« first day (305 days earlier)      last day (2259 days later) » 

6:00 PM
Yes @Tezz Trika system explain that one very beautifully.
 
@TheDestroyer he is wise enough to understand which vedantins say :)
 
@RakeshJoshi Sree Charan follows Visistaadvaita.
 
@RakeshJoshi Vedantins means only advaitans say that. Actually I don't know about vyavaharika and paramatmika level. I am trying to understand about it.
 
It is like Zooming in ourselves, Zoom out is liberation.
 
@SreeCharan excellent answer :)
 
6:01 PM
@RakeshJoshi You don't need to test anyone here.
:)
 
@Seeker haha... zooming in ourselves... nice..
 
@Tezz 😀😀
 
The Panchasamskara ritual is following Vishishtadvaita.
 
@TheDestroyer i m not testing but i feel that you are of opinion that either me or him are not clear that which vedantin accept ishwara as non real at absolute level
 
@TheDestroyer 😀
 
6:02 PM
2 mins ago, by Rakesh Joshi
@TheDestroyer he is wise enough to understand which vedantins say :)
@RakeshJoshi then why did you say this?
 
i asked his opinion what he think about this.
 
How it is not test?
 
let him speak na we dont need any proxy here. if he feels bad he will say it
 
@Seeker by the way you may be already aware Brahma Sutras explain creation of world as just being Leela of Lord as I discuss here:
 
i have not made testing remarks on anyone here.

but in fact i have been time and again asked about what is my position in shastra . where i have learned etc etc. though i dont mind it
 
6:05 PM
12
A: What exactly is a leela (लीला)? Is there a scriptural definition of leela (लीला)?

TezzFirst of all, a question arises: How or why is the name or concept of Leela relevant in Hinduism? It's because Brahman is defined as fully omniscient and omnipotent by many Vedic verses. Brahman is defined as being beyond mind and hence to be understood by Neti Neti or Not-this Not-this. So for...

 
@Tezz nowadays "Leela of Lord* phrase seems a good excuse. 😂😯
 
@Seeker great one liner
 
Leela of Lord immediately suggests
There is a desire in Gid
God
Which contradicts very nature of God
 
Sanjay leela is not doing good either @Seeker :)
 
@Tezz Srimannarayan stopped Tirumangai alwar (last among 12 alwars) from being a robber. It is due to Alwar's devotion towards Lord.
 
6:09 PM
Only which is incomplete can have desires,
 
@Seeker haha yes... still every stories have their justifications from Karmic point of view...
 
@RakeshJoshi 😂😂😂Yes.
 
Sanjay leela aur Raam leela ka zamaana hai @Seeker
 
Question is very straight, thinking to ask on SE.
 
@Seeker It's not like that. We are thinking from our perspective. We always try to justify things from limited things we know. (to say we have limited consciousness). But Lord is beyond everything. See Tezz answer.
 
6:11 PM
@RakeshJoshi 😯😯😯 Pathetic.
 
@SreeCharan oh I don't know about Alwars... I just know there were 12 Alwars... and I think NathaMuni is one of them...
 
@Tezz I think that was directed to me. Nathamuni is not an alwar.
 
@RakeshJoshi what does "Zamaana" mean?
 
Yes, right @TheDestroyer. I don't know about Alwar sir @Tezz. 😯😐
 
@TheDestroyer Generation
 
6:13 PM
@SreeCharan ok.
 
@Tezz @TheDestroyer @SreeCharan contrary to puranas i do hold the view that creation is not same everytime ... i.e jagat is not repeated in a same way everytime.

like same mahabharat willl take place in all kalpa in a same way

because in world we see no repetitions as such

and gods ccreativity is unlimited.

no human is same as the other, no leaf is same as other and nothing in the world is exactly same as another.
 
Jan 30 at 6:49, by Sree Charan
@TheDestroyer bhootam- poodatthalwar, sarascha- pogai alwar mahadaahvaya- pey alwar; bhattanatha- periyalwar; sri- andal; bhaktisara- thirumazhishai alwar; kulasekhara- kulasekhara alwar ; Yogi Vaahaan- Tiru Pani alwar bhaktanghri renu- Tondaradippodi alwar; parakala- Tirumangai alwar; yatindra- Bhagawad Ramanujacharya; Mishran- Sri Madhura Kavi alwar; Srimath parankusha muni- Sri nammalwar. @ChinmayaB @SwiftPushkar 12 alwars
 
@Seeker Oh sorry I mistakenly mentioned you...
 
