I'm not certain what exactly started the issues that have recently been raised in meta, but I'm tempted to ask/bounty a question in meta about how to raise these concerns (not moderator issues, but the inciting incident) correctly
Like, a better worded "what to do if someone makes a harmful answer to a question"
except this time not-so-subtly jabbing at "savage Colonialist campaigns", "the non-scientific attitude of mainstream Muslim scholarship" and "the Western atheist paradigm of science and civilization" etc.
it was posted shortly after the first one was already deleted and messaged.
perhaps. but especially in Islamic circles the term "Colonialist" is often used as a synonym for "European", or "Catholic", or "Christian".
or "Western" civilization in general.
there are so many ways the post could be written without jabbing at anyone while still answering the question. i can't help but see the word choice and the entire answer as deliberate and hostile towards "the West".
There are many Theories about that, but Allah made clear "That is because Allah would not change a favor which He had bestowed upon a people until they change what is within themselves" (8:53 and in 13:11)
There's no doubt that stagnation started within the Muslim ummah itself.
@goldPseudo Did you know you can actually squeeze in 80 downvotes in one day? There's a gap between the start of a new day, and when the roomba kicks in. So if you downvote 40 questions during that time period, which then get roomba-ed, you get to make another 40 (: