going to be wrong.
\documentclass{beamer}


\begin{document}

\begin{frame}
\only<2->{

\begin{itemize}[<+(1)->]
\setlength\itemsep{0.3cm}
\item Stream: 5, 4, 5, 7, 4, 5, 7, 4. Length of stream is $m = 8$
\item Number of distinct symbols $d=3$.
\item $\epsilon = \delta = 0.1$, estimate $\hat{d}$ so that \[
\Pr\left(\left|\frac{\hat{d}}{3} - 1\right| > 0.1\right) \leq 0.1
\]
\end{itemize}
}
\end{frame}
\end{document}
@Anush ^^^
@DavidCarlisle it is all wrong as you say
@Anush well I'd have guessed @samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz version was wrong as well, but I suspect she is right, she has used beamer before:-)
15:37
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz exactly perfect!Thank you
@Anush oh no I see she changed it to \only<2-> that looks more reasonable:-)
@DavidCarlisle and added a (1) :)
@Anush You could achieve a similar effect by a simple \pause before the itemize
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz it was the \only change I had missed, I didn't see how you could have an auto-increment on the items but still only show overlay 2
@DavidCarlisle it's a black art to me still. The (1) is pure genius
On a totally unrelated topic: does anyone know how to persistently disable the chat ping sounds? Using the "audio notification level" at the top of the page only works until cookies get deleted (or eaten)
15:41
have no speakers?(That's my option)
@Anush I used to have mine turned off most of the time, but with all these covid-19 telecons, I often forget to turn them off again and jump in my seat if there is a sudden ping ...
This code apparently draws a rectangle
\draw[gray,thin] ([xshift=-3pt,yshift=3pt]\X.north west) rectangle
([xshift=3pt,yshift=-3pt]\X.south east);
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz I don't think you can do both things, at least 'within' the page: cookies are how that sort of info is stored
This code is inside the loop
\foreach \X in {over,good,under}
{ RECTANGLE }
@JosephWright OK, thanks. User script then to the rescue
15:44
I would like to draw some text below each rectangle, but centered and the text depends on X
what's the easiest way?
@nbro The easiest way is to make a compilable code and not only fragments
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz I am using this code tex.stackexchange.com/a/485932/63097
comment the last lines with Time and Values
and then what I want to do is add text below each rectangle
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz I now have tikz questions on both sites. I think that makes me promiscuous
cool
what I would really like are colors that are maximally far from each other in terms of perception
15:59
@Anush So not random colours.
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz I went for random as an easier proxy
@Anush You could define n equidistant colours in HLS space, this should give you the most different colours
16:54
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz @JosephWright \beamer@sortzero \beamerx@\texttt ?
@DavidCarlisle ?
1
Q: The LaTeX project public license (LPPL), version 1.3

illya_kI've read through https://www.latex-project.org/lppl/lppl-1-3/ but I still don't really understand how this licence works. Can I use the "work" under this licence in a commercial product?

17:18
@UlrikeFischer beamer changed the definition of \texttt in 2019 and x^\texttt{b} doesn't work (not that I mind about that too much) but I just woncer what it does, didn't check the source just \show\texttt
In the light of recent code excerpts in this chatroom...
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz oh my: polygon.com/2020/9/1/21410285/…
17:40
omg
```
Process started

Process exited with error(s)
```
thank you!!!
@nbro This comment is about as insightful as the error it's complaining about...
so that you understand how much I feel when I am using latex
@nbro Well there's a simple solution to that problem. Switch to Word and then you'll clearly have no trouble at all.
the good thing is that I get an error but an output is produced
It's like when you drop an atomic bomb
you get an output but also an error
mental error
but apart from these things, latex is not bad
could be better though
everything could be better, even my language
Anonymous
17:56
20 hours ago, by cis
0
A: Automated ruler - how to have one set of rulers around each picture, 2 pictures side by side on a page

cisThe following uses tcolorbox (which based widly on TikZ) for all positioning tasks (no further packages are required here) and TikZ for the ruler-annotations. First: The unitlength \u should be determined like here. The method is based on to measure the dimensions of the raster boxes and thus to ...