@SreeCharan ok :) that was i precisely asking , thanks
 
6:13 PM
Yeah. ;)
 
@Tezz ^^
 
@RakeshJoshi Noone holds creation is same everytime... there are variants...
 
then how come one character comes in every kalpa ?
 
@SreeCharan I find very difficult to pronounce their names...
@SreeCharan Is Ramanujacharya also considered Alwar?...
 
no ramanuja is not alwar
 
6:16 PM
@RakeshJoshi those character come which are mentioned in Vedas... because Vedas speak the eternal truths...
 
@SwiftPushkar Why Chinni (Chota) Krishna is not active? Krishna should be most active member here. I think as Krishna was born recently (you changed pic recently) , he is calm.
 
@Tezz @SwiftPushkar Ramanujacharya is not an alwar. But he is mentioned in the verse. Because it is written by his shishya.In that verse he says Kuresha (shishya of Ramanujacharya) says he would always remember them
 
@Tezz is mbh repeated in all kalpas ? is puranas 18 in all kalpas ?
 
@RakeshJoshi see my question and answer here for how variants take place... just an example:
5
Q: Did the destruction of Daksha's sacrifice also happen in present Vaivasvata Manvantara?

TezzIt is a well-known event that Mahadeva destroys the sacrifice of Daksha when Devi Sati destroys herself in the sacrifice. But it happened in the Pitri Kalpa. Destruction of Yajna of Daksha is the symbolism of the fact that Devas due to their arrogancy are stupefied to such level that they procee...

 
@TheDestroyer haha bro , he is very much much active like past :)
 
6:18 PM
@RakeshJoshi Puranas may not be 18 in every creation because there is not a Vedic statement that there are 18 Puranas...
 
@Tezz i feel your answer says that there will be only slight difference isnt it ?
 
@RakeshJoshi No,Mahabharata also doesn't repeat in every Kalpas...
 
@RakeshJoshi Events mentioned in Vedas happen in all kalpas. We can consider Vedas as Classes and Puranas as instances or Objects.
 
@RakeshJoshi yes...
 
@Tezz vedas dont talk of vyasa and suka deva etc but they are repeated right ?
 
6:20 PM
@RakeshJoshi Different Jeevas come to occupy the same position with same names mentioned by Vedas...
 
@RakeshJoshi Present Indra name is Purandara.
 
suka is a position ?@Tezz
 
@RakeshJoshi I think Vyasa is seer of some hymns of Vedas.. and Suka is mentioned in some Upanishads.. which maynot be authentic ... so not sure...
 
@RakeshJoshi Even Brahma is just position. Hanuman is said to be next Brahma, though i don't know Scriptural evidence.
 
in next manvantara there will be rama and krishna etc?
@Tezz vyasa is not a seer for ANY mantra as far as i know ... if you know please let us know
 
6:22 PM
Cosmic repeat telecast. 😂
 
@RakeshJoshi Ramayana took place in Padma kalpa also... it isn't necessary that it always take place...
 
i am of opinion that creation is different everytime . not slight difference but almost full difference .
 
@RakeshJoshi Yoga Vasistha mentions Kakabhusunda seeing Ramayana 11 times Mahabharata 12 times etc...
 
😵😵
 
yes sir i do not hold this view that is what i meant in my eariler statements @Tezz
 
6:24 PM
@RakeshJoshi will there be sun or moon in the next creation or not.. ?
 
talk about humans first na
 
@SreeCharan oh ok , but as he is considered as Acharya , he also is in the category of Sant संत , but of Arch kind , and Main etc..:)
 
@RakeshJoshi Do Vedas also change?
 
is there any statement in vedas which says that creation is same everytime ?
@TheDestroyer
 
@RakeshJoshi do you think there can be creation without moon.. ?
 
6:26 PM
@RakeshJoshi But there is a statement in Vedas which says Supreme Brahman refers Vedas to create Cosmos. It must be same creation by that statement.
 
assumption is not good . vedas never said world is dream yet people assumed it.
if vedas say that brahman creates same sort of world every time then we can analyse it
 
@RakeshJoshi what assumption?
 
