« first day (2916 days earlier)      last day (1709 days later) » 

00:01
Is this question a dupe? If not, it should probably get a CW answer.
00:14
Dupe of something? No repro? Or should it have an answer saying that the solution was to upgrade to 20.04?
00:42
all six comments are no longer needed
00:57
I've rejected this edit with a custom message:
> "fulfil" is an accepted spelling (merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fulfil), and spelling and grammar in quoted text should not be changed.
It needs at least one more review.
I've reject this edit with the custom message:
> This radically changes the post by removing the information that disabling the on-board camera restored Bluetooth functionality ("BT returned").
It, too, needs at least one more review.
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; One Line only; Low Rep; 3.0;
@EliahKagan same situation here, still a dupe
OT Pop!_OS - I think it should be migrated to Unix & Linux after being closed.
01:41
@EliahKagan hmm that question looks off topic
02:32
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer (60): How do I Install Ubuntu on Chromebook? ✏️ by SeldlonForester on askubuntu.com
 
2 hours later…
04:43
@Zanna Hmm, yes. Maybe one of those six comments should've been kept. (One has been kept, so far, but not the one that asked for release details.) I've posted a new comment to inquire.
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; One Line only; Low Rep; 1.5;
^^ All of the actual answer is behind the link. The other text is commentary about, but does not summarize, restate, or otherwise cover, what is said there.
05:31
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, repeated url at end of long post (393): How To Use Primal Grow Pro? by primalgronz4 on askubuntu.com
05:42
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported question (93): Which window is the best for my laptop core i5 4th generation? by umer ghani on askubuntu.com
05:53
Is it an answer?
06:11
dupe Please add second dupe target from my comment.
Added.
06:37
Thanks.
06:58
@EliahKagan thanks! your comment is the only one remaining so I'm not sure which one was kept, but I was unable to flag the last comment on mobile - seems I can't flag comments when I have to expand them (but whether I will be able to reproduce this later or not is uncertain haha)
All the others are gone now. Hopefully the OP will comment or edit in reply to mine and it can be removed soon too. :)
:)
why on earth did they think that would be a good idea?
I'm wondering if SE still knows they are.
Maybe the problem is fixed on some sites.
oh yes?
The comments on Cody Gray's MSO post, linked in my meta answer, seem to suggest something like that.
But on Ask Ubuntu, the problem is decidedly not fixed and has never been.
I think this is especially a problem for questions closed as no repro.
They just say off-topic.
Unless you're high rep or the OP.
07:06
yeah
:(
Is there a on MSE for this?
(Why do I not know how to make any magic links anymore?)
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body, +1 more (491): sites.google.com/site/testo360italy/ by ghmuhnmbqwdo on askubuntu.com
I think there is effectively no company awareness of how this affects our site because we're small and CMs don't do as much here. I think also that there is very little awareness here among high-rep users, because high-rep users see the useful information.
Really it should get a post on our meta, because it specifically affects us in a different way. It's probably a weakness of my recent meta answer to suggest that it affects all sites the same way. On further consideration, it probably affects us much worse than most sites, since our sub-reasons are complex and non-obvious.
@EliahKagan [meta.se]
07:15
Thanks.
I'm sure I once knew that.
Possibly yesterday.
Since [meta.so] doesn't work, is it [meta.so.se] like how it's Unix & Linux Meta?
[meta.so]
no idea
it didn't work for years :/
What a shame
Debian question.
VTC'd.
The quality is high, other than being about Debian but posted here. After closure, I think it's a good candidate for migration to Unix & Linux.
thank you kindly
If we are going to move, we might as well move it now? Otherwise a mod has to reopen and close/migrate it.
07:24
I support this.
It has three close votes. Personally I think it is reasonable for a mod to hammer it, given that there's a specific benefit of doing so.
OP has an account in Unix.SE. Wonder why post here then?
I would like to know for sure, is 14.04 supported or not?
I found this question and hopefully, it will answer my questions.
Was slightly confused because of the comments here and the linked wiki page.
07:48
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in title (98): Testo 360 Mexico Testosterone Enhancer by karys wartions on askubuntu.com
09:03
confirmed that unprotecting doesn't bump the post, phew!
oh no
I can totally see why I protected that question since it got a whole bunch of answers that, in my opinion, were mostly wrong
still, have unprotected it
and deleted some of my comments haha
09:40
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; Possible Link Only; No Code Block; Low Rep; Self Answer; 1.5;
11:02
11:38
@Natty tp
@SasukeUchiha I rejected your edit suggestion to the Trello board guidelines because of the way I think SEDE should be pronounced (see this post on English Language & Usage)
but I am mentioning this to thank you for suggesting that edit, as it made me edit the guidelines myself
I'm not sure my edit made the guide more accessible, and I should probably edit it further, but at least I did something :)
12:40
@pomsky I think vanadium's claim "There is no need for the .desktop file to be set executable" is absolutely wrong.
@pomsky I never used Ubuntu in phones so I'm not sure about this. Neither I have been in similar situation on desktop. That said, I think the answers may also work for PC installations as well.
(unrelated) There have been many suggested edits since past week which unnecessarily bolds some parts and they are being approved without removing that formatting.
Am I the only one concerned?
