« first day (2856 days earlier)      last day (2079 days later) » 

3:42 AM
Helllllllooo
 
 
5 hours later…
9:08 AM
Morning all
 
 
3 hours later…
11:42 AM
@UlrikeFischer About?
 
 
1 hour later…
12:57 PM
@JosephWright ?? About what??
 
@UlrikeFischer Creating PDF objects
@UlrikeFischer I'm looking at l3draw a bit, and the parts that link to other concepts. Tackling transparency, I'll need to do some basic stuff on objects. So I was wondering what sort of interfaces would be good for you in tagpdf.
 
1:08 PM
@UlrikeFischer I'm looking at your set up for objects: I take it that you have to have them written right at the end (using etoolbox's \AfterEndDocument hook) rather than \AtEndDocument
 
1:20 PM
@JosephWright Hm. Well normal graphics are imho regarding accessibility more or less a black box. Like an img in html: all the info has to go in the alt-key. So you need some hook at the user level to put code at the begin and at the end. A special case are nodes: They are often used to add text, so one need hooks to mark and store them.
@JosephWright I'm not sure that I really need \AfterEndDocument. But when writing the structure objects I naturally need to know all the relevant structure, including floats and stuff perhaps added in \AtEndDocument -- so it is a bit of a race: writing later it better ;-).
 
@UlrikeFischer Sure
@UlrikeFischer At this stage I'm still on the l3draw functionality sweep - matching pgf
@UlrikeFischer Point is that the outstanding stuff is mainly held up by needing driver support, and that overlaps strongly with tagging: PDF objects and the like
@UlrikeFischer Right
@UlrikeFischer I'll raise this with the team: I think a private hook that is intentionally right at the end, after everything, would be good
@UlrikeFischer When I say private, I mean 'explicitly for finalising PDF/tagging structures'
 
@JosephWright Where do you think that it overlaps?
 
@UlrikeFischer Both of them need PDF object structures and similar: low-level support or at least some abstraction beyond using \tex_pdflastobj:D and similar
@UlrikeFischer For example, one can create PDF objects in (x)dvipdfmx, so there should be a common interface
 
@JosephWright Ah. You mean the various commands that I setup in e.g. tagpdf-luatex.def. Like \__uftag_pdfobj:Nn. Yes, it would be useful if they were already defined in l3driver.
 
@UlrikeFischer Exactly
@UlrikeFischer Just wondered if there was a particular interface that would be useful
 
1:43 PM
@JosephWright This part of the code more less only set alias names for the primitives. Everything that offers an driver independant interface should be fine. In luatex it could be useful to have an interface to get and set the data also in lua.
 
 
1 hour later…
2:45 PM
@PauloCereda you should try a European summer:
user image
3
 
3:23 PM
+w+-+++++++++++++++++++++++++]]
 
@barbarabeeton your comments are as insightful as ever:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle -- drat. i was cleaning my keyboard, and i forgot to disconnect it. let that be a lesson. (lovely summer, by the way. our furnace kicked on last night. very, very strange. more like indian summer than the real thing. better, though, than 35=(c) temperatures with almost 100% humidity, which is what was happening up to a couple of weeks ago.)
 
@barbarabeeton we walked that ridge last Sunday but the temperature was 30 degrees C higher last week:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle -- so you didn't need your long woolies.
 
3:39 PM
@barbarabeeton today it was a bit nippy (1C)
 
@DavidCarlisle -- not a day for sandals then. sounds like you're having a nice unstressful holiday.
 
4:02 PM
@barbarabeeton oh, and I thought you're writing in BrainFuck
 
@boycott.se-yo' -- no, just brain-awol.
 
4:32 PM
@DavidCarlisle They are endangered species: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaiian_duck. Confess you ate too much!
 
5:05 PM
Hello everyone
Did anyone hear about the scutoid? It seems interesting to represent it in 3D with TikZ!
 
@manooooh This is a job for @marmot
 
@CarLaTeX ohh this marmot is in everything
 
@manooooh the speediest TikZ expert of the West
 
@CarLaTeX my apologies for didn't know his job :)
How is your Sunday going?
 
@CarLaTeX Who is pinging me during hibernation? ;-) @manooooh The shapes except for the beetle are probably straightforward to do with tikz-3dplot if you have the coordinates and have a fixed (or limited range of) view angle. Otherwise it becomes tedious unless you switch to asymptote...
 
5:15 PM
@manooooh Sundays always go well, the problem is Mondays
 
@CarLaTeX You can skip Mondays: just hibernate. ;-)
 
@marmot But it is Summer, how could you be hibernate?
 
@CarLaTeX Move to the southern hemisphere. ;-)
 
@marmot I should learn how to do it
 
@CarLaTeX Honestly, it becomes boring after a few months. ;-)
 
5:17 PM
@marmot Oh, are you in Brazil like @PauloCereda?
 
