« first day (2755 days earlier)      last day (2563 days later) » 

19:00
The website says I need to send my Hochschulzugangsberechtigung though, which makes no sense to me and is gonna be a real pain in the ass :(
You have to prove that you have an equivalent of the Abitur, yes
It's like the grades don't matter but you have to have it
That's so STUPID
hahaha
that is a really long word
Hochschulzugangsberechtigung is a nice word. You have to give them your Hochschulzugangsberechtigungsbescheinigung to prove that you have a Hochschulzugangsberechtigung
hahaha
Still I'm really angry, I need to pay like 100 pounds to have some stupid useless document sent to me because the English exam boards are assholes
19:03
I've you've lost your Hochschulzugangsberechtigungsbescheinigung you have to make a Hochschulzugangsberechtigungsbescheinungswiederausstellungsantrag
German is fun
That sucks, my high school gives me new copies of my documents for free
That's because you live in a not-backwards sh*thole
lol
that kinda sounds like I'm saying you live in a sh*thole
but that's not what I meant of course
I thought you meant to put the "not" in some other place
Not-backwards not-shithole
oops
I broke my own censorship rule
Double negative?
not really, if you negate each part separately
Geldgierige Wichsteufel
double the negative for emphasis
19:08
Lol, your German swearing is really authentic
sarkastisch gemeint oder wie
hahaha
No, I was serious
ah right
most complicated german words I know are
Actually I have a really horribly strong farmer accent
19:10
bremstrallung and zitterwebegung (no idea if i'm spelling those right)
bremsstrahlung
nope, bremsstrahlung and zitterbewegung
right
Zitterbewegung?
lol
okay
haha
So if $(X, \Gamma)$ is a cell complex and $\Phi : D \to X$ is a characteristic map for some open cell $e \in \Gamma$, how can I show $\Phi[D] = \operatorname{Cl_X}(e)$
Gadoladolälla is a funny word people from "my" region always teach people
19:11
Hochschulzugangsberechtigungsbescheinungswiederausstellungsantrag is not really a complicated word
2
and those I'm only aware of because physics
Meaning something like.. "the hook on the outside of the window of your parents' bedroom that you use to hold the shutters open"
lol
don't u dudes just smash words
wordsmash
wordsmaschifikationshammer
19:13
A word should not be a sentence.
@Semiclassical what's the difference
The headache I get from trying to read one versus the other.
pssshhhhhhh
the harder it is to read the better tbh
lol once you know all the subwords of a word it really becomes very easy to read the long words
seems like it'd make it hard to look up words
19:17
while we're at it we should remove all punctuation
you don't have to look up the whole word when you can break it into parts correctly
in fact fuck separate words lets just have one big fuckin word
spanning pages and pages
Kant debunked language in Groundworks already
There was a law in Germany that was officially called Rindfleischettiketierungsüberwachungsaufgabenübertragungsgesetz
19:19
ahahaha
My German is rusty, reading stuff like that is hard
Kant debunked Kant years ago
I was a Küchenbauteilettiketierer in Austria for a while
etikettierung* wow
double-t in the wrong place
But honestly, 100 pounds as a Hochschulzugangsberechtigungsbescheinungswiederausstellungsantragsgebühr is way too much
hahahaha
Eine Hochschulzugangsberechtigungsbescheinigungswiederausstellungsantragsgebührübertr‌​eibung ist das
19:26
@EricSilva A bunch of languages don't use spaces
It's very common in Germanic languages!
Chinese and Japanese don't use spaces, I don't know if there are any other examples actually
Korean
english is just a poser germanic language
for nerds
> Vietnamese uses spaces between syllables instead of between words (except some few recent loanwords)
Huh weird
The anti-German
19:30
whoa
i didnt know that
i should ask my roommate about that
Dziewięćsetdziewięćdziesiątdziewięćmiliardówdziewięćsetdziewięćdziesiątdziewięćm‌​ilionówdziewięćsetdziewięćdziesiątdziewięćtysięcydziewięćsetdziewięćdziesięciodzi‌​ewięcioletniego
Polish wins?
