Suppose $f(x)=\frac{1}{x^2}$ and $g_k(x)=kx$ for parameter $k\in\Bbb R_{>0}.$
$g_k(x)$ maps onto itself as $k$ increases. The transformation maps a point on $f(x)$ to another point on $f(x).$
How would you write down this transformation more mathematically? Is it related to another, more well-kn...
If $\text{Hom}(B, Q) \xrightarrow{f^*} \text{Hom}(A, Q) \to 0$ is exact and $Q$ is injective object (in an abelian category), then how does the proof go that $f : A \to B$ is a monomorphism?
@geocalc33 hey
@geocalc33 want to learn some homological algebra, which applies to all math in existence?
they have underlying abelian group structure by definition, and together with a scalar mult which makes them into $A$-modules for some ring or field $A$
When $A$ is a field you get by definition a vector space.
i'm only seeing x and y in the rule definition but if these other things are varying in the analysis of interest i would definitely have more questions
You'd have to prove that $y/a^n + y/b^m = y/c^k$ has a solution $k, c$ for all $a, n,m, y$.
First if $y = 0$ then any $c^k$ will do
So assume $y \neq 0$
Divide out $y$
Then mutliply by $a^n b^m c^k$
That takes things from denominators into numerators
You'd also need that simultaneously $a^n x + b^m x = c^k x$ for the precise same choice of $c,k$ as the first problem
So you have a system of two equations to solve, but because $c^k$ could be possibly many things, i.e. you're given two parameters to choose, to satisfy the two equations, you might have a linear space.
But in any case, $L = \bigcup_{i = 1}^{\infty} X_i$ not elementwise
@StudySmarterNotHarder for $n=1$...Therefore, the collection of squeeze mappings forms a one-parameter group isomorphic to the multiplicative group of positive real numbers
Quick question (will be back in a couple of hours for more details): if I have an equation of a second derivative of a function, can I integrate the other side of the equation to make the expression one of a first order derivative?
I want an expression for the first derivative with respect to x in the schrodinger equation
andrew i am not an expert on the schrodinger equation but very frequently you can indeed integrate both sides of "f''(x) = blah" and get "f'(x) = new blah." the issue is that new blah might not be any easier to analyze than the original formula for f''(x). it's not guaranteed to be a slam dunk unless the RHS is in some way 'simple' or cleverly dealt with.
you see an analog of this in high school algebra, particularly when students move just one copy of something involving a variable x to the one side and then tries to solve for x by applying an inverse function to the other side. if the other side still has x's in it, that might not be much easier to analyze.
@AndrewMicallef with regular derivatives, sure, but with partial derivatives you have to remember that the constant of integration is a function of the remaining variables.
@AndrewMicallef it seems to me that if you integrated w.r.t. either $x$ or $t$ (say the 1-D Schrodinger) you'd be left with an integral of $\Psi$ itself, not just an equation with $\Psi$ and its derivatives.
@TedShifrin I am thinking now of working out the surjectivity of that map by looking at surface theory. In particular Beauville's book on classification of surfaces. I think the surjectivity can be achieved by by dividing it into cases.
will discuss with my supervisor tomorrow. I don't think there exist one technique to prove it for all surfaces without delving it into cases.
@StudySmarterNotHarder @Andrew Not to mention you have no idea what to do with the left-hand side. You can interchange integral and derivative and then you'll have $\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int \Psi\,dx$.
i always thought more in terms of integration than measure. integration behaves better if you can do a lot of countable limity stuff with functions. functions of interest to topology often behave nicely with the topology, so consider that when you try integrating them.
there's a bunch of stuff left out of that but that's my first few thoughts.
there you sometimes are working with a completion, which can be worse for some purposes. books aren't consistent about this. but yeah, the standard examples are best.
Test statistics. The test statistic is a number calculated from a statistical test of a hypothesis. It shows how closely your observed data match the distribution expected under the null hypothesis of that statistical test. @StudySmarterNotHarder
In statistics, the t-statistic is the ratio of the departure of the estimated value of a parameter from its hypothesized value to its standard error. It is used in hypothesis testing via Student's t-test. The t-statistic is used in a t-test to determine whether to support or reject the null hypothesis. It is very similar to the Z-score but with the difference that t-statistic is used when the sample size is small or the population standard deviation is unknown. For example, the t-statistic is used in estimating the population mean from a sampling distribution of sample means if the populati...
I started programming by entering opcodes manually into a TI-86 calculator. You could then execute the text file as an assembler program using the OS, by default!
I had a table of all the opcodes
I had to translate them into hex numbers with address and everything. From there I moved into C
@KyleReynolds Avra posted the link for you, drag the first Start ChatJax link into bookmark bar. You have to visit that link from your bookmarks each time you enter chat to render math
Open that link and add start ChatJax as bookmark. Then whenever you are here, please click on that bookmark for start ChatJax to render LaTex equations. This is how people ae able to read your questions Kyle.
Make sure after you got questions from teachers here to update your page by clicking on bookmark you have just saved for start ChatJa
It's weird, people growing up around each other in the same country speaking the same language as other (English-speaking) countries, an accent develops, and it sticks over evolutionary time
*in that area
I'm going to try and hear your text in an Irish accent for bit
And I will detect from text-alone that you are truely from Ireland
the twin prime conjecture is false. i have some wonderful pamphlets that lay out the whole thing. they are available for modest prices, given the importance of what is inside.
publishers don't seem interested in making a blind offer, so i turn to you, the public
for a premium the sale can be secret and you can claim the work as your own.
ahh, the shortsightedness of the mathematical public.
A real miracle of mathematics is that analysis is the strongest attack on prime number problems. In a sense Analytic NT is more powerful than Alg NT on prime number problems, all because of the zeta function and surrounding math
It's shocking that continuity and differentiation are used to attack discrete-like integer questions
yeah it seems like there ought to be all sorts of things you could do fairly simply. with the right equipment. maybe that's the catch - too many peopple are doing useful things.
i once made an origami model of five intersecting tetrahedra, using some instructions on the internet. really tight tolerances. i would have preferred to print it out.