@marmot I didn't ping you dear marmot, but it's good for you to know that I thought ping you ;)
@CarLaTeX you are seeing the future!! That's bad
 
@manooooh I know, that's why the message started with @CarLaTeX ;-)
 
@marmot hihi
 
@manooooh :)
 
@marmot well the colours must go then I think. I thought that drawing the intersections with the planes and forming the different faces was more difficult
 
5:25 PM
@manooooh You do not need to compute any intersection if you know the coordinates. The first shape is just a pentagon in one plane, a square in a lower plane, one special coordinate and some edges between them. The question is if you have that special coordinate or you want to compute it also.
 
@marmot hmm, with that idea the code is reusable for maybe then assemble figures that join with the scutoid?
 
@manooooh Of course.
 
@marmot nice
 
@manooooh Another thing that should work for (more or less) arbitrary view angles is patchplot from pgfplots. I never really tried this so far but according to the manual it should work. There you only specify the vertices and then define the faces depending on the vertices. The only thing I do not know is if you can combine faces with different numbers of corners, but I think if it is not possible you can cheat.
^^^^ why are there so many ducks? ;-)
 
@marmot Because ducks are cute!
 
5:34 PM
@CarLaTeX You mean that the magical mirror is lying? ;-)
 
@marmot No, but even the Evil Queen Envy was beautiful, Snow White was the most beautiful
 
@CarLaTeX OK, now I am relieved, otherwise I would have to send a complaint to the manufacturer of these mirrors. ;-)
 
@marmot LOL
 
5:52 PM
@manooooh Try this:
\documentclass[border=3.14mm,tikz]{standalone}
\usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
\usetikzlibrary{3d,shapes.geometric,calc}
\makeatletter % https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/48776/121799
\tikzoption{canvas is xy plane at z}[]{%
\def\tikz@plane@origin{\pgfpointxyz{0}{0}{#1}}%
\def\tikz@plane@x{\pgfpointxyz{1}{0}{#1}}%
\def\tikz@plane@y{\pgfpointxyz{0}{1}{#1}}%
\tikz@canvas@is@plane
}
\makeatother
%
\begin{document}
\foreach \X in {-90,-85,...,55}
{\tdplotsetmaincoords{110}{\X}
\begin{tikzpicture}
@manooooh Of course if you want to have arbitrary view angles and all faces filled, it will become messy, but very easy for a given view angle.
 
6:34 PM
@marmot obvious solution: eat more duck
 
@DavidCarlisle How does that answer the question "Why are thee so many ducks?" ?
 
@marmot it doesn't answer the question of why but it solves the problem.
 
@DavidCarlisle Which problem?
 
@marmot too many ducks
 
7:23 PM
uneatable, davidproof duck, variation 1 ^^^^ @CarLaTeX @PauloCereda @samcarter @DavidCarlisle
 
7:34 PM
@UlrikeFischer LOL
 
@UlrikeFischer but fortunately if you let them out into the duckpond they sink without trace.
 
 
2 hours later…
9:30 PM
Guys, we are all beautiful! Here I met excellent collaborators and people <3 <3
 
GuM
Good evening/afternoon/morning (depnding on your time zone) to everybody! I’m returning—or, at least, I hope so—to TeX.SX after a period during which I had lost active contact with the site. It looked like a “quasi-revolution” was about to deflagrate three weeks ago, apropos the site’s new look: anger, people going on strike, questions no longer being qnswered…
Three weeks later, everything’s calm again, as though nothing had ever happened. Did I miss anything?
 
@marmot wooow so big and precise! I must confess something: when I try to execute the code that you make in 3D, either in Overleaf or with TeXnicCenter, it always generates about 30 pages, preventing that in one there is movement. Although it is very beautiful!
@CarLaTeX you are an Evil Queen :)
 
Aug 9 at 23:30, by David Carlisle
@AlanMunn people moaned about the black top bar when it was introduced but (a) they tweaked it a bit and (b) you get used to it so it worked out OK in the end. I suspect moaning now while they are rolling this out might have some effects, but I think the site will carry on pretty much as it was, whatever, comp.text.tex in a monspace font in emacs newsreader wasn't that pretty either...
 
@GuM Welcome back!
 
GuM
@samcarter: Thank you!
 
9:40 PM
@GuM actuallly several of use are using user css or javascript to re-style the site to a more usable format, I suspect stackexchange won't change the new default style so not worth arguing about it for too long, kick up a fuss and tell them the new design is horrible but if they choose not to change it, it's their site and ultimately they get to choose what it looks like:-)
 
GuM
@DavidCarlisle: I see. And what about the rumors of moving the contents to a new site, hosted by TUG?
 
