@exitingcorpse Rest assured that I am not offended by your misinterpretation. It happens to me a lot, because I'm (at times vehemently) opposing the communis opinio on this matter.
@exitingcorpse Sadly, the human race has as of yet been unable to stop making errors. At least, it is good to see that you display to have taken the nontrivial hurdle of being able to admit you make mistakes at times. :)
hah, a good example is mushroom hunting. apparently in australia it is very dangerous, as the mushrooms can look very much like european ones, but be poisonous
@Lord_Farin I guess it's a neutral zone - Perhaps we start there, then the difficulty menu appear in front of us and when we choose, we go from Mexico to the chosen country.
@PeterTamaroff Even a two-year old child knows that. I asked him to show me what the deleted answer is. It's not difficult to get, but neither you nor him get the point. Interesting.
"When my mother was pregnant with me, they did an ultrasound and found she was having twins. When they did another ultrasound a few weeks later, they discovered that I had adsorbed the other fetus. Do I regret this? No, I believe his tissue has made me stronger. I now have the strength of a grown man and a little baby."
@Lord_Farin Also, first I remembered that it's wrong. When I corrected, I thougt: "I guess Farin os Skull were almost typing their corrections to that" XD
@skullpatrol She'll come back, say mean words for you and your family, get pissed and then GTFO. Then Matt Nott Madd Kiddo will come and say: "Oh, another one went away because of skullpatrol, we gonna cry-ay-ay - PLIS, do something! :"(
at first i was impressed that they typed it all out, until i noticed these kind of sentences "PART 3 5 X 4 = 20 MARKS IN THE SECTION, SOLVE ANY FOUR OF YOUR CHOICE 1. "
Uhm, if I have a surjective simplicial map between simplicial complexes i.e. every simplex in K' is the image of a simplex K under f: K -> K' for f simplicial map, is f_* surjective in homology?
ah cool. are you familiar with Robert Goldblatt's book on it? i went to the library the other day and they didn't have the book i was after, i saw the name (i recognise it from his book on nonstandard analysis)
it's got one of the most sinfully ugly covers i've seen in maths
@amWhy Your last comment to my answer indicates that we think alike. Such seems to happen a lot lately. :)
@amWhy Hm, I hope you didn't read the comment from which it was distilled... // I did actually attempt (in parenthetical comments) to indicate that it is not the issue that I object to, but the method. Apparently, I didn't fully succeed.
@Lord_Farin Yes, I do not think "imposing" reform on others is the route to go...I try to lead by example, so to speak, or comment, to bring attention to the matter when I see it, and usually, the author of a comment or answer that I address in a comment is very receptive/acknowledging.
..I do wonder, though, for those who are dismissive of the issue, of addressing such a user, say it happens to be "Bruce Manford" that is dismissive. countering with something like "When Bruce stated____________she meant...", or "Bruce's comment upsets me: her use of _________________" :)
@amWhy I am not very sure. Recently, I have read books by many authors who by default use "she" instead of "he" and I have never even noticed it. And if you were to pass a directive saying that, in case the gender is not known, by default use "she", I would not care. And yes, edits only on gender neutrality shift focus away from more important edits as Lord Farin said. And there is already too much information to be processed on MSE.
@exitingcorpse I do not understand... "Not seeing yourself"? But then that is how sometimes you visualize your reading. You put yourself in the shoes of people who post the question and then imagine how you would solve it.
well, an analogous example (text: books :: actors : movies) is the general male dominance in films. you might like to read about the bechdel test, for instance
@BabakS., in case you are still here, does it seem possible to post in Farsi here on Chat, or at least mix English and farsi? I have seen other languages/alphabets here, some going right to left...
@somaye, I get it, the second and third lines. Easy answers, I am fine but not usually happy. The fine part will be tested this week, twice a year I get checked for too much cholesterol and the possibility of diabetes. So, this week I go to the place and they take a little blood, send that to a medical/chemistry laboratory. Then on June 19 I see my medical doctor and she tells me how i am doing.
@anon, Charlie told me in general terms that she was fed up with Chat. She does not seem to like email either, just individual chat features as part of Facebook or Gmail or the like.
@somaye, well, yes. The first tests, in 2007, were very bad. Then I completely changed my diet, on advice from a friend who is a gastroenterologist. I think the thing that helps the most is the fish oil pills. I take five pills each morning, each 1100mg (big), providing 300 mg EPA and 200 mg DHA. I also take three pills of flaxseed oil, each providing 540 mg of ALA. These are the three important "Omega-3" fatty acids that Americans do not get enough of.
Omega-3 fatty acids (also called ω−3 fatty acids or n−3 fatty acids) refers to a group of three fats called ALA (found in plant oils), EPA, and DHA (both commonly found in marine oils). Common sources of animal omega–3 EPA and DHA fatty acids include fish oils, algal oil, egg oil, squid oils, krill oil and some plant oils contain the omega 3 ALA fatty acid such as seabuckthorn seed and berry oils, flaxseed oil, Sacha Inchi oil, Echium oil, and hemp oil.
Omega-3 fatty acids are vital for normal metabolism but some of the potential health benefits of supplementation are controversial. Omeg...
@somaye, you are young, so your doctors are not going to pressure you too much, yet. After age 50 they get very aggressive. It is better to eat actual fish, but I really, really, really hate that fishy taste. So, I take the pills instead. I had difficulty digesting the pills, it took more than three years to gradually increase the dosage to the current level.
@somaye, alright, but a recipe is a long thing for a Chat window. Maybe you could write a (short) lesson and email me that. I do not promise to put in much effort, though. My mother sometimes cooked swordfish I never liked it.
@somaye, John Wordsworth, who was called Old John before, has been putting pictures of barbecue on Facebook, Persian style, on an outdoor babecue (fire) grill. I will try to copy the names of the dishes John: I now follow the Iranians when it comes to barbecuing food. I reckon they have several thousand years experience John: Planning a barbecue tonight ... with kabob koobideh and shish tawook - hope it all works out well!
@somaye, I will see if I can find it somewhere. Meanwhile, Charlie is on email complaining that I take too long to answer, which is why she prefers chat. i am trying to explain that sometimes i do not really want to explain why there is a delay, at least not publically. So it seems better to me to use a facility where such explanantions are not necessary. I will be back in ten minutes or so...
@exitingcorpse Don't worry...I've been second-guessing myself a lot lately, and certainly did when I read your comment, so rushed to delete my answer...all is good...I'd rather be corrected "wrongly" than not corrected, when I'm wrong!
@DanZimm in this case you are not talking about $\mathbb{R}^n$ as ambient space, but about $X$ equipped with the subspace topology from $\mathbb{R}^n$.
Ah - I see - I am not very familiar with baby Rudin, but I reckon you could master the essentials of a rigorous definition for topological spaces in half an hour from an introduction to topology. I mananged to do so - and I am not a a topologist (just use it sometimes)
i think the two most basic notions to get acclimated with is "sets are not doors" (they can be both open and closed) and the definition (or characterisation, depending on your axiomitisation) of continuity in terms of "closeness"
the usual definition takes as a basic concept "open sets", and says that "the preimage of an open set is open". a lot of people get confused why it isn't the other way around
@nerdy you can talk about both. f(x,y) would have the form f(x,y) = ax + by, where a and b are constants
my main problem is, he says that f is linear for y(n),y(n-1),...,y',y if f(y(n),y(n-1),...,y',y,t1,t2,...,tn) = a(t)y(n) + b(t)y(n-1) + ... + c(t)y' + d(t)y + e(t)