11
A: Where does Rig Veda states about Cyclical Nature of Creation?

Tezz10.190 is the Hymn to the creation in Rig Veda. In it's third verse it states sun and moon were created like that of previous creation. सूरय्याचन्द्रमसौ धाता यथा पूर्वमकल्पयत् I दिवं च पृथ्वीं  च अंतरिक्षमथो स्वः   II  RigVeda 10.190.3  II "The Ordainer created the sun and moon like th...

 
@SwiftPushkar Ramanujacharya made Vaishnavism popular. He wrote bhashyas on Prastanatrayi and made Vaishnavism popular. Not that vaishnavism didn't exist before him but with other name.
 
brahman refers vedas to create cosmos ... but does it mention that same cosmos will exist al times
 
6:28 PM
@Tezz Nasadiya Hymn too says it.
 
what does it say sir ? @TheDestroyer nasadiya
 
Sir, Kalki Puran is written in past tense. Now I understand that Kalki has happened already via theory of repetitiveness.
 
@RakeshJoshi vedas are constant (as he refers them always), content is constant and as content is constant, it must be same creation. No assumption Sir!
 
@Seeker it amazes me ... these people have already come to know what is there going to happen in all the upcoming creations ... great astrologers also cannot know such things what holds in the mind of god
 
GN all.
 
6:30 PM
@Seeker there is also anothet possibility:
@sv. It is a common practice of describing a future event in past tense in our scripture... It is so because when sages want to know about future,... by samadhi they go to future and become third person omnipresent at that place and of that event... so for them it is already happened... so they describe by past tense like "said", "went", etc... — Tezz May 9 '16 at 2:13
 
@TheDestroyer what does nasadiya say i m waiting
 
@RakeshJoshi Do you have correct translation of Nasadiya Hymn?
 
@SreeCharan Yes , the vaishnavas previously , were known as Bhagvatas , The word Vaishnava is of recent origin i think , cause we wont find that word much in SB
 
u can say froim wiki also no prob ..
 
I read it in "Spirtual heritage of India" by Swami Prabavanada.
@RakeshJoshi
 
6:31 PM
@Tezz Oh time traveling possible according to Hinduism? @RakeshJoshi yes sir. Such predictions contradict the notion of free well.
Will*
 
@Seeker No free will.
 
@Tezz @TheDestroyer when there is no creation at all then nasadiya is useless for you because it talks of creation. hence its illusion
 
@Seeker
5
Q: Does Shiva or Vishnu or Trikaladarshi Yogi know our Aagami Karma or our free will?

The DestroyerAagami Karma is actions we do in this birth. This is generally said to be free will. See this question: Is our destiny predetermined? If yes, then why do our actions affect our karma?. Does Shiva or Vishnu or a Trikalagnani Yogi (who can know past, present, and future) know our Aagami Karma? Or ...

@RakeshJoshi You talk always without context.
 
Thanks @TheDestroyer.
 
@Seeker there is one interesting case of time dilation:
2
Q: How much earth year passes in 1 second of Brahmaloka?

TezzEvery religious book, Vedas and Purans , units of distances such as Yojana have been tried to be converted in English in modern age. In Such Situation How much is the 1 second of Brahmaloka on earth ? How much it be when applied to chaturyugas and manwantars ?

 
6:34 PM
@Seeker @TheDestroyer @Tezz

But, after all, who knows, and who can say
Whence it all came, and how creation happened?
the gods themselves are later than creation,
so who knows truly whence it has arisen?

Whence all creation had its origin,
he, whether he fashioned it or whether he did not,
he, who surveys it all from highest heaven,
he knows - or maybe even he does not know.[11]
 
@SreeCharan - i think , puranas called (Vaishnavism) as Bhagvat Dharma , here Dharma word is used as path , and not as separate religion as such. :)
 
no one knows what was before creation and what will be after creation but you people have already known about upcming creatons :)
 
@RakeshJoshi yes, you are joining world as Illusion here... and it is without context...
 
then accept that there is some creation as accepted by nasadiya which is against advaita
 
@RakeshJoshi We know before creation (now) but after creation no one knows what happened before except Brahman alone.
 
