« first day (322 days earlier)      last day (2242 days later) » 
04:00 - 18:0018:00 - 21:0021:00 - 23:00

Rickross
Rickross
6:08 PM
@RakeshJoshi Not something that i can answer with any amount of conviction..Mahanirvana Tantram says that its the best among all agamas..Just like Ganga is among all rivers so is MT among all Agamas(it says something like this)..In that text Sri Aadya says how Sadashiva created Agamas and Nigamas for the liberation of Kali Yuga people..So,this clearly indicates the special importance of agamas in Kali
@Rakesh Joshi but this also does not explicitly rule out the possibility of Agamas existing in previous Yugas or someone or some gruops even practicing them in small numbers..
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@Rickross sri kula and kali kula was there since the time immemorial
 
Rickross
Rickross
@RakeshJoshi Yes since Satya Yuga
@RakeshJoshi I think Hayagriva gave SriVidya to Agastya in Krita?
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
if agamas are to beleived then there were multiple types of sri vidyas follwoed by celestial beings like chandra, manu etc
it even predates that era similar geometric shapes were found in inscriptions of indus valley etc
agastya , lopamudra, durvasa etc lived in satyuga.
 
Rickross
Rickross
@RakeshJoshi Yes..In Kali how was Sri Vidya propogated?
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
anyway this is different subject related to different chat room not vedanta :D
in kali mainly datta sampradaya
sri nagar was once a headquarter of sri vidya too..
@Rickross
 
Rickross
Rickross
6:16 PM
@RakeshJoshi Ok..What is Vedanta?the Darshana or Upanishads?
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@Rickross allah knows the best :P
 
Rickross
Rickross
@RakeshJoshi Ok..
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
but i see that south indians are obsessed with vedas that they want to relate everything with vedas ...
even agama
 
Rickross
Rickross
@RakeshJoshi Ok..
@RakeshJoshi I am not sure if i can say that..They are ritualistic a bit more may be..They adhere to both Sruti and Smriti
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@Rickross in this room i had mentioened that i do not beleieve that there is something like veda-aadi or veda- anta etc...
 
Rickross
Rickross
6:19 PM
@RakeshJoshi Vedanta usually refers to Upanishads but thrs also philosophy by that name
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@Rickross ritualism in tantra is nothing less than vedas !!

in fact it surpasses vedic rituals ...

i have seen/ heard people performing navavarana pooja on sri chakras for 10- 15 hrs !!!
@Rickross they begin to say vedanta is upanishad... later they introduce Vedanta sutra (400 AD origin) and then BG .. and so on... then prakarana granthas.
Tantric deeksha samskara is no shorter than vedic thread samskara.
 
Rickross
Rickross
@RakeshJoshi Yes thats true..although Agamas are meant for Kali..the same texts also mention that it will be difficult for kali yuga people to perform the Kriyas(mentioned therein) properly because they r too elaborate..
@RakeshJoshi Ok..i don't like the Darshanas..I consider them Pasu Shastras..the Shastras that binds..:D
@RakeshJoshi Yes..
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
i think its later day people who did such differences like kali yuga etc ..

in all yugas it will work . provided the doer is genuine and done in right way.

kanchi mutt pontiff has clearly said that yajnas are not prohibited in kali yuga but its a misconception.
as per one's pravritti one chooses the path .
 
Rickross
Rickross
@RakeshJoshi Yes thats exactly y there r so many paths..
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
so its not right to say that XYZ work only in some yuga
but its true vedic rituals are extremely tough to follow in todays time ..
maintaining shrauta agni needs independant house .. with good ventilation
 
Rickross
Rickross
6:27 PM
@RakeshJoshi I don't think Veda mantras work in this age...We can see them not working too..Because of mixture of castes..absence of Samskaras..Cow slaughters everywhere..
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
vyasa himself varna sankara no?
 
Seeker
Seeker
Yes @Rickross right. Vedas work only in perfection.
 
