« first day (2592 days earlier)      last day (1753 days later) » 

12:42 AM
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty fp
@Natty fp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
^^ That one's still around.
@Natty tp
 
 
2 hours later…
2:36 AM
That's a lot of bad feedback
 
Well it was saying to install Wine in order to use Flash in native Firefox on Ubuntu.
The linked page didn't have anything about that, either.
 
2:52 AM
The linked page looked like it was someone running Windows who installed something in Windows that fixed the problem (and the thing they installed wasn't Wine!).
It would maybe have been best if I had commented on the post to clarify that before voting to delete it. The case for deletion was stronger than it appeared because it was unclear if the OP had even done that or had even used Ubuntu: they might have done the fix on Windows, then assumed installing wine corresponded to it. I don't know. Anyway, I don't think it's really a problem or that we need to undelete it to try to comment and then redelete it.
 
@EliahKagan hahaha
 
>The real reason, of course, is that it's obviously evil and wrong and therefore fun for hack value
This thing works fine on my Windows system, so obviously wine is The Answer to make it run on Linux
Public Health Warning: wine is not the answer to everything
Etc
 
3:08 AM
Well, they gave a specific command. I don't want to say they didn't run that command on an Ubuntu system. They very well may have. I don't think that is what actually fixed it for them, but I don't think it's implausible that they ran it. I'm just not 100% sure whether or not that command was what they meant to indicate specifically worked for them.
 
Maybe it helped them with a different problem
 
I doubt it directly helped with a Firefox problem in Ubuntu, but yes.
It might be that installing it had the effect of installing or upgrading dependencies that were incidentally helpful in Firefox in Ubuntu.
 
 
2 hours later…
5:15 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, link at end of body, +7 more (792): https: AAA//atozfitnesstalks.com/rejuve-allure-cream/ by Mk Shastri Shastri on askubuntu.com
 
unclear, probably an issue with shell theme and/or font, but no response from OP
dupe, unfortunately would be closed as unclear
 
5:40 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Pattern-matching website in answer (79): Notification saying "A new Virus is Stealing Data!" on Ubuntu 18 by Michael on askubuntu.com
 
@Natty tp
 
6:34 AM
I don't really understand the title of this question
and I am not familiar with Process Explorer on Windows
what exactly does this person want?
The question is in HNQ right now
so I want to make it less... arcane looking
OTOH, maybe I'm just substantially more ignorant about this than the average passer by...
 
That question makes sense to me.
@Zanna The idea is that you have a program that lists currently running processes, but it's sometimes difficult to figure out what process corresponds to a particular window in the GUI. So it provides a facility that lets you select a window, and then shows which process owns that window.
 
@EliahKagan I see
so if the title were "How can I get process information from a window?" that would be clearer?
 
Should the question be reworded? Should it have a screenshot of Process Explorer?
 
6:50 AM
I feel the title is overly vague about what's wanted at the moment. A screenshot of Process Explorer would be a nice-to-have
 
I think a number of Windows users might not be familiar with Process Explorer because, although it's a poplar tool, it does not come with Windows. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_Explorer
 
@Kulfy I've made an edit to that question which hopefully makes it a bit more readable.
Are those a kind of errors you'd get if the disk was failing I wonder...
@EliahKagan it seems like a pretty geeky/sysadminy tool :)
 
I wonder why the OP of this question thought that recompiling the driver might help them; unless they were really exaggerating when they said they were a beginner, they must surely have found that suggestion somewhere, and that place might have other useful information... I feel like I should comment, but I don't think I'd be able to give any useful advice here
... regardless of what info they supply, so I don't really know what to say
 
7:10 AM
@Natty tp
 
7:40 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad keyword in username, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, +3 more (485): What is Keto Body Tone | Keto Body Tone Ireland by Keto Body Tone Ireland on askubuntu.com
 
7:56 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] No whitespace in title (61): UserLambdaValidationException by Emmie Andrew on askubuntu.com
 
OT programming
 
8:13 AM
Would it be reasonable to add What specific bad things happen when gedit is used with sudo? as another dupe target on Is “sudo gedit” inferior for editing system files? (Pinging you @Zanna because you have the gold badge.)
 
8:26 AM
Based on the core of what the question is asking ("Can there ever be any problem"), the duplicate closure is reasonable. But if it had stayed open then I would have posted an answer which I think would have been appropriate there but inappropriate on the current dupe target (as well as on those other two I've mentioned).
 
@EliahKagan I feel slightly icky for the closure as the duplicate suggests "use sudo -H instead of sudo", but it seems OP is already aware of that.
Anyway, as gksu no longer available, I prefer the gvfs admin backend to edit system files and folder
 
8:41 AM
Do we have a question just asking how to edit system files with graphical editors?
 