6:36 PM
@TheDestroyer but you already told which things are going to be repeated in upcoming creations like daksha yajna , ramayana etc
 
@RakeshJoshi Nasadiya Sukta is talking about How the Avyakta manifested as Vyakta jagat... it is not talking of present creation...
 
@Tezz which creation and which manvantara is it talking of then ?
 
@RakeshJoshi First tell me context of Nasadiya Hymn.
 
@RakeshJoshi Sir look at these both the latest threads. 😵
 
CONTEXT PLEASE>
 
6:37 PM
@TheDestroyer the context is creation as per rig veda
 
@RakeshJoshi Ramayana necessarily doesn't repeat..
However Destruction of Yajna repeats...
 
you said kak bhusundi already saw it 11 times ?
 
@RakeshJoshi I didn't understand context but i know now some events which happens in future but after creation i don't know past things till i read Vedas and Puaranas.
 
@RakeshJoshi more than 18000 kalpas has passed in this Brahmas life...
 
@TheDestroyer @Tezz world originates in a spontaneous manner out of swatantrya shakti
 
6:39 PM
Sir @Tezz Daksha, Jalandhar etc went to the Brahmalok. But lacs of years didn't pass when they returned.
 
these revelations would make you nominee for padma bhusan award
 
@RakeshJoshi At time of creation (freshly in that cycle), i don't know any past events and only Brahman knows them.
Now Ok?
 
@Seeker I think they went in BrahmaLoka present in Meru Parvat...
 
then you are saying all cosmos will be same .. ramayana will hapen . daksha will happen . moon will come
 
@TheDestroyer Answer implies indirectly that everything is fixed at the time of first karma ( creation).
 
6:40 PM
its like doubting on creative power of brahman \
 
@RakeshJoshi Ok... you may help to nominatem..
 
@Tezz if you take indian citizenship i will send a letter to president :)
 
@Tezz Mount Meru has different Brahmalok?
 
@Seeker No. There's no first life. cycle of creation, Preservation and Destruction is happening since eternity.
 
what will happen with us tomorrow we dont know how can we be sure about next creations
 
6:42 PM
@Seeker I think There is also a Brahmaloka in earthly dimensions ie. In Svetadwipa...
 
@TheDestroyer 'Since eternity' is hard to digest.
 
@RakeshJoshi Major events are already predestined. Don't you believe in Trikaladarshi Yogis?
 
@RakeshJoshi haha I won't take...
 
then tell me what is going to happen in upcomingyears @TheDestroyer as per any prophecy
 
@Seeker That's only way to make Law of Karma sensible and logical.
 
6:43 PM
@Tezz Why can't we witness then? Even where is Sumeru Parvat?
 
@Tezz where is that mount meru on eath ? this research is worth a noble prize
 
@RakeshJoshi
7
Q: What do we know about the future Mahayugas?

Keshav SrinivasanBackground: The four Yugas (Satya, Treta, Dwapara, and Kali) together make up one Mahayuga. 1000 Mahayugas make up one Kalpa, which is one day in the life of Brahma. After the Kalpa is over Brahma goes to sleep, and there's a Pralaya which destroys the three worlds, at the end of which Brahma ...

 
@TheDestroyer Yes. Some truths can be known by experiences only.
 
@Seeker Even Vedas say that.
 
@Seeker our eyes aren't worth seeing it...
 
6:45 PM
@TheDestroyer even though i practice astrology but i cannot predict as good as you guys .. kudos to you.

i will stick to nasadia and related hymms ... let the creation be mystery and unique
 
@Seeker I think it also comes in description by Sugriva in Ramayana to Vanaras...
 
@Seeker see whats app
 
@RakeshJoshi Yes, you may stick to it... but we believe many events are repeated... and Adi Shankara tells the same in Brahma Sutra Bhasya... Ramanujacharya also tells the same....
 
Yes. ✌✌👏 @Tezz @RakeshJoshi @TheDestroyer
 
more than acharyas i go with Rig veda.. you may choose other literature
 
6:47 PM
@RakeshJoshi You don't believe in Puranas. So, you don't believe these things.
 
In every age the Gayatri mantra is heard by a sage named Vishwamitra..
4
A: Sandhyavandanam before the age of Vishwamitra?

