@TheLittleNaruto Moderator is also a user. A user can post questions. Moderation is different and asking questions as a user is different. I thought you know it.
@TheLittleNaruto Well, you haven't seen all the questions posted. THere are bunch of them. Asking how one sect or an acharya interpets or refutes one idea is not spreading hatred.
Last thing, I want to tell you, Hinduism is mostly about spirituality, Each and every sect talks about it only. We should be more focus on this not on which sect acharya refuted other sect and why etc. etc.
5
This will not raise awareness about hinduism, it'll only raise conflicts
2
People who are new, they'll be confused, end up laughing on us.
@TheLittleNaruto Say it all of them. Who are Vedantins and who are not Vedantins. It is not done by only one user. There are dozens of questions from other users also. When you say to them, I will stop talking.
2
If you still say the same thing, fine then. I will consider one of those users who see only one side of a coin.
@TheLittleNaruto I assure you that my intentions are good. The purpose of my question certainly wasn't to attack Shaktas, on the contrary I think that Madhvacharya is misinterpreting the relevant Sutras of the Brahma Sutras and making it about Shaktas when it's not. In fact, the whole point of my question is that Madhvacharya's argument didn't make sense to me, so I was trying to find out if I was misunderstanding the argument in some way.
2
@TheLittleNaruto That is a high-quality question in my view. It's asking about the logic of an argument given in a commentary on the Brahma Sutras. It's the sort of advanced question that's likely to attract experts to the site.
2
@TheLittleNaruto It doesn't raise hatred at all. It doesn't criticize the Shaktas, if anything it criticizes Madhvacharya for criticizing the Shaktas. And I have no hatred for Shaivas or Shaktas, even if I disagree with them. I've read numerous Shaiva and Shakta works, as my Meta answer will attest.
Some of the mera links I want to share with you, https://hinduism.meta.stackexchange.com/q/361/7853 https://hinduism.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1222/7853
Suppose, question B is identified as duplicate of question A. Now user X answers B. It might be voted &/or accepted by OP of question B.
If this is done knowing full well that post A has an answer already.
Is it fair practice to be followed by all?
@TheLittleNaruto Yes, I'm well aware that there are a few users who regularly criticize me on Meta. But I don't think their criticisms are valid. We'll have to agree to disagree on that.