Tiếng Thái (ภาษาไทย, chuyển tự: phasa thai, đọc là Pha-xả Thai) là ngôn ngữ chính thức của Thái Lan và là tiếng mẹ đẻ của người Thái, dân tộc chiếm đa số ở Thái Lan. Tiếng Thái là một thành viên của nhóm ngôn ngữ Thái của ngữ hệ Tai-Kadai. Các ngôn ngữ trong hệ Tai-Kadai được cho là có nguồn gốc từ vùng miền Nam Trung Quốc ngày nay và nhiều nhà ngôn ngữ học đã đưa ra những bằng chứng về mối liên hệ với các ngữ hệ Nam Á, Nam Đảo, hoặc Hán-Tạng. Đây là một ngôn ngữ có thanh điệu (tonal) và phân tích (analytic). Sự phối hợp thanh điệu, quy tắc chính tả phức tạp, tạo liên hệ (có thể là liên tưởng?…
Too many diacritics ^
(Vietnamese)
wow the latin alphabet is not appropriate for the phonology of these languages
I wonder how close Thai phonology is to Chinese. Pinyin seems to work reasonably well
It's not intuitive for people who speak other Latin-using languages, but it's internally consistent
my SO is apparently very very confused by pinyin
19:34
Pinyin "er" is pronounced more like "ar" and weird things like that
but it's always pronounced the same
she can never tell what anything is saying unless its written in like traditional or whatever it is
zherrrrrrr
na'errrrr
huārr
Beijing is apparently pirates
hahaha
Hey cool fact
can i use derivatives to recursive sequences?
19:35
You know the weird "arrrr" accent that pirates have?
Cornwall innit?
@ÍgjøgnumMeg
The one guy from that one film was from that one place
@AkivaWeinberger Yeahhhh, I live like.. just on the border
A lot of people in my city speak like that
hahaha
Is Bristol there? My British geography isn't that great.
Bristol is about 1 and a half hour drive away from here
but bristolians have a similar accent
i want to prove that $x_{n+1}=x_n - \frac{(x_n)^2 -a}{2x_n} $
is monotone
can i take derivative?
use*
im trying with induction
but i must know what $(x_n)^2 -a$ sign is
since $x_n \geq 0$
19:42
What I might do is write the $n-1$ case, $x_n=x_{n-1}-\frac{(x_{n-1})^2-a}{2x_{n-1}}$
and then compute the difference of those two equations i.e. $x_{n+1}-x_n=$ stuff
doesnt lead somewher
its the same as $x_{n+1} - x_n=- \frac{(x_n)^2-a}{2x_n} $
only with n-1 instead :p
suppose $x_0=1 $
maybe you should look at $x_{n+1}^2-a$
thats what i wrote
@ManolisLyviakis Not what I meant.
i need to know the sign
19:55
no you wrote $x_n^2-a$
First, we can write the initial equation $x_{n+1}=x_n-\left(\frac12 x_n+\frac{a}{2x_n}\right)=\frac{x_n}{2}+\frac{a}{2x_n}$
ok
maybe i should take 2 cases
so then $$x_{n+1}-x_n = \left(\frac{x_n}{2}+\frac{a}{2x_n}\right)-\left(\frac{x_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{a}{2x_{n‌​-1}}\right)=\frac12(x_{n}-x_{n-1})+\frac{a}{2}\left(\frac{1}{x_n}-\frac{1}{x_{n-1‌​}}\right)$$
a>=1 and 0<=a<=1
19:58
which further simplifies to $$x_{n+1}-x_n = \frac{1}{2}(x_n-x_{n-1})\left[1+\frac{a}{x_n x_{n-1}}\right]$$
Which feels pretty suggestive to me
suggestive?