Anonymous
How could I get rid of the horizontal spacing between the images and the blue lines?
@DavidCarlisle It allows action specs for font changes; can’t be done by expansion, so something had to give
@DavidCarlisle as the official LaTeX position is to require braces anyway, I felt this was something that was okay
@JosephWright yes sure I'd already left a comment on the question that it was never expected to work, but I just wondered what was the actual change:-)
@nbro that isn't a latex message, so you are complaining about the wrong thing, in the wrong place.
18:15
so what error is that?
@nbro no idea: you ran some program which presumably executed latex in the background and it's just telling you that failed. latex itself (assuming it started at all) will have made error messages on standard out and in the log file.
@nbro assuming "the process" was latex, it could be anything. You presumably know what program you were running.
18:30
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz that's a great idea
18:54
I just run pdflatex with the option to create the standalone pdf
@nbro no you did not run pdflatex, you ran some other program which called pdflatex (or some other program) in the background and detected an error. The message you show is from some program that you have not mentioned.
"pdflatex" --shell-escape -synctex=1 -interaction=nonstopmode %.tex|open %.pdf
that's the command I executed on the editor
@nbro so the editor you have not mentioned ran pdflatex (or the open command) in the background and detected an error. it would presumably give the same message for any command it ran that returned an error so the message is completely unrelated to latex
I don't understand to be honest how this is not related to latex if I am trying to compile a latex document with a latex compiler
anyway, maybe I will post a question
@nbro the message comes from your editor not from latex.
@nbro it may be that latex had an error, if so the error message will be in the log file (weirdly you seem to be piping the output to open so you would not see any terminal output) but the message you show is not from tex it is from the editor
19:08
I compiled without --shell-escape and it produces the pdf even though I get another error, so it's fine, let's say, in the sense that now I get what I need
@nbro If you get any error the pdf is most likely not usable. Also why did you have --shell-escape if you don't need it, you should avoid using that in almost all cases, certainly don't use it on anything of unknown source/
I wanted to create a pdf with only the tikzpicture (to be included in another latex doc)
but it did the trick even without it
maybe because I was using \documentclass[border=5mm]{standalone}
@nbro why would you need shell-escape though?
I think I saw it somewhere, in a post
I was producing another tikzpicture as a pdf image with that command before, and I was not getting problems
@nbro It gives any document that you copy from anywhere and run full access to any file on your machine that you can access, it can delete all your files, mail your password file to a foreign state, anything.
19:27
well, I think I trust pdflatex not to destroy my life, but sometimes I wasn't so sure :P
@nbro if you use --shell-escape you absolutely should not trust it, that is why shell-escape is disabled by default
cis
cis
19:49
2 hours ago, by Vincent Mia Edie Verheyen
How could I get rid of the horizontal spacing between the images and the blue lines?
:55417655
The images are v- and h-centered in the "rasterboxes / tcbitems". It depends on the image, whether there is a h-space. If they shall stick together, you could add halign=right to the left image and halign=left to ther right image. But note that the rulers aligned to the rasterboxes, not to the images. I don't know how to erase the outer h-space prober at this moment. After setting raster force size=false, you can use ` add to width=-5mm` in the tbcitems.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: ghostscript: {  resolution: 166  , device: png16m}
\documentclass[a4paper, landscape]{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\usepackage[showframe=false,
margin=20mm,
]{geometry}
%\geometry{paperwidth=15cm, paperheight=30cm, margin=2mm}% optional
%\usepackage{mwe} % Dummy Images
\usepackage{textcomp} % \textcopyright

\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{calc}
\pgfkeys{/tikz/savevalue/.code 2 args={\global\edef#1{#2}}}
%\pagecolor{lightgray!22} % see page margins
But thats not a proper solution
If you want to address this on the main page, I would recommend you to do it on the basis of a very simple example with a tcbitemize environment from which everything that has nothing to do with the whitespace problem has been removed; in other words: a minimal example.
People here tend to deal with small, simple examples, not with overall problems here (I was able to do that because I was familiar with the topic, others not),
 
1 hour later…
cis
cis
21:03
It also interests me, so here:
0
Q: tcolorbox: How to set minimal sized rasterboxes at tcbitemize

cis I want the rasterboxes horizontally only as wide as the content (like in "section 1"). What have I to do? \documentclass{article} \usepackage[most]{tcolorbox} \tcbset{sharp corners, } \begin{document} \section{tight works here} \tcbox[size=tight,on line]{\Huge B} \section{tight works not horiz...

22:00
@MarcelKrüger hooray, the luaotfload travis tests passed ;-) unicode-math is back again.
22:15
@UlrikeFischer Yeay! I think I also have a fix for the database issue.
cis
cis
@nbro Your inquiries are sometimes complicated, the helper has to find out what needs to help.
22:26
@MarcelKrüger should it go into the release? Then I wait with the upload.
right
I explained above, but let me explain again
I am using that code in that link
and I want to place a label under (or above) the rectangles (for each rectangle, a different label). The labels need to be separate from the rectangles (i.e. some padding between the rectangles and labels)
when you execute that code, you will see the rectangles
Is that clear now?
I guess this can be done with \node or \draw, but I am not sure how or what is the best way
Another problem that I have
I am using \only<1>{...} to create animations and I am using \note{} to add notes, but the notes are only added at the end of the last \only when using pdfpc. Is there a way to put them at the beginning?
22:47
0
Q: How to make the notes (created with the \note command) appear before the animations (created with the \only command)?

nbroI am using the following code \usepackage{pgfpages} \setbeameroption{show notes} \setbeameroption{show notes on second screen=right} \begin{document} ... \notes{ here the notes go after \only<2>{...} } \begin{frame}[fragile]{My title} \only<1>{ first part of animation } \only<2>{ second part ...

22:59
@UlrikeFischer I think that would be good, especially since that as been reported twice now and it might also be relevant for the containerization use cases that recently came up a lot.
23:30
@nbro If you want notes to correspond to overlays on a frame, use them inside this frame
23:48
@samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz thanks, that seems to do the trick
I didn't know I could put the notes inside the frame

« first day (3593 days earlier)      last day (1636 days later) »