« first day (2045 days earlier)      last day (2881 days later) » 

12:06 AM
@ArTourter Hats off to Slackware! I miss the good old days. :)
 
 
6 hours later…
5:51 AM
Hi everyone
Somone know where I can get a sample of a book math AMS-LATEX?
 
6:40 AM
@antoniov.joel not sure what you mean exactly texdoc amsbook gives fairly full description of the ams classes including amsbook
 
6:57 AM
@DavidCarlisle I saw that amsbook-template.tex, but you know.. I'm getting trouble about undestand it, anyway.. I'll keep try to understand it
 
@antoniov.joel there are dozens of examples on this site you could start from see tex.stackexchange.com/search?q=amsbook
 
 
2 hours later…
9:02 AM
0
Q: How to write this Digamma Symbol in Latex?

WilliamSpecifically I want to write these in LateX: http://shapecatcher.com/unicode/info/120779 http://shapecatcher.com/unicode/info/989 http://shapecatcher.com/unicode/info/401 I am using TeXstudio, so I can compile in pdflatex, xelatex, or lualatex and some other ones. What is the simplest possible...

The OP is being very rude in the comments.
 
9:24 AM
@HenriMenke Yes. So why did you answer?
 
@UlrikeFischer I'm almost sure that this is not the answer he wants.
@UlrikeFischer I should have posted a Plain TeX solution.
 
@HenriMenke The O.P. should be more polite ;-)
 
10:25 AM
@DavidCarlisle Yeah sorry, was too lazy this morning.
 
@TorbjørnT. :-)
 
10:42 AM
@HenriMenke Left a comment and a downvote
 
 
2 hours later…
1:02 PM
@egreg OP accepted my answer and deleted all of his comments.
@esdd Why did you give all your points away on TeXwelt?
@esdd Thanks, by the way ;)
 
1:17 PM
I have found a bug in TeXLive 2016 which seems to be related to XeTeX engine… I suppose I should wait TeXLIve2017 to get corrected version?
 
1:30 PM
@Maïeul Engines can be updated during the year: depends on the nature of the issue
@Maïeul Demo?
 
@Maïeul New XeTeX has more classes: you need 4095 not 255
 
how. and what happens if using 255 ?
 
@Maïeul 255 is now just some normal class and will in your demo not have any chars in it, so you won't see anything
 
hum
so the issue should be solved on polyglossia and not on on csquotes ?
all 255 must become 4095 ?
 
1:38 PM
@Maïeul Yes, or better a token that represents the concept (so you can set it to the appropriate value as required)
 
yes, I saw E. Gregori open an issue on this point
many thanks
you can close
 
@Maïeul \chardef\xetex@boundary@interchar = 4095 or similar
@Maïeul Ah, I see @egreg suggests something akin to this
 
many thanks
I hope this will be released quickly
 
@Maïeul There will be quite a bit of post-TL'16 release activity I suspect
@Maïeul We've got a kernel update for the same thing
 
@JosephWright I suspect too. I hope Martin will have time
the problem was for me that the latest version of biblatex in TeXLive 2015 was buged… so I do quickly to TeXLive 2016… and
 
 
2 hours later…
3:48 PM
> ls /usr/local/texlive/
2007/		2009/		2011/		2013/		2015/		texmf-local/
2008/		2010/		2012/		2014/		2016/		texmf.local/
6
 
@egreg Show-off
 
@DavidCarlisle I'll update the test file for L3 later today for TL'16
 
> Or you think? How fast is this man typing? Does egreg have a chip in his brain directly sending his thoughts to the Your Answer interface? He types an answer faster than i can read the question. Leave an upvote.
@Johannes_B: ^^ :)
@egreg No future releases? :D
 
@DavidCarlisle Was thinking 'Why hasn't Travis picked up the new release' then realised I have a check in the script so it will only look for an entirely new install when I delete the cache
 
4:00 PM
@egreg how do you deal with updates during the year? Are the packages in 2015 the DVD version or the last version you could download?
 
