« first day (3055 days earlier)      last day (1960 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

7:00 PM
How's it spacetiming?
 
I suppose one cannot always avoid the nerd convention
How's it going everyone?
 
hello Demonark
 
Good afternoon.
 
I missed the conversation about spacetime
 
hi @CaptainAmerica
 
7:02 PM
hi @CaptainAmerica16
 
I went to the eye doctor today.
 
How was?
How many fingers am I holding up?
 
I think...
 
7:04 PM
Please click on all pictures with stop signs
 
My prescription is the same as last year, thankfully. It's been getting worse every year since 4th grade. At the point, my vision is 20/200.
@Daminark Lol
 
My vision can detect ripples in the space time continuum
 
This is in contrast to both Apple's iDoctor and Asimov's I, Doctor
 
wow, @CaptainAmerica: That is seriously horrible.
 
Mine without glasses is also that
 
7:06 PM
@TedShifrin I know, my mom freaked out because the doctor kept mentioning I might be legally blind. I can see 20/20 with glasses though, so not that bad at the moment.
 
Yeah, that sounds like legally blind.
 
Astigmatism and my vision kept decreasing badly until I was about... 15?
 
I still need glasses for driving and movie theaters, but I'm fine otherwise.
 
Are your glasses really heavy?
 
Astigmatism as well, I'm also near-sighted.
@AkivaWeinberger No, but they are large.
 
7:07 PM
Once I started wearing antiglare glasses it stopped plummeting
 
Oh, I have that (as well as progressive sunglasses) because of my cataracts.
 
I might need to invest in those
On occasion I can see my eye's reflection in my glasses
 
DogAteMy: I think they now use light plastics rather than glass, so glasses aren't heavy any more.
 
Interesting
I'm no chemist
At some point I should look up why glass is transparent, on a molecular level
 
Crystal structure? Hmm ... I dunno.
 
7:10 PM
I still don't know where color comes from tbh
There's a blue pigment called techelet whose formula had been lost for two thousand years
 
Isn't it obvious? You can't see through opaque objects. The only other option was clear.
 
Certain things absorb or transmit only certain frequencies of light, I guess.
 
(Or tekhelet, however you want to spell it)
 
So it's all about wavelengths.
 
(תכלת)
 
Anonymous
7:11 PM
@AkivaWeinberger There's a nice thread on that here
 
That reminds me - I saw a rainbow on the ground today.
 
Neat
Had it rained recently?
 
Probably oil, CaptainAmerica.
 
Anonymous
@CaptainAmerica16 Well, there's translucent
 
Yeah, it rained all night.
 
7:12 PM
There's a water fountain in the park near my house that I used to have fun making rainbows with
 
@Blue Oof, I didn't think of that
 
'cause if you put your finger in it in the right way, it makes this massive spray of water
 
during a storm I saw lightning go across a rainbow
 
and then the sun hits it and makes a rainbow
 
@Ultradark That sounds intense.
 
7:13 PM
Zeus got angry with Iris?
 
Yeah the gods were angry that day
 
There's a neat thing with light
where, technically it's this infinite dimensional space of frequencies, you can add together as many different frequencies as you want,
 
Really?
 
but our eyes can only see a three-dimensional subspace of that 'cause we only have red, green, and blue cones
(or maybe fewer if you're color blind)
So as a result there are types of light that look the same to us but our actually different
and they'll refract off of materials differently
I forget the word for this
Animals with more types of cones than us can distinguish more light than we can, as a result
There's also the question of how sensitive to change each individual cone is, but that's a separate thing
 
Animals must see some freaky stuff.
 
7:18 PM
Computer screens, for example, only make red, green, and blue light
because they're built for humans
so they can't make yellow, they can only make something that's indistinguishable from yellow for humans (by combining R, G, and B)
but different animals would be able to tell that it's not the same
 
The aquaponics lab I work in has lights that only give off red and blue, so that when you back into normal light, everything looks green.
 
Cool
(This is why the color space on computers is RGB. It's entirely to do with human anatomy, rather than a property of the universe)
 
@Ted The Spivak guilt got to me, I'm back in ch. 1
 
I'm sick of chapter 1.
 
I felt bad for skipping so many problems.
So that's what I was doing all night.
 
Anonymous
7:22 PM
@AkivaWeinberger Isn't that a bit of an oversimplification? :/ Red, blue and green aren't three specific frequencies any way and there's sufficient overlap between those colors in the visual spectrum.
 
