« first day (1645 days earlier)      last day (3672 days later) » 

02:00
@Axoren He's not really user1111?
heya @AlexG
@TedShifrin Hi there. :)
@AlexanderGruber He's probably user1111, but Julian think's he's someone else, too.
@Axoren I am 99.9% sure his real name is not user1111
I know who he really is and he is in this chat room now
02:01
well, @AlexG, you're sure I'm not Ted Shifrin, too :D
@Alexander I know his real name
@AlexanderGruber I'm 100% sure. I'm looking at census documents across the globe.
You can't trick me, @Ted.
Not a single human being has been named user1111 in the past century.
@Axoren You should name a kid that then.
02:02
User2 and User7 are both popular names in Wisconsin, however.
@AlexanderGruber That would be too edgy. He'd never survive in a public school.
It's practically asking him to do drugs at a young age.
LOL this is getting weird
@Axoren See, you're setting him up to be an early boomer
@AlexanderGruber @Axoren @Mike I named him above ^^
Very few people care, @JulianRachman :P
We only have evidence of one person caring :P
We're all kind of immune to this sort of thing since @Hippalectryon and @Ramanewbie were going nuts a few days back
Same avatar and everything.
02:07
@Axoren LOL. Ya. I dont really care much either. It is jsut that I saw the question he had asked on MSE and I remember us asking the question together because of one of those reference citations on my blog.
0
Q: How to find out the first name of a professor whose home page lists only first initial?

user1111This is probably a soft question. I am interested in complex analysis, and I want to ask the first name of this person, S. Ponnusamy, whose name I wish to mention in a paper. What is the best way to go about asking such stuff?

@JulianRachman Why do you care so much about this?
user105491
I do not appreciate such things being said about me online
@PedroTamaroff His coauthor is Vladimir Putin.
@JulianRachman If he is harassing you, flag him and report it to the mods. It should not matter who user1111 is, they'll look at him for harassment. If he's not harassing you, it shouldn't matter who he is.
user105491
I would like a moderator to remove Julian Rachman's comment above about me
02:09
I dont know I just took Sherlock Holmes to the next level. :)
@SanathDevalapurkar Flag it.
@SanathDevalapurkar What comment?
user105491
Him saying my name
user61230
[pops in] whazzgoinon
You use your name.
02:09
You guys are supposed to be best friends. Come on, kids!
Ill jsut delete it
Are you making trouble, @Emrakul? :D
This is silly. Who wants to talk about math?
user105491
me
@Emrakul Tell me a math story.
02:09
I guess that one.
Ignores the kids.
Finally: Pedro is ignoring me :D
@TedShifrin You're not a kid!
Well @Mike, let me tell you what buddy
02:10
Aw, I'm not? :(
user61230
@Ted Just tellin' a bad joke about math! Which is a crime where I live, so yes!
I'm thinking about being a topologist.
Ok. Well. I am sorry for all the trouble. My crazy hunches get in the way of my "doings"
:)
@AlexanderGruber But topology has infinite indecomposable continua.
user61230
@Mike Have you heard the story about the three medieval kingdoms on the shore of a lake?
02:11
Woopies
user105491
@Alexander if you don't mind me asking, what year of university are you in?
@Emrakul do you live in a physics department?
no, @Emrakul, but be warned that this better be good.
I'm a 2nd year graduate student, @Sanath.
user61230
@Alexander SHHH. they don't know I'm still here [hides]
user105491
02:11
Ah, nice!
user105491
So what were you studying until now?
@Emrakul Trust me, they'll never take you back now.
user105491
something related to topology, i presume
@SanathDevalapurkar Finite group theory.
Wow, really, @AlexG? I'm truly shocked (just don't tell @Hippa).
user61230
02:12
@Mike Ahh, I see! Well, there were three medieval kingdoms on the shore of a lake, and they had been fighting for many years.
Remembers the "I'm shocked" meme.
