« first day (614 days earlier)      last day (4703 days later) » 

12:00
Oh, sorry, I must have David confused with someone else then. Thanks, @Gigili for pointing out my error.
No problem. I live to please.
i WISH i was 36. look out ladies, here i come! but, alas....
i have, as the saying goes, traded my hard drive, for a floppy
7 hours ago, by David Wheeler
my age is no big secret...i am 50
i said that 7 hours ago! i'm much older now.
Uh-oh. 57?
12:03
ah, gigili, if i was 80 years younger and still had both my legs....
I'm younger than 7 hours ago.
i was born almost exactly 20 years after ringo starr
Okay, I give up.
I thought for a moment it must have been the "David K", who has a blue-checkerboard gravatar that looks very much like that of Mr Wheeler.
that blue david thing is gonna catch on. i can feel it.
12:06
... and who is also from Texas.
... but who claims to be 28. Younger than both of us put together.
hey, i'm not just "from" texas...i was BORN here. i even know some racists. true story.
Who's David K?
I'll have nightmares about different kinds of David.
Glad to know that I'm too stupid, but I knew that already.
12:17
@Gigili He's the one you were referring to when you said
Mar 23 at 1:16, by Gigili
I got confused which David was the old one
I only remember this because I briefly thought you meant me.
@tb ? No trace of you there except you cast a close vote--does that involve a 10k feature or some such?
@KannappanSampath not at all. "You guys are just too stupid to see it". It's gone for good now.
Doesn't sound familiar, must be amnesia.
Might have been some other Gigili.
but she certainly looks a lot like you.
@tb Oh, I see...I don't like so much of noise... I'd defend I am not. :) [Yes, I know that's arrogant but can't help when OP is not making much sense too.]
12:23
@KannappanSampath it looked like spam when it was first posted and it didn't get better...
@tb Hmmm. I have not visited main for a long time.
@DavidWallace I am the only Gigili in the entire world.
I think not.
@Gigili Back at you!
oh wow...that IS a watchband....
@DavidWallace Hugh.
12:31
Yeah, I originally thought it was a big dangly earring, but if you look at the large version of the photo, it's definitely a watch.
funny...one of middle names is hugh
... but speaking of having nightmares, I'm off to bed. Good night, everyone.
Night.
I knew you will say that.
and clairvoyant, too!
what am i thinking now...um, don't answer that...ok, now its safe. go ahead.
oh, well, good luck, sandra :)
@Gigili you asked about rob. he's here.
12:40
I am sad about Indianisms in English... I have fallen into traps several times but not as bad as Recent Victor post on meta. I wonder why does that guy flatter himself doing stuff he has little or no idea about.
speechless
what's an indianism?
@HenningMakholm Yes.
@DavidWheeler Look at the title--That's the right way of saying what he intends to say in Hindi, an Indian Language...But, it does not work that way in English...
@DavidWheeler A language error caused by the speaker/writer copying patterns from an Indian language (Indian English or native subcontinental?) which do not exist in that form in English (or whatever the target language is).
12:44
Hi
ah, like a french guy saying it not makes cold.
Is it just me, or has Victor's English become less comprehensible over the past handful of months?
Is there a measure for that?
I always found it impenetrable.
I only sincerely feel that I get corrected often by native speakers--I don't want to speak something in English that sounds horrible or hilarious to a native speaker. My accent is bad too, very few people here would already know.
@tb Some sampling of old questions of his indicates that it probably is just me.
12:49
@KannappanSampath can i ask you a personal question?
@KannappanSampath Speaking of which, the meaning of the first part of that post is not clear to me. Do you mean that non-native speakers don't often correct you, or that you're insincere when you feel non-native speakers correct you?
@DavidWheeler Depends--Ask and if I think it is OK, I'd answer that...
@HenningMakholm OK. I should have said: I would like to corrected often by native speakers. :)
where you live, is there a large value placed on being polite?
@HenningMakholm He had a few questions that he copied more or less directly from somewhere. Those might have looked slightly better than the usual ones.
@DavidWheeler Mostly yes. Elderly people would expect that of you.
12:52
The problem with his questions is that they reveal only part of the truth because the worst ones are deleted.
@KannappanSampath Ah, I understand you. I wish I would get corrected by native speakers more often :p
from what other people have told me, english is a difficult language to master, partly because the rules aren't very rigid.