$t\ge 0, p\ge 1\implies (1+t)^p\le 1+p\max\{1,2^{p-2}\}t+\max\{1,2^{p-2}\}t^p$...hmm
convexity?
I mean, $x_{n+1}^2-a$ simplifies to $((x_n^2-a)/2x_n)^2$
@mercio oh, nice
Main thing that I can see from what I wrote is that if all $x_n$ are positive, then $x_{n+1}-x_n$ has the same sign as $x_{n}-x_{n-1}$
Which is exactly what you'd want for monotonicity
@ÍgjøgnumMeg da zählen nur die Noten vom Bachelorstudium
20:01
xn are positive
Yeah, that looks to be easily proven.
$a>0$ here?
@MatheinBoulomenos Okey aber trotzdem benötigt man das Abiturzeugnis lol
i still dont get why the same signs
I guess it'd have to be, since this looks to be Newton's method with $f(x)=x^2-a$
20:02
@ÍgjøgnumMeg ja. Du darfst nicht studieren wenn du kein Abitur hast
4 mins ago, by Semiclassical
which further simplifies to $$x_{n+1}-x_n = \frac{1}{2}(x_n-x_{n-1})\left[1+\frac{a}{x_n x_{n-1}}\right]$$
@MatheinBoulomenos Das ist mir schon klar, nur blöd dass man das noch beim masterstudium benötigt lol
take a look at that second factor $1+a/(x_n x_{n-1})$
@MatheinBoulomenos Wei\st du was ein Ami brauchen w\"urde?
thats exactly what it is @Semiclassical
20:03
SAT/ACT?
thats what im trying to look xD
If $a>0$ and $x_n>0$, what can you say about the sign of $1+a/(x_n x_{n-1})$
@ManolisLyviakis yeah, in which case $a<0$ would be pretty nonsensical
oh x_n are all positive right
@0celo7 Ich glaube ein Highschoolzeugnis würde als äquivalent zum Abitur zählen
Right. So that factor is definitely >0 as well.
20:04
so whatever the first factor does so does the left hand side
Right. They both have to have the same sign
so that means it is monotone
pretty awkward proof maybe im not used to them
did cercio came up with something else?
It's a technique I like to try in these cases.
6 mins ago, by mercio
I mean, $x_{n+1}^2-a$ simplifies to $((x_n^2-a)/2x_n)^2$
is that something?
god, the worst inequalities are those with numbers
20:06
Well, it means that $x_{n+1}^2-a$ is definitely not negative , since it equals the square of something else
like, say at least if you used convexity or whatever
Ich glaub ich hab eh kein Abitur gekriegt um ehrlich zu sein, meine A-Level Noten waren scheiße, hab eigentlich nur so 2 Fächer bestanden und dann bin ich einfach nach Österreich gezogen, jetzt hab ich gute Noten im Bachelorstudium aber kann wie's aussieht wahrscheinlich nicht in Deutschland studieren weil ich "technisch" gesagt keine Hochschulzugangsberechtigung hab lol
@0celo7 yeah, not saying anything seems sloppy
"By convexity on the interval X, we have inequality Y."
@ÍgjøgnumMeg Was? Echt? Das klingt seltsam, aber ich kenne mich nicht so genau aus
20:08
@Semiclassical I need $(1+t)^q\le 1+\mu t+\nu t^q$
I believe it, I think
Seems plausible
But it's a bit of a weird bound.
@mercio how dd you find that?
@ManolisLyviakis I think you can show it by plugging the recursion for $x_{n+1}$ into there and simplifying sufficiently
@Semiclassical it's amazing how much of PDE/measure theory is reduced to convexity of functions on R
@0celo7 hmm
20:09
I looked at $x_{n+1}-x_n$ and used the recurrence relation until its sign became obvious.
