« first day (4631 days earlier)      last day (688 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

00:04
🙉
why would i be interested in an Lp space with p = 10 over, say, p = 20? i.e. what are we trying to do when we try higher values of $p$
I'm just looking for a path of reasonable effort forward given what I should know for my profession, and what I need to know for finding optimal solutions within my profession.
I just need a list of options to decide on
00:20
@leslietownes your point is well taken, sir. But, for over a hundred years this is what the nearest library had
12 hours ago, by user 85795
user image
Bruh, there's nothing wrong with wanting to find the best available option one can reasonably find within say a few months at most.
With the internet, the library of the world is available.
Have you read any of Concrete Mathematics by Knuth.
No, unironically. I haven't read much of anything. Most of what I've done, if I didn't recall it from what I learned in public school, I figured out for myself because myself is all I (thought) I had.
Try it.
Though if I were to read Knuth now, it'd probably be quite pleasant.
00:23
@user85795 how do you quote yourself in chat?
:<message_id>
Just like you quote anyone else.
testing :63339289
:63339289
lol no without spaces and also I just realized that's not the quote you're talking about
great success
00:25
Doing that creates a reply message
@user85795 how do you quote people at all
This is the question of time. It has plagued man since the dawn of time.
Top left corner of the message is an arrow to click on.
?????
"reply to message" will pop up
00:27
that only makes a reply, no? not the quote
@user85795 test
yeah it only does a reply
Nor does it show up for your own messages because yes, no one would ever want to reply to himself.
Above that is a 'permalink'
said a programmer at the dawn of time
Yes but vat iz dee seentaks
Copy the 'Permalink'
In discord, it's straightforward because it uses markdown which... is funny because it varies slightly in this chat from markdown that we're accustomed to on there.
> quote
> quote

This shouldn't be quoted, but it is
00:30
2 mins ago, by shintuku
yeah it only does a reply
yesss!!
thanks
For some reason the newlines do not delimit quotes like in Discord.
52 secs ago, by AMDG
> quote

This shouldn't be quoted, but it is
The best interface in the world. You have to post a message link explicitly and then for some reason it gets turned into a quote.
Which would unironically be ideal in discord
Completely opposite problem
Would be better if it did just give the link verbatim followed by an embed like Discord:
The Art Of Computer Programming by Knuth is a classic.
I've never read the classics. Or played them for that matter.
00:35
12 mins ago, by user 85795
Try it.
@user85795 Well as you said here... "[n][...][o]"
Important example of course. Always gotta have more than one.
^ really interesting watch. Love it. Very informative. Even provides page numbers and everything.
01:22
@AMDG Must be short
Yup, as short as this chapter.
Apr 1 at 6:42, by user 726941
user image
@robjohn Spoiler alert: it's 14 seconds
Have some common sense algebra guys.
01:38
It's wild conjecture time
0
Q: Does there exist a sequence of antiderivatives $f_0,f_1,f_2,\dots$ with $f_i(0),f_i(1)$ integers?

Akiva WeinbergerDoes there exist an infinite sequence of differentiable functions $f_0,f_1,f_2,\ldots:[0,1]\to\Bbb R$, not all the zero function, such that, for all $i$, $f_{i+1}'=f_i$, and in addition $f_i(0)$ and $f_i(1)$ are both integers for all $i$? I conjecture the answer is no, though I'm unsure of how to...