@Daniil Reading that again, I see, that is horrible too. But yes you're right. But I missed a "get".
@DavidWheeler Is English worse in that respect than other natural languages?
Am I allowed to have a little bit of a whine?
12:54
shoot
@DavidWheeler BTW, is this that personal question you referred to?
I think the topic I picked for my BSc's thesis is difficult.
What did you pick?
Nah, English is quite easy, @HenningMakholm. For example, in Russian we have different verb forms in past tense, depending on the gender of the object.
I don't know @HenningMakholm it seems "looser" to me than other languages i've learned a bit of, but my experience is limited
12:55
Algebraic topology.
@MattN That's good. Otherwise completing it wouldn't impress anybody.
4
also, grammatical cases.
@HenningMakholm I had exactly that to say. +1
@MattN i did my thesis on algebraic topology, too, for my BA, unfortunately, i've forgotten most of it.
@HenningMakholm I've been thinking about changing it to something "easier" but I've made a similar mistake once before in choosing something I'm not interested because it allowed me to go abroad.
12:57
@Daniil Very true. It's fairly easy as opposed to German.
I know almost nothing about algebraic topology.
@DavidWheeler Isn't the "A" in "BA" for "arts"? Where does algebraic topology fit there?
@MattN Just ask Asaf. He's quite the expert.
3
i was a math major at a liberal arts college
: D : D
I'll ask him about diagram chasing.
LOLzzzz...
@MattN Beware, he might chase you ... instead of the diagram :p
12:59
@DavidWheeler I believe it is rather easy to get to a certain level that enables you to communicate, because you need and hear it all the time. On the other hand, you hear and read bad English all the time -- to the point where it is difficult to tell if you get accustomed to bad habits of non-native speakers or whether it's actual English.
and i have poor habits...i used to pride myself on my command of my native tongue, but life has corrupted me most foully.
I thought I'm unlikely to get a chance to see any of it later and also I wanted to do something that's not easy.
Ok. Now I feel slightly better.
takes tissues, wipes away tears and blows nose
you'll be fine, Matt
you're smarter than i am, and i muddled through it, so so can you
I've been watching too much American TV and films which heavily influenced my English skills. So now I use stupid "idioms" like 'man', 'dude', 'could care less', etc.
13:03
@MattN (^slight exaggeration)
@MattN We get that. :)
@Daniil it's all part of our evil plan for world domination by exporting culture that lowers world intelligence
@KannappanSampath That almost sounds like an in Soviet Russia joke : )
in soviet russia that gets YOU
@MattN I don't know what is that joke you're referring to! Culture differences, I think.
13:06
Yakov Naumovich Pokhis (, ; born 24 January 1951), better known as Yakov Smirnoff, is a Ukrainian-born American comedian, painter and teacher. He was popular in the 1980s for comedy performances in which he used irony and word play to contrast life under the Communist regime in his native Soviet Union with life in the United States, delivered in heavily accented English. He owns a theatre in Branson, Missouri, where he performs year-round. Smirnoff is also a professor at Missouri State University and Drury University where he teaches "The Business of Laughter." Early life Smirnoff was b...
@MattN it's assume that complicated challenges improve your personal growth rates. I do not know anything about your area of study/work, but you give an impression of a really smart person, so I think you'll be fine
the classic "in soviet russia" joke is: "In America, you go find party. In Soviet Russia, party find YOU."
Oh, Thank you @MattN
@DavidWheeler That's in the video I linked. : ) The commercial is where the meme came from.
@Daniil Thank you! I wonder how I managed that : ) (I'm a maths undergrad)
13:08
the reference being to being hounded by the communist party for any small social infraction
@DavidWheeler Thanks for this.
Reminds me of the old Googling joke where you could feel lucky when looking for Chuck Norris and land here
The link gets hidden by mouse-over menu. Well, "history" will do.
ah, chuck norris
13:11
@tb : D
@MattN yeah, but I thought you were a grad student, because you touch upon topics, which looks quite complicated from my point of view
@Daniil It looks quite complicated to me too. Teddy bear will confirm that I don't really know what I'm doing (yet) : )
hey guys
Even though it's not actually complicated. When I learn something new it looks so "advanced" and a year later I realise just how basic it is : /
who has a copy of scott osbourne's basic homological algebra?
