« first day (67 days earlier)      last day (135 days later) » 
17:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

22:00
"not 10pm" is your reponse to the probe i haven't tried?
and no one else would have solved one yet
no not 10pm was in ref to "22"
ahahaha right, he barely lived a day
i was going to ask why you didn't list 0:1 and 1:0 originally. they're fantastically simply confounding
did i mention tantalizingly so?
born at 13:40 dies at 22:00 and created a whole field of mathematics (pun intended)
that was the life of solomon grundy
Oh my I totally forgot about that had to look it up
22:03
no response to my 0:1 / 1:0 question? that does equal a response
what was the question??
why didn't you list those originally?
oh
dunno
oh because
but of course
I wanted to give a list in ascending order first
ascending on both L and R
22:05
how functional of you
I could have gone descending on both too I suppose
or flip flop
or sporadic
scientists have discovered a way to convert between those kinds of lists
but I wanted it to appear "normal"
both of 0:1 and 1:0 do fit the patterns in binomial and ternary representations
(oh about appearing "normal," pinocchio also wanted to become human)
don't tell everyone
22:07
(it can happen in fairy tales)
the observation that someone made about the decimal numbers beginning with the same digits as their hex representations
what are your patterns?
turned out to be from the coincidence of 2^something looks like 10^something/3.1orso
binary had a lot of low-probability runs of 0s and 1s
ternary was missing a lot of 2s
the coolest pattern was almost-sierpinksi-triangles in the binary numbers
trippy :)
          1
        1..
       1..1
     1..1..
    1.11.11
   1....111
   1..1..11
  1....1..1
  1...1.111
  1..11..11
  1.11.1.11
  11.11..11
but now that we know you cherry-picked the examples, it has to be another coincidence
wow it is quite
22:12
beautiful! say it
Cantor-esque
yeah, with the sun shining on it
fun to find 2-D patterns even when they don't pan out
an obvious pattern is that all the binary forms have a 1 at the left end... heh hehe
and a zero to the left of that too!!
can't be coincidence
\overline{0}
22:16
did we ever find out what the odd number out was?
Monday / Tuesday
your answers just kept getting better and better
I'm guessing the teacher has a solutions book
I think it will be the >0.5 answer TBH going by the level
did you see my hidden answer?
no? let's go see
where is the puzzle
odd one out?
22:18
21
A: Find the odd number out (from math book)

Jonathan AllanDue to the occurrence of $0.4\overline{8}$ rather than $\frac{22}{45}$ I think it could be Because An alternative, quirky one that I kind of like, but definitely not the intended one: Because Or how about Because

not sure what you mean by hidden, looking at the "edit" source
hmm so hidden I can no longer see it
it was in a comment on a now delete post
guess u need 10k rep to seeit?
that's hidden!
oh for the beta site privileges of yore
ok so for your enjoyment....
Leave each aside in turn and then take the {product of numerators / sum of divisors} of simplified form fraction.
leaving aside 0.37 isthe only one that yields an integer
189
now that's as transparent as if in celophane!
:p
I gave all the resulting fractions too
there is another less well hidden answer too
22:24
a complete answer should always be rewarded
(now looking again at edit history, how are you retrieving these?)
in question's comment: I said "@Lawrence or 2 as it's the only digit not used (there is an upside down 6, honest)"
oh yeah! i did laugh but didn't even notice it was from you
(Lawrence suggested 5 as the only digit used only once)
sure glad that this site has enough serious people that some of us can be silly too
without tilting it too far
once someone came up with a parody answer to one of my puzzles so i gave a ludicrous deadpan reply
but they took it seriously and had to explain that they weren't serious
so i had to return the secret handshake
sarcasm lost on the sarcastic? :D
22:29
i don't know just how to take that so i'll fake it
is that for real?
or are you pulling my leg?
just looking for workplace.se
....PSYCHE
dont
edit
hah bet you thought i was going to say "stop" or actually make an edit
This answer is cool except for the fact they list the reciprocal rather than the entry and confuse the OP
0
A: Find the odd number out (from math book)

Daphne BI'm gonna go with because

22:34
thanks for pointing that out, it's better than i realized
oh, i did see your unanswered comment here, calling that puzzle a "corker"
and then something like we should rethink "math book" puzzles
what did you mean?
i like the puzzle, even if it turns out lame, for all the fun it has brought
well this particular problem from a maths book is quite interesting in a way :)
ah yes, just wanted to double check
poor teacher
obviously we don't want "factorise x^2-2x+2"
yeah, that's a "drill" or an "exercise"
which reminds me has anyone progressed on the time machine?
22:38
this one?
13
Q: The Time Machine works but my friend is gone!