Rickross
Rickross
@RakeshJoshi Matsyagandha and Parashara ;P
Going to sleep :D
Bye to Rakesh and Seeker :)
 
Seeker
Seeker
Bye Rickross. :)
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
GN
@Rickross i had posted earlier in detail about varna and veda. you can see when free
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
6:36 PM
@TheDestroyer You can also check the fact that sanskrit is precise and doesn't allow for ambiguities.
@Rickross so anything not sruti is laughable? You are confusing regarding the hierarchy of Scriputural authority.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban what do you mean by Ambiguity?
Sanskrit is not ambiguous but limited consciousness of our minds make it ambiguous.
More precisely, Veda bhasha.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer exactly
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban that's what i'm saying. :)
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer So you agree that saying something is to be laughed at because of lack of evidence for the school/philosophy you favour is something that is not warranted and potentially offensive?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban that's why i say philosphies are like fingers which point towards Moon (Supreme Brahman). If fingers fight among themselves, we miss moon.
Credits: tezz.
@anuvaramban I said it may not be respectful but not fanaticism.
You should call me fanatic, if i say only my philosophy is correct.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
6:46 PM
@TheDestroyer but i wasn't calling you one, i was calling the person who made the callous statement that they were engaging in fanatic tendency (wasn't even calling them fanatic)
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban May be he got that feeling by acts of fellow users but that is his personal opinion.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer so why are you calling me out only?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban when? what?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer should you have not included us both in this comment?
@TheDestroyer why is his disrepect not a belief is but my feeling offended a consequence of my belief?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban I know about Rickross. He believes in that.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
6:51 PM
@TheDestroyer so you are fine engaging the other side given you admittedly know nought about their belief but know the offender's belief and therefore request the other party to be polite?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban Rickross said many times Parameswara created many philosophies to confuse people. Previously he said he doesn't stick to any philosophy.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer so insulting people is fine as long as you know the offender's belief?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban Nothing about whose belief?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer in this case the other party is me
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban be clear. i'm not able to get your points. See my first message. I said laughing is not fanaticism. but i didn't explicitly support his statement. And then to Yogi i said my opinion about Vedic Sakha.
I just made it clear that laughing is not fanaticism but it is also not respecful.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
6:56 PM
@TheDestroyer In way that offender might understand and possibly you as well - I think Saiva agamas are laughable because they don't even claim to derive from Vedic Sakha.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban If i want to get into words like that, i can use many words. but i don't get anything doing that. There's no use in hating anything or laughing at anything. We must get good content from all Scriptures. Hinduism should teach love not hatred.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Agreed, so ask the first offender to apologise and i will be happy to recant my statement as well, upon proof that my claim is wrong.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban You ask him. Why should i ask?
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@TheDestroyer who is the offender nanna
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer you saw fit to act as his attorney by siding with his claim i find that assistance to falsehood/offense
@RakeshJoshi Rickross is.
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
7:01 PM
take it lightly .. bava ...
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@RakeshJoshi fine then help me by getting him to apologise!
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban You should be clear. I didn't side anyone. You might be thinking i supported him as i spoke similar to him.
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
before rickroos someone called me and rickroos fanatic... :P
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer no you insisted that he didn't offend even after my first comment informed you that he did.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban Don't link fanatic with offending. Both are different.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
7:04 PM
@TheDestroyer i said he exhibited a fanatic emotion, a tendency didn't say he is fanatic
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer "We must get good content from all Scriptures. Hinduism should teach love not hatred." You offend Vedanta Deshikacharya you offend all of the Vaishnavism by offending Pancharatra texts @Rickross Offended Bhagwad Ramanujacharya along with you hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/8501/…
and you expect us to believe that you are neutral angels @TheDestroyer
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban I get offended everytime when someone demeans Rudra or Shiva by calling him JIVA. Then will vaishnava user say sorry to me?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer I'm okay if you are willing to apologise on his behalf since you are so keen on defending him unjustly
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@ChinmayaB when ramanija and his successors offended sankara then who will apologize on their behalf ?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Have you done PurvaPaksha?
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
7:05 PM
@RakeshJoshi You did it yourself first apologize for that
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer as far as what he laughed at is concerned, i am certainly qualified to comment.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB See rejecting Acharya views is not offending. Don't make to speak more on this. it's really not good.
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@ChinmayaB first ask yamunacharya, ramanuja , desikan etc to apologize for talking bad of sankara in their books ..
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB I'm trying to stay neutral as far as possible.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer You hurt sentiments of entire community, and then you want me to say that don't call Rudra a jiva when he is clearly born according to Shathpatha Bramhana
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
7:07 PM
@ChinmayaB Rejecting your phiosphy is not offending.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer My demand is simple, as a moderator you are behaving more like an attorney to one party - let's assume that is due to your limited knowledge or pure instinct, i want an apology from offender - i think this conclusion is right. If you want to support him under the guise of being neutral, pretty soon you will have to apologise as well. Cut your losses for now and ask him to apologise since you have taken it on yourself to represent him as his mouthpiece.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer You have offended Panchartra by saying that is not vedic system. When Sage narayana did this
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Come one. Be realistic. I didn't agree with vedanta Desikan . How is that offending?
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@ChinmayaB do you know that krishna chaitanya physically assaulted an advaitin after listening brahmasutra bhashya?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@RakeshJoshi this is classic false equivalency! that is an individual's fault, what rickross did is also an individual fault, civilised discussion requires he apologise!
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
7:10 PM
@anuvaramban I cleared i didn't side anyone. If i was not neutral, i would immediately delete raskesh Joshi's answer on Sri Rudram. (I asked Keshav about it and came to know it was Acharyas interpretation).
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@RakeshJoshi I don't know or care about ISKON and their people
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Cherry Picking at it's best. See other verses which say Rudra gave birth to Brahma.
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
I will criticize any acharya or sect which i feel wrong. its my right.