Yes. Absolutely. Without a doubt. By the Nah'yeev-May-D'tup Theorem.
Ah yes, I know his nephew
You mean their nephews. And I don't mean that in a woke sense either. Those three people have been instrumental... I mean, without them, how would anything in mathematics be proven? Their laughable objections--a devil's advocate if you will--are the only reason why rigor exists in mathematics!
@AMDG if you replace "garbage" with ♾️ some of them approach "sensible."
Just like physicists used to write the speed of light as c = ♾️.
@user85795 LIsten. Bud. I know you're new to this, so I'll go easy on you... but... we all know you can't sense abstract entities, let alone fathom infinity in all its being, so that makes it even less sensible.
01:48
Infinity smells like a raspberry
That's not true. It smells like bananas, the objectively worst-smelling vegetable of all time.
Can you use "true" with ♾️
I don't know, can you?
Does it equal itself.
The correct way to phrase such questions is "May I use 'true' with ♾️?"
01:51
What is "true" then.
Let $\kappa$ be the cardinality of the set of all grammatically incorrect sentences.
Light travelled at ♾️
c = ♾️
@AkivaWeinberger Then κ is me every time I try to speak another language.
No experiment said otherwise.
Albeit they believed in the aether wind :P
That must mean that $c = -\frac{1}{12}$
01:54
lol
So the aether wind created the minus sign in -1/12
Or was it Ramanujan
Now simply put, if you $\infty\exp(\frac{90}{360}\pi i)$, then clearly we get $8$.
@AMDG thanks for taking it easy on me, bud 🙏
Egg. Tough crowd I see.
@user85795 Any time, young apprentice.
02:10
Naysayers will say this actually equals -1 chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/63339590#63339590
Unfortunately I forgot the factor of 2 so it's all downhill from here
@AkivaWeinberger we'll have to try and get professor Hamkins into the chatroom to confirm that.
Perhaps, invite him from Twitter?
02:25
Does anybody know why the conjugate of $a + b$ is $a - b$ where $a$ and $b$ are real numbers?
That actually doesn’t make sense in general.
The general terminology comes from field theory — things like $\sqrt 2 \pm\sqrt 3$.
yeah. maybe more helpful to think of that as an operation on algebraic expressions (e.g. the difference of squares identity, used e.g. in 'rationalizing the denominator' when a and b are sqrts of stuff) than on real numbers.
totally makes sense to say, flip the sign in a - b to a + b. makes less sense to say, like, what do you get from the real number 1 when you flip the sign. is 1 = 1 - 0 for this purpose, or 0 - (-1), or some other thing.
02:44
@Ajay did you forget the "i" in "bi"?
It generalizes to things with cube roots, too.
03:13
@user858770 no.
@leslietownes I've never thought of it like that
I always just think flip the sign
Only for square roots.
The conjugate of $3+\root3\of 2$ is surprising.
If $a+bi$ is the root of a polynomial with real coefficients, then $a-bi$ is also a root of the same polynomial
Conjugate pairs
👍🏽
03:36
@TedShifrin Why is the conjugate of that surprising?
wouldn't the plus just become minus?
Why?
What is point of the conjugate? You multiply and end up in the rational numbers.
03:59
Say we have a sequence $(a_n)^{\infty}_{n=1}$ of real numbers. Is the following implication always true? $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n \quad \textrm{converges} \implies \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a^{3}_n \quad \textrm{converges}$$
I’ve assigned that question before.
What have you figured out?
I tried the comparison test
Assuming what?
$|a_n|$ is convergent
OK, so then we’re done.
04:12
We know that $|a_n| \to 0$ whenever $n \to \infty$
Huh, how?
If abs conv, then it is true. But what otherwise?
Wait, so then the implication is false?
Wait i'm being stupid
huh? thats a normal question to ask. it's an interesting problem, if sum a_n is not assumed to converge absolutely.
at least, i don't see it as a "look at it and just 'see the answer'" kind of thing.
exactly the kind of thing a prof like ted would assign.
04:32
I even put this into Spivak as an exercise in the 3rd edition, I think. It’s surprising.
@Ajay Did I say that?
@TedShifrin Say what?
See what I linked to.
ted invited you to think about what happened if sum |a_n| is not assumed to be convergent. he didn't tell you what might or might not happen in that case. it's a separate thing, not resolved one way or the other by addressing only the absolutely convergent case.
it's certainly worth thinking about why it might not be true in general, or why it ought to be. i don't know that the absolutely convergent case is much of a help.
 
2 hours later…
06:30
Can anyone please help me with this:
0
Q: Find a particular integral of $y=\frac{1}{D^2+4D+5}x.$

FranklinFind a particular integral of $y=\frac{1}{D^2+4D+5}x.$ I tried solving it like this: Given, $y=\frac{1}{D^2+4D+5}x.$ So, we can say, $$y=\frac{1}{D^2+4D+5}x\implies y=\frac{1}{4D}(\frac D4+\frac{5}{4D}+1)^{-1}x=\frac{1}{4D}(1-\frac D4-\frac{5}{4D}+\frac{D^2}{16}+\frac{25}{16D^2}+....$$ But this...

