« first day (2852 days earlier)      last day (2093 days later) » 

8:00 AM
@marmot I just edited the answer to fit the question.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:20 AM
An interesting answer:
31
A: What programming language should a professional mathematician know?

Per AlexanderssonLaTeX This is perhaps not the answer you are looking for, but it is indeed a programming language (it is Turing complete), and it is also a language that every professional mathematician needs to learn. One can make quite nice graphics with for loops and the similarities with more 'traditional' ...

And someone made TikZ a good programming language for mathematician's too:
9
A: What programming language should a professional mathematician know?

Joel David HamkinsMy answer is: TikZ This is a programming language, often used in combination with LaTeX, for producing high-quality graphics. I view this language as important for mathematicians, not because mathematicians will use it to solve their mathemaical problems, but rather, because mathematicians will...

 
9:46 AM
@DavidCarlisle oh no
 
10:47 AM
@user1732 Hm, that link takes me to a login page.
 
sorry, you have to join wordpress.com
 
 
1 hour later…
11:50 AM
@PauloCereda @Skillmon success!
 
 
1 hour later…
1:02 PM
@Skillmon -- but the latex team is not responsible for nearly all document classes. if you encounter this error in a package, submit a bug report to the maintainer. (i sure hope the ams classes don't spawn such a message ...)
 
1:16 PM
@barbarabeeton the messages are known and really old. And of course I know that the team is not responsible for it.
 
@Skillmon It's more to do with the expansion behaviour of some commands: today one would pass all data protected using \unexpanded (as we do in expl3)
 
 
1 hour later…
2:38 PM
user image
2
 
 
4 hours later…
6:14 PM
@PauloCereda applies to CS people as well I think :)
 
@boycott.se-yo' LOL
 
Hello @DavidCarlisle
@DavidCarlisle Seen the question about the standard classes?
@DavidCarlisle I'm pondering peek functions ...
 
6:47 PM
I feel like I am screwing something up. Can I get section headings to only show one level of the numbering but references to the labels to show all levels (i.e., I.1.A)?
 
@StrongBad yes. You can redefine \@seccntformat to get a special format of the numbering.
 
7:05 PM
@UlrikeFischer so I will have to nest everything like tex.stackexchange.com/questions/308737/…
 
7:30 PM
@StrongBad The actual code depends on your actual code. You only asked if it is possible ...
 
@UlrikeFischer yup. I think I have something working. Thanks
 
8:29 PM
@JosephWright no, will look
@JosephWright your answer seems to convey the group-think well:-)
 
8:55 PM
@marmot My feeling is that the decoupling question is really an XY question, so we probably don't have enough information to understand the aim of the question or the relation to the answer.
 
9:27 PM
@samcarter Agree. I just refrain from spending my last vote on the question nor her/his answer. ;-)
 

« first day (2852 days earlier)      last day (2093 days later) »