« first day (3226 days earlier)      last day (2091 days later) » 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

18:00
No, I don't remember why I started.
Maybe rebellion against your apostrophes.
rebel :P
@Mathphile: Have you considered something like unique factorization? Any prime factor of $x!$ must divide $x$.
@nbro I don't know what the derivative of a function with respect to a function is. If $f$ is a function of $x$, and $\Delta x$ is an independent variable, how in the world is $f$ a function of $x+\Delta x$?
Heya Ted
hi @Rithaniel
18:10
@Alessandro si dice p.es. "un gelato della fragola" oppure "un gelato con la fragola"?
oh, hey @Mathein
hey @Ted
buonasera! @Alessandro
@Tanvir You there?
Hello, I'm trying to show that the direct sum of the line spanned by $u=(1, 0, \dots , 0, \dots)$ and its orthogonal complement (the set of sequences with $u_1=0), is not equal to $l^2(\mathbb N)$
Are you sure?
All sequences with $u_1=0$ or all $\ell^2$ sequences?
In other words, orthogonal complement in what Hilbert space?
18:17
Oh in $\ell^2(\mathbb N)$
So what makes you think the whole space isn't the direct sum?
Well, as far as I'm concerned it is the direct sum, but I stumbled upon a problem that claims this, the only thing I changed was that instead of the first element being $1$ they chose it for some $n$
I don't believe it.
Can you clearly state what the vector space in the other problem is?
If you have a closed subspace of a Hilbert space it always decomposes as that and it's orthogonal complement
@AjayMishra yes
18:24
It's just $\ell^2(\mathbb N)$, isn't it infinite-dimensional ?
No, I mean, what is the subspace?
growls at Balarka's apostrophe
Oh the line spanned by the vector $u=(1, 0, \dots, 0, \dots)$
@Tanvir How you figure out azimuthal part? or you are getting in that part?
@FuzzyPixelz $\ell^2(\Bbb N)$ is $\langle (1, 0, \cdots ) \rangle \oplus \langle (1, 0, \cdots ) \rangle^\perp$. I was referring to what the precise problem in the other thing you saw that made you think otherwise.
18:26
@FuzzyPixelz: Somewhere recently I saw a post about sequences that only had had finitely many nonzero terms as a subspace of $\ell^2(\Bbb N)$ or $\ell^\infty(\Bbb N)$. Are you sure you're not confusing things?
Sorry @Ted
Ill try be more careful next time
@AjayMishra for the hemisphere I get that but for a spherical cap did not get that
My text precisely says that they consider the set of all sequences $(u_n)$ in $\mathbb R ^ {\mathbb N}$ such that $\sum_n u_{n}^2$ converges, with the typical inner product
@MatheinBoulomenos "un gelato della fragola" is wrong, "un gelato con la fragola" means an ice cream with a strawberry added on top, "un gelato alla fragola" means a strawberry flavoured ice cream
18:30
@AlessandroCodenotti ah of course!
grazie!
Di niente!
Are you studying Italian in your break semester?
@Tanvir It seem to require another parameter.
I'll try at least
I could post the problem here but it's in french.
@Ted knows French
18:32
:)
je suis une baguette
@AjayMishra Yeah I also think so. Either height of the cap or polar distance from center of sphere
I approve of that choice @Mathei :P
Balarka, Ted is trying to unravel the nonsense in this, but Fuzzy's will certainly be easier.
I bet what you have in mind is the subspace of $\ell^2(\Bbb N)$ spanned by $a_1, a_2, \cdots$ where $a_n = (0, \cdots, 1, \cdots, 0)$ with $1$ at the $n$'th plane.
That is not closed: it's what Ted said, the subspace of finite sequences with trailing zeroes
18:33
@Tanvir I took height as the parameter, but that is not helping at all.
@AjayMishra Did you try with angle?
@FuzzyPixelz Yes, OK. So your scenario and the scenario in the problem are different.
which angle, specify it please!
The line spanned by $a_1$ is a closed subspace, the subspace spanned by $a_1, a_2, \cdots$ is not.
18:34
Yeah, @Fuzzy, you're thinking $n$ is fixed, and they're taking the span for all $n$, as @Balarka suggests.
overkill approach: a Banach space is never countably-infinite dimensional by Baire
@AjayMishra check here theta angle. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_cap
I'm embarrassed now, thank you.
I think it's confusing, actually. But they never said $n$ was fixed.
@AjayMishra that also defines how large will be the cap. if it is 90 means its a hemisphere
18:36
@TedShifrin Looks scary
I asked the person who gave me this whether it's fixed or not and they didn't give me a clear answer
Some day you should learn about Chern-Simons, Balarka.
@Alessandro è difficle parlare italiano nella vita quotidiana, volo fare forse un "tandem"
@TedShifrin Roughly, what's it about?
I don't have a clue
You know what transgression is, right?
18:38
Yup, those arrows in the spectral sequences I never really understood, right?
Doesn't need to be coming from a spectral sequence.
Eg one which comes in Gysin sequences but that's easier to interpret as cup product with the Euler class
Huh, I see, I haven't heard of them in other contexts
posso parlare solo un piccolo, piccolo po' dell'italiano, probabilmente troppo poco per fare un "tandem" (non so come si dice "tandem" nell'italiano)
Basically, when a cohomology class vanishes (say a 4-dimensional class on a 3-manifold), you can get a canonical "antiderivative" (in this case a 3-form) that is interesting. That's the transgression.
Oh interesting
18:42
Gauss-Bonnet has something similar, working on the frame bundle. That's how Chern got the invariant (generalizing geodesic curvature for surfaces) to integrate over the boundary in the case of a Riemannian manifold with boundary.
@everyone, Can you please have a look in this problem? stuck for a quite long time.
0
Q: Area of a spherical cap crossing an intersection

TanvirI have a sphere that equally divided in to two hemisphere P and S. There is a plane that separate two different zone. Upper zone called A and lower zone called B. The angle $\alpha$ defined where the sphere is touching the intersection plane.So $\alpha$ larger means sphere is more in zone A and v...