@StrongBad I have a similar set up and have the 'final' versions
@StrongBad I.e. at the end of the cycle, not the DVD ones
 
@JosephWright presumably, at least for Linux, if you could get the DVDs, getting the "first" version would be easy.
 
@DavidCarlisle, @JosephWright -- i've been advised of a broken link to tex.ac.uk/CTAN/latex which was intended as a pointer into latex3 information. what is the best replacement for this? (ctan search does have a "latex3" category which lists the various packages released so far, but maybe something a little more general is wanted; the original link is on the page ams.org/tex/what-is-latex .)
 
@StrongBad There's a historical archive of all of the TL versions: it has the DVD images + the final 'download' updates
 
@JosephWright -- looks pretty good, thanks. but it could use some refreshing -- last updated february 2012.
 
4:08 PM
@barbarabeeton Yes: we can alter the sources, though I'm still to agree with @StefanKottwitz and @PauloCereda how best to actually update the live version
 
@JosephWright Oh no!
 
@StrongBad Yes, all fully updated
@StrongBad I also have the DVDs
 
@JosephWright -- a never-ending problem. hope you can come to agreement expeditiously.
 
@barbarabeeton as soon as @PauloCereda's finished his thesis
 
@DavidCarlisle Does NAG employ ducks?
 
4:16 PM
@PauloCereda sounds familiar :-)
 
@PauloCereda I don't see anything in here that says you have to be human
 
@DavidCarlisle ooh and the duck knows Fortran!
 
@PauloCereda Would you like having @DavidCarlisle as the boss? ;-)
 
@egreg oh my!
 
@JosephWright or even \e@alloc@intercharclass@top
 
4:22 PM
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I know
 
@JosephWright do we have a plan to release that.... (I had forgotten about it with all the luatex and ho-tex changes)
 
@DavidCarlisle Doesn't seem so at the moment :-)
 
@JosephWright am I seeing right thing that warwick mirror is seeing tl2016 but no updates from pretest state yet?
 
@DavidCarlisle Yes
@DavidCarlisle Updating some Travis-CI things, it seems the rest of the mirror network is behind Warwick anyway: getting TL'15 there still :-)
 
@JosephWright probably after updates start we should push out a new update.
 
4:25 PM
@DavidCarlisle I chekced first thing today:-)
@DavidCarlisle Yup
 
@JosephWright Karl's not announced it yet:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle I have to fix some siunitx stuff (getting a lot of messages on c.t.t: rather odd)
 
@JosephWright oh I see tl2016 is announced on ctan-ann/c.t.t I thought he'd say something on texlive list:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle ctan.org/mirrors/mirmon shows Warwick is one of the most up-to-date mirrors :-)
@DavidCarlisle Not from KB, though
@DavidCarlisle I suspect he's waiting for the mirroring: certainly the US mirrors at the moment are still hosting TL'15
 
@JosephWright color grouping siunitx question looks wrong (mbox redef) haven't looked at the code though:-)
 
4:32 PM
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I need to check on that
 
@JosephWright -- announcement by karl on ctan-ann this morning: "TeX Live 2016 has been released. It is now or will be soon available from CTAN sites (mirror.ctan.org/systems/texlive). Package updates will resume in another day or two."
 
@barbarabeeton Ah
 
@JosephWright I was going to push out graphics and tools, but I suppose with the xetex thing we should just update everything and have a new ltnews26 (that would be three this year..) or we could call it a patch release so avoid having ltnews26 but it's not really a bug fix, catching up with engine changes.
 
@DavidCarlisle Three releases is fine with me: with online updates there's no reason not to, and engine changes do dictate responses
 
4:48 PM
@JosephWright -- with the way things are going, anyone for four?
 
@DavidCarlisle I can help writing duck jokes!
 
yo'
5:10 PM
@barbarabeeton I hope I'm being correct here: groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.text.tex/efgxsS6eL4w
 
@JosephWright sure it just means that someone has to fill out a page of news to describe a one line change to the upper limit for xetex char classes:-)
 
@yo' -- oh, gad! that has to be webster's online, which i have begun to dislike. the paper third international has "pro-cess" for verb, and "process" (no hyphen) for noun. my desk dictionary (webster's collegiate, based on 2nd international) has "pro-cess" for verb, and "proc-ess" for noun. things are changing, and i'm not sure i'm in favor in this case.
 