13:16
teddy bear???
@MattN he won't. Teddy bears don't believe that there are topics that are easier than others. It's what you make of them.
hey teddy do you have a pdf copy of that book?
No, I don't.
and i can make a hat, or a plane, or a sailboat....
ok
thanks for it
I tried this whole afternoon
13:17
Did it work? I didn't test it.
It was the third hit on Google.
but because of this US online privacy offensive a lot of links did not work
I don't like .djvu.
Oops. True! I wouldn't d/l that if I were you. Isn't Australia pretty strict?
uh, copyfascists
@MattN But so many people download like crazy here it's so hectic that no one really cares
Use Tor if you are concerned about your safety
13:19
@MattN Why? That presumable occupies less space.
@KannappanSampath I don't like the software that I use to open and read them. I don't like pdf either. If I like something I get myself a paper copy.
If you have troubles downloading it, I can reupload it somewhere else
spasiba
I already have the file :D :D
13:21
@MattN It's pretty costly for people like us coming from the 3rd world, you should agree.
Yeah, Amazon's prices on textbooks are wild.
@Daniil Once I heard my supervisor saying to his wife on the phone: Yaneznayu paka, yaneznayu paka, yaneznayu, paka paka paka and he slammed the phone down!!
@Daniil You are awesome! It's in pdf! : )
@MattN "Получить файл"
the yellowish one
Yes, just realised. I'd clicked it a while ago and nothing happened. Now it worked.
Thank you!
13:23
@BenjaminLim haha, he was muttering "i don't know, bye, i don't know, bye..."
@Daniil where are you now in lomonosov state?
I know that was why I laughed like hell because I understood what he was saying
and then halfway there was the word "b***t"
Heh, it must be easy to get away with swearing in a foreign language :p
i love the 4 squares theorem
I live in Moscow, if that's what you mean
@Daniil you go to lomonosov state uni?
my supervisor is from there
13:25
sorry, I am not comfortable with talking about specific universities
@DavidWheeler A friend of mine found a completely elementary one page proof of that. Unfortunately a very similar argument was published just two years earlier.
Yes. But that wasn't what I was saying.
Btw, I sent you some friendly insult. : )
@Daniil horosho
@tb do you have a link?
I should go and do some more stuff. Bbl
13:32
bye guys i'm going too
@Daniil Thanks for the book : )
@tb @KannappanSampath @MattN @Daniil thanks for the book bye
@BenjaminLim Bye Take care.
Later, @BenjaminLim
13:47
@DavidWheeler no, unfortunately not. I only have a paper copy.
harrumph! well i shall sleep then. fine lot you all are!
i'll come back and torture you later. bring weapons.
14:05
I'm armed and ready, give up your weapons of mass destruction.
I am unstoppable! There is no way that Time Fly can stop me... from running away, that is.
Temp-bye.
@DylanMoreland at least you tried :)
I do not like the sound my under-desk server makes.
Scary or just loud?
Loud. Wheezing. Grating.
If certain people were unable to ask questions, it would not be the worst thing in the world.
14:33
Well, they already are. I think I would be specific and say post instead of ask.
Okay, at least it's the CPU fan, not the hard drive...
That's comforting...
At least somewhat.
Nothing a vacuum cleaner can'f fix ... i hope.
Runs nice and quiet after separating the fan from the heatsink and vacuuming between them. Now to see how it sounds after screwing it back in.
crosses fingers
wheeze and grate again. Grumble.
14:45
Is this moniker a euphemism for spambot?
If so, it's a rather erudite spambot, don't you think?
:)
user19161
@KannappanSampath Sometimes I get the international paperback edition from say abebooks.com, you should check it out.
user19161
And check out 4shared.com, there is a lot of good stuff there in pdf and djvu form.
user19161
Shipping aside, other than special paperback versions, amazon.com is usually the cheapest.
14:56
Speaking of spambots flag please!
15:07
Noise down from "angry 300-gram mosquito" to "slightly maladjusted idling Diesel engine" by taking out two of the attachment screws and making sure the power cabling leans against the fan case just so. Will have to do for now.
@HenningMakholm can you recommend me some intro-level material on infinite trees and automata?
@Daniil Nothing definite comes to mind, sorry. I know there are such things as automata for infinite trees, but I've never sat down and studied them systematically.