That graph describes the map to the 3D subspace
 
@Ted I'm done with ch. 1 by the end of Dec. no matter how I feel.
 
Anonymous
@AkivaWeinberger Which graph?
 
It really would be better if you got to more interesting stuff, @CaptainAmerica.
 
This one
 
7:25 PM
@TedShifrin That's why once we are done with all of math, we can get on to more interesting stuff. =)
 
@TedShifrin This is it. The final stretch, then I'm seriously going to move on.
 
Thank goodness for transfinite induction, Jasper.
 
Based on that graph, I'd guess 500nm light would look the same as the right combination of 450nm and 550nm light
give or take
 
I plan on finishing math when I go to grad school. Can't wait to see what classes come after that.
 
$\sin(500x)$ and $\sin(450x)+\sin(550x)$ are different functions though
 
7:26 PM
DogAteMy: You get serious beats if you combine 450 and 550.
 
I hear MATH2 is intense.
 
@TedShifrin Is that a thing that happens with light??
I mean I guess it must
but I dunno what that would mean
 
You get pulsing, I presume.
 
@AkivaWeinberger Why are you calling this a 3D subspace?
 
I need to ask my physicist friends.
 
7:27 PM
Er, that's probably actually $\sin(x/450)+\sin(x/550)$
'cause it's wavelength, not frequency
@user616128 One dimension per cone cell
Color, as seen by humans, can be described as an amount of red, an amount of green, and an amount of blue
This is what the RGB encoding is on computers
 
@CaptainAmerica16 What is MATH2?
 
@JasperLoy It's the math you do after you finish math.
 
Color as it actually exists in the universe is an arbitrary linear combination of waves
 
"One dimension per cone cell" makes no sense at all
 
It's the configuration space of the colors
not an actual geometric shape
You need three numbers to describe it, is what I mean
 
7:30 PM
The different types of cones have different responsivity to different wavelength within the visible spectrum
 
Yeah, and we can describe a color by three numbers, describing how activated each type of cone is
 
@CaptainAmerica16 Whether it's grad classes or undergrad classes, they only cover a fraction of a good book, and a good book only covers a fraction of the important stuff in a topic. So classes are just introductions to topics to enable you to get a paper qualification along the way.
 
You need one number to describe visible colour, something like a weighted average of the frequencies of the EM-waves corresponding to the photons
Why are you saying there are three numbers?
 
Wait sorry I misread
 
The picture was responsivity of each of the three types of cones
 
7:32 PM
@AkivaWeinberger On Windows 10 I can specify three numbers in RGB to get a colour.
 
It's not the average of the frequencies
 
@JasperLoy I was kidding, but that's exactly why I'm going to study calc in more depth at the end of this school year.
 
@AkivaWeinberger You're going to have trouble perceiving a single photon
 
No monochromatic light is pink, for example
 
@Ted Do I need a lot of linear algebra to really understand affine geometry?
 
7:33 PM
Pink can only be obtained by combining lights of different frequencies
It doesn't look the same as the average frequency
 
@CaptainAmerica16 After you read Spivak's Calculus, you can read Shifrin's Multivariable Mathematics, which is essentially multivariable calculus with linear algebra.
 
Think of it this way: Sound is a wave, just like light. If I play more than one note at once, it doesn't sound like one note.
It sounds like a chord.
 
@CaptainAmerica: You need linear maps/matrices.
 
But our ears are better than our eyes, because our ears don't have just three types of sound sensors.
 
Unless you're tone-deaf, DogAteMy :D
 
7:34 PM
If they did, then every noise would sound like some combination of C, E, and G (for example)
@TedShifrin True
 
When I was in the choir some singers were tone deaf.
 
@AkivaWeinberger I don't understand how this refutes what I said?
 
You wouldn't be able to tell apart different instruments, even
 
Tone deaf people can play the piano, but they can sing the wrong tone even after you play it to them.
 
Monochromatic light is taking a stream of photons with the same associated EM frequency
 
7:35 PM
@user616128 You said "You need one number to describe visible colour"
No one number can describe pink
 
@JasperLoy That sounds like a plan.
Something I feel like I agreed to before - it's been so long.
 