@MatheinBoulomenos Ja also da braucht man nur so 3 Fächer, ich hab Deutsch, Mathe und Erweiterte Mathe genommen, hab so gar keine Arbeit gemacht und hab das Buch nicht gelesen wo wir zur prüfung eigentlich lesen müssen hätten, also hab ich einen zweier in Deutsch geschrieben, einen zweier in Mathe und sonst hab ich nichts gekriegt hahaha
@mercio I like the result, though I'm guessing the algebra is a tad tedious
@0celo7 convexity is great when it works
@ÍgjøgnumMeg ah okay, das ist hier anders hier im Abitur
well not really, things cancel out pretty neatly
ah, nice
20:11
$x_{n+1}= x_n - (x_n^2-a)/2x_n$
@Semiclassical well $x\mapsto x^q$ is indeed convex when $q>1$
so maybe I need to use convexity there
so $x_{n+1}^2-a= x_n^2 - (x_n^2-a) + ((x_n^2-a)/2x_n)^2-a$
@Semiclassical that gives me $(1+t)^q\ge t^q+1$
welp
@mercio yeah, that's not too bad
@0celo7 yeah, that's where I'm confused
the linear bound seems more like a tangent line statement
20:13
@MatheinBoulomenos Ja das weiß ich schon, in Österreich ist es glaub ich ähnlich bei der Matura, finds trotzdem blöd dass man das zeugnis braucht fürs masterstudium wenn ich eh beim bachelorstudium gute noten kriege, aber okey is wurst, zahl ich halt 100 pfund für so an stück
hoiiiii
whereas the $t^q$ part seems like a secant line statement
Rant over
@mercio yeah that what i did just a sec before
so since that is positive
@Semiclassical well you expect the function to be $\sim t^q$ so really I would expect $(1+t)^q\le \text{big constant}+t^q$ to work
20:14
maybe make that $2t^q$ or something
idk
then $x_{n+2}-x_{n+1}=- \frac{(x_{n+1})^2-a}{2x_{n+1}} $ is negative
If $1\leq p \leq 2$, this becomes $(1+t)^p \leq 1+p t+t^p$
does that make the sequence decreasing for all n>=1?
If $p>2$, it's $(1+t)^p\leq 1+2^{p-2}t+2^{p-2}t^p$
@Semiclassical which way looks more legit?
20:16
@Semiclassical How about this:$$\left(\frac{1+t}{2}\right)^q\le \frac 12 1^q+\frac 12 t^q$$
@ManolisLyviakis Both work.
using convexity
hmm, but that'd be $(1+t)^q\leq 2^{q-1}+2^{q-1}t^q$
Oh crap, do I need that to be 1 out front...
yeah
I think there's a thought there, though
20:17
well I mean for the purposes of the proof
I do, unfortunately.
the linear lower bound would be $(1+t)^q\geq 1+q t$
nah, my line of thought goes nowhere
that's just it lying above the tangent line at 0, right?
Right. Which isn't that useful here.
does a Taylor expansion work?
this function is analytic, isn't it?
Dunno.
it seems reasonable
actually, no, that won't help
a taylor expansion near zero $t=0$ would give $q(q-1)$ coefficients
that doesn't seem like an improvement in this context.
20:22
someone claims $(1+t)^q\le 1+q(q-1)t+(q-1)^{q-1}t^q$
which seems so random
yeah
that one could be doing second order Taylor stuff, since it has that $q(q-1)$ coefficient
but I feel like we're missing a trick here.
hmm
the inequality is equivalent to $$\frac{(1+t)^q-1}{t}\leq \mu+\nu t^{q-1}$$
Right?
20:25
yeah
That seems really suggestive
My tangent line calculation gives $(1+t)^q\le 1+q(1+t)^{q-1}t$
induction?
