@Mathphile: Have you considered something like unique factorization? Any prime factor of $x!$ must divide $x$.
@nbro I don't know what the derivative of a function with respect to a function is. If $f$ is a function of $x$, and $\Delta x$ is an independent variable, how in the world is $f$ a function of $x+\Delta x$?
Hello, I'm trying to show that the direct sum of the line spanned by $u=(1, 0, \dots , 0, \dots)$ and its orthogonal complement (the set of sequences with $u_1=0), is not equal to $l^2(\mathbb N)$
Well, as far as I'm concerned it is the direct sum, but I stumbled upon a problem that claims this, the only thing I changed was that instead of the first element being $1$ they chose it for some $n$
@FuzzyPixelz $\ell^2(\Bbb N)$ is $\langle (1, 0, \cdots ) \rangle \oplus \langle (1, 0, \cdots ) \rangle^\perp$. I was referring to what the precise problem in the other thing you saw that made you think otherwise.
@FuzzyPixelz: Somewhere recently I saw a post about sequences that only had had finitely many nonzero terms as a subspace of $\ell^2(\Bbb N)$ or $\ell^\infty(\Bbb N)$. Are you sure you're not confusing things?
My text precisely says that they consider the set of all sequences $(u_n)$ in $\mathbb R ^ {\mathbb N}$ such that $\sum_n u_{n}^2$ converges, with the typical inner product
@MatheinBoulomenos "un gelato della fragola" is wrong, "un gelato con la fragola" means an ice cream with a strawberry added on top, "un gelato alla fragola" means a strawberry flavoured ice cream
I bet what you have in mind is the subspace of $\ell^2(\Bbb N)$ spanned by $a_1, a_2, \cdots$ where $a_n = (0, \cdots, 1, \cdots, 0)$ with $1$ at the $n$'th plane.
That is not closed: it's what Ted said, the subspace of finite sequences with trailing zeroes
Basically, when a cohomology class vanishes (say a 4-dimensional class on a 3-manifold), you can get a canonical "antiderivative" (in this case a 3-form) that is interesting. That's the transgression.
Gauss-Bonnet has something similar, working on the frame bundle. That's how Chern got the invariant (generalizing geodesic curvature for surfaces) to integrate over the boundary in the case of a Riemannian manifold with boundary.
I have a sphere that equally divided in to two hemisphere P and S. There is a plane that separate two different zone. Upper zone called A and lower zone called B. The angle $\alpha$ defined where the sphere is touching the intersection plane.So $\alpha$ larger means sphere is more in zone A and v...
So Chern's genius was to intuit expressions in connection and curvature forms to get a combination whose derivative would be the Pfaffian of curvature (namely, the integrand in Gauss-Bonnet).
@RyanUnger Take a Cantor set and mark all the midpoints of each of the intervals during the one-third removal in the process of building the Cantor set
Alright, so with this orthogonal complement of $F$ must reduce to $\{0\}$, but then $F$ alone contains the non-square-summable sequences of $\ell^2(\mathbb N)$. I call it a day.
@BalarkaSen order of the quotient grp is 6 cause the lcm(ord[2]_4, ord[4]_6) is 6 and Z4 X Z6 has order 24, so S3 and Z6 are the two isomorphism classes
How do I check if the quotient grp is isomorphic to any of those without computing its elements?