Keshav SrinivasanIn every age the Gayatri mantra is heard by a sage named Vishwamitra.. In this section of Ramanujacharya's Sri Bhashya, his commentary on the Brahma Sutras, Ramanujacharya explains how sages with the same names hear the same mantras after undergoing Tapasya: As words such as Indra and Vasisht...

 
i m quoting nasadiya which u dont want to accept
 
@RakeshJoshi In every Kalpa, Indra loves Ahalya.
 
and sankara rapes kashi queen @TheDestroyer
 
The idea is the Brahma uses the Vedas as a blueprint for the creation of the world. In particular Brahma, knowing that certain mantras have certain sages' names associated with them, proceeds to create sages with those very names.

By the way, the fact that the Vedas describe things that are common to every age is the reason why the Vedas seem to refer to specific stories despite being eternal; see my answer here.
@TheDestroyer it isn't necessary he rapes... "he loves..."
 
6:49 PM
@RakeshJoshi The story of Indra is mentioned in Vedas. I'm not quoting out of thin Air,.
@Tezz as mentioned in Vedas.
 
i m also quoting from story written by sankaras pupil not my imagination
 
@RakeshJoshi "and sankara rapes kashi queen " 😂😂😂
 
@RakeshJoshi Does it say in every kalpa?
 
@TheDestroyer if all great souls come then why not sankara ?
he doesnt go to raurava right for commiting adultery ?
 
@RakeshJoshi Shankara may come... but it isn't necessary that he necessarily comes...
 
6:51 PM
@RakeshJoshi You should talk with Pramana? Simple saying is of no use in debates or discussions.
@Tezz I think he will come in every kalpa. Kurma Purana mentions it which is not of this Kalpa.
 
that is why i ask you people not to mix vedas with oithers
 
Sir @Tezz but Repeated happenings theory seems very discouraging. And Nasadiya Sukta says none knows what happened before creation.
 
ok as per you is it okay to worship such gods like indra and other vedic god despite these bad deeds ?
 
@RakeshJoshi You don't believe Puranas. That's not our mistake. We prefer Vedas over other scriptures but also believe in Puranas.
 
@TheDestroyer yes, he may come repeatedly but it isn't necessary he necessarily comes...
 
6:53 PM
@RakeshJoshi Yes. We do yajnas for him.
 
u prefer vedas that is you have bveen saying since long but wehenver i quoted vedas against purana you didnt
 
@Seeker I think we should know proper context of verse to understand it better.
 
@TheDestroyer why shuld we do yajnas for a rapist and coward ?
 
@Seeker Nasadiya is talking how Sages do not know how Avyakta manifests as Jagat...
 
@RakeshJoshi Don't argue for sake of arguing. Vedas mention it. I'm not saying it.
 
6:55 PM
i m asking why should we worship such gods then ? does it make any sense ?
 
@RakeshJoshi You must find answer for it as you have studied vedas under Guru.
 
as far as i see majority
the moola samhitas i dont thinjk have such story
swetaswatara i think is a later day upanishad
its language is very different from ancient vedic
 
@RakeshJoshi Do you know all lost Samhitas?
 
i think shakhas have lost .
 
@TheDestroyer @Tezz Puranas making it difficult. Kashmiri Shaivism will ease this. I will post once I find on these matters.
 
6:58 PM
@RakeshJoshi A shakha has one samhita with it.
 
@RakeshJoshi RigVeda Moola Samhita also mentions Indras such story...
@Seeker Ok.. all the best...
 
but 1 samhita can be chanted in multiple shakhas with slight variation in mantra

example kanva and madhyandina shakha
@Tezz is this story about ahilya ?
 
@RakeshJoshi But that doesn't mean we lost all same info.
 
@RakeshJoshi Svetasvatara, Katha, Mundaka and Mandukya use similar language..
 
this is again assumption.
i m talking that the present vedic literature which has more of positive stories in constract to such negative stories
@Tezz if i may know what is your level of sanskrit study
 
7:00 PM
@RakeshJoshi btw you should know that Svetasvatara is a Mantra Upanishad not a Upanishad only...
 
@RakeshJoshi what assumption?
 