Three edits to this question were posted by the author as three separate answers in an ongoing dialog with himself.
 
@pomsky Thanks. I've replaced my old comment on the question with this one which mentions that.
 
@EliahKagan Post already reported
 
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; Contains Whitelisted Word - I Fixed; Low Rep; Self Answer; -2.0;
 
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Ends with ?; Low Length; No Code Block; Low Rep; Self Answer; 2.0;
 
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; Low Rep; Self Answer; -2.5;
 
(Though that one might be hard for a bot to reasonably distinguish from an answer.)
@Natty tp
@karel Thanks. The three answers are deleted now, and I commented on them to advise the OP to edit the question instead. I'm not sure if it's best to edit the information in for them or just wait for them to do it.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body (96): Canon CanoScan LiDE 25 Ubuntu 14.04 lts Failed to Scan ✏️ by Tortuga Torben on askubuntu.com
 
9:03 AM
Can we consider this as unclear? Or may be OT?
 
Hasn't OP mixed up "score" and "answers" here? Or is it me who is getting confused?
 
@Kulfy I think that's off-topic → not about Ubuntu.
 
It also has a very poor answer.
Is Ubuntu forum on-topic on Ask Ubuntu?
Currently writing a question to ask on meta regarding .
 
The quick and dirty answer is yes.
It's on-topic on the main site.
The Ubuntu community is on-topic.
Ubuntu Forums is only on-topic on meta if the question being asked is also about Ask Ubuntu.
 
I didn't mean that. Look at the excerpt of . Should I ask a question on meta whether we need this tag or not?
 
9:10 AM
Oh.
 
IMO this is a bad tag and used incorrectly on main site.
 
The tag wiki itself looks okay to me. We do definitely have some questions that really are about Ubuntu Forums. But yeah, it seems to be used on some questions that are not actually about Ubuntu Forums.
Actually, there might be few enough of those to just remove the tag from the questions where it doesn't fit.
But I'd say go ahead and post on meta.
 
Should we re-tag the questions (if necessary) and let the tag be there for questions regarding forums?
 
Which ones are you thinking of retagging? Some of them really are about Ubuntu Forums.
 
0
Q: How to install MOPAC7

TemplarI am trying to install MOPAC 7 and downloaded it from the website. It has 7 folders - Interfaces, Modules, MOPAC_7, src_interfaces, src_modules, src_subroutines and Subroutines. There are no installation instructions. I downloaded it from http://openmopac.net/Downloads/Downloads.html , the one na...

 
9:15 AM
Yeah, definitely.
I've just retagged it.
 
OT close voter(s): This question is definitely on-topic; we help people with Ubuntu community resources here ("Services provided by Ubuntu"). Furthermore, it does not belong on meta, which is only for questions about Ask Ubuntu itself (not about other Ubuntu-related sites). It might be considered a duplicate of this earlier question though. If we close either of these as a duplicate of the other I recommend merging their answers. — Eliah Kagan Jul 25 '13 at 4:40
OK I'm convinced with your comment. Discarding the draft.
 
Okay, if you're convinced.
But there is nothing wrong with posting on meta if you're not sure.
Like, even if it's something I disagree with. :) :) :)
Anyway, I don't know what position you were going to take on meta... but you're at least right that the tag could use some attention.
Let's go through the other questions and see if some of them have the tag wrongly.
(Assuming you're up for that.)
 
1
Q: intention for new group - but how solve data-floods?

dschinn1001We are a group of deaf (in Germany and worldwide) people, who want to join together to one group, and they are interested in Ubuntu. Now point is: script-language, no deaf person is very fond of script-language and not every deaf person knows the oral script-language of international deaf people....

@EliahKagan Yeah doing that only :)
 
Thanks.
@Kulfy That's (at least in part) about the Ubuntu community but not about Ubuntu Forums specifically. I'll retag it now.
 
@EliahKagan If I was still in confusion I would have posted on meta. Like once I and Zanna had a conversation regarding a question in this chatroom only but still I wasn't sure about the appropriate action. So I posted on meta.
I guess that's it. There were only 2 questions tagged wrongly.
 
9:24 AM
Oh. Cool.
 
9:42 AM
I'm not sure why but looks very much odd here
It is requesting to remove the limit. IMO a employee should retag it as
Or may be some other.
 
10:01 AM
@EliahKagan I just reopened the question because I didn't think it was a dupe of the suggested
since OP never said they were using sudo gedit at all
they say they are using sudo -H gedit
so, can anything bad happen when we use that command?
I actually saw that post before I came here
I saw the comment on the post in AUGR
and I flagged it as unfriendly
 
Sorry, which post?
 
@pomsky yeah, reopened
@EliahKagan sorry, that one
 
Oh. Flagged one of the comments that had been there?
 