Never mind, I didn't see the date
07:08
The minor edit was not really needed.
07:26
how to show
@robjohn
What does $\lt$ mean in this context?
08:02
what indeed
the "for any linear transformation T" at the end of that is so stylistically awful.
08:44
@robjohn this usually denotes subspace.
subgroup also depending upon the context.
sheesh, koro. spoiler alert.
nobody denotes like that
 
1 hour later…
09:53
@PrateekMourya Pretty much, you need to verify the properties of a subspace. If $x,y\in S$ and $a,b\in\mathbb{R}\text{ (or }\mathbb{C}\text{)}$, then $ax+by\in S$, etc.
10:26
@PrateekMourya Do you the definition of a subspace or linear subspace?
As robjohn said, all you need to check for all u, v in \ker T and \alpha in K such that T(u+\alpha v) \in \ker T
T(u+\alpha v) =Tu+\alpha Tv=0
10:54
We found solution of wave equation in $\mathbb{R, R}_+$. For $\mathbb R_+$, we have two cases when $0\leq t\leq x$ and $0\leq x\leq t$. When we find solution in $\mathbb R^3$ using Euler-Poisson-Darboux equation,we convert the equation to $\mathbb R_+$.
But we only consider $0\leq r\leq t$. why?
11:47
I was struggling with this problem a lot and doing enormous amount of bashing but all my travails ended up as a failure!
It was then I found this above solution.
It's a pretty clever approach. But I dont the motivation behind it?
Is it just heuristics ?
To me, this approach seems uncanny in a way, that there was indeed a dilly of a simplification step involved in the solution( I mean considering the two new variables x and y and proceeding like that : this was witty in my opinion)
12:05
x^2 is prime element of k(x^2), k is field.
12:25
Hey @robjohn Could you permanently remove one of my answers?
Can you delete my answer to this question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/4675611/…
I skimmed past the post description and didn't see that the OP had not tried anything on their own
12:49
@Franklin To me it's pretty obvious. The only part that is not obvious is why $x,y$ are integers.
This also became clear after thinking for a few seconds.
13:03
@Ajay there is no way to remove an answer completely. People with enough reputation will still be able to see it. However, since you've deleted it, no one can flag or downvote it.
Happy Passover/Easter
13:20
1
Q: The average of 10 scores is $25,$ and the lowest score is $20.$ So, the highest score must be...

Arthur The average score of $10$ students in a test is $25.$ The lowest score is $20.$ Then the highest score is: $$A.100,$$ $$B.70,$$ $$C.30,$$ $$D.75$$ The answer key suggests option $B$ as the answer. I don't understand why this differs from my solution: Let the marks obtained by each student be $x...

Can anyone please help me with this strange question
?
It can be at most $70$
it must be at least $25\frac59$
I see that answer is already there.
13:50
In my book it is written that for any $\xi\in\mathbb R^n$, $|\widehat{f_n}(\xi)-\widehat{f}(\xi)|\leq ||f_n-f||_{L^1(\mathbb R^n)}$. What I want to ask is shouldn't there be a $||\xi||$ term?
Is it true that $|f(x)|\leq ||f||_{L^1}$?
@PNDas so is that a standard way, of solving these problems?
@PNDas There is no $\|\xi\|$ there. The $\|\hat f\|_\infty\le\|f\|_1$
If $f\in L^1$, then $\hat f$ is continuous, therefore, we can get the pointwise maximum.
Ahh yes
I forgot about that inequality.
Thank you.
@Franklin Well the straight forward way would be $b-d=(c+9)^{3/2}-c^{5/4}$, but then I don't know how to proceed from here.
Otherway would be $9=a-c=(b^{1/3})^2-(d^{2/5})^2$.
14:14
@PNDas That's the point. I am not saying this impossible of course. But this appears to be some far out of the box, way of bashing things out. I guess this should be kept in mind as an important strategy for solving these problems!
How to count the number of matrices similar to a 3×3 daigonal matrix diag(1,1,2) over some finite field, say F_3 ?
$\overline{X}\to \mu$ as $n$ increases?
or the mean of the $\overline{X}$s approaches $\mu$ as the number of samples increases? is that more accurate
A~B iff char(A) =char(B) & min. poly. (A) =min poly(B) as matrices are of order 3.
A~B iff trace(A) =trace(B) & det(A) =det(B)
A~B iff char(A) =char(B) & min. poly. (A) =min poly(B) as matrices are of order 3.
Nvm it's clear to me that the set of $\overline{X}$ has mean of $\mu$ for any given size sample
or $$\mu = \frac{\sum_i \overline{X}_i}{(N/n)}$$ I believe
So the problem is reduced to find number of matrices of size 3×3 over F_3 having trace 4=1 and det 2
14:46
Can anyone please help me how to ascertain the number of terms in the expression $(x_1+x_2+...+x_r)^n$ ?
My reasoning goes like this: If we have, $(x_1+x_2+...+x_r)^n$ , then all the terms in this expansion, will be of the form $(K)(x_1^{a_1}x_2^{a_2}...x_r^{a_r}$, where, $a_1+a_2+...+a_r=n$, and hence all possible terms are of the number of non-negative solutions of $a_1+a_2+...+a_r=n$, i.e $\binom{n+r-1}{r}. (K is a real constant ).
Are my reasonings correct/valid ?
I am sorry, there's a typo in the statement: "hence all possible terms are of the number of non-negative solutions of $a_1+a_2+...+a_r=n$, i.e $\binom{n+r-1}{r}. (K is a real constant )." This should be hence all possible terms are of the number of non-negative solutions of $a_1+a_2+...+a_r=n$, i.e $\binom{n+r-1}{r-1}. (K is a real constant ).
15:25
The correct link is
0
Q: What is the percentage of students required atleast equal to?