ifsomeone want they can counter it with logic or refereneces.

but every saint or acharya is someones guru .. we cant help it.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Any shruti
?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer do you agree then that rickross is being insulting?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
7:12 PM
@anuvaramban You ask Rickross. If that insults you, then we should dig many messages.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@RakeshJoshi You don't know your limits that's what is your problem I don't disrespect any adviata Acharya publicly I don't know my guru's did or not but I don't because I know that adi shankracharya did a great job saving us from Athieism
Atheism
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Yes many. Let me give. many tezz answers say.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Okay
Give me a
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@ChinmayaB YOU DID NOT BUT YOUR GURUS DID .. ITS AVAILABLE IN WRITING. !!
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@RakeshJoshi ASK THEN WHY ARE YOU YELLING AT ME THIS IS CALLED FANATICSM
fanaticism
THEM*
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
7:14 PM
@ChinmayaB You can see Sri Rudram Anuvaka 5 where Rudra is mentioned as Meedustama.
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
getting the taste of your own medicine
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@RakeshJoshi EVEN YOUR SHAKTA GURUS DID
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
Meedustama is Brahma.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer then please stay out of the discussions if you don't follow what is happening? Thanks!
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban It should be applied to all messages. Why only one message of Rickross?
@ChinmayaB It says Girisha, Shipivista and Meedustama. Rudra, Vishnu and Brahma. Trimurthi is Rudra.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
7:17 PM
@TheDestroyer feel free to quote and demand an apology from concerned party, i'm not here to monger justice for everyone's behalf - they can speak for themselves like i did just now but frankly if mod bias like this is there, they would be discouraged only!
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban First let's define what is offending from all parties and then conclude it.
If Rickross says he got offended, what should i do?
This is detrimental to site if sectarianism takes this site.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer since you have done nothing for this, i would say immediate past experience dictates you don't get involved and let him speak for himself
@TheDestroyer There's no objective criterion for these things
@TheDestroyer agreed so please ask them to remove all hateful comments from SriVaishnava questions.
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@anuvaramban which thread
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban See other side. there are many hate comments about Shiva.
Even answers which demean Shiva.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Are they opinions or do they have scriptural backing?
0
A: Why did Sri Ramanuja refuse to hail Shiva? What was the need to prove that Vishnu is the one true God?

RickrossThe basic six daily duties of a Brahmin are described in many Shastras and i quote from the Parashara Smriti here: Sandhyam Snanam Japo Homo Devata Atithi Pujanam Atithyam VaiswaDevam Cha Shat Karmani Dine Dine . Ablution and prayer, inaudible recitation (of sacred words), burnt- offer...