15:25
Have a minute @HenningMakholm?
Should it be "could be transmitted from mother to fetus" or "can be transmitted blabla"?
@HenningMakholm no worries, cheers
@Gigili Depends on what you're trying to say; "could" is more tentative than "can". If you say "can", it implies "this may or may not happen for you but we know there are some people it happens for", whereas "could" would imply "we don't actually know whether this ever happens, but we don't know that it doesn't happen either, so better be confused".
I don't think many native speakers would pick up on the difference unprompted, though -- but you'd have to ask one of them for that.
@HenningMakholm Got it, thank you.
Very well explained.
15:45
If anyone wonders who Dr. Terry Allen is: youtube.com/watch?v=Fgnx12iE3TU and arxiv.org/abs/1105.1383
I has improved theorem!
Congratulations!
Yes 8-).
Hmm, I actually just made an inhomogeneous estimate homogeneous (which they say is a nicer result). But still, cool.
Feels good, doesn't it? :)
15:47
Now hit the Whisk(e)y in the Jar!
Surely will do that 8-).
16:02
Arghh, why the fuck can't I concentrate on reading :|
This is bollocks, I am going for a small walk, before I go mad.
(sorry for pathetic blogging attempt)
16:43
@Daniil Let me know if it works. So I can try it next time.
16:55
I'm working on an answer to this.
For $X=S^2$, I have $X/A$:
I thought maybe one can use that $X/A$ is path-connected and then compute $\pi_1 \cong H_1$ instead of doing $H_1$ directly.
But then I realised that I've never really computed a fundamental group so I can't finish my answer. Also, I'm not quite sure whether doing $\pi_1$ is actually easier than $H_1$.
17:10
Oh, that should've been $\pi_1^{ab} \cong H_1$.
@MattN Hello Matt. It might be easier to compute $H_1$ using cellular homology.
Too sleepy. Never mind.
Don't worry, you guys can come out now from behind the cupboards. I won't ask any more algebraic topology questions.
17:37
climbs out of the box
: D
Hey does this mean that Dr. Terry Allen got his Dr. from Cornell?
No, it means that Cornell is the main sponsor of ArXiv.
Should look at the URL not the huge logo on the site : (
@JonasTeuwen Thanks : ) Now I feel quite stupid.
Don't be, I was wondering a similar thing some while ago.
I don't think so. Genealogy doesn't know him either and if he got his Ph.D. (in maths) at an only mildly reputable uni in the past 50 years you can be pretty sure that he's in there.
17:44
But Genealogy doesn't know robjohn either, right?
I wouldn't call Princeton mildly reputable :-).
And, moreover, he'd be pretty aware of the fact that posting something on ArXiV doesn't magically provide repuatbility of it
It doesn't know me, for example. Hopefully that's because the University of Copenhagen is more than mildly reputable.
It doesn't know me either, but that's not so strange 8-).
It's a bit boring. It doesn't provide links to the actual theses.
It does know the Teddy, apparently.
So I will be the sixth.
Is this our guy?
@HenningMakholm I was talking about the US.
Hmm, it seems to have the most Western-European universities too, no? :-).
But @HenningMakholm was in computer science, not mathematics, no?
17:50
I think the fact that I'm looking up this guy indicates that I'm bored.
@JonasTeuwen Sure, but it claims: Throughout this project when we use the word "mathematics" or "mathematician" we mean that word in a very inclusive sense. Thus, all relevant data from statistics, computer science, or operations research is welcome.
"is welcome" sounds as if they expect you to write your own entry.
Let's send Terry an email and tell him so he can write himself an entry there. : )
@HenningMakholm Sure, but they don't think it is very relevant?
Do people add themselves?
Anyone read this:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Joy-Sets-Fundamentals-Undergraduate/dp/0387940944
?
@JonasTeuwen More than what you ever wanted to know about it: ams.org/notices/200708/tx070801002p.pdf
18:01
@tb Hah, thanks.
@tb tl;dr -- did you add yourself or not?
No. There was some librarian who was assigned from ETH to do this (I think).
At least there was lots of information that shouldn't have been there.
I like the title.
Not sure what you mean. I only mentions your two advisors. It would make sense to link to the thesis. No? That would much more interesting than someone's advisor.
Here we only get "dr.".