RudstarIf atleast 90 percent students are good at sports, atleast 80 percent students are good at music and atleast 70 percent students are good at studies, then the percentage of students who are good in all three is atleast equal to? My approach: I couldn't quite proceed in the the proper way, howeve...

I need some help in this...

The answers given are incomplete in my opinion
[I did a repost as my prev messages were faulty]
Sorry for all the confusion...
 
2 hours later…
17:10
@Arthur So let's see your attempt at a more complete solution. The second one posted is quite correct (especially with the comment after).
17:20
Thanks everyone! I got it verified and I feel that my approach is correct.
Can anyone please help me with this:
0
Q: Let $f:[0,1]\to (1,\infty)$ be a continuous function. let $g(x)=\frac 1x$ for $x>0.$ then, the equation $f(x)=g(x)$ has

FranklinLet $f:[0,1]\to (1,\infty)$ be a continuous function. let $g(x)=\frac 1x$ for $x>0.$ then, the equation $f(x)=g(x)$ has $$A.\text{no solution},\quad \quad B.\text{all points in (0,1]},\quad \quad C. \text{atleast one solution}, \quad \quad D.\text{none of the above}$$ My solution goes like this...

@TedShifrin the solution posted by drhab is correct, I see. I find sense in it. Is that answer you were talking about?
That is terribly written, @Franklin. I don't see a proof of anything.
@Arthur: Is that the second posted solution? No, there's no reason it should be correct.
@TedShifrin Was there something to prove ? 😂😂😂
If you're going to post on a mathematics site, why not post actual mathematics?
We're sick of your non-stop multiple choice stuff.
@Franklin Your question doesn't even have a finished title ^^"
17:28
@Hippa :D Not surprising :)
Just writing out the entire question is NOT a title.
@TedShifrin Are you coming back to France anytime soon by any chance ?
@TedShifrin 😂😂😂 Now, that you say it. Yeah, lately, I am posting soooo much mcqs. But I actually created a post on mcqs after a long while. Mostly, I do discuss here....
@Hippalectryon I haven't traveled anywhere since Covid. I would like to, but it may have to wait until I have surgery on my lower back. Why do you ask?
@Franklin The point is that this is a good example of an exercise where you can practice using actual mathematics from your basic calculus/analysis course.
@TedShifrin Just wondering :) Sorry to hear about your back
We need a fancier meal next time, @Hippa :)
17:32
@TedShifrin I am not that creative writing titles, Idk. I will let some community members suggest it...🥲🥲🥲
@TedShifrin Let me know next time you come and I'll invite you :D
@Franklin It has nothing to do with being creative, it has to do with writing a title that makes sense without reading your question
@TedShifrin I hope the surgery goes well
I just last night got an email from a Danish woman who, as an exchange student at UGA in 1985-86, took my Calculus with Theory course. She, along with a German guy and a number of the plain old American students, was so impressive. Anyhow, she just emailed out of the blue to thank me for being a good teacher :P
@Franklin Also I don't know if you realize, but the way you ask your "question" feels less like a genuine math question and more like a "I have homework to do and i'd like to get good grades so please verify my answers", which is not the spirit of MSE at all
Oh oh, I feel @Hippa's meme identity returning.
17:34
@Hippalectryon "with writing a title that makes sense without reading your question" -Now, that is what creativity is!
@Hippalectryon to be honest:
@TedShifrin That's so nice !
How about something like A less-than-obvious application of the Intermediate Value Theorem?
@Hippalectryon If this sort of questions, were given on homework, then the students would throw eggs or even worse stones on him out of frustration!
No, without the multiple choice, this is actually a good basic analysis question.
@TedShifrin But I feel, the options made it easier...
17:37
Franklin, you have to remember that those of us in the US and Europe do not come from a culture of MCQ once we are adults.
We're not interested in your easiest MCQ answer. We're interested in your learning mathematics and making efforts to learn it.
What's MCQ btw ?
multiple choice question
Tu aurais dû deviner :P
> those of us in the US and Europe do not come from a culture of MCQ