Engineer ToastSo my friend Fred and I have been developing a time machine. I know it sounds impossible but we think we've hit a breakthrough! Fred has had a successful test run but he didn't tell me where he was going! Right before he left he sent me this weird email with a table full of text and a scanned cop...

yes
nothing since my last
:(
was hoping someone else would do the other half :p
hadn't seen that, gotta love it
and how about those pyramid___ answers, yours and someone elses?
bravi!
9
A: Single solved state for Sudoku Pyraminx

Jonathan AllanBrute force shows that for the example there are: $8$ solutions if rings are not considered* $0$ solutions if rings are considered* Call the left of the three faces at the top of your net $L$, the middle one $F$, the right one $R$, and the one underneath $D$. In the current configuration...

and:
3
A: Single solved state for Sudoku Pyraminx

2012rcampionLike Jonathan Allan, I wrote a program to search for solved states. I'll present it in Mathematica/Wolfram Language, but I'll also provide a Python script that works the same way. Encoding Here is the pyramidix pyramatrix pyramadix triangular Rubik's cube I started with: The corners are lab...

Easy compared to the Turnstyle solver
link?
4
A: Engel's Enigma Optimals

Jonathan AllanAs you say, you are implementing a type of Douglas Engel's puzzle, an "Enigma". Given the colour set and the fact that you are ignoring the orientation of the triangular wedges ("corners" in twisty puzzle lingo) in your implementation makes it a either a "Turnstile" or "Avenger" (I believe one wi...

