« first day (3326 days earlier)      last day (80 days later) » 

 
1 hour later…
@RandomPerson last 90 days
longest time frame available
@RandomPerson yeah but... what you wrote is either ungrammatical or means something different to what I wrote
I think what I wrote is just fine
so I didn't feel like replying to that :/
sorry
I thought maybe we could chat about it when you were around
@RandomPerson I think so yes, but he won't be able to tell which ones have the most support
 
3:12 AM
thanks for posting the meta question though
I do think it will be worth posting more answers to Phillippe's question
 
 
4 hours later…
9:34 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad ip for hostname in body, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, body starts with title and ends in url, +6 more (727): prime-naturals-cream.wixsite.com/moisturizer-cream by Victorhitae on askubuntu.com
 
 
3 hours later…
1:22 PM
I suppose that we should burn this tag:
 
 
1 hour later…
3:03 PM
@Zanna OK.
@Zanna for mods or 10K rep. users?
@Zanna It's OK!
@Zanna Sure. Go ahead.
@Zanna hmmm.. true.
@Zanna :)
@Zanna True!
@BeastOfCaerbannog If you can, post about this in meta :)
 
3:36 PM
Hey mods! @jokerdino @Zanna What's your opinion about adding the tag in my latest meta post such that more people from our community can see the question?
 
4:23 PM
@RandomPerson same for all
 
@RandomPerson I'm not sure I need to post a question in meta. The tag is only used by 22 questions, doesn't have a usage description, and I don't think that there would be a debate about removing it.
I would just need a confirmation from a mod and I could remove it myself.
Mod -> @Zanna
 
waves
 
well I see no value in that tag
though I don't want to discourage anyone from posting on meta
we could probably come up with a good pun about it
:58799074 the waving? That was a "hi!" wave, sorry for its ambiguity
 
4:33 PM
and hi :)
 
@Zanna Yeah! I deleted it just when you answered :/
@Zanna Hi :D
@Zanna do you have something in mind?
 
@BeastOfCaerbannog now my message will be completely baffling to future historians :D
@BeastOfCaerbannog not really... in any case I think it's probably okay to get rid of that tag without a meta post
 
@Zanna Hahaha!
@Zanna if you think that a meta post is more appropriate, I really have no problem in creating one. But I think it's obvious in this specific case that the tag is not useful.
 
yeah :)
 
Great! I'll do it tomorrow. If anyone needs some rep from editing (@RandomPerson), feel free to edit and I will probably review them.
@Zanna You don't have to remove them yourself (I suppose it might be tempting to you).
 
5:02 PM
I just skimmed through them for issues that are easier for me to deal with :/
very slowly working on the tag
@RandomPerson good idea
slightly worried about an argument kicking off about EOL policy :/
btw tip for anyone interested: you may have noticed that when you format a tag in chat you can click it and go to the page of posts with the tag
if you want to refer to a meta tag, you can use [meta-tag:tagname]
example:
oh, there aren't any featured meta posts right now... I'll tag your post @RandomPerson , somewhat warily
now my example works :)
@RandomPerson can you elaborate a bit on what you don't like about the current wording?
 
 
2 hours later…

« first day (3326 days earlier)      last day (80 days later) »