@Pandya Oh ok. In any case what Kumarila Bhatta is saying is "If it was valid to say that because someone is really intelligent they're allowed to read multiple Shakhas, then it would be equally valid to say that because someone is really rich they're allowed to offer both Yava (rice) and Vrihi (barley) at once. But the second is invalid, so the first is invalid as well."
@KeshavSrinivasan Btw, Brahma Sutra has tried to clear confusion between different topics by different Shakha and explained how to consider they're saying similar by equating different shakha's explanation in favourable way. So, can we say we're allowed to study different Shakhas on the basis of it?
@KeshavSrinivasan @Pandya - is there noticeable difference btw."Brahmanas of Shakha" or just few.I don't know much , but by far from my understanding i think , some Tradiations only are diff.
@Pandya - oh , ok ,i came to conclusion when i have seen the Rudra patha of various Shakhas , there is some difference in swaras ,but most of the Rudra is same 😊
@Pandya Well, even the Purva Mimamsa Sutras compare the descriptions of Yagnas in different Shakhas and show that they're the same. That's the funny thing, Kumarila Bhatta discusses what different Shakhas say but he also says you're not allowed to read multiple Shakhas!
@Pandya - yes , already seen that question , but i will try , i can give some answers based on books I have about karmakanda /pooja vidhi/ Joytish etc.but the explanation is given in marathi language ,so giving sources is problem ,and Don't know what other experts or Panchanga believe , difference in Longitude & latitude.
@Pandya - So a shubha kaal in MH ,may be Ashubha in guj ,because slight diif.in geographic location😊
@SwiftPushkar There are some differences in organization, and there are some stories that are found in some Brahmanas and in others, but for the most part Brahmanas from different Shakhas of a Veda contain the same set of Yagnas and more or less the same instructions on how to perform them. The biggest difference in Brahmanas is between Shakhas of the Krishna Yajur Veda and Shakhas of the Shukla Yajur Veda, but that again is an organizational issue.
@KeshavSrinivasan Hmm.... Though I think your question can be simply answered as No! Haha but it looks broad to find out if any scripture doesn't say you're not allowed......
@SwiftPushkar Btw, is Gulika Kala considered Shubh or Ashubh?
@KeshavSrinivasan - oh i see , i am going to read all this in some time , and yes , I learned a lot about vedas from your answers , i got my basics from u ,thanks 👍👍💐
@Pandya Haha yeah, it's possible that the answer is simply no. It's also possible that some scripture explicitly says "You're freely allowed to read multiple Shakhas."
The Vedas are Shruti, which means "that which is heard" (what Christians would call "revelation"). Hindus believe that from time immemorial, sages known as Dhrishtas (literally "seers") have, during a state of Tapasya (deep meditation), heard sacred verses directly from the gods. In the Dwapara...
@Pandya - No i Don't know much about these beliefs as we personally do not believe in Shubha /Ashubha kaala , and many such beliefs ,which does not have any practicle value as such ,and are few fillowers only , so technically i can give answers on some well known facts only ,based on books ,like Marriages , janma kundali etc.
@TheDestroyer The Brahmanas of the Vedas originated in disciplic successions originating with Brahman. Here is how the Satapatha Brahmana of the Rig Veda was passed down, for instance: sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe15/sbe15099.htm
> In any case, when someone says "I read the Rig Veda" without qualification, they usually mean the Rig Veda Samhita, because the Samhitas are the core part of the Vedas which came directly from the gods.
As I discuss in this answer, each of the four Vedas consists of four portions: Samhitas, the core part of the Vedas consisting of verses heard from the gods; Brahmanas, which provide instructions on the proper performance of important rituals; Aranyakas, which provide a guide to rituals meant for...
Hindu scripture is made up of two categories, Shruti and Smriti. Shruti means "that which is heard" (what Christians would call "revelation"). Hindus believe that from time immemorial, sages known as Dhrishtas (literally "seers") have, during a state of Tapasya (deep meditation), heard sacred v...
@KeshavSrinivasan Btw, kindly speaking, my this question may be closed as duplicate regarding your this answer but I've not voted to close as duplicate :P (and no one has tried!) as I don't wish! Haha
Though it should be noted that I've not posted Q/A, actually my answer is posted about a year after the question!
