@ChinmayaB Yes. we are brahmins and Sri Vaishnavas. But these days iyengars means only people with tamil origins. We are of telugu origin . We are Sri Vaishnava from generations at least since my great grandfather times.
Every language encodes within it a unique culture and a world view. This site being an English site, our questions and answers are in English. But certain words lose meaning when translated to English.
For example,
Sin is not bad karma or paap
Atman is not soul
Jati-varna system is not caste ...
He has written in निवेदन (announcement) that he has given explanation on the basis/reference of following Sanskrit scriptures: (1) Shri Shankaracharya's Sharirak Bhashya, (2) Shri Ramanujacharya's Shri Bhashya, (3) Shri Vallabhacharya's Anubhashya, (4) Shri Nimbark Bhashya, (5) Shri Bhashjaracharya Bhashya, (6) Brahmananad Deepika, (7) Shri Vijnanbhikhshu Bhashya and Shri Ramanand Vyakhya.
Sigmund Freud (/ˈfrɔɪd/ FROYD; German: [ˈziːkmʊnt ˈfʁɔʏt]; born Sigismund Schlomo Freud; 6 May 1856 – 23 September 1939) was an Austrian neurologist and the founder of psychoanalysis, a clinical method for treating psychopathology through dialogue between a patient and a psychoanalyst. Freud was born to Galician Jewish parents in the Moravian town of Freiberg, in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. He qualified as a doctor of medicine in 1881 at the University of Vienna. Upon completing his habilitation in 1885, he was appointed a docent in neuropathology and became an affiliated professor in 1902. Freud...
@Cucumber Namaste! Don't compare "Religion" with "Dharma". The so called Indian subcontinents Religions are "Dharmic faiths". "Matam" (Sanskrit word for Religion) is something which comes from "Man" or Mind. But on other hand faiths of Indian subcontinent are expouded by Rsis (seers) or sages in transcendental consiousness. it's absurd to compare Religion with Dharma.
@Pandya Most of the present day Hindus adhere Advaita Vedanta. So, may be it is leaning towards Advaita.
@Tezz Why Surya is called "MaartaNDa"?
m. (fr. मृता*ण्ड) " sprung from a (seemingly) lifeless egg ", a bird RV. Br.
@Thedestroyer Niyogi is a brahmin who are no longer in priest tradition. Our family occupation was not priesthood but we do daily karmas such as Sandhyavandanam. Vaidukulu means brahmins who continued in priesthood.
if question is off-topic, close it, don't flag it.
4
because later, if mod closes it alone, some or the other user will rage on meta saying that the decision was incorrect.
closing questions, referrals etc need peer reviews, also it's something which even a decent reputation user can do. Yes, if the question is not yet closed even after a week? Then flag to a mod, but than, we need to make our users aware that they should be taking those actions instead of flagging it to a mod
@Pandya umm, nop.. there are weird flags all the time.
some say that edit the post, some ask for a close, delete, some say the answer is incorrect. Mods are not supposed to judge whether an answer is incorrect or not. Yea, if the answer is completely incorrect, we will delete it, but if it has minor issues or somewhat wrong, all we need to do is a downvote.
@SreeCharan They should delete it. we have enough of high-rep active users now. When I contribute on StackOverflow, if I comment/delete vote/close vote anything, I do check in a day or two from my activity tab that whether the action was performed or not, if not, than we need to flag to a mod that 2 delete votes are casted, but since we are not getting the third one, we need a mod to step in.
But we should prevent flagging if answers are incorrect. Only flag if they are spam, hate speech, hurting religious sentiments and so on
in general, flag when immediate actions are required which might not be available to normal / high rep users
@SreeCharan Sorry, but am not getting what you are trying to say.. bookmarked mean star messages.. if you want me to remove those stars, I can do it.. but the messages you are sharing are not starred
@Pandya I think it's referring to the Gitacharya (Krishna)... not about ourselves...
@TheDestroyer where did you see the word Martanda.. ?..
@Pandya in those Hindi Archives of Shankara Sutra Bhasya.. part 1 doesn't start with "Athato Brahman Jijnasa".. why? Where are the previous parts.. ?..
(H2) मार्ताण्ड [p= 813,2] [L=163563] m. (fr. मृता*ण्ड) " sprung from a (seemingly) lifeless egg ", a bird RV. Br. [p= 813,2] [L=163564] " bird in the sky ", the sun (= or v.l. for, मार्तण्ड) Rājat.
The Martand Sun Temple was a Kashmiri Hindu temple dedicated to Surya (the chief solar deity in Hinduism) and built during the 8th century CE. Martand is another Sanskrit name for the Hindu Sun-god. Now in ruins, the temple is located five miles from Anantnag in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir.
