« first day (4556 days earlier)      last day (67 days later) » 

05:47
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad phone number in body, mostly non-latin body, potentially bad keyword in username (182): How do I get 𝔸merican 𝔸irlines to 𝕒nswer?‭ by spammer‭ on askubuntu.com
 
2 hours later…
09:13
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title (2): What is In999 Invite Code? 718283626646( Claim Exclusive Bonus)‭ by Computer‭ on askubuntu.com
 
1 hour later…
10:26
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in answer (1): Ubuntu 24.04 Thinkpad T14 Gen 5 Intel suspend on lid close‭ by Алена Смирнова‭ on askubuntu.com
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer, blacklisted user (76): GnomeSodokumouse‭ by Алена Смирнова‭ on askubuntu.com
 
1 hour later…
 
2 hours later…
14:10
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer (85): add-apt-repository ppa:openssh/openssh‭ by ferrema‭ on askubuntu.com
 
2 hours later…
17:44
But very low quality is a standard flag.
 
3 hours later…
 
1 hour later…
22:02
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title (2): What is In999 Invite Code? 718283626646( Claim Exclusive Bonus)‭ by Sap15‭ on askubuntu.com
23:29
@CPlus Can you give the address of the declined flag / post?
I was not involved in this one I suspect; some background here on the VLQ flag though:
102
Q: Am I misusing the "Very Low Quality" flag?

awkspI'm a little confused about what the "Very Low Quality" flag is supposed to be used for. I've read these answers about the VLQ flag: Is the Very Low Quality flag too ambiguous? Why were these “Very low quality” flags declined? Which state that the VLQ flag is intended for those questions whic...


« first day (4556 days earlier)      last day (67 days later) »