@robjohn I apologize for asking an English grammar question in a math chat room and especially making you type out so much, but at the same time I would like to thank you for your answer, you have cleared up my question completely.
@N3: well, you couldn't really use it for "pick a random number from the interval [0,1]". You need something else (uniform distribution). But someone who knows probability better than me should explain that
@Skullpatrol The subtract discussion? It didn’t look horribly heated. By the way, I don’t think that I encountered the use of opposite to mean negative until I was an adult; at the very least it’s a usage that has become more common in the schools since I was a kid.
I used to have the old halloween question favorited, and it would show up purple in my fav list because it was deleted, but now it doesn't show up at all in my list.
For me it isn’t: it’s ‘5 minus 2’ or possibly ‘5 less 2’, though that sounds quite old-fashioned to me. With youngsters I might expect ‘5 take away 2’.
@BrianMScott As I said to Rob: I agree it does sound odd, but I was just wondering if there was a grammatical reason as Rob explained that part of it to me.
@rob: A question: I got a chat message while I was away; how do I reply to it now? One way is to painfully scroll through the older messages till I find this one. Any other way?
The only way to reply is in the here-and-now or future, you can't project comments back in time on the transcript. I don't understand how searching for older messages is a "way" of replying to older messages...
@anon OK: let me rephrase my question: suppose you have the link to an old message. How do you reply to it? Try doing it, and I think you will understand the difficulty.
@anon Yes. E.g., this message is a reply to your "Wait, chat messages can be made in reply to specific chat comments in a coded way? I'm not sure I follow the discussion here." It is also a reply to you, but this is a side-effect (or that's how I see it).
The study goals for that course are: "Can understand a wide range of demanding, longer texts, and recognise implicit meaning. Can express themselves fluently and spontaneously without much obvious searching for expressions. Can use language flexibly and effectively for social, academic and professional purposes. Can produce clear, well-structured, detailed text on complex subjects, showing controlled use of organisational patterns, connectors and cohesive devices."
I'll think I'll do that if my advisor wants to pay for it 8-).
@Srivatsan No. That comment looked like an assertion first , then like a question and then like a retort and then like asking me back without a question mark and so on.... and hence "??"
@KannappanSampath I'm glad I could write a comment so ambiguous that it looked like a question, a retort, a question without a question mark, among other things. =)
@Srivatsan yes, but... oh, you are bidding goodbye today for when you leave for India. I thought that you were bidding goodbye to go to class or something
@Skullpatrol I didn't realize that all chat was one. I made the other gravatar for Mathematica chat, and then found out that it would appear here, too.
@Skullpatrol I guess I could change it back to the knotted Möbius strip
I have a veeerry short Mathematica question (no need to answer): i.imgur.com/Vi8Ed.png what is the expkamax[k_] := expkamax[k] = ... good for? Especially the second term.
expkamax[k_]:= defines a function, and expkamax[k_]:=expkamax[k]= does the same thing, but caches the values it has computed so it doesn't compute them again