== History ==
The Martand Sun Temple was built by the third ruler of the Karkota Dynasty, Lalitaditya Muktapida, in the 8th century CE. It is said to have been built during 725-756 CE. The foundation of the temple is said to have been around since 370-500 CE, with some attributing the construction...
Currently the "Bookmark a conversation" feature is great. It provides just what a user needs in a busy chat room; get in, get the important stuff from the bookmarks and get out.
Though sometimes, these bookmarked conversations have a lot of extra stuffing in it. Chit Chat. Sometimes 100-300 mess...
@TheDestroyer My most recent meta post..let me see if i can post a link ...its deleted now by me..no..possibly no purana tells that story..but that does not mean that is not true either
@Rickross Yes. Markandeya Shiva story is true. It's quiet a famous and many Achryas say this story in Parvachanams. But i'm interested in Sanskrit words of Shiva's boon to Markandeya
@TheDestroyer Haha i have undeleted that post to give u the link..if i gave the link of the deleted post cud u still see that?Anyways after u have finished reading it i'll delete it again..
@Tezz Can you that part of verse as I interpret "you yourself know yourself by yourself" as like Paramatma (as a or with/by being Jivatma) knows Paramata.
I used to get "upset" (though that is too strong a term) when I got downvoted without comment. If my answer isn't good enough then I'd like to know why. Not only does it improve the answer for the OP but it improves my knowledge too.
Where the down-vote has been explained I've found it useful & ...
@TheDestroyer I have chkd with someone who has read all Puranas in Sanskrit..He said to me that the story is possibly not in any puranas..I used possibly coz there mite more than one manuscripts for any purana..But that does not mean that the story is false..Even he said the same..Its a story
@Rickross I feel there's no reason to downvote those posts. But i think downvotes shouldn't be taken seriously. It's more or like people disagree with us.
@TheDestroyer * true Story i meant..also we shd not rely too much on scriptures because how much amount of scriptures are available to us and what huge amount has been lost?
@TheDestroyer So if some stories are very popular but seemingly don't have scriptural proofs then we have to assume that may be they were contained in those parts of scriptures which were lost or changed with time
I just noticed that I lost a bunch of points from my reputation score, and I used the "reputation" tab on my user profile page to try and track down the cause.
During my investigation, I noticed there was an unusual event of type "reversal". In the normal place of a question title, it says "voti...
@TheDestroyer I'm not much serious about these philosophies..I think too much indulgence in hetuvada & philosophies are gateways to hells..Do u know of any philosophies that is capable of describing even a toe nail of the Almighty?
@TheDestroyer Sadashiva says-They know me by Dvaita-Advaita but actually i'm Para Dvaita-advaita..that is beyond them..
Kãlãnjãra means who is the destroyer of Kãla. ie. Who is Kãla of Kãla (Kãlakãla). There is also a tirtha called Kalanjara where Lord Shiva destroyed Kãla while protecting his devotee Sveta. Kurma Purana Uttara Bhaga chapter 36 tells that story:
There is a great Tirtha by the name Kãlanjara wh...
@Mr.Alien - IMO , that's beacuse the vastness of Hinduism scriptures.One perticular good answer might be anywhere among these scriptures.Finding it and writing answer is also a timeconsuming part. Information and Avaliability of scriptures/books with users is also a case(as was me sometime ago). Even after good answer , it's not sure that the answer will get good votes.And In Hinduism one has to experience and understand thre concepts, so thete are some facts which we can't explain properly.
like Antaratma , parabhraman , jivatma ,supreme creator , etc
@SwiftPushkar Agreed, but we should be supporting right content and not shitty one, like recently I remember, there was a question where a guy was asking for personal recommendation.. makes no sense to me
@Mr.Alien - Yes ,i agree , but there are user levels also , as one browse this site more , he come to know more more abt.how to write good stuff.Even i got that aftet 5-6 months continues reading.And became able to write atleast some answers after i downloded puranas /books , and collected some basic info. during all my previous misconception's were also cleared out and i got a clear idea abt."What Hinduism really is" so it depends on current level and readings of user also😊
@Mr.Alien - Yes , totally agree with u 😊👍👍👍 I am inspired by answering style of @KeshavSrinivasan , Be happy , sai and all who were present here before me
I do know that according to Upanishads, All the higher Lokas except Brahma Loka, are subjected to circumgyration/reparation (birth-rebirth).