I'm thinking about doing persistent homology... so, applied algebraic topology
glares at Pedro
persistent homology is rad, you were looking at that last year, right?
you should teach me about it.
@AlexanderGruber Just don't do bothersome homology.
02:13
@Alexander [kneels and bows down]
user105491
@Alexander I know more about homotopy theory, to be honest
user61230
@Mike There was an island in the center of the lake - a most beautiful island, filled with beautiful flowers and chests of riches. The kingdoms decided they would do battle, and the winner would claim the island and its contents. The first kindgom had 12 knights, and each knight had five squires. They hurriedly polished their many pieces of armor, cleaned their horses, and cooked their food.
@MikeMiller It's pretty cool. It's got that nice... chunky feeling, the same one as FGT. But unlike FGT, it has applications.
@Emrakul This is rarely how war works but I shall suspend my disbelief.
user61230
@Mike The second kingdom had 20 knights, and each knight had ten squires. Everyone at this camp was also preparing for battle - and even more hurriedly than the first. But at the camp of the third kingdom, there was but one lonely knight with his one squire.
user61230
02:15
Shhhh, I'm telling a story!
4
I didn't know I'd come for a bedtime story ...
It's always bedtime somewhere.
@Axoren :)
@MikeMiller Basically what you do is look for patterns in data by building all these funky complexes. You grow balls around all the points and keep computing Betti numbers, see how long stuff sticks around.
[sits down with my calculus pillow and topology mug with hot chocolate]...
02:16
That's why I always say good night to @Mike, @Axoren.
user61230
This squire needed only to cook for two people: himself and his knight. So he grabbed his pot and hung it off a tree by a thick rope, dangling above the fire. He busied himself making a meal, while the knight spent time polishing his armor.
The idea is you're figuring out what topological space the data "probably" came from
@AlexanderGruber I know the basic idea (I saw a talk Gunnar Carlson gave about it)
user105491
Can things like moduli spaces be used?
02:17
One of our new assistant profs is running a one-hour undergraduate research seminar on big data and homology, @AlexG.
I'm more interested in the meaty parts.
@Pedro It seems as though your are left out. lol. we still see you...
user105491
it seems very related to it
@MikeMiller Yeah- right, the current idea is to maybe become that dude.
user61230
@Mike In the morning, the battle came. The three kingdoms sent their squires out to fight. The battle raged for hours, and the blood splattered, turning the water of the ocean red. Yet at the end of the battle, the one squire remains. This only proves that once again, the squire of the high pot and noose is equal to the sum of the squires of the other two sides.
02:17
to become Gunnar Carlson?
This one squire can feed a whole army! Those first two kingdoms have such a wasteful military.
Have you seen Lost Highway?
@JulianRachman What?
user61230
[flees]
@TedShifrin Have him record it. I can guarantee an audience of 1
@MikeMiller I love david lynch. :p
02:18
@Pedro I didnt see you comment
On what?
anything yey
I doubt that's possible, @AlexG, but I can give you a few names of smart undergrads if you want to contact them about it.
@AlexanderGruber So you're proposing a sort of Lost Highway situation, with you in place of Bill Pullman.
02:18
That's because I'm busy.
@MikeMiller I was headed towards being the mystery man with algebra. :p
@TedShifrin Everything is possible in the wonderous world of smartphones
haha
i'm going on a jodorowsky kick soon.
never seen a single of his films.
We're already 4 weeks into the semester, @AlexG.
@Ted Feels like more than that
02:21
Why, I was just informed that I'm going to have my discussion sections recorded by a DSO student, which is apparently part of my contract.
@Kevin: It's already going way too fast for me in terms of getting my house ready to sell. And my calculus exams today were quite disappointing. sigh
@MikeMiller I haven't either.
i just got over my tarkovsky kick. hell of a director.
Сталкер is now one of my favorite movies.
@Ted Serious question. Are they always disappointing?
Oooh, @Mike is typing in Cyrillic.
user105491
02:22
Hey short question
Movie's name's in Cyrillic.
user105491
asked in the homotopy chat room already
No, @Kevin. And some were quite pleasant. But most of these kids got A's last semester, so I don't expect scores in the 50s this semester :(
user105491
but does anyone have advice on how to make poster boards for math research?
@SanathDevalapurkar Well
The first thing you do is you get a poster board
user105491
02:23
yeah...
So then you print your paper
user105491
that was unexpected as well
No pictures, 12pt
And line it with it like wallpaper
user105491
That's basically just sticking individual pages of a paper next to each other
12pt seems awfully small, @AlexG
02:24
In this chat, we give people terrible advice!
4
LOL @Kevin
@SanathDevalapurkar Yeah, exactly. Dont forget to put some blank printer paper next to your display in case people forgot to bring theirs for the exercises to the reader.
@TedShifrin is right - if you want your text to be visible, you need 16pt. More than that is crass.
user105491
Alright
How do I into Mathematica?
02:25
Wow, I got starred for being right.
user61230
my gods, the stars are everywhere
user105491
but most of my paper is text
user105491
how do i make it seem interesting?
For a posterboard? I think the titles and such hould be more than 16 pt perhaps
user105491
and not filled with equations?
02:25
Is it all pretty much self explanatory, or do I need to learn a language?
(People will take larger font as an insult - you're implying they have bad eyesight.)
@SanathDevalapurkar You could put it in typewriter font
People love that
It's wacky
@MikeMiller But the last thing you want is someone leaning over the presentation table because they can't read it from a distance.
Like all computer languages, there is syntax, @Axoren. I imagine those of you who program in C++ will find it easy to learn.
@SanathDevalapurkar My experience on the internet is people like cats. Try putting pictures of cats in it.
02:27
@SanathDevalapurkar I think what you should do is create an original display for your posterboard based on your paper. Don't try and cram too much information on the board. The important thing is to have a well-presented introduction, a summary of the results, and a good discussion of what they mean
@TedShifrin I was assuming it was mostly functional. Are there any weird special forms, though?
@Axoren Well, if people actually do have bad eyesight, you should have portable versions of your poster they can look at from up close.
@MikeMiller You mean printouts?
There are great help pages and examples, @Axoren.
Yes, but in trifold, @Axoren
02:28
@TedShifrin I'm installing it now, so I have no interactive feedback, yet. I just wanted to get some vague notions of what I'm getting myself into.
But, more seriously @Sanath, do basically the opposite of all that and you'll be good. Lots of pictures. Post your full result so that it's available, but don't focus on the in depth parts of the actual paper, people just want to get the gist. Try to act like you're writing something for Popular Science.
On my webpage you can find a basic introductory primer that has some useful stuff, @Axoren.
@Axoren If you want to learn Mathematica I'll teach you but you need to come up with some stuff you wanna do
I have plenty of stuff I want to do, @AlexanderGruber. Lol.
I have plenty of impossible functions that are stupid, but they will eventually serve a practical purpose.
@Axoren Mathematica is mostly very high-level in terms of language and syntax. There are just a few structures that basically everything follow
02:30
The weirdest thing is programming functions with # as the variable :P
@Axoren Good, let's plot 'em
user105491
@Alexander @Kevin Thanks! @Pedro I'll do that as well!
What's the first one
user105491
:-)
user105491
i have never used mathematica before
02:30
@Axoren You can do anything with loops and stuff you can do in C++, but there's usually a better way to do it in Mathematica
@TedShifrin pure functions are so awesome
@AlexanderGruber You don't understand...
user105491
in fact i have never used a programming language for math before
I'll link you one.
user105491
i suck
02:30
This is the most recent one.
@Axoren, as I said, there is some cool stuff in my primer :P
@Axoren Ok let's plot it
@TedShifrin I'm going to look at it right now.