18:09
Missed that^ :/
@MattN Well, given that the entire purpose of the exercise is to model the student-advisor graph, your notion of "interesting" is abviously not what the project is using.
@KannappanSampath Don't worry it wasn't about you.
@HenningMakholm True dat. : )
Is it just me or is it impossible to find Rajesh via this page?
(and if the latter is the case, why?)
@tb Because he probably has not participated much on Meta?
@KannappanSampath hey are you there?
18:13
@DavidWheeler Sure, I am
i have a weird request....if you can't help me, i totally understand
you're from india, right?
@tb He doesn't seem to have a meta account.
@DavidWheeler Yes.
@tb Forget it--He has asked 21 questions on Meta. :/
ok, i'm looking for this song, see, and i have a bit of trouble since i can't recall much about it
@KannappanSampath Can you link to his meta profile?
18:16
@DavidWheeler Tell me something about it....
this is what i know: it's a bhajan, i think done by MS Subbulakshmi
@KannappanSampath Weird. Thanks!
well, see that's just it...i can't remember the name, and it's name was probably in another language anyway
and she's recorded like a gazillion records, too
Is it the one I linked?
18:19
no...the record it's from was probably recorded in the early '80s i think
Let a+b mean exactly that one of a, b is true. Express a+b in terms of the symbols introduced above. (Introduced symbols: And, Or, Not)

Is this the rioght answer? -> (a+b)&~(a&b)
@DavidWheeler Oh, so you're looking for a original rendition?
one of the OTHER bhajans (not the one i'm looking for) was "he govinda he dayala" (or something like that)
and all i can remember is the LAST line, which isn't too helpful, because the name is usually the FIRST line
@DavidWheeler So, what is the last line?
@GustavoBandeira That + is not supposed to be a +, right?
18:23
something like "hari nam kapyala" (probably spelled wrong)...i remember that the translation on the liner notes said it meant: hari is a name of god
@HenningMakholm Nope, it means Or
the first line was the same word (or phrase?) repeated over and over: something like: beelay, beelay, beelay
You can check your answer yourself by drawing up a truth table and checking that the overall value comes out as it should.
Yup, i've done that.
And the truth values come up as i want.
Then that's your answer.
18:25
I'm just unsure if that question is really asking what i answered.
i suppose that's sort of like trying to find a beatles' song with the word "yeah" in it, but i have been looking quite hard....
looks like + is disjunction and either # or (+) is exclusive or
@GustavoBandeira Looks right to me.
Yay! I'm not so dumb (i guess)
@DavidWheeler Try this...
That satisfies Gazillion times record you mention...
18:27
@HenningMakholm This is a print of the problem page: imm.io/lD0D
perhaps i'm misreading it @GustavoBandeira, but i think you want: a+b <=> (avb)&~(a&b)
or in this case equivalent to
@DavidWheeler Look the page print i sent: imm.io/lD0D
your question asked you to define an equivalent expression for a+b....seems unfair to use + in the definition, no?
18:29
@GustavoBandeira Still looks alright. I'd have things to say about the author's pretending that the logical symbols are abbreviations for English words, but that's not your fault.
@HenningMakholm Pretending? What you mean?
i believe he is looking for the symmetric difference, and i used a "somewhat standard" v for logical "or"
@DavidWheeler Was that a wrong one too?
the exclusive or: exactly one of a or b is true (one, or the other, but not both)
@KannappanSampath too long...this was just a short bhajan, maybe 5-6 minutes long
@DavidWheeler Oh, I see.
18:33
@DavidWheeler The symmetric difference of OR is XOR?
@GustavoBandeira yes
symmetric difference = xor
@DavidWheeler Did you find that from Youtube too?
@GustavoBandeira In reality the logical symbols have the precise, well-defined meanings you can read from their truth tables. There's nothing else needed to defined how they behave, though giving a rough equivalence to English words can sometimes help the intuition. However, it is important to be aware that the English words do not always behave like the logical symbols do, when used in ordinary English speech -- the meaning of English words are fuzzy, ambiguous, sometimes context-dependent...
no, it's not on youtube
@DavidWheeler XOR is the symetric difference or there is a symmetric difference for every boolean function?
18:35
... and the meaning of logical symbols are not. So attempting to define logical symbols as if they were just shorthand for English invites students to think that all of the inherent fuzziness in English expressions must also be present somehow in formal logic. That is a disservice.
