> Finally, BibTeX 0.99d is the current version; what about BibTeX 1.0?
> “Any decade now” is my standard reply. But seriously, 0.99d came out at the beginning of the decade in 2010, fixing a URL-handling bug, and I expect 1.0 around the end of the decade. I also expect some modernization updates to the standard styles within the next year.
@DavidCarlisle yes, before our last Unix server was retired I did manage to get a lot of .pub files convereted to sgml which my scripts can the mostly clean into usable LaTeX. Though I've only converted a small numbers of samples, so I don't know if my scripts do the right thing in general. I fast test at least showed some warnings about some regexp results that might end up undefined...
@DavidCarlisle Remember the question with the ⨉ prefix? The OP mailed me he's studying algebra on a book published in 1900: onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/… . I told him to use a slightly more recent book.
@DavidCarlisle “It remains to justify the use of the 0 of the ordinary numerical notation in the new meaning. This is at once done when we notice that in a purely quantitative sense 0 stands for the limit of the difference of two quantities that have been made to differ by as little as we please”. The “new meaning” is that “+a–a=0”: “The special case +a–a deserves close attention. A special symbol, namely 0, is used to denote it.”
@Johannes_B Well obviously the first screenshot is from an earlier version of the file. But it shows that the fontsize has changed so I wouldn't put too much weight on the content.
I have a number of latex files section1.tex, section2.tex, etc. Each of them should be able to be compiled individually to give a normal LaTeX document. I would like to write a file master.tex that will \include or \input these files and combine them into a single document.
Note that I do n...
\begin{enumerate}
\item one two three one two three one two three one two three one two
three one two three one two three one two three one two three one
two three one two three one two three one two three
\item one two three one two three one two three one two three one
two three one two three one two three one two three
\begin{enumerate}
\item one two three one two three one two three one two three one
two three one two three one two three one two three one two three
one two three one two three one two three one two three one two
In the past I've used the MinionPro scripts/packages, by Achim Blumensath, Andreas Bühmann and Michael Pedler, to install the Minion Pro font set. I have to do this once more on a new computer —a Mac this time— and I find that now there is an alternative set of scripts (and packages?), FontPro, b...
@egreg @Alenanno I don't think so. The question is about the package support for the fonts not the fonts so it's reasonable to think that either there are technical reasons for using one vs the other, or there is no substantive differences. But either way I don't think it's purely opinion based.
I have a number of latex files section1.tex, section2.tex, etc. Each of them should be able to be compiled individually to give a normal LaTeX document. I would like to write a file master.tex that will \include or \input these files and combine them into a single document.
Note that I do n...
