@TheLittleNaruto This is a new wave on the site. There were good old days when questions are seen as as questions not as intentions.

@TheLittleNaruto There are many questions like these seen as questions and not in user's point of view.

@NogShine Wow! Much Wow!

Like a tree wizard changes a color according to the surroundings, you're doing same.

@TheLittleNaruto Many questions are posted like these. Search on the site.

@TheLittleNaruto These type of questions used to get good response in the past but not now.

@NogShine Earlier there was no/very few users who could understood the intentions, now everyone knows what it is.

@TheLittleNaruto intentions...

@NogShine Then you guys should not complain if someone ask questions on Vaishnava

@TheLittleNaruto Should you ask everyone to stop or defend hated questions? When you cover, you should cover both or stop pointing everyone.

@TheLittleNaruto Who are you guys? Division?

@NogShine Well a moderator should at least,

Don't see posts from sect pov. This is where the problem arises.

Oh Man!

@TheLittleNaruto Moderator is also a user. A user can post questions. Moderation is different and asking questions as a user is different. I thought you know it.

Keshav knows how to manipulate question so that no one can question it, but his intentions are clear.

If you can't see it, then Nog there is nothing to talk

@TheLittleNaruto Well, you haven't seen all the questions posted. THere are bunch of them. Asking how one sect or an acharya interpets or refutes one idea is not spreading hatred.

@TheLittleNaruto What were his intentions?

dominating

This will not raise awareness about hinduism, it'll only raise conflicts

People who are new, they'll be confused, end up laughing on us.

If you still don't understand, fine then.

@TheLittleNaruto Say it all of them. Who are Vedantins and who are not Vedantins. It is not done by only one user. There are dozens of questions from other users also. When you say to them, I will stop talking.

If you still say the same thing, fine then. I will consider one of those users who see only one side of a coin.

@TheLittleNaruto I assure you that my intentions are good. The purpose of my question certainly wasn't to attack Shaktas, on the contrary I think that Madhvacharya is misinterpreting the relevant Sutras of the Brahma Sutras and making it about Shaktas when it's not. In fact, the whole point of my question is that Madhvacharya's argument didn't make sense to me, so I was trying to find out if I was misunderstanding the argument in some way.

@TheLittleNaruto That is a high-quality question in my view. It's asking about the logic of an argument given in a commentary on the Brahma Sutras. It's the sort of advanced question that's likely to attract experts to the site.

@TheLittleNaruto It doesn't raise hatred at all. It doesn't criticize the Shaktas, if anything it criticizes Madhvacharya for criticizing the Shaktas. And I have no hatred for Shaivas or Shaktas, even if I disagree with them. I've read numerous Shaiva and Shakta works, as my Meta answer will attest.

@KeshavSrinivasan

@TheLittleNaruto Yes, I'm well aware that there are a few users who regularly criticize me on Meta. But I don't think their criticisms are valid. We'll have to agree to disagree on that.