[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching website in body: Lipovyn if you have to and get the whole by user812593 on askubuntu.com

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, +3 more: fortraxitonetry.com/enduraflex-testo-boost/ by wqabzkhcb on askubuntu.com

Should this question that we closed be migrated?

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body: supplementsreview.ca/enduraflex/ by maxis on askubuntu.com

I think this would be a good idea...

What do people think about having another bot in the room?

what do you think @SmokeDetector? Would you like a friend?

:D

@Zanna if you want to put one, go on :)

if hes to spammy we still can tell you

I doun't expect much messages

haha right :) we can always fix it if we don't like it

probably less than from Smokey from what I have seen.

well like i said put it and lets see :)

Smokey is already the most active user here haha

Same could be said about the AUGR if it were still posting there

so now the most active user there is the unix.se feed :P

haha that definitely didn't used to be the case

good old times....

we get old

haha we get old. we get passive rep. some things are reliable.

thinking about returning to AUGR for general trouble making

stars own post ahhh the power abuse

:D

(:

FTR I starred the one soliciting opinions on the new bot, not the one about causing trouble in AUGR...

:43689108 sounds ominous

[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +4 more: freesupplementrial.com/highend-cbd/ by sroukozow on askubuntu.com

@Zanna we already have 2 bots here.. should a third one come, will there be conflicts between them?

@jokerdino 2 bots? O.o

we don't talk about it because it hurts their sentiments.

Sorry

@jokerdino anyway, they'll have to play nice with all the modly lurking that goes on in these parts

damn, everything Leave Open, Leave Open, Leave Open lately... what's wrong with me? Am I going soft?

Unclear.

Unclear but hopefully they'll add more information and then it could be reopened.

Unclear, I think. The "or other keys" part suggests that even the very general answer in the comment might not be correct.

This question is not unclear, but I think it can be regarded as a duplicate. Do we have any better question about how to install additional language packs than that one?

@Zanna As you, um, know :), it's common for questions to get wrong close votes. (A question can also be fixed after some correct close votes, but it's flat-out wrong close votes that I have been seeing more often recently)

@EliahKagan when I needed to get my system to support a new language, I read many questions on Ask Ubuntu, and their answers were not very helpful. Finally I more-or-less figured it out. I would love Gunnar Hjalmarsson to write a canonical post on that subject

@EliahKagan yeah... in particular at the moment it seems like everything is getting votes as a duplicate of something very loosely related :S

@Zanna Does this relate to that answer?

I don't know about that. I just know that Gunnar Hjalmarsson is our language support expert

How is this question a duplicate? Shouldn't it just have an answer explaining that the system is Lubuntu (or that, at hte very least, the desktop environment being used is LXDE with the default settings and theme of Lubuntu)?

I think we should close this question as a duplicate, then probably ask for a merge.

Why do people want to make every possible batch renaming question a duplicate??

@EliahKagan yeah...

@EliahKagan that drives me absolutely up the wall

"I have a question about Ubuntu..."

"Use Perl"

Problem solved

Don't people like writing answers?

In some cases it is possible to figure out how to do something based on answers to another question. Often I still disagree with closures, but that seems like a reasonable difference of opinion. But I am increasingly realizing that many, if not most, close votes on batch renaming questions don't involve considering the specifics of the question all.

Writing answers is totally the most fun and exciting thing about AU... and the close-second most fun part is reading other people's awesome answers

@EliahKagan yeah!

For example, this question asks how to do something that doesn't appear to be touched on, even slightly, in any answer to that one. That second question does not even have any answers that contain the text $1, $2, $3, \1, \2, or \3!

Is there a new batch renaming question getting closed as a dupe that needs answering instead? Because I'll totally turn on my laptop for that if so...

I am tempted to opine that the answer to that question is always yes. But the example I've just mentioned is answered. ...That doesn't mean you shouldn't post your own answer, though.

Haha maybe not quite always. I should definitely go to sleep if it's not a rename emergency

(Unrelated to the above.) Would you be willing to post a meta answer about that? Unless we're going to close that meta question as a duplicate, which is not totally unreasonable but probably not the best idea (in any case, I have a dupe hammer for discussion questions on meta, and I don't feel comfortable just using it on that question now), it should be answered.

If no one posts an answer I will probably do it. But I don't know when I would do it. I've gotta go afk for a while in the next minute or so.

Ok, I'll do that

am I losing my mind?

going to sleep

@Zanna No.

:)

I mean, certainly not based on that, anyway. :)

@Zanna Sounds good to me.