I said "weighted average of the frequencies"
Not frequency
 
I'm not sure I understand you
If you take the weighted average of frequencies you end up with a single number
 
Yes, and each of your photons in monochromatic light has the same frequency
 
Sure, but pink is a color and you can't get monochromatic pink
 
7:38 PM
But in the case that you are not perceiving monochromatic light, each of your cones has a different responsivity to different wavelengths
(which was normalised out in your picture above)
 
and you have three cones, resulting in three numbers describing what you're seeing
Do you know what the RGB color space is, on computers?
You give the computer three numbers and it gives you a color
 
And when looking at something that is pink, you have a massive number of photons being absorbed, with non-constant frequency
 
@user616128 OK
Doesn't mean pink isn't a color
 
@AkivaWeinberger You realise how computer monitors use RGB do you not?
You know what a pixel actually looks like?
 
Yes
Three subpixels
 
7:41 PM
Yes
And if you use a magnifying glass you can clearly observe them
The photons aren't activating cones in an extremely local region
When you observe the screen with the unaided eye, photons are indeed activating cones in the same region
Tell me what white is in your three dimensional space?
 
(100%,100%,100%)
 
Anonymous
Biology SE has a very nice discussion on the human color vision model. It's a bit more complicated than the RGB model we use for computers. The point here is that the L, M, S cone cell frequencies have considerable regions of overlap whereas the RGB model does not - so you can describe it as three independent coordinates (what Akiva calls a 3D subspace), whereas that simplistic model does not apply to cone cells but approximates it rather well.
 
#FFFFFF, in RGB
 
Anonymous
Life would have been simpler if we could have described our vision in terms of "activations" of RGB cone cells with values ranging from 0 to 1 for each coordinate. Unfortunately, real physics sucks. :)
 
Hey I found a Wikipedia thing
> A "physical color" is a combination of pure spectral colors (in the visible range). Since there are, in principle, infinitely many distinct spectral colors, the set of all physical colors may be thought of as an infinite-dimensional vector space, in fact a Hilbert space. We call this space $H_{\rm color}$.
> A humanly perceived color may be modeled as three numbers: the extents to which each of the 3 types of cones is stimulated. Thus a humanly perceived color may be thought of as a point in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. We call this space $\Bbb R^3_{\rm color}$.
 
7:48 PM
This is where spectral decompositiion of operators on Hilbert (Banach) spaces comes from :P
 
I have to go now, thanks for the discussion :-)
 
The map $H_{\rm color}\mapsto\Bbb R_{\rm color}^3$ has a kernel, resulting in two points with the same image
 
Um, an infinite-dimensional (affine sub)space of points with the same image?
 
Right yeah
Here's the spectrum of a lemon
The spectrum of a computer image of a lemon would be mostly zero except for three spikes
 
Anonymous
@TedShifrin Lol, I knew there had to be a connection :P
 
Anonymous
7:52 PM
Spectral decomposition...spectroscopy.....phew
 
Finally found the name of the thing!
In colorimetry, metamerism is a perceived matching of the colors with different (nonmatching) spectral power distributions. Colors that match this way are called metamers. A spectral power distribution describes the proportion of total light given off (emitted, transmitted, or reflected) by a color sample at each visible wavelength; it defines the complete information about the light coming from the sample. However, the human eye contains only three color receptors (three types of cone cells), which means that all colors are reduced to three sensory quantities, called the tristimulus value...
Metamers.
Or metametric colors.
 
Wow.
 
Almost done with grad apps, just have 3 left
 
Quite the ordeal, Demonark. Remember that some of us had to do this with typewriters and pens.
 
> The term illuminant metameric failure or illuminant metamerism is sometimes used to describe situations where two material samples match when viewed under one light source but not another. Most types of fluorescent lights produce an irregular or peaky spectral emittance curve, so that two materials under fluorescent light might not match, even though they are a metameric match to an incandescent "white" light source with a nearly flat or smooth emittance curve.
 
7:58 PM
Not to mention the pain of sending in recommendations on paper for years.
 
Lack of autofill... How many schools did people apply to then?
 
> Normally, material attributes such as translucency, gloss or surface texture are not considered in color matching. However geometric metameric failure or geometric metamerism can occur when two samples match when viewed from one angle, but then fail to match when viewed from a different angle. A common example is the color variation that appears in pearlescent automobile finishes or "metallic" paper
 
Probably 6-15.
It cost money then, too.
 
I ended up with 15
But wow doing 15 on paper is a nightmare
 
I was cocky and I think I applied only to 6.
I was confident in a few safety schools.
Plus I was super lucky and got an NSF graduate fellowship.
I still remember typing almost 100 job applications individually.
 