 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
7:22 PM
@anuvaramban He quotes scriptures.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Right now, my issue is with one specific person who made illinformed comment, why are you intent on generalising these things?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
See he even supported ramanujacharya in his answer about Chola King act.
@anuvaramban I already made my stand. You can ask him directly for apology.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer REad this
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer read comments completely
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
Narayanat Rudraojayate
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
7:25 PM
@anuvaramban Ill informed is not actually correct. he just doesn't agree with that. As your Dharma, you agree with it.
@anuvaramban which comment?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Then stop engaging me about this! If you truly believe he should deal, i have asked him to apologise. I will ask again in front of you @Rickross You owe an apology for speaking about things detrimentally when you don't have entire purvapaksha. Please apologise immediately for laughter comment. Thanks!
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Rickross makes comments like this without knowing for sure whether he forced it or not
But having said that,he himself might have committed the same offence of forcing a deity upon his brother when the later converted to Shaivaism.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Callous deriding is what he engaged in. It was not a matter of agreement it was a matter of offense via double standards for his beliefs as opposed to others on this forum
@TheDestroyer you wanna read it in context, then read all comments
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer You should see this as well v
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@ChinmayaB link is broken
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
7:29 PM
@anuvaramban only high rep users can open it :P
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@ChinmayaB :P Ok boss.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Well, that question was deleted. he mentioned sectarian people. Why did you leave Shaivite king? He also included king.
@ChinmayaB As words of Rickross hurts you, every time a Sri Vaishnava calls Shiva as jiva. It hurts many people here.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Because I don't care about Choza King he deserves criticism no acharyas , I repeat no acharyas hurt each other even if they were totally in disagreement with each other. Choza king plucked out eyes of one of the Sri vaishnava acharyas just because he defeated his shaivite minister
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB How correct is for Sri Ramanujacharya to convert Shiva temples to Vishnu temples?
@ChinmayaB See my comment. I mentioned book in it.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Proof aplease
Which comment?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
7:34 PM
See first comment on rickross answer.
@ChinmayaB Everyone has their cons. Why only pointing positives?
This book. You can read it.
Author mentions it.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Yeah I saw it, but only one book mentions there are no "Substantial proofs" is what you've said
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB haha. How many books you want?
@ChinmayaB Our history is like that. Even Shaivites converted many Vishnu temples to Shiva temples.
Hindus converted Buddhist temples to Hindu temples.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer I don't want million proofs, but If he is talking about Tirumala Tirupati temple then Bhagwad Ramanujacharya converted it by debate not by force
he killed no one there is no bloodshed involved in this @TheDestroyer
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Without knowing how can you cay by debate not by force?
@ChinmayaB There are other accounts which reject Chola King stories? Whom do you believe?
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer No debate is done by Nyaya shastra methods where two equally learned people show their sides
@TheDestroyer The accounts are recorded in many Vaishnava Kings records.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
7:41 PM
@ChinmayaB Others too have their arguments.
@ChinmayaB I suggest you to see Sri Chinna jeeyar Swami interview where he says one can praise his own God without demeaning other Gods.
@ChinmayaB Who said Krishna Deva raya is Vaishnava?
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer That doesn't mean you can say anything to my acharya
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB what?
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer ?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB what did i say to your acharya?
 
