The linked page looked like it was someone running Windows who installed something in Windows that fixed the problem (and the thing they installed wasn't Wine!).
It would maybe have been best if I had commented on the post to clarify that before voting to delete it. The case for deletion was stronger than it appeared because it was unclear if the OP had even done that or had even used Ubuntu: they might have done the fix on Windows, then assumed installing wine corresponded to it. I don't know. Anyway, I don't think it's really a problem or that we need to undelete it to try to comment and then redelete it.
Well, they gave a specific command. I don't want to say they didn't run that command on an Ubuntu system. They very well may have. I don't think that is what actually fixed it for them, but I don't think it's implausible that they ran it. I'm just not 100% sure whether or not that command was what they meant to indicate specifically worked for them.
@Zanna The idea is that you have a program that lists currently running processes, but it's sometimes difficult to figure out what process corresponds to a particular window in the GUI. So it provides a facility that lets you select a window, and then shows which process owns that window.
I think a number of Windows users might not be familiar with Process Explorer because, although it's a poplar tool, it does not come with Windows. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_Explorer
I wonder why the OP of this question thought that recompiling the driver might help them; unless they were really exaggerating when they said they were a beginner, they must surely have found that suggestion somewhere, and that place might have other useful information... I feel like I should comment, but I don't think I'd be able to give any useful advice here
... regardless of what info they supply, so I don't really know what to say
Based on the core of what the question is asking ("Can there ever be any problem"), the duplicate closure is reasonable. But if it had stayed open then I would have posted an answer which I think would have been appropriate there but inappropriate on the current dupe target (as well as on those other two I've mentioned).
(Though that one might be hard for a bot to reasonably distinguish from an answer.)
@Natty tp
@karel Thanks. The three answers are deleted now, and I commented on them to advise the OP to edit the question instead. I'm not sure if it's best to edit the information in for them or just wait for them to do it.
The tag wiki itself looks okay to me. We do definitely have some questions that really are about Ubuntu Forums. But yeah, it seems to be used on some questions that are not actually about Ubuntu Forums.
Actually, there might be few enough of those to just remove the tag from the questions where it doesn't fit.
I am trying to install MOPAC 7 and downloaded it from the website. It has 7 folders - Interfaces, Modules, MOPAC_7, src_interfaces, src_modules, src_subroutines and Subroutines. There are no installation instructions. I downloaded it from http://openmopac.net/Downloads/Downloads.html , the one na...
OT close voter(s): This question is definitely on-topic; we help people with Ubuntu community resources here ("Services provided by Ubuntu"). Furthermore, it does not belong on meta, which is only for questions about Ask Ubuntu itself (not about other Ubuntu-related sites). It might be considered a duplicate of this earlier question though. If we close either of these as a duplicate of the other I recommend merging their answers. — Eliah KaganJul 25 '13 at 4:40
OK I'm convinced with your comment. Discarding the draft.
We are a group of deaf (in Germany and worldwide) people, who want to join together to one group, and they are interested in Ubuntu. Now point is: script-language, no deaf person is very fond of script-language and not every deaf person knows the oral script-language of international deaf people....
@EliahKagan If I was still in confusion I would have posted on meta. Like once I and Zanna had a conversation regarding a question in this chatroom only but still I wasn't sure about the appropriate action. So I posted on meta.
I guess that's it. There were only 2 questions tagged wrongly.
Actually I wonder if all the comments on that question -- except karel's possible-duplicate comment -- should be deleted at this point, to better facilitate clarification or improvement of the question.
@Zanna I think reopening it was fine. I wouldn't want the possible-duplicate comment deleted (not sure if that's what you're responding to) but not out of disagreement with it being reopened. It can always get reclosed if that's what people decide. It was hammered closed anyway.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body (293): XFCE evolution error by Eliztose86 on askubuntu.com
@pomsky Thanks again for telling me about that. Would you be willing to check if I've accidentally said any wrong stuff about the gvfs admin backend in the answer I posted on that question? (You should feel free to say no or ignore this request, of course. Others can comment on it and I can look into it further.)
Thanks to both of you for reading it over! (Though now I feel like I should've asked about its accuracy in main chat... I don't to create the appearance, or effect, of campaigning for votes among a small group of people.)
@pomsky Yes. I was (somewhat) familiar with gvfs paths, just not admin://.
@Kulfy Either way is fine, I think, if you mean on that answer. They were about the answers, and not just noise, and I don't think they were getting in the way of other comments. But you've deleted your first comment; perhaps I should delete mine.
I made a Live USB with Ubuntu and Mint,but cannot reach the live desktop due to black screen that happens after the two boot entries "Ubuntu with or without ACPI.I can't turn the PC off after that.
Just to clarify that English isn't my main lanaguage and that im very new with Linux.