Aah though that was some kind of university / ... !!
@TedShifrin I will have to think about it, without mcqs. You know, that's a nice one, indeed...
LOL @Hippa
17:39
@TedShifrin Just for curiousity: Are all the tests there of, subjective type?
There are lots and lots of totally standard applications of the IVT. The fact that one function here is defined only on $(0,1]$ makes this one a tiny bit more interesting.
@TedShifrin true...can't agree more...
In real mathematics courses (not high school level), some lazy teachers give short-answer tests, but most require work to be written out and evaluated.
@TedShifrin @Hippalectryon Now, that's a real homework what @TedShifrin suggests me to do, i.e making it a non-mcq question!!!!!
Of course, for things like most math competitions we have to write MCQ to get things machine graded quickly.
17:41
@TedShifrin in undergraduate entrances? Are they all subjective?
This is what most MSE questions have become since you left, @Hippa.
On the advanced placement exams (which earn college credit) there is a third or so which is actual written responses. The rest is MCQ.
The fact that there are MCQ in the world doesn't mean that MSE should be overrun with them. IMHO.
@Franklin Sure, but MSE isn't a platform where people verify your homework !
@TedShifrin :/ I mean there was always those questions, but you mean it's become much worse / more frequent ?
MCQ and L'Hôpital's rule. I want them ALL banned.
@Hippalectryon come on, come on, come on...that's not a homework. How should I explain...the answer's not given there. Now, you are making me uncomfortable!!! I feel embarassed...🥲🥲🥲
Yes, worse and more frequent and now there's a negligible probability of interesting questions.
So, in one paragraph or less, what's your thesis on, @Hippa?
17:52
> I feel embarassed...🥲🥲🥲

I mean... https://i.imgur.com/6JUro5p.png MSE is a place where people help *each other*, not where people take their precious time to check your answers. If you start contributing to the website by answering questions yourself, you'll maybe realize why we're so turned off by this kind of question :)
@TedShifrin I'm working on new "mathematical" models to perform numerical simulations of fluid equations on very decimated spaces (hence at a very reduced numerical cost).
What are "very decimated spaces"?
Think of a "normal" numerical simulation. Usually, it's performed on a spatial grid of a given resolution, where every "pixel" has the same size. Hence to simulate a system with a biggest size L and a pixel size l, you need N=(L/l)^D points in D dimensions.

We're working on a "subset" of the grid (in spectral space), such that N~log(L/l)^D
Ah, sparser sampling.
Yep. We call that "log-grids".
@Franklin g(x) =1/x has no continuous extension over [0, 1] :)
17:57
@SouravGhosh Why did you comment this?
@TedShifrin Is there anything wrong?
I think we all know that, and that's why my chosen title for the question was "a less-than-obvious application of IVT."
Continuity is weaker than IVT :)
18:12
I do not get your point.
18:28
How to count the number of matrices similar to a 3×3 diagonal matrix diag(1,1,2) over some finite field, say F_3 ?
A~B iff char(A) =char(B) & min. poly. (A) =min poly(B) as matrices are of order 3.
A~B iff trace(A) =trace(B) & det(A) =det(B)
The word similar has a well-defined meaning.
Now you're defining $\sim$ with weaker notions.
Yes. Two matrices are similar iff both represents the same linear map (possibly under two different bases)
So what are the last two lines?
Well. For matrices of small size( upto 3×3) last two lines are equivalent but not in general.
I just cannot make sense of things you say. I'm out.
18:34
Notation A~B : A, B are similar.
18:48
I am studying the following series: $$\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1+(-1)^{k}k}{k^{2}}.$$ Does it converge absolutely? I am not allowed to use the alternating series test.
I have tried to use the traingle inequality to get an upper bound, but that only diverges.
(I know that the above series converges...)
What do the terms look like for large $k$?
$ \frac{1}{k^2}$ ?
@SouravGhosh what about $\begin{bmatrix} 1\\&1\\&&2\end{bmatrix}$ and $begin{bmatrix} 1&1\\&1\\&&2\end{bmatrix}$?6
@schn Really?
You need work on your basic intuition.
@DLeftAdjointtoU cool!
18:59
I have hacked the infamous Quiver editor
into my own django template
Ugh. stupid \ missing.
I'm actually using BSS to visually edit a lot like a WYSIWYG web editor. Then hand coding the Django side
@TedShifrin :(
@Koro want to see the code?
Would you like to see the ruins my friend
@TedShifrin maybe $\frac{(-1)^k}{k^2}$?
19:00
I won't be able to understand it atm. :(
We need more than 10 milliseconds to edit on mobile.
I'm doing field theory.
@Koro nice. What theorem are you on?
@schn don’t worry about sign. Worry about magnitude.
@DLeftAdjointtoU So I have done: algebraic extensions, splitting fields.
I know definitions of separable and normal fields.
19:02
Nice.
Want to study together on that?
Extensions, not fields
yeah we can.
K, I'll create a room
sure
@schn what does $\dfrac{k+k^2}{2k+k^3}$ look like? Does the series converge or diverge?
19:06
let me think
Good day to the peanut gallery.
Ted. I had some questions on understanding with regards to showing $f(x) + g() = \frac{\pi}{4}$.