@Pandya I don't think if a question contains answer in another question then it should be marked duplicate... I think we should mark duplicate only if question matches...
@TheDestroyer @KrishnShweta btw.. the reason why I like that verse most in Shiva Tandava Stotram is it nicely summarizes various acts of Lord Shiva...
@TheDestroyer @KrishnShweta I worship him who is: Destroyer of the Desire (Smarantakam)... Destroyer of cities/body of illusion (Purantakam)... Destroyer of the cycle of Samsara (Bhavantakam)... Destroyer of the Karma Kanda portion of Vedas (Makhantakam)... Destroyer of Pride (Gajantak)... Destroyer of darkness (Andhakantam)... Destroyer of Kala (Tamantakantakam)...
@KeshavSrinivasan "When he says "Now, coming to understand My design and following My instruction, Hari and Sesha have already been born as the sages Sankarshana and Patanjali for the resuscitation of the middle section of the Veda dealing ..." who is he here?...
@Tezz So according to the Shankara Digvijaya, Kartikeya incarnated as Kumarila Bhatta to restore the Karma Kanda of the Vedas, Vishnu and Adiseshan incarnated as Sankarshana and Patanjali to restore the Devata Kanda of the Vedas, and Shiva incarnated as Adi Shankaracharya to restore the Jnana Kanda of the Vedas.
@Tezz The Sankarshana part makes sense, since he was a commentator on Kasakritsna's Devata Kanda Sutras, but I'm not sure what Patanjali's Yoga Sutras have to do with the Devata Kanda, i.e. the Samhitas.
Yeah. For now, i too believe in Advaita Vedanta. Actually, in Maya, relatively everything (every Philosophy) is possible. There is actually a beautiful sentence in Shankara Digvijaya: Shiva says to Kartikeya, "The Veda has three strands in its comprehensive teaching -The ritualistic, the meditative and the gnostic. By establishing the sway of the Veda with its three-pronged message, the spiritual ideal can be preserVed in the world. If the spiritual ideal is saved, society is saved. For, sound social organisation leading to the
Many must have heard all the incidents and stories of Lord Shiva but very few are aware about his children. We all know that he had two sons Kartikeya and Ganesha but in reality he had three sons and three daughters. Surprising but true! Shiva’s three daughters are worshipped even today in differ...
He had three daughters
1. Ashok Sundari 2. Manasa 3. Jyoti They are mentioned in the Shiva Purana. Readers can refer Rudra Samhita: Section II – Sati Khanda of Shiva Purana.
@TheDestroyer I don't think Rudra Samhita Sati Khanda mentions this story... do you know about it...?
@TheDestroyer also see.. "She was the one who saved Lord Shiva when he drank poison during the “Samandar Manthan”or “Amrit Manthan”. Haha... lol...
@TheDestroyer I think the story of Manasa is just a folktale... do you know any scriptual basis... ?
@SwiftPushkar I haven't checked fully... but I think it's not there...
@Tezz @SwiftPushkar According to the tale, Manasa devi is given the status of goddess by Shiva. Adishesha worshipped her and made the queen of the snakes. I don;t believe these.
@SreeCharan - yes , but serious users will not entertain that blog , Hinduism SE is far more better , we present facts with links , quotes so its much more reliable.
@Tezz OP added Devdutt patnaik as a reference. Devdutt patnaik is an author who adds folklores and creates a belief in readers that it is true. Draupadi wanting Karna as sixth husband is one such example.
BTW @SwiftPushkar you once said using "Hanumana" instead Hanuman would be respectful. The actual word is "Hanumantha". I remembered the word some time ago.
@Tezz - yes , you are correct the word "hanumanta" is more respectful ,in marathi language we use both words but , when writing the word in english , Hanumana looks more respectful saying :)
@SreeCharan - Actually Ganesha is widely worshiped & much popular deity in Maharashtra. But we dont know much about that ( shubh labh ). We can see the word शुभ -लाभ in pictures , but people always take the meaning of that as -auspicious and gain :) in business or in day today life
It's probably because the story of Ashokasundari is only attested in the Padma Purana; you can read the story starting from page 1280 of this section of the Bhumi Kanda of the Padma Purana. (If you want to read the rest of the Padma Purana, see my answer here.)
