Here is a question that sounds like a bug in LaTeX: tex.stackexchange.com/q/446976/4736 . An equation in a footnote causes an empty footnote field on the next page. I'm curious, because obviously people have put equations into footnotes forever, so what am I missing?
@KeksDose well, having footnotes itself is a bug :-) I mean, the bug is that no warning is shown, not the behaviour itself, because you basically want LaTeX to do something which is impossible.
@KeksDose If you don't mind, I'll report it on the LaTeX team bug tracker...
\section{Introduction} There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. \footnote{There is another theory which states that this has already happened.}
When I use a LaTeX code like this:
\documentclass[aps,twocolumn]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\section{Introduction}
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, i...
its a bug in the class, looks like a recent change in the github log, can't test here, no tex, but the package name constructed by
\expandafter moderncv\romannumeral
which doesn't do the right thing \expandafter does nothing there, you can ignore the warning until it's fixed.
Lines 315 to 333...
@boycott.se-yo' that's odd (you can not upload .tex files, but .txt should work
@DavidCarlisle no, more like a content-heavy page including an image, a small ingredients list, and preparation instructions :) Something which we could somehow sell as "useful" for the purpose of duckuments (so as some dummy content).
When I use a LaTeX code like this:
\documentclass[aps,twocolumn]{revtex4-1}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\section{Introduction}
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, i...
its a bug in the class, looks like a recent change in the github log, can't test here, no tex, but the package name constructed by
\expandafter moderncv\romannumeral
which doesn't do the right thing \expandafter does nothing there, you can ignore the warning until it's fixed.
Lines 315 to 333...
