I'm not very familiar with TikZ -- is 3.0.1a (of 2015-08-29) the latest version of TikZ? The documentation doesn't seem to have been updated since then... (In 3+ years?)
@UlrikeFischer @PauloCereda @marmot @samcarter Bravo! The Arts section was brilliant. And the coati dreaming of a white Christmas.
@ShreevatsaR Yes, I think that's the most recent version. There was a question on the site about whether it's still being updated (the most recent answer from @JosephWright is yes.) tex.stackexchange.com/questions/427890/…
Also it seems that Till Tantau is no longer the primary maintainer (and hasn't committed to the repo since 2016 August). Oh well... the documentation is so detailed it's a shame it has errors
@marmot Well I was trying to decide between Graphviz or TikZ for drawing some graphs, and I ran into issues with the very first example I tried (search for “documentation” in this answer: tex.stackexchange.com/a/291718/48)
@ShreevatsaR Yes, there are even more issues with the graph drawing algorithms (as well as related issues in the tikz-feynman package by the OP writing the answer). To which extent these are TikZ issues, I don't know. And it is known that the greatest challenge with TikZ is to know which libraries are to be loaded.
@Skillmon It happens, I have had ones that are several years old accepted, presumably a user who just passes by occasionally to ask a question and gets reminded of a previous one
@Skillmon It's happened to me too. I think many new users aren't aware of the green tick, and remain unaware of it for quite some time, then they discover it – or get chided in the comments for never accepting any answers to their questions – and then they go back and accept a bunch of old answers.
@DavidCarlisle Today, I saw that you were one of the authors of the psfrag package. I have been using that package for quite some time now, whenever I compile a document with that I nicely get a pdf named as main_file_name-pics.pdf'. Could you tell me whether we can mimic that behaviour for some other document where I donot use psfrag'?
@CarLaTeX Hi, I'm writing to you as usual quickly as I'm on break between polls. Did I see this morning that you took away your answer regarding a diagram? Why, you didn't have to from my point of view. :-( I hope the translation is correct, as I use deepl translator. Greetings and kindness again.
@samcarter Well, the plagiate in Paris is so bad that one may doubt that its creator used TikZ. But your copy is very nice, yet not precisely a marmot. (It is also hard to find marmots at this time of the year. ;-)
@Raaja that's the pdftex wrapper around psfrag, you get a similar thing just using graphics, for any eps files that you include it will automatically make pdf files
@DavidCarlisle thanks, I'll play with that tomorrow and see what I can achieve ;) (now-a-days most of the city editors in journals are doing a sub-par job :/, thereby, pushing the typesetting job on our head :/)
@L.K. like any setting it is local to the current scope, if you do {\small zzz} it is just the stuff in {...} that is small, if you do it in a frame it is just that frame that is small, if you do it outside of a frame it will have global scope
@marmot Very nice! The mouse could go as Doppler effect for carnival :)
@nbro Can you try something like \makeatletter \g@addto@macro\@listii{\itemsep4pt} \makeatletter (if this does not work, can you ask a questions on the main site including a MWE?)
@DavidCarlisle Yes the conversion is indeed easy, however, when given to a journal for final compilation they often mess it up :/ for no reasons. So, thinking of a full-proof way to ensure the inline fonts of the manuscript is reflected in the texts in the figure as well. Though, working in my own computer is nevertheless, not an issue :D
@Raaja well then I would definitely do the conversions externally yourself and submit pdf rather than relying on tex shelling out to epstopdf and converting them on the fly on the publisher's machine
@UlrikeFischer :) That's the best material for a dugout - the bear is safe and won't get hugry! (If bears eat honey, they probably don't mind other sweet stuff)
@JosephWright the old ones (latex-doc.zip not latex-doc-ctan.zip) were lying around and I got as far as selecting the wrong one in the browser then just thought I'd go back to the filesystem and double check the filedates:-)