Rakesh Joshi
Rakesh Joshi
@TheDestroyer is it true that ramanuja tried convert tirupati temple procedure from vaikhanasa to pancharara by doing pancha samskara? i doubt that its not true
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
7:45 PM
@TheDestroyer Supporting Torturer choza king is disrespect for the sacrifice of my acharyas
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@RakeshJoshi I don't know about Tirumala Temple.
@ChinmayaB That will be condemned by anyone if it is true. No one should pluck eyes. How can one worship Shiva by hating Vishnu?
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer That's what that choza king did and you are glorifying him how could you support such fanatics?
@TheDestroyer Krishnadevaraya was formally a Sri Viashnava
Vaishnava
He was initiated by Vyasatirtha en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyasatirtha
Krishnadevaraya
Krishnadevaraya (IAST Kแน›แนฃแน‡a Deva Rฤya) was the emperor of the Vijayanagara Empire from 1509 to 1530. He was the third ruler of the Tuluva Dynasty. Presiding over the empire at its zenith, he is regarded as an icon by many Indians. Krishna Deva Raya earned the titles Kannada Rajya Rama Ramana (lit, "Lord of the Kannada empire"), Andhra Bhoja and Mooru Rayara Ganda (lit, "King of three Kings"). He became the dominant ruler of the peninsula of India by defeating the Sultans of Bijapur, Golconda, the Bahmani Sultanate and the Raja of Odisha. The great south Indian mathematician Nilakantha Somayaji...
@TheDestroyer Oh sorry I mean madhava sampradaya
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB You should read my points carefully. I never support any fanatics.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Very first comment on Rickross's answer is in support of Choza king
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Oh please, you just blindly suppoerted Rickross - how is that not fanaticism in itself?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
7:50 PM
@ChinmayaB Honestly, if such a cleaning has to performed, there are many things to perform.
I don't know to which extent it goes.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Then clean it, you are a mod
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban Show me comment where i supported Rickross.
@ChinmayaB You mean my comment?
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer YEah
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
This line, without thought , is a direct affirmation of rickross claim - the kicker being you voluntarily made this statement not on being called out! " @anuvaramban Well, then citing without evidence they belong to Vedic Sakha is also fanaticism."
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB I spoke the truth and it hurts you. you should think broadly. I cited a book.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
7:54 PM
@TheDestroyer @anuvaramban Well, then citing without evidence they belong to Vedic Sakha is also fanaticism.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer It takes more than a book to support such fanaticism.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
This is a direct support of his purport without backing and you chose to insert yourself in this way without being invoked as well!
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban I was talking about people not about Rickross.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
What are you saying bro?
@TheDestroyer ^^
if this keeps up you will also need to apologise
start being neutral, then you can moderate discussion in chat - that's my 2 cents
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban to whom i should apologize, your manomaya Kosha or Atma?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
7:57 PM
@TheDestroyer due to my limited understanding i will accept just the words, "@anuvaramban i'm sorry for taking sides without understanding what's going on"
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban about people who claimed Pancharatra Agamas belonged to Vedic Shakhas.
but see bfore message to understand context.
If.. else statement.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Programmer "If..else statement">
?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Android App Developer.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Great! :D
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Not my problem, i didn't force anyone else to believe it or offend using this belief as of yet.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
8:00 PM
@ChinmayaB Thanks!
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer also how does it offend you when people say it belongs to Vedic Shakhas, is it because Saiva agamas don't make that claim so no one should. is that what you find offensive?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban I already said my stand clear. Rickross laughing is not respectful. But you can't call it fanaticism.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer I agree, what you are doing now is a clear example that his offense is of a minor nature.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Why don't you join this ?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban See i was trying only to say what fanaticism is.
 
Seeker
Seeker
8:03 PM
Good night all.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@Seeker GN
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB That is not for programming. But i do use Custom ROMS.
Lineage OS 14.1 on my old Moto G1
@anuvaramban btw, what about this comment of you?
1 hour ago, by anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer In way that offender might understand and possibly you as well - I think Saiva agamas are laughable because they don't even claim to derive from Vedic Sakha.
But i don't ask any apologies.
I don't give importance to Manomaya Kosha. :)
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer It was in the context of making you realise that he was being ignorant and offensive. If the sarcastic device is depleted of its context then i can't be held responsible - you know what you are doing!
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Are you a freelancer?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer I had to sensitise you thru a sarcastic rejoinder to his blantantly offensive statement - that is the extent of your neutrality
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
8:08 PM
@anuvaramban I can't speak of his true intentions. you can ask him directly.
@ChinmayaB No. Just Android App Developer and learning Swift. But i want to write Civils but i lost interest in material world. Not sure what to do next. May go to Himalayas.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer I did, he is yet to respond but in the meanwhile you have been slowly shedding your semblance of neutrality to support him. what is your agenda here? i agree it is not enough to conclude he is a fanatic but you can't deny it is not coming from fanatic tendency as well.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer @anuvaramban Interested in sleeping or atleast calming down your manaomaya kosha as destroyer said. We should keep a moderator for debates if mods are engaged.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@ChinmayaB @TheDestroyer he should recuse himself off the discussion right now
he meaning the mod at hand - @TheDestroyer
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban You just misinterpreted my statements. I just wanted to define what is offensive.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer If you are a Kshatriya Civils will suit you.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
8:12 PM
You should be able to say if Rickross ask what is offensive and he may provide some past incidents.
@ChinmayaB I'm kshatriya by birth. But after joining this site, i lost interest in all these. After all, everything is maya.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer "lost interest in material world..." (my advice take it or leave it read) BG chapter 3 with any bhaysa you will understand importance of doing karma for benefit of society.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer This comment is an illustration of your hypocracy!
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB I know. I have Spiritual Goals (Never say your spiritual Goals to anyone). :P
@anuvaramban I said he believes in Ekam Sat Vipra Bahuda vadanti
How it make me hypocritic?
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer How can maya disturb your spiritual goals ? :D
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Obviously. It can. These discussion are disturbing. But i used to say to myself this is not real. Don't give much importance to them.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
8:18 PM
@TheDestroyer you claim to be neutral but don't see his offense because in reality it is hard to be neutral - so the claim of neutrality is what is deceptive.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Outside, many material things are bothering.
@anuvaramban I said it is not respectful. Do you argue for sake of arguing?
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer But since you are bramhan by yourself you should be able to counter that maya
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Brahman is only after realization. Knowing concept doesn't make you Brahman.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Then what makes you Bramhan
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Oh please, i was talking to rickross when you inserted yourself needlessly
on the claim of being neutral arbiter i might add
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
8:21 PM
@ChinmayaB Realization. Many paths are there. But true nature is Sat Chid Ananda. Only after realization you know your true nature. But this is Advaita. But i hardly stick to any philosophy.
Advaita is close to my view now.
But i wait for my Guru. I hope my Guru is Dakshinamurthy.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Okay you mean shiva in tezz's profile pic?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban You mentioned my name first. See chat.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Yes. Jnana Aspect of Lord. btw, as words can't express truth, he expresses it by Mouna.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer ^^
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
8:23 PM
4 hours ago, by anuvaramban
@Rickross @TheDestroyer Is not the statement "now this is laughable" rooted in fanaticism?
This is your 1st comment.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer ^^
 