@UlrikeFischer: Amazing photos!
@barbara: is it possible to include some note in the next TB editorial about the TeX donkey contest? Ulrike has posted some nice photos. :)
 
yo'
@barbarabeeton honestly, the variant where "process" is treated as "record" makes sense to me, but that's me, a non-native speaker :)
 
@PauloCereda -- should be possible, but it won't happen until fall or later. (not sure yet whether there will be an ordinary "editorial notes" in the proceedings issue; there usually isn't.)
 
5:24 PM
@PauloCereda Thanks. Did you saw how Paul rearranged his code?
 
@UlrikeFischer Oh my!
 
@yo' -- yes, and that's the whole point: to clarify the text. you don't really care unless it's broken at the end of a line, but there, when it's broken the "wrong" way, it can lead to all sorts of confusion. i'm for clarity.
 
yo'
@barbarabeeton also, in English English it would be pro-cess regardless of the part of speech, if I understand things correctly
 
5:41 PM
@yo' -- you do understand this correctly.
 
6:26 PM
@egreg it's lucky I'm fluent in Italian:-)
Perfetto funziona, grazie mille: non sapevo si potesse leggere direttamente i byte — DPD- 3 mins ago
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle you should have replied "switch to the now very stable lualatex"
 
@yo' Vai fondo della classe, e tacere.
 
yo'
6:42 PM
@DavidCarlisle you made it wrong, I'm not @egreg...
 
user147690
Hello guys, quick question:
 
user147690
in Mathematics, 4 mins ago, by Alex Clark
I can't see a latex symbol for some reason in the lists, and I can't get it on dextify, it's like a smaller version of $\vee$ in the superscript, like $L^\vee$ (for the dual of an invertible sheaf is the context)
 
user147690
Smaller and flatter
 
user147690
Does anyone know this perchance?
 
yo'
@AlexClark flatter like smaller in height?
 
user147690
6:45 PM
Like shallower slopes than $\vee$
 
user147690
Probably same width, but small height
 
user147690
So yep sorry haha
 
user147690
Still browsing lists for it haha
 
user147690
Ahh I may have found it
 
user147690
$L^\frown$
 
user147690
6:47 PM
Nope
 
user147690
Insufficiently zoomed on the latex page
 
user147690
$L^\sqsmile$
 
user147690
That's the one(although need a package probably), thanks for your time. (Mnsymbol)
 
Where do you guys keep your latex templates?
 
@AaronHall What are these? I have a few models (more-or-less scripts) for making plots but beyond that ...
 
6:49 PM
I guess I mean style templates?
style files?
I need to get used to editing them.
quick.
 
yo'
@AlexClark Don't load mnsymbol, it's insane
Try this (it's a dirty trick, but should work):
\documentclass{article}

\begin{document}

\mathchardef\widehatsymbol"0362

$L\widehatsymbol \neq L^\wedge$

\end{document}
 
user147690
@yo' Insane?
 
yo'
@AlexClark it's intended for use with Minion fonts, and it changes a lot of things. It's visually incompatible with any other font, IMHO
 
yo'
@AaronHall yeah, if you mean packages and classes, then this is the answer. If you mean templates, the answer is very different though :) @Johannes_B can give you his opinion :)
 
6:52 PM
@AaronHall nowhere (I just use the standard classes, or for specific projects just keep a package with the document)
 
I want to tweak backgrounds and stuff, so I need to create my own styles, right?
 