@manooooh Did you try to convert the 30 pages into an animation? I usually use something like convert -delay 10 -loop 0 -density 100 -alpha remove document.pdf output.gif for this
 
@GuM personally I'm not keen on the idea. There are already other similar forums but overall it's best if questions are gathered in one place even if that place is not as good as it could be, it would take years for a new site to gather the google rank of this one, so it would be confusing and make it harder to establish a "main" help site.
 
GuM
@DavidCarlisle: OK, it sounds wise. Thank you very much for bringing me up to date, I was only curious to hear what had happened of all that clamor.
 
@GuM note the report is biased by the fact that I'm here. some people (percusse at least) have left so they are not here to answer you to say they have left.... but mostly I think the site is carrying on as before
 
GuM
9:53 PM
@DavidCarlisle: I see. Well, I’m glad to hear that! :-)
Thanks again and good night/… to everybody!
 
10:32 PM
@manooooh My bad, this the code for the animations. You may just pick one angle to have one frame. Or convert the multipage document to an animated gif with convert -density 300 -delay 4 -loop 0 -alpha remove multipage.pdf animated.gif (that's how the animated gifs are created.)
 
@samcarter where do you paste that code?
@marmot ok, where do you paste that code?
 
Oh, I see @samcarter already took care of this.
@samcarter Thanks! Cool animation: https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/447866/121799
@manooooh Which system are you using. The above command works on Linux and MacOS terminals provided you have ImageMagick installed.
 
@marmot ??? I don't know anything of that!! I use Windows 10 :(
@samcarter nice trajectory :)
 
@manooooh Poor you! How do you manage to write such nice questions and answers, being handicapped like this? (Just kidding ;-)
 
@marmot hahaha! It takes me a long time to have the code compilable and easy to understand
I am one of those who maintains that Windows is still a powerful tool for everything...
 
10:42 PM
@manooooh I'm wondering if there is an ImageMagick for windows, maybe you gogole it, or just search for "create animated gifs on windows". I have not really used a windows machine in this millennium and I am not missing them. ;-)
 
@marmot Thanks! Serendipitously I had the correct convert command already in my clipboard to produce the animation :)
 
@marmot but wait, even if I could see the gif in my PDF output, the others person which I share my document will be able to see the same gif? Or them will see 30 pages?
 
@marmot there is (native and via cygwin) note the windows one the syntax is something like magic convert .... as convert is a system utility to reformat disk drives and it's best not to get the two confused:-)
 
@manooooh I have heard that the command can also be used with windows with GraphicMagic or something of a similar name. (don't have windows myself, so I cannot really help there)
 
@samcarter ok, no problem dear sam. I'll take a look at those programs later
Thanks
 
10:46 PM
@DavidCarlisle I guess on a windows machine that won't make much a difference. Regardless of which command you use, you will produce a mess.... ;-)
@samcarter And I have simply starred tex.stackexchange.com/questions/136666/… ;-)
 
@marmot I'm terrible at compiling code in a Windows system :/
 
@marmot I have used windows (mostly cygwin) as my main machine for many years now
 
@manooooh I'm pretty sure it is not your fault.
@DavidCarlisle WOW. This sounds to me like winning a marathon running in chains. They should triple your reputation score!
 
@marmot ... or from my teachers. Anyway I have not taken much time to find what can be done in an unofficially Windows environment
@marmot x4! x4!
 
@marmot That is indeed a great answer! Also last weeks addition to of the export option to the package -- very useful for all the residents of the tikzzoo.
 
10:52 PM
@samcarter Can you enlighten me what "last weeks addition to of the export option to the package" is? Please. ;-)
 
@marmot windows is OK, but it helps if you run cygwin and an X server so you can use a real window system over it.
 
@marmot "As of version [2018/08/22], animate has the package option export, to be used together with the standalone document class, as in:"
 
@DavidCarlisle I see. You are running a real OS that pretends to be windows. That's smart. ;-)
 
@marmot basically as long as I can run emacs, I'm happy.
 
@marmot It automatically produces a multi-page pdf instead of an animation without all the workaround code AlexG posted previously
 
10:55 PM
@samcarter Thanks! Then I just wait till I see a real life example in one of you nice near future examples. ;-) BTW, in you recent answer, one could also use fading footsteps, what do you think? ;-)
 
@marmot I'd be delighted to see a footstep answer from you!
 
@samcarter Nah, I don't want to step on your feet. People don't believe me if I write just for fun ... ;-)
 
@marmot Thanks for your concerns, I can assure you my feet would not mind another answer to this question!
 
11:21 PM
@samcarter OK, I added something. Just wondering if the foot prints can also be used as plotmarks. This may allow one to make them fade away... ;-)
 

« first day (2856 days earlier)      last day (2079 days later) »