@Axoren Unfortunately things like sum/product over primes is kind of difficult to implement
Actually now that I think about it, there may be a way using boolean and if statements
@TedShifrin How do I open .nb's? Is that the Mathematica Format?
02:32
@Axoren It is
Mathematica opens 'em just fine, @Axoren
@TedShifrin Still downloading it, I was trying to read it like a webpage.
nope, @Axoren, need at least the Mathematica reader. :)
Oh lord... Mathematic emailed me, apparently.
I'd just like ot say that me and hypergeometric functions do NOT get along
02:34
How am I screwing this up so badly... It's just a download...
I'm like my parents right now.
Does your university give you free access to it, @Axoren?
Hey. I had a math question
@Axoren HOW DO I INTERNET!?!?
We're not open for math questions, @Julian.
@TedShifrin That's exactly what they're emailing me about... Are they just sitting at their computers or something?
02:35
@Axoren They can be confusing with their little access code things... follow their directions
Waiting for someone to try and download the non-student version?
Your university needs to vouch that you're a bona fide student for you to get access to the actual Mathematica, @Axoren.
@Julian Unless you want wrong answers, I wouldnt ask math question here.....
Oh my god.
Oh, well, I don't think I should be showing that.
Wolfram makes its money by being bitchy :P
02:36
That seems like it was sent personally.
Yup, it does. Who knows what you were doing ...
Ya Wolfram doesn't like it when you try and use Mathematica to watch pr0n......
@Kevin Haha. I trust you guys. I mean, do I have anyone else to ask?
@KevinDriscoll 8008135
@Axoren hold on just lemme get my calculator......
02:38
I am the minority of mathematics
@AlexanderGruber Is that the product over primes function?
@KevinDriscoll I think it's a sex joke.
So............. Can I ask my question?
@KevinDriscoll Yup, as the number of primes increases
02:40
@Axoren I don't think so. It looks like a finite polynomial represtnign the first several terms of your function
Goes up to the first 100 primes, seems to be converging pretty well
I had to write a tiny program for Mathematica to only put in terms for the primes; do you know a shortcut for that, @Alex?
@AlexanderGruber How did you list the primes? Is guess theres a PrimeQ[] functions or maybe you just pre-made a list...
Haha, @Ted and I had the same question
I used PrimeQ for my recursive call.
@KevinDriscoll I used Prime[n]
02:41
any CAS worth its salt nowadays has a prime(n).
Is Artin's Algebra a good book for abstract algebra?
Ah, returns the nth priem I imagine
indeed
yes, @Julian. I'm extremely fond of it.
This was actually the full code I used,
f[x_, n_] := Product[(1 - x^2/Prime[i]^2), {i,1,n}]
g[n_] := f[#, n] &
L = Table[Plot[g[n][x], {x, -10, 10}, PlotRange -> {{-10, 10}, {-5, 20}}], {n, 2, 100}];
Export["prf.gif", L, "gif"]`
02:44
@Ted That is great! I just found out about it when watching MIT's lectures on Abstract Algebra
Oh my god, that's a mess.
I have to learn that syntax?
@Axoren Not really
@Axoren In mathematica it looks nicer
@KevinDriscoll I'll take your word for it
It's also quite compact. 4 lines isn't much of a program in any language but Mathematica.
02:45
Still trying to install it
You can make it display better, and I also added a little layer of complication that you won't necessarily have to
Wait, how big is this thing installed?
by making the $g$ function
yeah, you didn't need that at all, @AlexG ... you were just showing off #.
What is pound/hash/sharp?
02:46
@TedShifrin I didn't need it but it is better semantically, once you understand it
@Axoren Thats a special MMA syntax. It allows one to define a pure function
<--- prefers impure functions
Wasn't it already pure?
@Axoren A pure function is a function where you don't explicitly make the variable
02:47
Let me give you an example, the identity function is $f(x)=x$
So it's a function object.