@yo' @AaronHall Don't use templates.
 
ok, I won't!
I do use org-mode to latex.
(is that a template?)
 
yo'
@AaronHall you don't "need" them, but they can be a good solution
@AaronHall no, that's emacs, an alternative universe :)
 
I have fought tweaking the background color for hours on end from org-mode. No worky.
 
yo'
6:55 PM
@AaronHall well, org-mode is one of these semi-automation tools, right?
 
user147690
@yo' Yep, looks great :D
 
user147690
Thank you
 
@AaronHall Org-mode is not, but speaking in general, we don't know what a template is.
Templates are a mystery.
 
ok. I... ok.
 
yo'
@AlexClark well, if you switched font, you might need to change the number as well, to whatever shows in the terminal/log after issuing \show\widehat (the trick is basically to use the symbol for the wide hat accent, but not as an accent)
 
6:58 PM
@yo' A friend gave me six of her old phones. One of them is a touch thingy thing. And i noticed .... all my contacts, all my phone numbers, almost everything, was stored on my old phone, not the sim-card.
 
yo'
@Johannes_B yeah, that's a common problem. I actually solved it by duplicating all the contacts (the old phone allowed for it). Still, the provider's salesguy didn't bring them correctly from the old SIM to the micro/nano-SIM I needed, so it was a bad luck. But anyway, I decided to backup them from the old phone one-by-one into a sheet, so I was saved.
I love this work. I got a phone call today that I'm needed in a jury on Thursday, when I'm supposed to supervise exams. Also, I got a 60-page work (today) that I should review until Thursday.
 
@yo' I can't connect to the old phone. Everything lost.
@yo' Busy week? ;-)
 
yo'
@Johannes_B that sucks :(
@Johannes_B yeah, and then I'm responsible for a weekend scout trip
 
user147690
7:14 PM
How do I get a flipped version of yours that looks better also @yo'
 
user147690
I did \newcommand{\fwidehatsymbol}{\mathbin{\rotatebox[origin=c]{180}{$\widehatsymbol‌​$}}} But it looks bad, and is probably terrible practice
 
user147690
I imagine I can fix it by just pushing it upwards, but is this really bad practice?
 
yo'
@AlexClark it is a bad practice indeed :D I'd say go for asking a question on the site. You can use the code you have above and explain what do you actually need. Call it something like "Inverted hat superscript, like wedge"
 
user147690
Ahaha
 
user147690
\raisebox but that seems to do something else,
 
7:20 PM
@JosephWright The new menu in TeX Live Utility allows for changing the TeX Live version, but it doesn't allow changing from universal-darwin to x86_64-darwin or conversely :(
 
@egreg Does it? I don't bother with such things :-)
 
@yo' Oh my, you can do it ;-)
 
yo'
@Johannes_B I think I can. Have I mentioned that I've got another student work review due on Friday?
 
7:37 PM
@yo' I am pretty sure, that you can do it.
:-)
 
yo'
@Johannes_B but it's gonna be tough
 
@yo' What doesn't kill us, makes us stronger.
Might be a crappy translation of something we say in germany.
 
yo'
@Johannes_B we say that in Czech, too :)
@Johannes_B seems it exists in English, too, just without the comma :-)
 
@Johannes_B Quelo che no strosa ingosa
@Johannes_B Translation: “What doesn't strangle, fattens”.
 
7:49 PM
@DavidCarlisle I've been watching Fawlty towers and Blackadder. Who is this Nietzsche?
:-)
 
@Johannes_B A guy who could have spared some consonant.
 
@Johannes_B some german bloke. I don't know, I've been studying Italian history recently.
 
@DavidCarlisle your answer to the "why doesn't TL rolling update" is a tad ranty...and without the context of reading all the TL/LuaTeX/ lists and chat discussion here, not very easy for someone to understand.
 
@AlanMunn "ranty" I thought that was the calm public version:-) people will understand when tl2016 rolls out in the next few days and a reasonably large proportion of documents stop working in luatex
 
@DavidCarlisle That's why it was only a 'tad' ranty. And yes, I suspect I'm one of them. I'll probably just switch back the XeLaTeX.
 
yo'
7:58 PM
@DavidCarlisle There is a reason why I keep many versions of TL :)
 
yo'
8:22 PM
@Johannes_B This helps :) phdcomics.com/comics.php?f=1824
 
9:06 PM
Nietzsche was a nihilist, right?
 