12:55
@Kulfy are they by the same user?
Some of them. I tend to reject some if not all.
in Ask Ubuntu General Room, Jun 20 '16 at 15:42, by jokerdino
Fix Misspelled Ubuntus.
 - Fix all the wrong Ubuntu! (P.S. Last time I checked, there was quite a bit. Would require effort initially to clear up the backlog)
 - [0](http://askubuntu.com/search?q=Ubunto+Ubunut+Ubunutu+Ubunu+Ubntu+Ubutnu+Uuntu+Unbuntu+Ubunty+Ubunt+Ubintu+Ubutu&submit=search) [1](http://askubuntu.com/search?q=Ubantu+Ubbuntu+Ubnuntu+Ubnuto+Ubnutu+Ububntu+Ububtu+Ubuhntu+Ubuhtu+Ubunbtu+Ubunti+Ubuntuu&submit=search) [2](http://askubuntu.com/search?q=Ubunuto+Ubutno+Ubuto+Ubuuntu+Ubuutu+Unbnuto+Unbnutu+Unbunto+Unbunu+Ununtu+Uubuntu+Ybuntu&submit=search) [3](http://askub
if someone is persistently doing something we don't like in suggested edits, I usually write a comment on one of the posts, or ping them if they have been to chat, and harangue them about it as nicely as I can manage
@jokerdino I will try writing a query for it
it will be a really ugly query
@Zanna No. They aren't available on chat. I rejected around 5 of them. I'm not sure if people really look at reject comments on approved edits. I mean, the edits which I rejected but other reviewers have approved.
@jokerdino Do mods know the number of questions deleted by Community bot in the past run?
not sure
13:05
I need to wait for data dump then :)
@Kulfy I mean, you can ping editors of a post
if the edit was approved
so you can @ them in a comment on one of the posts they edited
they will get a notification so they probably won't ignore it
That's a good option.
@Kulfy I'm not sure about the newer releases with the Desktop Icons extension, but for the older releases, where Nautilus handles desktop items, marking as executable is necessary to be able to 'allow & launch' the .desktop launcher.
Probably the extension does thing differently? (I'm not sure)
Note that it's not necessary to mark as executable if you put them in ~/.local/share/applications/ as the GNOME Shell would automatically add the associated application to the application grid.
13:23
@Zanna ugh can't do it
@pomsky Indeed but vanadium stated "There is no need for the .desktop file to be set executable. For use on the Desktop, place it in the ~/Desktop folder. On the desktop, right-click the icon and choose "Allow launch"." which at least on 20.04 won't work. On double clicking it will open the file in Gedit.
@Kulfy Yeah, but the question was specific to Ubuntu Touch. I thought that's what you were asking.
Oh well, I meant if the answers would work on PC installations as well. Sorry for the confusion.
@jokerdino Related meta question 🙃
@Kulfy I'm pretty sure there are already existing Q&As for that. But the question about Ubuntu Touch should not be heavy-handedly closed as a dupe of such a question for the reasons I explained before.
@Kulfy For example this one
I agree. But I wasn't able to find similar question for Ubuntu.
13:31
what is this dubious answer?
#!/bin/bash
indicator-cpufreq
Script contains just this. They seem to need a desktop entry for command.
@Kulfy I don't have a system with a newer Ubuntu releases with me right now, so unfortunately I cannot check. If you confirmed it, then consider leaving a comment below vanadium's answer. Also perhaps fix / leave-a-comment answers posted to this question.
Anyway, better to delete the question too.
(unrelated) deletable
"Allow launching" adds executable bit for the owner. So, I think "There is no need for the .desktop file to be set executable" seems somewhat contradictory, IMO.
Interestingly, double clicking from Nautilus don't work.
@Kulfy Then I don't see a problem. As an end-user, I would always read it as "There is no need for the .desktop file to be manually set executable".
@Kulfy Yeah, GNOME controversially removed the feature sometimes back.
IIRC it used to work in GNOME 3.28, i.e. 18.04.
Ah. I see. Good for new users.
I think it doesn't work since the 19.04 or probably the 19.10 release.
Makes sense since article was written in May 2018, just 1 month after the release of 18.04.
@Kulfy Also Ubuntu shipped both 18.04 and 18.10 with an older version of Nautilus (3.26.x) to provide the legacy desktop-icon-handling feature.
Hmm. Interesting.
14:12
@Kulfy did you download the script file?
Yup.
@Kulfy does the answer make sense??
Seems to be. If it works for OP then it's an answer, I think.
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; Possible Link Only; No Code Block; Low Rep; 4.0;
Links are dead.
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; Possible Link Only; No Code Block; Low Rep; Self Answer; 1.5;
seems unclear Link expired
15:47
16:08
dupe. Avinash's answer applicable there.
@EliahKagan seems the post has been warmly welcomed in U&L
@Zanna No problem. Grammarly suggested it. I didn't think much. Sorry. Glad it brought your attention to the guide though. Cheers, stay safe and good luck on the election
@Natty tp
 
1 hour later…
oooh
I'm not allowed to do any work after dinner
@Zanna that's very nice
glad
oh you already fixed them :)
18:28
I have closed 11 of them as duplicates of askubuntu.com/questions/783398.
I personally think the closures are right but do have a second look if anyone got time and is feeling generous.
18:59
@Kulfy Yeah, it appears the script is being used as a shortcut to run the command. So the answer is correct, though there are other ways to do it... and also, indicators shouldn't have to be manually run. But that's their solution and it probably did work. @jokerdino
19:24
I believe the uTorrent interface shows where it puts files. One should be able to go into its settings and see and change this. But it's been years since I've seen uTorrent used, much less used it myself. (I use qBittorrent.) Is there something this question about finding out where uTorrent has downloaded a file can be duped to? If not, it needs another answer.
20:02
@Natty tp
Why does this edit replace Ctrl+Alt+T with Super+T?
 
2 hours later…
@EliahKagan Super + T does nothing. guntbert should have caught that.

« first day (2916 days earlier)      last day (1709 days later) »