Tezz
Tezz
@all Main site isn't opening for maintenance purpose... is it happening to all?..
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB I believe Truth is beyond all these philosophies. We must expand our consciousness.
@anuvaramban and i was explaining you how this is not fanaticism.
Ok Guys. Bye. Sleeping.
@Tezz Yes. Not opening.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
"We apologize for any inconvenience, but an unexpected error occurred while you were browsing our site. Itโ€™s not you, itโ€™s us. This is our fault. Detailed information about this error has automatically been recorded and we have been notified." @Tezz
@TheDestroyer GN
@TheDestroyer Leave maya :D
 
Tezz
Tezz
Oh... when will it open?..
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
8:26 PM
@Tezz Are you not sleeping?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
5 hours ago, by anuvaramban
@Rickross Do you not differentiate between Shruti and Smriti as well? I'm curious to know
 
Tezz
Tezz
@TheDestroyer haha..
I just woke up..😀😀
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer this is my first comment
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Only after realization. But it happens slowly.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
5 hours ago, by anuvaramban
@Rickross Do you not differentiate between Shruti and Smriti as well? I'm curious to know
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
8:27 PM
@TheDestroyer Planning Bramhavidya?
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban I mean which mentioned me.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
because that will for sure make you attain Bramhan
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Mix of all Yogas. karma, Bhakti,. Jnana. Lol.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer how do you call fanatic behaviour by another name>
?
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@TheDestroyer Bhakti yoga is Karma + Jnana
 
Tezz
Tezz
8:28 PM
Oh now... Main site also works...
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
i will accept that it is merely disrespectful if you agree that rickross has to apologise @TheDestroyer @Rickross
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban See. fanaticism is who believes his own philosophy is correct. But criticizing a philosophy doesn't make him fanatic.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer i will accept that it is merely disrespectful if you agree that rickross has to apologise @TheDestroyer @Rickross
@TheDestroyer fanaticism is inability to change belief based on new evidence.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban Why my views for you? I already made my stand clear. Ask him.
@anuvaramban which dictionary?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer because your view that it is not fanaticism is somehow important to me, that i have to agree and yet you don't care that i can have a view that is different than you!
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
8:32 PM
@anuvaramban that is conservatism.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer fyi i'm being sarcastic with first part of the sentence since that is also something that needs explicit statement now
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban I can understand by word "merely"
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer you clearly don't understand sarcasm or satire.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban which Sarcasm?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
"@TheDestroyer i will accept that it is merely disrespectful if you agree that rickross has to apologise @TheDestroyer @Rickross"
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
8:36 PM
2 mins ago, by The Destroyer
@anuvaramban I can understand by word "merely"
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
obviously the mere is sarcasm meant to show the ridiculousness of the asymmetry of expectations you are peddling
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
what do you think it says?
@anuvaramban btw, i don't give importance to manomaya Kosha. Let people hurt it. And karma takes care of it.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer Good to know, if the need arises i will be sure to insult you also :P
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban Shall i say you one thing. people who are deeply involved in Maya tend to think like that. I got offended by it. I got offended by this. One must see Sanskrit meaning of "Man"
Man means to think, to consider. Not sure.
Yet, they say i got offended by this.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer stop peddling your maya to me. I have done enough research to know the parroting preachers when i see one.
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
8:41 PM
@TheDestroyer @anuvaramban Sleep and let others sleep :D (Chinmaya upadesha 1.1.1....)
 
