« first day (2588 days earlier)      last day (314 days later) » 

 
2 hours later…
 
2 hours later…
5:37 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +6 more (888): topwellnessblog.com/sophia-berton-cream/ by teond1 on askubuntu.com
 
 
2 hours later…
7:12 AM
@Kulfy Agreed. It ended up getting closed (and not as a duplicate), so I've voted to reopen it.
 
7:31 AM
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
 
@EliahKagan I followed you and voted to reopen
 
Thanks. Once it's reopened (assuming that happens), any reason not to reclose it as a duplicate?
 
Only if they changed ownership without manipulating fstab. I'm not sure.
 
Okay.
 
Do we need ? Suggested edit which tried to create that. PS: I rejected the edit.
 
8:38 AM
@Kulfy I voted to close it as unclear.
@Kulfy Maybe if it had more information about what the OP is trying to accomplish and specifically what they'e done and what happened. I've voted to close it as unclear, too.
@Kulfy I also voted to reject.
I don't think closing this question as off-topic was the best way to handle it. I found that when searching the site for the generic bug-reporting question. It probably shouldn't be a dupe of that, but I think it would be good for people who land there to get somewhere with information about how to report bugs without Apport. I vaguely recall we have something about that...
If so, then it should at least get a comment. And maybe get reopened to be closed as a duplicate. I'm not sure.
 
@EliahKagan I can't see any reason why that would be off topic...
 
It could be interpreted as an attempt to report or raise attention to the bug that got in the way of reporting the other bug.
Okay, I have voted to reopen it. Two more votes needed.
 
@EliahKagan hahaha so unclear
 
@Zanna But do we have anything to dupe it to at least link to on it?
 
I don't know of a dupe target for it
but I think it's a good question
or at least an important issue to raise
 
@Natty fp
 
@EliahKagan I skipped it for now because I'm not sure what to do with it. I'd go back and review this question if I knew that someone had a plan to do something decisive with it like close it as a duplicate or alternatively post an answer to it.
@Natty fp
 
Okay.
 
@Natty tp
 
 
1 hour later…
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, body starts with title and ends in url, link at end of body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad ns for domain in title, +2 more (300): spastrong.com/fyt-lyft-keto/ by jacksondar2 on askubuntu.com
 
 
2 hours later…
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
 
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; Low Rep; 2.5;
 
 
1 hour later…
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; One Line only; Low Rep; 3.0;
 
 
2 hours later…
5:12 PM
How can I ping this user to stop creating ?
 
What's wrong with it?
It's a specific relevant thing isn't it?
 
User is trying to create a new tag which IMO isn't needed.
10 hours ago, by Kulfy
Do we need ? Suggested edit which tried to create that. PS: I rejected the edit.
History ^^
 
 
2 hours later…
8:34 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Url-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +6 more (889): health-body.org/keto-now/ by gegedepu on askubuntu.com
 
 
2 hours later…
10:55 PM
 
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; One Line only; Low Rep; 1.5;
 
Is this really intended as an edit? Or was that the OP's solution to the problem?
@Kulfy We seem to have a number of questions about, or at least involving, libreboot. I hadn't been aware of that. Maybe we should have the tag. However, if you have reason to think the tag is not helpful, then when you reject edits that attempt to add it, you can do so with a custom message summarizing why.
 

« first day (2588 days earlier)      last day (314 days later) »