8:02 PM
Seems to have worked out well enough in any event. I had 3-4 backups in there, and 4 wishful thinking. The remaining 7 I classify as rough but hopefully I have a shot
Maybe 2 of the 7 are a bit less confident
And oof, 100?
 
Well, your list that you showed me looked reasonable to me in the end.
Yup.
Now there's MathJobs and people just post things electronically. Or maybe the Russians post them.
 
Yeah, I ended up adding Notre Dame to it, I had a fee waiver because of the workshop I went to some time back and at least one guy there knows and seems to like me
 
I know several people on the faculty there. It was also one of my multiple job interviews back in 1981. :P
 
hi chat
 
hi Semiclassic
 
8:04 PM
So I'd like to think it's safe, and they have Behrens and Putnam who seem really interesting. Also two number theorists, though they're assistant professors so less sure bets
 
OK, lunchtime for me and then I need to take a walk.
 
i think i reached the limit of my polytopes stuff, or at least the limit of what I can get a computer to do for me
 
Putnam or Putman?
Guess you need a mainframe, Semiclassic.
 
Uh oh, thought it was Putnam. I hope I didn't misspell his name in my SoP
 
Oh oh.
The geometry guy I know is Putman.
 
8:06 PM
when one of your steps takes your computer an hour and results in a convex hull of half a million vertices in 63 dimensions
that's a sign that you probably should stop asking your computer to do it
 
You're right and I did misspell it. :'(
 
Presumably only relatively few of those vertices are actually relevant, @Semiclassic.
I'm sure you're not the first to do so, Demonark.
 
yep. once you apply an appropriate mapping from RR^63 down to RR^3, you end up with a convex hull of just 68 points
 
Is this irrevocably posted without possibility of correction?
Why are you RRing, Semiclassic?
 
because I'm used to how sage writes rings
 
8:08 PM
Sadly, yes. Hopefully whoever is reading it is also dyslexic.
 
QQ = rational field, RR = real field etc
 
Oh.
 
(it's actually working over rationals, since I want exact results)
 
I'm sure that slows things down HUMONGOUSLY.
 
yuuup
To make sure I was actually making progress, I split up the process to create the half-million vertices into 63 steps (one for each coordinate---you just need to ensure that each of them is nonnegative)
 
8:11 PM
Ugh ... well, anyhow, I need to get going.
 
the first 50 steps take tenths of a second each
the next 10 about half a second each
next is about a second, then 15 seconds, then 90 seconds
 
Yeah flight is about to take off so I should go airplane mode
 
that just leaves the last step...which takes an hour :3
 
Heading to Texas for winter break
 
8:29 PM
@Daminark Have fun
 
8:57 PM
what are you trying to do @Semiclassical?
 
9:20 PM
@AkivaWeinberger That sounds right. The complement has countably many components.
 
10:05 PM
How can we show that the diophantine equation $x^3+5=11+y^3 \Rightarrow x^3-y^3=6$ has no integral solution?

If we calculate that modulo $6$ we get that $x^3\equiv y^3\bmod 6$. Does this help us?
 
10:47 PM
@MaryStar You need two cubes that are six away from each other
Think about the sequence of cubes (1, 8, 27, etc)
 
In Spivak, is 0 considered part of the positive numbers?
Nevermind, I'm pretty sure it isn't.
0 isn't a positive number anywhere 😑
 
11:12 PM
Shouldn't have the underlined part been $[F(a,b):F]\leq mn$ ?
 
11:29 PM
Hi all, a quick question. Suppose I know that $\int f \leq M$ for some $M$. Can anything be said about the integral $\int f \cdot g$ for some integrable function g?
Like can I put any bound on the integral of the product using M
 
@NicholasRoberts "Holder inequality"
 
Ive heard of Holder's ineq when studying LP spaces. Does it apply here?
 
You'll want to assume either f is non-negative or replace that by a bound on the integral of $|f|$
 
Actually, the absolute value should have been there. I meant to write L1 norm. So thats good
But for holders, dont we need 1/p + 1/q = 1?
 
11:46 PM
Sure, so figure out what p and q are appropriate here
 
Thanks for the tip, Mike! Btw i saw your talk at stonybrook last spring, was very good!
 
Given several points, that if connected would form a nonlinear, concave arc, find a function that passes through the points
 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (3055 days earlier)      last day (1960 days later) »