Not a function call
as a pure function you'd just write #&
Right
Got it.
The # is where the variable goes, the & shows where the pure function ends.
Real mathematicians talk about $f$ and $f\circ g$, not like calculus classes with $f(x)$ all the time.
02:48
So, functions defined as "f[x]:="
Those aren't first class objects?
@TedShifrin Don't forget! $f(k)$ is the fourier transform of $f(x)$!
what? k?
get out of here.
smacks @Kevin
@Axoren There's a lot of subtlety in what you just asked :p
frequency is $\xi$. don't be silly.
02:48
:= delays evaluation until execution
Plus you need f[x_] @Axoren
@AlexanderGruber oh my god, you're telling me this thing is lazy?
@Axoren You have a choice, you can make it lazy
@MikeMiller $k$ isn't a frequency! It's a wavenumber. Dual to length.
oh. yeah sure probably.
02:50
We've morphed into Mathematica.SE
Basically you decide when stuff evaluates. At first, you're not going to understand how it works, it takes a while to before you can start truly drinking the mathematica kool-aid on that level
@AlexanderGruber You're telling me that I could have just said "f[x_]=" for a non-lazy first class value "f"?
@Axoren x_ has a similar function to the # thing. It means that the x represents what you put in.
@AlexanderGruber This is suddenly way to much power all at once.
I'm going to turn evil at this rate.
@Axoren Think of all the integral you can do!
02:52
if you write f[x], you're defining the value of f for the symbol x. If you run f[x] = 1 and then you type f[x] it will give you 1, but if you type f[y], it's just going to give you back f[y].
I think you're already evil, @Axoren.
@TedShifrin That's what my local priest says.
Well, I'm so evil I don't believe in priests or rabbis.
and on the other hand, if you write f[x_] = 1 + x, then you'll get the thing you want to do, making a function which replaces the x's with what you put in the brackets.
So if I showed you a priest, you'd tell me he doesn't exist?
02:53
the := is a different issue. That's what makes it lazy or not lazy. (well, delayed or not delayed, anyway.)
@TedShifrin Percentage of Americans who vote for their ideal candidate if he's black? 92%
Not in my personal world, @Axoren.
@Ted Percentage who would even if she's a woman 87%
@Ted percentage if he is an athiest.......47%
I don't believe the 92%, @Kevin ... way too much racism in this country. I believe the atheist. Way too much religion, too.
@TedShifrin It's the "white guilt" that makes it so high.
02:55
@Ted I think it's because its still socially acceptable to refuse to vote for an athiest, but not a black man
Otherwise, he would have falsified the statistic lower.
You're overthinking it, when you say ideal candidate you think of that as being separable from race/gender/religion, i.e. a candidate whose views the person agrees with
but it's not separable. Most people vote for the person.
@AlexanderGruber Ya I won;t vouch for the study design
I think all candidates should be voted for in a Valentine Gameshow manner.
I'm going to make a very snotty comment, @AlexG. I think what you just said is very much correlated with intelligence.
02:57
You have no idea who they are, but you can ask questions about them and make your decisions from the other side of the wall.
@TedShifrin so is "most people"
@Axoren There is a philosopher named John Rawls that says this is how we should determine the ideal public policies, except we are behind the 'wall' from ourselves!
@TedShifrin I think using the Gutzmer formula to prove the maximum principle is pretty slick.
Probably the slickest proof out there.
I know not whereof you speak, @Pedro.
@KevinDriscoll Personally, I want a candidate who likes "Long walks on the beach."
02:58
@Kevin: I wonder what the percentage is for gay ... :D
@TedShifrin Perhaps you know it by the name of Parseval's formula?
Mean value theorem, @Pedro?
@TedShifrin I think they asked and its noticably higher than athiest
@Pedro I love the Parseval/Plancherel theorem

« first day (1645 days earlier)      last day (3672 days later) »