22:45
man! i liked that question a lot when i saw it but never checked up on it (first to comment on it, though)
gorgeous!
on some questions/answers 4 votes = 1,000
"on some questions/answers 4 votes = 1,000"??
ohhhh
I get it
on some questions or answers 4 votes is equivalent to 1000 on others
took some parsing as I was reading a fraction
oops, some times a "/" is just an (and/or)and/or(and/or)
(reading some nice long answers at the moment)
xor(and/xor)orxor
//
or nrnrnrnrnrnrnrn / mmmmmmmmmm
(gotta read those answers more carefully later)
maybe there's a constant = [answer length] * votes
although long != good
22:54
coming from someone who can type more than 3 lines in an answer?
short != good too
too much != enough
too much > enough?
always: what you said, never: what i said
although != should be "is not"
22:57
whoa, that was meant technically, came out looking sassy
that's like a liar's paradox
always: too much > enough, never: too much = enough
to " != should be "is not" " --> should not
is too
eeeerrrrrm
so 'is not" != "!=" ?
22:59
so just what does "!=" = ?
short is not good, long is not good.
right you are, goldylocks
"not equal" to
juuuuust riiiiiight
lim_x=sumlime^ridiculous (probably an oldie)
hehe
back in a few
23:02
()
23:12
(Y)
(whoops, was just going to say i wound up making breakfast and saw that you're back, i'll @JonathanAllan in a couple more minutes)
breakfast!
@JonathanAllan, yep, breakfast, 6 hours later
here are the ingredients and it's your turn to guess
1. bear hairs
2. other ingredients
nooo
coca koala?
sigh
laughing too hard to eat
whatever it is, it was too hot a minute ago
23:21
Teddy Collins?
piping hot now
but you're guess was getting colder
am I really meant to be guessing something?
guess what i'm trying to remember to ask you while i was in the kitchen
(i'm working on that one)
(even tried going back to the scene of the crime, but don't remember)
arr, a couple of weeks ago i thought i had the fractal logic puzzle set up
and still think so, but haven't really had a chance to put the right kind of time
you need time within time within...
that might be the next timer puzzle, really
timer -> timer -> timer -> .... -> light bulb
there's actually a limit, i'm pretty sure
because the timers have a quantum level
23:28
plus resistance
:p
hahaaaaa that's a great twist!
each timer goes slower based on loss
starting to remind me once again of that neat conversion you clued me into, \gamma (or its aliases)
where continuous converts to discrete
start getting onto phase effects of induction machines
you are? or this is?
no with the timers
right, what's that called, something like slew?
23:31
you have A.C. running them and they have inductance, capacitance, resistance - all of which affects the phase of the A.C. into the next and so on...
could have all sorts of funky goings on
add an amplifier along the way to add power back in
a circuit version of the telephone game
the amplifier will add noise
like editing a .jpg
yeh, think i was thinking about slew rate, where accurate corners become slanted and delayed
if you make enough noise on a phone line it, at some point, sounds like a cold caller
that's poetry
I don't even know how to solve the current one!
in a way a timer is like a 24-state flipflop
but i like your binary representation
i was thinking of making a timer puzzle with a 2-hour day, or some smaller number
23:35
yeah it's 24 0's and 1's in a loop
i almost did go with 30 to include more primes
the hardest part of the timer puzzle might just be getting used to the constraints
because they don't resemble other puzzles exactly
but they are comfortable once familiar
they do eventually simultaneously switch right? Like periods of 13 and 17 resonate with a period of 221?
no we're not talking leather
don't think so in this case because it has the chance for non-relatively-prime periods
really wish the more nifty solution was still in play
it took advantage of 24 = 4x5 +4
with 4 repeated periods of 5 followed by a single "period' of 4
oh so D and N don't need to remain constant?
they are constant
23:41
well they usually are not with the previous set up
but the way C fits in pieces means that it doesn't have to contain a period
in pieces?
B is like a chopper for C
right about the usual setup
except A will let it run
in fact the real start to this came from piggybacking 2 timers to get a pseudorandom pattern
23:42
B wont run during N
A will run C only while C is ON, and quite right about B vs N
even more so about A vs N
oh yes A will let B run if B is ON
too confusing for me right now :p
me too, to beat all i changed letter assignments when writing it up
did you catch recent attempts to get the sanbox chatbots into a feedback loop?
heh creare new images labelling timers C, D, N and day/night A/B... just to really mess with people
a little
hoho, i did something like that in a rebus puzzle
In psychology, the Stroop effect is a demonstration of interference in the reaction time of a task. When the name of a color (e.g., "blue", "green", or "red") is printed in a color not denoted by the name (e.g., the word "red" printed in blue ink instead of red ink), naming the color of the word takes longer and is more prone to errors than when the color of the ink matches the name of the color. The effect is named after John Ridley Stroop, who first published the effect in English in 1935. The effect had previously been published in Germany in 1929. The original paper has been one of the most...
23:46
!flip!!reverseIt!milkshake{boys to the yard} my, brings}
you know i'm going there to try it
not now after all, the place looks busy
doubt that will do anything
it's just a song by some chick called Kelis
ah, thanks, i was actually going there to stall for time because it wasn't making sense
blocked! for copyright rrrrrrrrrrrrrr
23:50
:o
try vevo?
just found it... let's see
got official vid?
looks like a different one
but it does show someone at a soda fountain
matches the picture above... must see
apparently i can learn from it but will be charged
Well ...My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard; and they're like "Its better than yours", damn right, its better than yours; I could teach you but I'd have to charge.
now the mixer overflowed, my my my
23:54
heh
might be able to get a sandbot to link to that
oh yeah, about assigning letters incorrectly
bit more subtle than "Pat It Up" by Tommy Lee Sparta... wonder if that's blocked
looks like a flip alright
she's spelling out letters
LOL
explicit lyrics
!!flip/subtle
never heard of vevo before
all of a sudden every video i watch is vevo
23:58
so it's not blocked?
only that first link was
this one's like vocabulary review
did i try these two crossword clues on you? from a week or two ago in the paper
"p**** fat till it lean one side 'o yo jean"
17:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (67 days earlier)      last day (135 days later) »