@TheDestroyer assumption that MANY LOST SHAKHAS WOULD HAVE MORE NGATIVE STORY ABOUT INDRA
 
@RakeshJoshi normal level...
 
Because there can't be a timer in Brahm so that it creates after such time of Brahma or dissolute after such fixed time. If Brahm is prone to time, it immediately reveals Brahm bounded & hence not God. I think we are missing something. Better to conclude after including other sources.
 
@Tezz that is why arya samaj gives importance to moola than upanishad
 
7:01 PM
@RakeshJoshi about Indra Indrani and Vrishakapi incident... I had already given you link...
 
so ahilya story is not mentioed right ?
 
Creation is immediate without any fixed time interval. Right?
 
what is the other story can you say ? is it about rape ?
 
@RakeshJoshi something like that...
 
in short can u say or post
 
7:03 PM
Good night all. :)
 
@Seeker the conclusion is not that Brahman is bound of time... the conclusion is Brahman is omnipotent so he does perfect creation every time...
@Seeker Good Night...
@RakeshJoshi read the 2nd spoiler in the answer here: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/3457/…
 
@RakeshJoshi when you say something, say with proper source which can be verified. Else , others may assume it as your assumption
 
What is the difference between Dwikpala and kshehtrapala ? @all
 
@TheDestroyer till now you have been saying as assumption

there is no word like mithya or dream world in vedas but you assumed it

next you assumed that world will be same

then you assumed that vyavaharika etc when they are not at all mentioned in vedas
dikpala are rulers of 10 directions
@SwiftPushkar
kshetrapala are local deities of that particular region .
 
@RakeshJoshi and btw also many mantras of Svetasvatara are from Veda Samhitas itself...
 
7:10 PM
@RakeshJoshi world as dream is based on interpretation. Like how others interpret, Shankara too did it.
 
some upaniushads comtain some mantra from moola veda but sometimes it has additioal too
@TheDestroyer but still no such word is directly given in vedas. but creation is repeated several times you should keep in mind
 
@RakeshJoshi yes... but Svetasvatara has many mantras from Veda Samhitas itself...
 
even kalli santarana might have
 
@RakeshJoshi ohh , ok and wht abt. the idols we find in front of Garbhagriha of temples ,generally on both sides , are they just guardian of temple ?
 
dwarapaalas @SwiftPushkar
 
7:11 PM
@RakeshJoshi we already discussed this. See our old discussion why you ask same questions?
 
im saying when something is not mentioned then its your assumption only

nasadiya says there was no creation then the creation manifested. means wrold exists but you reject it @TheDestroyer
 
@TheDestroyer btw are you reading only Isha Upanishad in this ShivaRatri?...
 
and what isthe way to know which interpretation is correct ? @TheDestroyer 10 acharyas have different interpretation
 
@Tezz yes.
@RakeshJoshi it's again difference in interpretation.
 
@RakeshJoshi just believe what you think as correct... and let others believe what they feel as correct... this is the way to know correct interpretation...
 
7:14 PM
@RakeshJoshi Yes , they are Dwarapalas , i know , but do the temples have , guardians in all four or more corners etc? like Dwikpala
 
@Tezz ohj
.i didn't see it properly
 
yes then how will you come to conclusion @TheDestroyer

you will post sankara bhashya i will post madhwa bhashya

both of them have quoted vedas to support their views

then how come there is any conclusion possible ?
@SwiftPushkar i think in shiva temples we have some deities on three sides of griha .. i dont know about 4 guardians
 
I will read Isha in Sanskrit and English. But i wakeup whole night. So, may read other Upanishads too. @Tezz
 
@RakeshJoshi Yes , right , i just read that in Shiva-purana , which i am reading right now , so asked.. :) thanks
 
@RakeshJoshi it isn't necessary that one will surely reach to the conclusion... these are paths only.. if God is moon then philosophies are just the fingers which point the moon... so it's better if one doesn't get stick in philosophy only...
 
7:17 PM
then there is no discussion is possible cos n number of achayras with diff opiniuons can be quoted
@SwiftPushkar shiva temples have unique construction
 
@RakeshJoshi all philosophies are true relatively. Such is complex nature of Maya.
 
in kerela the parikrama style is also diff
 
@SwiftPushkar which chapter?
 