@HenningMakholm i answered the question Gustavo asked
@HenningMakholm What you're telling me has something to do with this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_semantic_metalanguage
my "description" of it is informal, my symbology was not
@DavidWheeler I'm confused here. Suspecting crosstalk. I wasn't reacting to you.
@DavidWheeler OK. So, tell me about how you happent to listen to that song? Did you have a translation os some such?
18:36
Thanks guys, I was distracted by expanding on my answer on meta (which was the reason for my asking)
a friend of mine had the album
@HenningMakholm Is it about that universal meanings?
@GustavoBandeira I don't think so.
@HenningMakholm Yes, i've read the rest of your text. Thanks.
@DavidWheeler Then, I suggest you confirm if it's actually Subbulakshmi--BTW, why not ask him right away?
18:39
@KannappanSampath geez, i have no idea where he is....this was...28 years ago?
@DavidWheeler !!!! Then, I'll try hard and see if I get lucky! :D
@GustavoBandeira forgive me if i mis-interpreted your question, but it appears as if you were being asked to define a+b, and so + shouldn't occur in your definition (circularity)
@GustavoBandeira "Symmetric difference" is the one particular Boolean function you're trying to express. This name makes more sense when you consider naive set theory instead of truth values: then { x | (x in A) XOR (x in B) } is somehow the "difference" between the sets A and B, but it is symmetric in A and B in contrast to the ordinary set difference A \ B.
i always think of logic in terms of sets, anyway...there's an isomorphism in there, somewhere
there always is an isomorphism :) what do you mean?
18:44
@tb I have had 7 helpful posts and one not-helpful post! Is that a reason to be happy?
the correlation between "natural" language and logical formalism really only breaks down with "or" because we use it linguistically to mean both XOR and OR
the other terms correspond fairly closely, a fact mathematicans use when writing proofs in words
It breaks down even more with "if" -- beginning textbooks in logic usually have to spend several pages telling how the English "if" does not always match how implication works.
@KannappanSampath I guess so, I don't know. I wouldn't get worked up about it, but as long as you don't have more unhelpful posts, there's certainly no need to worry :)
@tb : ) I have decided not to get worked up with downvotes as well. It just renders my effort point less.
but...but we still use "if" in proofs all the time. should we stop doing that?
18:48
Mathematicians have carefully conditioned themselves only to say "if" when in fact it matches the meaning of logical implication. The rest of the English-speaking world does not care and use "if" in a variety of other meanings (as do most mathematicians when they're not intending to express a mathematical claim).
i do occasionally resort to the quaint-sounding terms "sufficient condition" and "necessary condition"
And there's nothing wrong with using "if" in this sense. It is just not the only one, and for a student who has not been carefully conditioned to the mathematical/logical "if", just giving that English translation for $\to$ is not going to help him understand it.
@DavidWheeler I find that confusing: I always have to think about what implication is meant. Especially if somebody writes $A \iff B$. necessity: blah, blah sufficiency: blah blah.
Did we scare @Gustavo away?
i've always found the term "only if" confusing, because of the logical meaning having a different parsing order than the written one
or is that "if", see now you've got ME confused....
18:52
i just think in arrows
it's "if"...that's just all wrong: we say A if B, but we read left-to-right, and the wrong synapses fire
by replacing "if and only if" with "<=>" in my head
i wonder sometimes about the ambiguity of language...do we think imprecisely, or did we just screw up when we invented language?
A if and only if is parsed as if - <=, only if- => Right?
@DavidWheeler It's only a screw-up if you think the reason for inventing language was so that we could do formal logic with it.
18:56
well, didn't we KNOW we were going to invent mathematics? and if not, why not???
i talk to communicate...well, except for the occasional gazorninplat
one caveman knew, but they beat him up with a rock when he started talking about ∃ and ∀
@Gigili it did work a little bit :]
Hi, everyone.
In the immortal words of Geoffrey Pullum: Languages love multiple meanings. They lust after them. They roll around in them like a dog in fresh grass.
@HenningMakholm In reality it was a necessary development to keep the human race alive so it's been invented for the sole purpose of reproduction. So why abuse it to do formal logic? : )

« first day (614 days earlier)      last day (4703 days later) »