« first day (3124 days earlier)      last day (123 days later) » 

1:30 AM
@UlrikeFischer -- Some of them are a bit sketchy to be called "manuals", but nearly every package I've ever seen has a "user guide" -- and usually much more reliable than a random wiki. (But @DavidCarlisle wouldn't necessarily know. He claims to never read them.)
@ahorn -- Kopka & Daly is one of the best. I keep hoping that Patrick Daly will consider preparing a new edition; sadly, Helmut Kopka is no longer with us.
 
 
3 hours later…
4:47 AM
WElp, forgot to actually hit submit on my qeustion after writing it
That would help
 
5:45 AM
@Canageek lol
 
 
2 hours later…
8:14 AM
@barbarabeeton some packages have code that is so transparently clear that no documentation is necessary.
 
8:37 AM
@DavidCarlisle I particularly like code parts starting with
\begingroup\expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\endgroup
\expandafter\ifx\csname pdf@escapestring\endcsname\relax
@JosephWright didn't xetex get \pdfescapestring?
 
@UlrikeFischer No, it's not in (u)pTeX either so I did not do anything about it. As we can do it from the macro layer, I'm reluctant to ask/work on more primitives
 
@UlrikeFischer that's easy to read it is read as "Heiko's if undefined" :-)
 
@DavidCarlisle ;-).
@JosephWright ah, this means that if the experimental driver should work in the end with xetex too, I either need to put Heiko's code back, or find some alternative which does
\def\Hy@pstringdef#1#2{%
    \begingroup
      \edef~{\string~}%
      \xdef\Hy@gtemp{\pdf@escapestring{#2}}%
    \endgroup
    \let#1\Hy@gtemp
  }%
But it looks as if it should work with l3str-convert.
 
9:03 AM
@UlrikeFischer we should replace them with \@ifundefined (which in its new \ifcsname form is a better test anyway.
 
@DavidCarlisle I'm doing it already, when I get to one of them, at least in the driver code.
How does one do \edef~{\string~}% in expl3?
 
9:17 AM
@UlrikeFischer Yes, it should
@UlrikeFischer It's \char_set_active_eq:NN, with a suitable throw-away definition
 
@JosephWright yes just found it and pondering about the "throw-away definition".
:50371072 why \~?
 
@UlrikeFischer Actually, that won't work ...
\char_set_catcode_other:N \~
\char_set_active_eq:NN ~ \c_tilde_str
@UlrikeFischer ^^^ Can't have ~ as an N-type argument on it's own
@UlrikeFischer What's that code actually for?
 
@UlrikeFischer if ~ was etex \protected you wouldn't need to stringify it before the edef would you?
 
@JosephWright It's used in a lot of places, e.g. url, destination names, form fields.
@DavidCarlisle looks like it, with \protected\def~{\nobreakspace{}} I can use it directly in \edef\tmp{\pdfescapestring{abc~xyz}}\show\tmp.
 
9:32 AM
@UlrikeFischer Right, but it should be covered by l3str-convert
 
@JosephWright nice, \convert\tmp{ Café~some } { } { utf16/string } seems to do the right thing without any need to redefine ~.
 
@UlrikeFischer yes but question as always is do you want to pre-expand, so \def\foo{Café} then convert \foo~some if you want to expand \foo but not ~ there has to be some expansion control somewhere
 
9:50 AM
@DavidCarlisle I can find things like \Hy@pstringdef\Hy@pstringName{\HyperDestNameFilter{##3}}, so expanding is probably necessary.
 
 
4 hours later…
1:33 PM
Here is a similar example of that tikz vs spaceskip issue
\RequirePackage{fix-cm}
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
\begin{document}

\begin{tikzpicture}

\node[text width=15cm] at (0,0) {
\fontsize{25mm}{27mm}\sffamily\raggedright
15th Congress for\par
};

\node[text width=15cm] at (0,-8) {
\fontsize{25mm}{27mm}\sffamily\raggedright
\spaceskip0pt%
\xspaceskip0pt%
15th Congress for\par
};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
When I'm doing something fast, I never consider adding the font stuff as options to the node.
 
2:03 PM
Would someone be so kind to fix the link in this answer: tex.stackexchange.com/posts/151806/edit ... following line: _You may also like to read further in my german blog: [TeX-Beispiel des Monats „Layout II: Kopf- und Fußzeilen“](http://tobiw.de/tbdm/layout-2)._ ... where the ended up in the URL field instead of the link text. It's below the silly 6-character-minimum since I lack the reputation on this SE site. (Mine already contains the necessary correction)
 
2:23 PM
@0xC0000022L Done :-)
 
Thanks
 
 
2 hours later…
4:31 PM
any professional journal typesetters here?
 
5:02 PM
@EmilioPisanty Not at the moment, but you can ask.
 
@egreg my journal of choice has turned all my \hats into \widehats
the proofs system allows me to edit the TeX for the equations, so I just reverted all of them back to \hats
is this the kind of thing that's going to get the typesetter super annoyed at me?
it was mostly $\widehat{\mathbf u}$, $\widehat{\mathbf e}$, $\widehat{\mathcal G}$ type of stuff
 
@EmilioPisanty Possibly. Apparently they're the kind of people who thinks that large things look better (they don't).
 
@egreg thanks =).
I mean, I'm right, right?
 
@EmilioPisanty Definitely
 
=)
I'll just roll those dice and see what happens
thx =)
 
5:08 PM
@EmilioPisanty ^^^^^ Nobody should have doubts, except, perhaps, for the calligraphic G.
 
@egreg maybe they really like Asian conical hats?
 
@EmilioPisanty That might be the reason! :-D
 
there was also a $\tilde{\mathbf E}$ to $\widetilde{\mathbf E}$, which, seriously
 
 
@egreg bf, not bb
 
5:12 PM
@EmilioPisanty ^^^ No doubt either that the left one is better. With \mathbf it's essentially the same.
 
hmmm. $\widetilde{\mathbf E}$ vs $\displaystyle \widetilde{\mathbf E}$
dunno
at the very least it looks different on MathJax
ultimately what matters is the journal pdf, which isn't super sexy either
 
@EmilioPisanty It is font dependent, that's true.
 
the journal pdf
 
5:39 PM
@EmilioPisanty WOW!
 
5:56 PM
@EmilioPisanty The \sim above the E looks an eyebrow and makes the E looks really angry with what they done to him :-)
3
 
6:19 PM
@EmilioPisanty why not just do \let\widehats\hats and then they can decide if they really want it
 
 
1 hour later…
7:21 PM
@StrongBad if only.....
 
 
2 hours later…
9:17 PM
In the light of tomorrow's birthday of Richard Wagner, Tikzducks Production proudly presents an excerpt from the latest production of the Valkyrie (Ring der Nibelungen):
@Skillmon ^^^ you should look carefully ;-)
@CarLaTeX ^^
 
9:46 PM
@UlrikeFischer oh, Bayreuth is mentioned :)
 
@Skillmon did you really look at the audience?
 
@UlrikeFischer yes, I did, did I overlook something (except the background image)?
 
@Skillmon left, second row.
 
@UlrikeFischer now that you pointed on it, there is a Vizzerdrix (my avatar) put there!
@UlrikeFischer can I star this twice?
2
 
@Skillmon ;-)
 
9:59 PM
@UlrikeFischer Oooh
 

« first day (3124 days earlier)      last day (123 days later) »