$q$ isn't an integer
shrug
yeah
If I write the LHS above as $\frac{1}{t}(f(t)-f(0))$ with $f(t)=(1+t)^q$
then the RHS is of the form $\mu+\nu f'(t-1)$
Ahah, I just noticed something while plotting
when $q>2$, that difference quotient is concave up. When $1<q<2$, it's concave down
($q=2$ makes it $(2t+t^2)/t=t+2$ i.e. linear)
So for $1<q<2$ I think it amounts to noting that the difference quotient is concave down and therefore as a function of $t$ it's bounded above by the tangent line at $t-1$
For $q>2$, I think one instead does a secant line bound of some kind. Maybe the line connecting $(0,0)$ to $(2t,f_{diff}(2t))$?
@0celo7 okay, here's an attempt. Let $g(t)=\frac{(1+t)^q-1}{t}=qt+\frac12 q(q-1)^2 t^2+\text{higher order terms}$
...nope
oops, expansion should be $g(t)=q+\frac12 q(q-1)t+\frac16 q(q-1)(q-2)t^2+\text{higher order terms}$
ok. note that the coefficient of $t^2$ is positive for $q>2$ and negative for $1<q<2$. I think this holds more generally for $g''(t)$ with $t\geq 0$, and I'll assume it from here. So $g(t)$ should be concave up for $q>2$ and concave down for $1<q<2$
20:42
Maybe one has to compare the derivatives.
possibly
Use a Gronwall type argument
they're equal at $0$, and maybe one gets some info from the derivatives
so one has to lie above the other
idk
yeah I dunno
yeah not very helpful...
I do think it can be done by looking at $g(t)$ for $1<q<2$ vs. $q>2$ and doing appropriate convexity arguments
But I'm not confident about the details.
20:47
the things you find on google lol
this guy is giving an axiomatic theory of inequalities
I would call this a reverse Bernoulli inequality
Which is more important, the invention of writing or the invention of paper?
this inequality.
@AkivaWeinberger The invention of writing. We have written documents that predate paper, and no one uses paper anymore, anyway.
20:51
@Semiclassical I got it for $q>2$, I think
Writing itself is clearly longer lasting and of greater overall impact.
There's some tomfoolery going on when the derivative becomes concave
because the growth is barely superlinear
I wonder why clay tablets didn't stay popular. Wouldn't they be cheap? Especially since paper was expensive for a while
Or is that completely wrong
@Semiclassical By using the first derivative characterization of convexity, I got $(1+t)^q\le 1+q(1+t)^{q-1}t$,
You can write the whole Bible in a bathtub's worth of clay, it's not the most convenient but it's not impossible
20:53
Now assuming $q-1\ge 0$, we have $(1+t)^{q-1}\le 2^{q-2}+2^{q-2}t^{q-1}$ using midpoint convexity.
clay tablets are not terribly portable, which is a problem
but paper bibles are a relatively recent invention
the Torah is written on sheepskin (not paper)
So $(1+t)^q\le 1+q 2^{q-2}t+ q2^{q-2}t^q$
Isn't it cowskin?
not generally, no
though any kosher animal is probably okay
@0celo7 nice
20:55
@Semiclassical that's neither of the bounds i find in the literature
but the jews were shepherds, not cattle ranchers
so most Torahs are on sheep
And it leaves $1<q<2$ open
hmm
yeah
I may have an argument there, but I'm not convinced yet
of course I mean $q-1\ge 1$ above.
20:57
@Semiclassical Ah, when $q-1\le 1$, the derivative is concave, hence subadditive.
So $(1+t)^{q-1}\le 1+t^{q-1}$
I always forget. concave in that sense = concave up or concave down in the calc 1 sense?
concave means concave down in the calc 1 sense
> Calfskin is usually used — about 65 animals are used to make a complete torah.
concave down is convex!
20:58
convex means $x^2$
So the one I read from is probably calfskin
though I could ask my Rabbi when I next see him
convex = concave up
yes
concave = concave down
20:59
poor language = everywhere
concave functions are subadditive, convex functions are superadditive

« first day (2755 days earlier)      last day (2563 days later) »