I always did the moving frames proof locally but never tried to see what happens if I do it globally on the frame bundle. I should try that out once
So Chern's genius was to intuit expressions in connection and curvature forms to get a combination whose derivative would be the Pfaffian of curvature (namely, the integrand in Gauss-Bonnet).
For surfaces, it's all trivial, of course.
Really struggle with people who pronounce "Weierstraß" as "Weierstrauß"
18:45
lol
is that really a thing?
I concur, @ÍgjøgnumMeg.
yeah it happens all the time lol
I even had a brilliant professor who misspelled it.
Silverman is doing it...
Weierbouquet
18:46
Leebniz
That ^
is the best
Youler
Nuth
18:46
I think this is a good time for a lunch break for Ted.
Shiffrin
Teed Sheefreen
@Ted forgive me
that reminds me, my mother is an English teacher and she had a student translate "Vogel Strauß" as "bird bouquet"
hahaha wat
18:48
not to mention the translation of "Der Menschenauflauf löste sich auf" as "The human gratin dissolved"
So what is a bouquet of birds?
the fuuuh
does anyone know what the set of "critical values" of the devil's staircase is? It's not all of [0,1]...is it dense. Full measure?
critical values meaning the values of the intervals on which it's constant
"Vogel Strauß" means ostrich
oh, how in the world did that come to be?
18:50
@RyanUnger Complement of the Cantor set, right?
because of all the colors?
@BalarkaSen I mean the values on the y axis
Apparently "Weier" translates to "fish tank"
Weierstraß was just an aisle in a pet shop
complement of the cantor set has connected components which are more than points
Oh, what it maps to
18:52
VALUES.
Strauß comes from the Greek στρουθίον (strouthion), from where the Latin avis struthio is derived, which turned into the english ostrich
I think there are no actual bouquets involved, seems like a homonym
That's a very roundabout etymology
@RyanUnger Take a Cantor set and mark all the midpoints of each of the intervals during the one-third removal in the process of building the Cantor set
That's the thing, I believe
so uncountable but not dense and not full measure
it has measure zero I mean
18:54
yes, I checked "Vogel Strauß" and "Blumenstrauß" have completely unrelated etymologies
but then maybe you can do this with a fat cantor set
scary thought
@MatheinBoulomenos voglio*
But it sounds like a good idea
@AlessandroCodenotti grazie
I'm just worried my Italian is too bad for even basic conversations
More precisely, I mean the midpoints of each of the intervals in $[0, 1] \setminus C$
Why isn't Italian a language of modern math?
18:58
@RyanUnger It's countable, isn't it.
Alright, so with this orthogonal complement of $F$ must reduce to $\{0\}$, but then $F$ alone contains the non-square-summable sequences of $\ell^2(\mathbb N)$. I call it a day.
penso che il mio italiano sia troppo male per fare un tandem
Right, @FuzzyPixelz, the subspace of eventually zero sequences in $\ell^2(\Bbb N)$ is dense.
Smells like topology, I don't know any topology, but thanks nonetheless.
\o @Daminark
19:00
Hey there ya lot of nerds
you dont know topology but are trying to work with Hilbert spaces?
Hey @Daminark
you just added one to the counter @Daminark
Actually, my course focuses on Euclidean spaces and occasionally inner product spaces, I was just trying to get a conter-example.
Hey, I am much more of a dork than a nerd, thank you very much.
19:03
nerd vs dork
vs bookworm
Join the Dork Side
3
Daminork
Dork Vader
19:05
@BalarkaSen basically I am wondering how bad the critical values of a graph can be
can a map $I\to I$ have dense critical values?
@Tanvir Do you know the answer?
I know it's possible for $R\to R$
the rational bumps thing
i dont want to think about that it seems awful
19:07
@MatheinBoulomenos just go ahead and try, practice is the best regardless of your level
does that work for $I\to I$? I guess it does if you make the bumps go like $1/2^k$ width
should
"seems awful" yeah welcome to this project
@AjayMishra Nope. Thats why I post it. I have edited the question. It might be helpful
@AjayMishra So far nobody can answer this problem. Not even a hint.
I will.
19:09
its like you have to have the height of the bumps converge to whatever the values at $0$ and $1$ are
which seems complicated and ugh
I've written down everything, atlast i realize that it is 3 D, I have everything prepared.
i am leaving the chat out of pure disgust
@AjayMishra Lets see. Can you upvote it? so that it draw attention.
My rep = 7
19:11
ohh ok..no worry then
 
2 hours later…
20:53
@BalarkaSen order of the quotient grp is 6 cause the lcm(ord[2]_4, ord[4]_6) is 6 and Z4 X Z6 has order 24, so S3 and Z6 are the two isomorphism classes
How do I check if the quotient grp is isomorphic to any of those without computing its elements?
21:29
Hey guys. I have a question.
 
2 hours later…
23:15
Ask away avant le garde
Pour vous avez veux ca
Un bonne phrase c'est bien connaitre: Juste demander; ne pas demander a demander.
Parlay voo
Oui je suis courrament en francaise
wee wee
Question: What is a cotangent space? It says it's the dual space of the tangent space but I don't understand still.
Okay after reading a bit more I think I understand better
Is there a way to formalize how malleable a symplectic manifold is compared to a quite rigid Riemannian manifold
23:33
you can think of them as the span of the $1$-forms
the cotangent spaces
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

« first day (3226 days earlier)      last day (2091 days later) »