Possibly relatedly, does the question benefit from its current first sentence?
 
10:08 AM
not at all
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, link at end of body, +7 more (795): Mega Keto Diet *faqssupplement.com/mega-keto-diet/* by oknmbhgpadqw on askubuntu.com
 
:)
 
Thanks for editing.
Actually I wonder if all the comments on that question -- except karel's possible-duplicate comment -- should be deleted at this point, to better facilitate clarification or improvement of the question.
 
do you think I should not have reopened that question?
 
I am definitely not excluding my own comment... at this point, should that be an answer?
 
10:13 AM
I would prefer to see an answer to this question
which actually addresses its content
@EliahKagan so, yes, if possible!
 
@Zanna I think reopening it was fine. I wouldn't want the possible-duplicate comment deleted (not sure if that's what you're responding to) but not out of disagreement with it being reopened. It can always get reclosed if that's what people decide. It was hammered closed anyway.
 
:)
Damn, yet another power cut so I'm stuck on mobile
 
I've deleted my comment, as part of practicing what I preach. :)
Whoa, the OP really did never say anything about using sudo gedit. @Zanna Thanks for noticing that.
 
I guess they did in the title. But it seemed they were not actually running that
 
@EliahKagan (unrelated) It seems you'll get gold badge for command-line any time soon. Since you now have 200 posts with whopping 1.6k score.
Also, should we delete our comments on your answer?
 
10:28 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body (293): XFCE evolution error by Eliztose86 on askubuntu.com
 
Again not OT IMO.
 
 
1 hour later…
@pomsky Thanks again for telling me about that. Would you be willing to check if I've accidentally said any wrong stuff about the gvfs admin backend in the answer I posted on that question? (You should feel free to say no or ignore this request, of course. Others can comment on it and I can look into it further.)
 
12:03 PM
should this comment's suggestion be implemented with an edit? I am not sure how to do it
 
12:13 PM
@EliahKagan Looks great, +1 :)
 
from me too, thanks for writing that answer!
Happy the question got attention
the sudo fun has started hahaha
 
@EliahKagan I guess you have already figured it out if you didn't know this beforehand, you can also use it while manually entering path in Nautilus
 
Thanks to both of you for reading it over! (Though now I feel like I should've asked about its accuracy in main chat... I don't to create the appearance, or effect, of campaigning for votes among a small group of people.)
@pomsky Yes. I was (somewhat) familiar with gvfs paths, just not admin://.
 
@EliahKagan I read your answer before I noticed you had mentioned it in here - I was watching the page anyway hoping you would post
 
12:56 PM
@Kulfy Either way is fine, I think, if you mean on that answer. They were about the answers, and not just noise, and I don't think they were getting in the way of other comments. But you've deleted your first comment; perhaps I should delete mine.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body (96): Hp Deskjet 1010 printers drivers for ubuntu 12.04 by user204894 on askubuntu.com
 
Yeah, I guess my comment isn't all that valuable now. I'll delete it. I've just deleted it.
 
1:17 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Username similar to website in answer (57): Setting nautilus-open-terminal to launch Terminator rather than gnome-terminal by alvaroferran on askubuntu.com
 
@Natty tp
 
2:45 PM
@EliahKagan Deleted second also.
 
3:10 PM
comment no longer needed
 
Is it possible to try "all" Ubuntu derivatives (official and non-official) out there?
0
Q: All Ubuntu based Distributions fail to boot after Grub

CroatI made a Live USB with Ubuntu and Mint,but cannot reach the live desktop due to black screen that happens after the two boot entries "Ubuntu with or without ACPI.I can't turn the PC off after that. Just to clarify that English isn't my main lanaguage and that im very new with Linux.

 
I suspect they don't mean all existing distributions, but all the ones they tried.
 
Or they just considered "Ubuntu and Mint"?
 
That could be.
 
 
2 hours later…
5:18 PM
duplicate: The accepted answer is similar to danjjl's answer
 
which is not a good answer imho
 
That's the last resort IMO
 
Yeah, most people should not use that method.
 
why the tag?
a while ago, we managed to get the OP of that canonical post to reconsider their accept :)
 
Oh. I realised it was accepted in Aug 17.
 
5:25 PM
I deleted my comment as it was confusing since the change of accept
 
@Zanna Not sure. I think it has nothing to do with the question.
I have edited the tags.
 
5:53 PM
git is also nothing to do with this issue I think
 
they have some arm64 packages which are causing the problem
 
6:47 PM
@Zanna Yeah I've already removed that.
@Zanna But that issue is generic IMO. There's nothing to do with architecture. I think.
 
 
3 hours later…

« first day (2592 days earlier)      last day (1753 days later) »