9:17 PM
Hi all. I have a little question about xcolor. The package documentation establishes that \colorlet{myblack}{Black} is the same as \definecolor{myblack}{named}{Black}. Why is incorrect to do \definecolor{myblack}{named}{Black!30} if \colorlet{myblack}{Black!30} is correct?
 
yo'
@OSjerick because there is no color named Black!30, that's already a mixing operator on colors. And \colorlet works because it's allows the color to be computed, i.e., the mixing performed.
 
@OSjerick named requires a colour name, Black!30 is actually a specific colour already
 
Obviously Black!30 is not a existent color name, so... Why is the correct way to see colorlet related with definecolor when color is passed as mixture?
 
yo'
@OSjerick they are not related. AFAIK, the manual only mentions that they behave the same, given the argument is a valid color name
 
@yo' I understood. Thanks. :-)
 
9:30 PM
@OSjerick probably some of the confusion is inherited from color where the distinction between the named color model and the names of colours defined by \definecolor is somewhat blurred at times especially if usenames option is used. (Who wrote that package anyway.....)
 
@DavidCarlisle It probably is. :-)
 
@egreg I learned from a master
 
@DavidCarlisle Finally you admit it!
 
@egreg there has to be something you are good at.
 
yo'
9:57 PM
@AaronHall Nihilists do not exist, they say.... :)
 
indeed.
 
@DavidCarlisle Either 1) No one has written better ones yet 2) Old guides still say to use them 3) They were told by older people around them that is what to use, since they've always used it and 4) it comes up in search first
@DavidCarlisle If you really want them to stop, put out an update that generates an error when you compile that asks them to stop. Make it still work if you hit R, but scare them.
 
@Canageek people use editors that hide such minor details like errors.
 
@DavidCarlisle really? Most hide warnings, but stop on errors
That I've uesd anyway (AcuTeX, TeXStudio, TeXMaker)
 
@Canageek that's not what I see answering questions here, even auctex runs in scrollmode so it doesn't stop on errors (then lets you step through the log)
 
yo'
10:01 PM
@Canageek if only...
 
@DavidCarlisle Huh, guess it has been a while. Possibly it only stops if it can't go on for some reason?
That or I just break it hard enough that the PDF won't create and assume it stopped >.>
 
@Canageek and the question just now where someone asking why references coming out as ? without mentioning begin {figure} matched by end{table}
 
@DavidCarlisle If you REALLY wanted them to stop, break compatibility, but allow them to set IKnowThisIsOutatedAndAmdUsingItAnyway=True
 
@Canageek I could use \def\x{\typeout{email egreg to ask how to fix this }\x}\x in the package...
 
@DavidCarlisle I wish someone would update subfigure to get people to stop using it. The "but it works" defense is really annoying
 
10:05 PM
@Canageek It's very unfortunate that the author didn't at least add a warning about it.
 
@egreg I'd love it if TeXLive and MiKeTeX made you jump though an extra hoop to install the obsolete tree
CTAN even says "subfigure – Deprecated: Figures divided into subfigures"
 
@Canageek Probably the author felt that so many documents used the package, so he didn't want to break them; note that subfig is not fully back compatible with subfigure.
 
@egreg If by not fully, you mean not at all. That is why it is a pain getting lab members to switch.
@egreg But leaving it out of TeXLive without going to specifically check a box for obsolete packages wouldn't break them, just provide incentive not to use it.
 
@Canageek There are instructions in the documentation of subfig to make it into accepting \subfigure and \subtable instead of \subfloat, but many users would not take the trouble. And we are still plagued by \usepackage{subfigure}. :(
 
@egreg !!! I did not know that
@egreg I thought the internal syntax was also diffrent.
 
10:11 PM
@Canageek Remember that most students get a “template” from their buddies who took it from their buddies…
 
@egreg Exactly. But if it wasn't in TeXLive or MiKeTeX, that would be extra work
@egreg Though knowing the people I work with, they'd then just find an outdated cls file somewhere and copy it to the directory of each new document, like they do with the acs and rsc templates
 
@Canageek This way, old documents which legitimately used subfigure before deprecation would not be compilable any more.
 