@TheDestroyer oh ok... if possible read Svetasvatara Upanishad too...
 
all acharyas opinion is contradictiory .. all cant be true
 
7:19 PM
After Isha? @Tezz
 
all vedantin claim from vyasa lienage its not possible thaty vyasa taught different vedanta to all @TheDestroyer
 
@RakeshJoshi you don't say that if you follow or understood Advaita
 
say what ?
 
@TheDestroyer yes...
 
@RakeshJoshi that philosophies are contradictory
@Tezz ok.
 
7:21 PM
@TheDestroyer - vayaviya samhita -chapter 24 Ritualistic worship of shiva :)
 
@RakeshJoshi all can also be true as blind man and elephant...
 
@SwiftPushkar part 1 or part 2?
 
@TheDestroyer they have criticzed ad abused each other in worst possible way in their books and you say theydont think each other contradictory ?
 
@TheDestroyer - i am findind ref. of Abhisheka by milk of shiva-linga question :) Uttar bhaga Part 2
 
7:22 PM
@RakeshJoshi you see abusing and criticizing not philosophy?
 
the philosophy itself is based on refutement of other philosophies
 
@SwiftPushkar ok
 
dwaita books are full of advaita refutation and vice versa
 
@SwiftPushkar wha you think about movies like oh my god ? offfering milk to poor or animals over abhishekam?
 
7:23 PM
@Tezz @TheDestroyer - you might already knew this :)
@RakeshJoshi I am not much fan of movies , I rarely see them , instead i love to watch documetory films :)
 
it was a movie with some religious message . @SwiftPushkar
 
@RakeshJoshi read philosophies instead of unnecessary criticizing.
 
@SwiftPushkar Yeah I quote those verses in my answerr here:
 
@RakeshJoshi oh ok :)
 
3
A: Which mantras should be recited to properly worship Lord Rudra?

TezzThere are various mantras which are used to worship Lord Rudra / Lord Shiva. In Shiva Gita various Gods and sages are seen singing various hymns of Lord Shiva. Shiva Gita is a part of UttarKhanda of Padma Purana which I discuss here.. One can read Shiva Gita here. In the Shiva Gita, Shiva Pradhu...

 
7:25 PM
@TheDestroyer i think you have not yet gone through their books

more than talking of own philosohphies they refute others .. its like fight
 
@Tezz yeah , already seen that answer of yours :)
 
Bye. Sleeping. Will discuss tomorrow.
 
do you think its better to donate milk to poor people or animals than using for abhisekam ?
 
Yee.. me too sleeping.. Bye all..
 
@SwiftPushkar did u enquire any pathshala aboiut rudri path ?
 
7:29 PM
@Tezz @TheDestroyer - but i wonder why we find the name "vinayaka" more often instead of Ganesha , in puranas ?
@RakeshJoshi No but i checked , one web site , they have no mentioned abt. any store , which sell , CD's and Dvd's
 
can u share link
 
@RakeshJoshi - vedbhavanpune.com and most probably i am visiting Alandi tomorrow , i will surely ask there abt. Rudri paath :)
 
yes please do try ....
in this site which page they say ?
i think this pathashala teaches rig veda alone ? @SwiftPushkar
 
@RakeshJoshi - ok , by the way , there is another ved-Paath shala in Pimpri-chinchwad , if i visit theree in some days , i will enquire there also , but most probably , they also dont sell any audio discs , i once visited there :)
 
that is sad
but i heard there is one famous renuka temple they sell some audio i think
 
7:37 PM
@RakeshJoshi Where is renuka temple ? in pune ? or Mahurgad
 
nearby
i forgot name
mahur
thre is one in aurangabad . sant gyaneshwar pathshala they are willing but dont have facitlity to record
 
@RakeshJoshi Yeah , that also is famous and prominant pathshala since long :)
 
one of the person said that the person who is there is well learned and 1st or 2nd rank holder in pathshala
i think u shd also learn samhitas when you get time .
 
@RakeshJoshi Yes , i am right now finishing Puranas , i wil next read abt. upanishads and wil go to vedas , but it will take some time .. :)
 
7:47 PM
will sleep now Bye GN , TC :0
 

« first day (305 days earlier)      last day (2259 days later) »