« first day (2081 days earlier)      last day (2260 days later) » 

5:33 AM
0
Q: Is the [tag:orientation] tag useful?

Xander HendersonAccording to the tag description, the orientation is: For question[sic] regarding the notion of orientation both in topology and in global analysis. There is no further information in the tag wiki. A quick perusal of the first page of questions tagged with orientation (of which there are o...

 
 
10 hours later…
3:26 PM
@MikhailKatz I do not really see why there is a need for secrecy. If they are some arguments why this could be a useful tag, without making them public it would be difficult to get some support for the creation of the tag.
I am not sure whether your message here in chat implies that you have sent me an email related to this - if that's the case, I did not receive any such email. But, as I said above, I think that it's better to say what you want to say in public. (After all, it is related to the site, not specifically to me.)
A new tag was created. The tag name contains an obvious typo and, moreover, is already synonym of . So I am removing the tag from that question.
0
Q: distance between two line as least square problem

Wowgiven that $P=(x,x,x)$ and $Q=(y,3y,-1)$ are two lines in $\mathbb{R}^3$ then I need to express in matrix form $\|AX-b\|^2$ to find the distance between $P$ and $Q$. I need to find two points on this line which are closest to each other. I tried like: $\begin{bmatrix}1&1&1\\ 3&1&0\end{bmatrix}\b...

 
 
2 hours later…
5:03 PM
It seems that occurrences of Bourbaki tag in the past were usually added by Mikhail Katz: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/787716/…
The above query found one question where it was created by another user:
2
Q: Why exactly is Bourbaki difficult?

user45220I keep hearing people say that Bourbaki is difficult for most undergraduates but I still don't understand why. Surely if it starts from definitions/axioms then practically anyone should be able to understand it, let alone just graduate/advanced undergraduates. I didn't have any trouble reading Eu...

Unless I missed something, in the remaining cases the tag-edit was done by Mikhail Katz.
9
Q: Bourbaki and the symbol for set inclusion

GausslerWhich notation ($\subset$ or $\subseteq$) was preferred by Bourbaki for set inclusion (not proper)? A side question: Was the notation for subset one of the many notations invented by Bourbaki?

1
Q: General topology by Bourbaki

kevinI have taken a first course in general topology (first four chapters of Munkres's Topology), now I want to learn more general topology. I heard Topology by Bourbaki is very good but it also needs lots of set theory. So my question is: Is the first chapter of Munkres on set theory enough to st...

6
Q: Is Bourbaki unique?

NethesisSo my understanding is that a while back a group of mostly French mathematicians, under the pseudonym Bourbaki, wrote a somewhat austerely written series titled "Elements of Mathematic(s)" covering a large swath of the discipline, starting from the very ground up with an axiomatic set theory. The...

3
Q: Formal Dirichlet-Bourbaki definition of function

ThomasWhat is the formal Dirichlet-Bourbaki definition of a function? I have come across this in this essay: http://www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu/journal/contentknowledge/meel01/article.pdf on page 1. I know what a function is and I can write down a definition. What I would like to know is what the the d...

8
Q: What is the legacy of Bourbaki?

Emilio NovatiAs I was preparing a short lecture (for amateurs) on the mathematics of the '900, I realized that this year marks the 70-th anniversary of the founding of the Bourbaki group. I remember that Bourbaki has been important in my formation (in the years 1970-80), when it was considered as a "school" ...

8
Q: Bourbaki exercise about "ramified" ordered sets

StefanThis is Exercise III.2.8 of Bourbaki's Theory of Sets. An ordered set $E$ is said to be ramified if, for each pair of elements $x,y$ of $E$ such that $x<y$, there exists $z>x$ such that $y$ and $z$ are not comparable. $E$ is said to be completely ramified if it is ramified and has no maximal ele...

22
Q: Can the Bourbaki series be used profitably by undergraduates?

user31029Can the Bourbaki series be used profitably by undergraduates and high school students?Are we the target audience? I came across the N.Bourbaki texts while surfing the internet(I have not had the opportunity to access them though) and was a bit amazed by the Wikipedia article suggesting they did m...

7
Q: Introduction to Bourbaki structures, and their relation to category theory

Alexei AverchenkoI just opened vol.1 of the Bourbaki treatise to take a look at how they define mathematical structure. I was amazed by its sheer complexity. Can you recommend an introductory text that wouldn't require as much effort to understand? Also, a few related soft questions: 1) Is category theory more g...

2
Q: Bourbaki and AC: How does he proves ZL?

ChrisIn the book Set theory, Chapter 3 N.Bourbaki, I would like to understand how Bourbaki proves ZL. I wrote the proof. It uses Zermelo's principle (which is okay since they are equivalent), so I tried to understand how Zermelo's principle is proved but I can't find any occurrence of the axiom of cho...

13
Q: Is the Bourbaki treatment of Set Theory outdated?

seraphOn page 5 of the following write up, the author asks why the Bourbaki did not notice that their system of Zermelo set theory with AC was inadequate for existing mathematics. Throughout the rest of the discussion, the author asserts that the Bourbaki group never acknowledged Godel's results on inc...

6
Q: What is the $\tau$ symbol in the Bourbaki text?

Nikolaj-KI'm reading the first book by Bourbaki (set theory) and he introduces this logical symbol $\tau$ to later define the quantifiers with it. It is such that if $A$ is an assembly possibly contianing $x$ (term, variable?), then $\tau_xA$ does not contain it. Is there a reference to this symbol $\...

9
Q: What is "Bourbaki's style in mathematics"?

GeremiaI know Nicolas Bourbaki "is the pseudonym of a group of (mainly) French mathematicians who publish an authoritative account of contemporary mathematics." But what characterizes "Bourbaki's style in mathematics"?

11
Q: Bourbaki exercise on connected sets

StefanThis is Exercise I.11.4 of Bourbaki's General Topology. Let $X$ be a connected space. a) Let $A$ be a connected subset of $X$, $B$ a subset of $\complement A$ which is both open and closed in $\complement A$. Show that $A\cup B$ is connected. b) Let $A$ be a connected subset of $X$ and $B$ a ...

1
Q: Question about action on groups in Bourbaki (Algebra I)

Carré rondIn Bourbaki, Algebra I, chapter I, ยง5 "Groups operating on a set" paragraph 1, Bourbaki defines the operation of a group $G$ on a set $E$ as a morphism $\alpha \in G\mapsto f_\alpha \in S(E)$ ($S(E)$ is the group of permutations of $E$). Then he defines a faithfull operation asking the morphisme ...

1
Q: Bourbaki on the fact that continuous function on a compact is uniformly continuous

portonI am now looking theorem 2 in paragraph 4.1 of: Bourbaki. "Elements of Mathematics General Topology. Part 1". THEOREM 2. Every continuous mapping $f$ of a compact space $X$ into a uniform space $X'$ is uniformly continuous. Now I realize that I don't understand the proof. Could you present me...

The question listed above are the ones that had this tag when it was created in 2016. It was created again not too long ago - you can find the list of question where the tag was applied in this incarnation here in chat: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/3740/2018/2/15
Some of the above question are also in the other list.
In the recent case, the following tag-exceprt was created: "This is philosophy- and foundations-related material on Bourbaki, not technical questions on volumes like Algebra, etc."
I do not know whether it is possible to find tag-excerpt for the previous incarnations of the tag. (And, of course, we do not know whether it was created at all.)
 

« first day (2081 days earlier)      last day (2260 days later) »