And Ashokasundari is described ...
@Tezz Swami Vishwananda says at Vyavaharika level, inanimate objects just have existence without Chit and Ananda.
@TheDestroyer if by dead if you mean your gross material body, then your statement is correct. if by dead, you mean the subtle body that leaves the material body behind upon death, then no. — Swami Vishwananda21 mins ago
@SwiftPushkar ok. You can even copy the comment here to chat by moving cursor to "time section" of comments under question or answer and copying link and pasting here.
@TheDestroyer - haha , yes , got it after trial and error :)
@TheDestroyer - By the way , i would also like to say say "Hearty Thanks" to you for puranas.. its because of you , i have got boost in answers and learned diff. puranas. So Thanks very much again.:)
@SreeCharan No, they don't, they're not Sri Vaishnavas. But Ramanujacharya did help the Vaikhanasas, by saving the Venkateshwara temple from Shaivites and others. The Vaikhanasas were so grateful to Ramanujacharya that they agreed to incorporate Alwar poems into the Tirupati temple practices. That's why Tirupati is the only Vaikhanasa temple where Alwar poems are sung.
@SreeCharan And they follow Vaikhanasa Agamas, whereas all other Vaishnava sects follow Pancharatra Agamas.
@SreeCharan Vaikhanasas have many strange beliefs. For instance they believe that you cannot convert into the Vaikhanasa sect, you have to be born into it. They consider themselves "Garbha Vaishnavas", because they believe Vishnu performs Samashrayanam for Vaikhanasa babies when they are in their mothers' womb.
As I discuss in this answer, one of the early movements that was important to the development of Vaishnavism was the ancient Pancharatra movement, whose sacred texts consisted of detailed procedures to worship the sage Narayana, an ancient incarnation of Vishnu. Since the Pancharatra texts origin...
@SreeCharan Haha yeah. By the way, they think that Vishnu only performs Samashrayanam in the womb for male Vaikhanasa babies, so they believe that women and low-caste people still have to perform Samashrayanam after they're born.
@SreeCharan Yeah, they're definitely strange. By the way, they believe in a philosophy called "Lakshmi Visistadvaita". I posted a question about it here:
As I discuss in this answer, one of the early movements that was important in the development of Vaishnavism was the ancient Pancharatra movement, whose sacred texts consisted of detailed procedures to worship the sage Narayana, an ancient incarnation of Vishnu. Since the Pancharatra texts origin...
@SreeCharan What Wikipedia article? By the way, Wikipedia says "Today Vaikhanasas are the chief priests in more than half of the Vaishnava temples in the South Indian states of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, and parts of Karnataka."
@KeshavSrinivasan Do you know how I got doubt about vaikhanasas ? Today, I have seen a video about tirumala temple. In which the chief priest of the temple explained history of temple and didn't even take the name of Ramanujacharya. Instead of the name of Ramanujacharya, he said our elders organised the rituals in the temple...
@SreeCharan Yeah, that does list a lot of Venkateshwara temples. I don't know whether that's just because the particular temples Wikipedia is listing is dominated by Venkateshwara temples, or whether Vaikhanasas really serve more in Venkateshwara temples than in other Vishnu temples. Maybe a lot of those Venkateshwara temples are TTD temples.
As I discuss in this answer, one of the early movements that was important in the development of Vaishnavism was the ancient Pancharatra movement, whose sacred texts consisted of detailed procedures to worship the sage Narayana, an ancient incarnation of Vishnu. Since the Pancharatra texts origin...
@SreeCharan Like I often search Twitter for advanced topics in Hinduism, like "Pancharatra" or "brahma sutras", and then if I find someone discussing those things I may invite them to the site.
@SreeCharan I think our site also has a Twitter account.
@SreeCharan Well, lots of people I told the site about on Twitter expressed interest in participating in it. I'm no sure which ones if any actually joined the site.
@SreeCharan I even invited some famous people, like Rajiv Malhotra and Devdutt Pattanaik. Both of them said they were interested in participating, but neither of them have joined the site yet.