From Chhandogya Upanishad 4.15.5:
अथ यदु चैवास्मिञ्छव्यं कुर्वन्ति यदि च
नार्चिषमेवाभिसंभवन्त्यर्चिषोऽहरह्न
आपूर्यमाणपक्षमापूर्यमाणपक्षाद्यान्षडुद...
@TheDestroyer The site quality has improved not just marginally but by leaps and bounds..Just bring in true PunDit here..He will confirm....atleast in the last 1 year there has been drastic change in quality..
@TheDestroyer I mean then people can get 20 upvoTes by answering simply from Wiki..Now users can't get more than even 5 upVotes although they mite be quoting from the 108 upanishads,18 puranas,18 Smritis..and more Scriptures :D..
@Mr.Alien That renting question was a valid question..actually u can't be sure on what is a meritorious Q and what is not unless u see an answer to it from scriptures..
@TheDestroyer Yes..that's what i meant..many people are unsure of whtr a particular post is off or on topic because they have not studied all scriptures and they don't also know which scriptures are likely to provide the answer to it..
@Mr.Alien As far i know, from consulting Vastu experts, both are allowed. If some user answers the same by citing Vastu Sastra, then it answers the question. Or Dharma Sastras may have answer or some rules. We don't know. Definitely bringing modern concepts is offtopic.
@TheDestroyer I can tell u many questions which many users here will instantly vote to close but the most important of Hindu scriptures have bothered to provide precise answers to them ..So what is Off topic to many users here is a mention worthy topic for the Shastras..So we shdn't just be in hurry to close questions here..give some time to the OP..See whtr u urself can improve upon the questions ..
@SreeCharan Ok..
@TheDestroyer Parameswara created many Shastras just to test us & also to trap us in Pashutwa(bondage)..So don't indulge into too much of philosophies..:D
Ok logging off now..will be back [email protected] Thanks for responding to my earlier question..@TheDestroyer Somethings shd only be learnt from Guru..Somethings can be studied on ur own..
@TheDestroyer I study many things on my own..My Guru gets angry on me for that..:)..I have 2 Gurus..
@TheDestroyer yes i know ..but learning on ur own by self-study is not recommended..You can very easily be misled..True knowledge can't be obtained without Guru's grace..studying a million of Shastras is of no use here..and also in Hinduism practicing what u have learnt is important rather than just studying Texts..
@SreeCharan Hero was supernatural being and Heroine name was Padma and entire movie was taken in America. Hero says he was from Shambala. Appude doubt vachindi naku.
@TheDestroyer There is also "itu garudani neevekkinanu" after listening and learning it, I changed the profile pic to Garuda and vishnu(one of the reasons). around 32000. now 12000 are only available.
@TheDestroyer Yes. The white part are the feet of vishnu, red the Lakshmi. the line under feet symbolises adishesha.
@SreeCharan In Dharma Sandhehalu, it is said Sushma nadi, Pingala nadi and Ida nadi meet at Ajna Chakra. So, Shaivaites put horizontally and Vishnavas put vertically meeting at point (V shaped).
@SreeCharan Did Swayambhu Venkateswara/Srinivasa have any namam just after he turned into idol?
@TheDestroyer Many were lost. Few which we are listening now are written on talapatras, stone carvings. The reason they show in the movie might be the reason.
@TheDestroyer No. that was the reason for the confusion on who the deity was. Ramanujacharya gave naamam, shankha, chakra to Venkateshwara which made Him the acharya of Venkateshwara.
@SreeCharan The Venkateshwara statue did have a Shankha and Chakra originally, but then Venkateshwara gave them to his devotee king Thondaiman so Thondaiman could win a battle.
@TheDestroyer Well, stone statues don't usually have stone Namams. But I assume Venkateshwara would be wearing an ordinary Namam made from powder when he turned to stone.
@TheDestroyer I think you should also copy paste "Cite the sources" like @Keshav does in case of "The term shaivates is overused these days....", "As I discuss in this answer". :P
@SreeCharan haha. i thought to copy Sv's comment giving link to metapost but still needs to link meta post and search for his comment. i am bit lazy now to do that. haha.
The destoyer raised a question @KeshavSrinivasan. Why do we put lord's lotus feet on his forehead himself. I said that symbolism is only for devotees. Do you know the exact reason?
I got a doubt about depiction of Krishna. @KrishnShweta @KeshavSrinivasan @Pandya @SwiftPushkar Why is krishna depicted with a peacock feather since his childhood?
@KrishnShweta My doubt is only about chidhood .Because in pictures/images these days, Krishna is depicted with peacock feather even since his childhood. He was brahmachari then and nothing to do with askalitha brahmacharyam.