Tezz
Tezz
@ChinmayaB haha lol๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban Your usage of words show your respect. You thought i was trying to impose Advaita on you.
Please see meaning of Man or เคฎเคจ
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer i was being blunt, you were being passive-aggressive. Let's call a dime a dime.
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@anuvaramban manomaya Kosha.
 
Tezz
Tezz
@ChinmayaB btw what is in 1.1.2
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
8:43 PM
@Tezz 1.1.1..... is an infinite series so there is no scope for 2 rofl :D
2
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB Upanishads of Pure thought.
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer I can say the same.
@ChinmayaB ROFLMAO
 
Tezz
Tezz
@ChinmayaB haha๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@Tezz atleast someone light it up by a star
@anuvaramban ^^^
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@ChinmayaB ok. i did.
 
Tezz
Tezz
8:45 PM
@ChinmayaB someone light which thing..?
Oh ok I now understand...
I was thinking of actual Sky Stars... haha...
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@Tezz Yup
@Tezz ROFL after waking up at 1Am you will see nakshtras not Prachi Sandhya :D
 
Tezz
Tezz
@ChinmayaB I also lighted it up....
@ChinmayaB haha... I'm looking at the stars from Window...
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@Tezz what made you wake up?
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
@TheDestroyer @ChinmayaB @Tezz GN! we can continue this tomorrow @TheDestroyer
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@Tezz @TheDestroyer Thanks! (Bramhan under construction don't be )
@anuvaramban KO! :D
 
anuvaramban
anuvaramban
8:48 PM
@ChinmayaB My fatality only works if i'm sleeping :P
 
Tezz
Tezz
@TheDestroyer I think I was destined to star up that message... may be that made me wake up... haha...
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@Tezz You have no free will.
haha.
 
Tezz
Tezz
@TheDestroyer actual reason I don't know... I think it's because I slept yesterday in day time...so that might have caused...
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@Tezz I think i should sleep.It's laready 2:20 AM.
 
Tezz
Tezz
@ChinmayaB Brahman under construction... lol...๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€
@TheDestroyer here it's 2:35 am.. I'm 15 minutes faster than you๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
8:50 PM
@Tezz Honestly get a life dude waking up at 1am and only thing you saw was Hinduism SE :D Btw I appretiate your light hearted nature
@Tezz that too tezz anu vaada yoga namak 10 mar adhayaya
 
Tezz
Tezz
@TheDestroyer Ok sleep good night... I think I'll also sleep after sometimes.... ๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€
@ChinmayaB Oh... you read my Anu aadhara Upanishad?..
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@Tezz Noway! I am talking about @anuvaramban
 
Tezz
Tezz
@ChinmayaB that may not be only thing... I might be using multiple tags in browsers... ๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€ haha
@ChinmayaB btw why aren't you sleeping?..
 
The Destroyer
The Destroyer
@Tezz time travel. ๐Ÿ˜€
 
Tezz
Tezz
Oh sorry tabs... I wrote tags...
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
8:54 PM
@Tezz I was planning to sleep early today but this vaada adhyaya was going on and I participated in it.
 
Tezz
Tezz
@TheDestroyer haha... I think it's not time travel... it's travel time.. haha๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€..
@ChinmayaB haha... Vaada Adhyaya...
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@Tezz Clearly its not samvaada :D
 
Tezz
Tezz
@ChinmayaB haha... Clearly it's not Samaveda... ๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
@Tezz No its still closer to Astrojyoti Samaveda parayanam.
 
Tezz
Tezz
@ChinmayaB how is Astrojyotis Samaveda?... I haven't listened... ?..
 
Chinmaya B
Chinmaya B
8:59 PM
@Tezz On a serious note if you planning to be awake you can meditate (its really awesome experience to meditate in moonlight(pavmana)).
@Tezz Its not good at all totally displeasing
 
04:00 - 18:0018:00 - 21:0021:00 - 23:00

« first day (322 days earlier)      last day (2242 days later) »