@egreg Without going to tlgmgr and downloading it by hand, yes
 
@Canageek if it's not in texlive tlmgr wouldn't install it?
 
@DavidCarlisle I meant make it optional, like Greek or Omega or whatnot.
 
10:16 PM
@Canageek There was a similar problem with caption. At a certain point, the caption2 package was issued, not compatible with the original one. A few years later, a new version of caption mostly solved the problems with back compatibility, so instead of issuing caption3, the author decided to revamp the simpler name. Actually the real package is caption3 and caption2 remains for back compatibility.
 
@DavidCarlisle Then people who need it could get it easily, but most people who don't know better would hit install defaults.
 
@Canageek well everything's optional but doesn't everyone use tlmgr update --all that's all I ever use.
 
@egreg Wait, so should I not be telling people to use caption ?
@DavidCarlisle I thought you had to do a fresh install each year?
 
@Canageek Don't worry: the good call is \usepackage{caption} (it internally calls caption3, but it is not a user's concern).
 
@Canageek yes but during the year do update --all and get everything, I don't try to install/update individual packages
 
10:20 PM
@DavidCarlisle Right, so when TeXLive 2017 came out it would be in the optional tree, and you've have to specifically click an extra checkbox to get it, like you do plain TeX, or the Games Typesetting package.
@DavidCarlisle You could even put in a placeholder package that would print in the output "This package is out of date. Please use subfig instead. If you must use this package it is in the obsolete tree of TeXLive instructions.
 
@Canageek I know nothing about checkboxes I just run the installer on the command line and it gets everything as far as i ever remember.
 
@DavidCarlisle From Apt-Get? It is divided into packages. You probably did texlive-full wiki.debian.org/Latex
@DavidCarlisle So if it wasn't included in texlive-full, you had to manually apt-get texlive-obsolete
 
@Canageek don't use the system tex, just get the installer from tug
 
@DavidCarlisle It would still be available, but not there all the time
 
@Canageek would massively annoy archives like arxiv if packages got removed if not absolutely dangerous
 
10:24 PM
@DavidCarlisle Ahh, I've never tried the cli version of that. You can choose what to install in the GUI one, so I leave out a lot of languages, lautex, xelatex, plain tex, omega whatever that is, etc.
@DavidCarlisle They'd just have to add a flag when they run the installer --includeobsolete or somesuch.
 
@Canageek since i only really use tex fro answering questions here it's hard to know in advance what packages I'd need:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Saves me a lot of download time, I can cut the download by 3/4
 
@Canageek compared to downloading the full build system and building luatex from source every day to track new bugs features, download time isn't the main issue...
 
45df
7h3 h3(2+
That was 6dd, s4dden3y was ty*5ng n40bres
Wa5t, 5t 5s st533 ha**en5ng. Any6ne 2n6w what 5s g65ng 6n+
Ok, turning caps lock on and off a few times seems to have fixed it.
Sorry
@DavidCarlisle Took me over an hour last time to download it. Not the full thing, just the 1 GB I need.
@DavidCarlisle There is a reason I asked about finding close geographic mirrors. It was nie when I was 30 min from UWaterloo. Now I have no idea what is close to me.
 
10:45 PM
so many packages at CTAN have not been updated for so long. I wonder if this is normal. I see version 1.0 packages, 10, 15 years ago. And that is it. This for me is little strange. May be the authors are not working on latex any more.
 
@Nasser If it ain't broken, don't fix it.
 
@egreg I have not found any software that could not use an improvement somewhere. Otherwise, we all will still be using version 1.0 of windows now ;)
 
11:11 PM
@Nasser Not certainly I. ;-)
 
I was using Visio 1.0 up until Windows 7 64-bit broke it
 
@Canageek That's a good reason for having to upgrade software: third party software that breaks ours. ;-)
 
@egreg Now I do without as it costs well over $100 and don't know if it still does floor plans
I think it is all flowcharts and things now
 

« first day (2045 days earlier)      last day (2881 days later) »