(i) To do the first part I only was successful in working it out because it was hinted to look at $f(x) + g(x)$ as a constant and to compute the value of $f(x) + g(x)$ at $x = 0$. From this everythign worked out. But where did the "idea" for thinking about things like this come from? I wouldn't have thought about looking at that quantity as a constant and I would not have thought of computing it at $x = 0$.
I respond only to hazelnuts.
Nutella?
I have a feeling you don't like nutella
No, way too sweet.
if there was a more mellow version?
19:18
Have you ever used jaggery powder instead of white sugar?
or thin layer sparsley spread over a baguette...surely this would be good
Any time you integrate you need a point (initial condition) to get the constant. $0$ is the only computable point. Of course you used (a).
@TedShifrin $$\frac{k+k^2}{2k+k^3}\geq \frac{k^2}{2k^3+k^3}=\frac{1}{3k}$$, we expect it to diverge :)
How was (a) used?
You should use limit comparison and take 2 seconds, not 20 minutes.
19:21
the mere fact that $f'(x) + g'(x) = 0$ implying that my value is a constant?
To know the function is constant? How else is the value at $0$ telling you anything?
Answered my own question when I wrote that last question.
@schn the dominating terms tell you it looks like $k^2/k^3 = 1/k$ for large $k$.
yes
In your question, what are the dominating terms?
19:25
for large $k$, we have $\frac{1}{k}$, no?
Yes, ignoring sign.
You wanted to look at absolute values.
Let $f(x)\in k[x]$ be irreducible of degree p, p prime. Let L be a splitting field of f(x) over k. If $g(x)\in k[x]$ is a polynomial of degree q, q>p, such that there is a in L with g(a)=0. How to show that g(x) is not irreducible in k[x]?
Yes.
@Koro Surely $f$ is relevant.
yeah, I don't understand how to bring that into mix.
Suppose g(x) is irred. Then I know that k[x]/(g(x)) $\cong k(a)$.
19:31
No contradiction. Think about two polynomials.
I still don't understand how to prove it though.
examples for verifying the situation are fine.
Given any two polynomials, what is natural to consider?
product?
Try again.
ah, another thing: [k(a): k]= deg g(x)=q
(if g is assumed irred.)
19:37
What is the most important notion in ring theory going back to the integers?
I have no idea.
in groups (finite), order. But in rings, I don't know.
Seriously? Two integers? Two polynomials? What is their ….
ah, gcd
Now go finish.
I'm afraid I don't understand how to use this information.
:(
if f has a root b in L, then [k(b):k]=p
If I could somehow show here that $k(a)\subset k(b),$ subfield or $k(b)\subset k(a)$, subfield, then I'll get a contradiction as follows: $[k(a):k]=[k(a):k(b)][k(b):k]$
But the containment does not seem true and it may not be true considering the fact I nowhere used the fact that L is a splitting field.
19:52
So you totally ignored what I suggested. Your typical behavior, I might add.
Can they be relatively prime?
I didn't ignore. I thought on but didn't understand how to go ahead as I said earlier.
🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
I think they can be rel prime.
$a_1(x) f(x)+a_2(x) g(x)=1$, $a_i(x)\in k[x]$.
It is not obvious from here why such $a_i$'s should not exist.
The above is from the fact that: if (f(x), g(x))= k[x], then...
Plug in $x=a\in L$.
We get that a is not a root of f as g(a)=0.
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (4631 days earlier)      last day (688 days later) »