$X$ be a metric space, $x, y \in X$ be two arbitrary points. $S_r(x)$ and $S_{r'}(y)$ be two open balls centered at $x$ and $y$. Pick $r$ and $r'$ such that $r + r' < d(x, y)$. Then if $z \in S_r(x) \cap S_{r'}(y)$, $d(x, y) \leq d(x, z) + d(z, y) < r + r'$, contradicting the assumption. Hence $S_r(x) \cap S_{r'}(y)$ is null.
@GustavoMontano You express it in local coordinates, and $g_{ab}$ is the inner product of $\frac{\partial}{\partial x_a}$ and $\frac{\partial}{\partial x_b}$.
@BalarkaSen Hello :) Hasse identity for Reimann Zeta function is $\displaystyle \zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n+1}\sum\limits_{k=0}^{n}\frac{(-1)^{k}\binom{n}{k}}{(k+1)^{s-1}}$ (sorry)
See, I have just derived the length of a curve by $\mathcal{L}(\gamma)=\int_{a}^{b}\sqrt{\left(\frac{du}{dt}\right)^{2}E+2\frac{du}{dt}\frac{dv}{dt}F+\left(\frac{dv}{dt}\right)^{2}G}dt$. How would one introduce the metric? I am assuming that you can. @DanielFischer.
@BalarkaSen haven't learnt anything new .. (there are no classes 'coz of the upcoming exam) .. I'm trying to learn stuff from here and there (like Apostol, and other books)
@BalarkaSen: Let $(M,d)$ be complete and $(f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of continuous functions $f_n: M \to \mathbb{R}$ and assume that the limit $$\lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) =: f(x)$$ exists for all $x \in M$. Is the set of points where $f$ is continuous dense in $M$?
@BalarkaSen: That's the first question I remember from functional analysis and I really liked it.
And Riesz' representation theorem still blows my mind, but I don't know if it would do the same to you.
@MikeMiller: The "simple" one, that for all $\ell \in \mathcal{H}^*$ there is exactly a $y \in \mathcal{H}$ such that for all $x \in \mathcal{H}$ $$\ell(x) = (y,x)_{\mathcal{H}}.$$
@MikeMiller: It was introduced in our functional analysis 1 course and I found it really impressive but it had no further application so I was a bit disappointed. Little did I know it would return in functional analysis 2 and with such significance. :o
Hmmm, is it evaluated so far? $$\int_0^1 \left(\frac{\log(x) \log(1+x)}{x}\right)^3 \ dx$$ May I say I'm the first one that evaluated it? No, not really, you never know from where a hidden paper comes to surface.
@MikeMiller: Some things in algebra, I do like, but I didn't pursue it further after the basic abstract algebra course. I am really interested in mathematical physics and unfortunately, real algebra isn't very common in physics.
I remember that some time ago I was asking this question Evaluate $\int_0^1\ln(1-x)\ln x\ln(1+x) \mathrm{dx}$ ,
and now, while I was making a review, I asked myself if we can get the closed form of
$$\int_0^1(\ln(1-x)\ln(1+x)\ln(x))^2\,dx$$
by using the similar tools as in that proof. The probl...
I also wonder how we connect $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+1} \frac{H_n^{(6)}}{n}$$ to $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+1} \frac{H_n^{6}}{n}$$ and then compute them. I really doubt any paper on earth can tell that.
@TheGame then a mathematician proved that logarithmic integral result in a very elementary way and put all in an article that is going to be published soon.
Rewrite every sentence in the text as relations between nouns. It is time consuming, but in the qualitative sciences where there is a lot of redundancy and faulty reasoning it works well.
@robjohn If we put together our old work, we prove elementarily that $$\displaystyle \sum_{n,k\ge 1}\frac{2}{k^4(k+n)^2}=-2\zeta^2(3)+\frac{25}{6}\zeta(6)$$
Actually, it's enough to prove this one $$\zeta(4,2)=\zeta^2(3)-\frac43\zeta(6)$$ that is done by our old work.
@robjohnit looks like no one there knows how to do that elementarily.
@robjohn in this proof, we consider all until we get the relation $(2)$
@robjohn then we consider your approach to the main series that was done elementarily, here (where you used $\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac1{k^an^b}-\frac1{k^a(k+n)^b}-\frac1{k^b‌​(k+n)^a}=\zeta(a+b)$)
@TheGame Thanks. What I posted above is more than mind-blowing since many mathematicians don't even know, imagine, dream that it is possible to compute that without using complex analysis, but only elementary tools.
Do you have idea how to find mapping between $H \oplus H$ and $H \otimes \mathbb{C}^2$ that establishes isomorphism? $H$ is some Hilbert spaces over $\mathbb{C}$.
As for my study methods, I've found that actually keeping track of when you're studying can be helpful. The first time I did that I realized how much time I waste and realized I wasn't studying as much as I thought I was.
I'm now doing 25 minutes with a 5 minute break 4 times and then a longer break, about 2-4 times a day (depending if I'm working or not)
I've also stopped writing everything I read. I used to do this and realized it was just rote which wasn't really learning. I now sit down with a book and work through everything in my head. I'll work through a tough proof, understand each step, then take a break and then work through it all in my head to make sure I really understood it.
As for whether or not these methods are optimal for me, I'm not sure. But they seem to be improvements.
great, do you have any ideas for this one? $$\sum _{i=0}^\infty (1-p_{i})\prod _{j=0}^{i-1}p_{j}=(1-\prod _{j=0}^{\infty }p_{j})$$
The only thing I got is that this is equivalent with: $$\sum _{i=0}^\infty \prod _{j=0}^{i-1}p_{j}-\prod _{j=0}^{i}p_{j} =(1-\prod _{j=0}^{\infty }p_{j})$$
@Kasper see if you can take a partial sum up to n on the left and a partial product up to m on the right and play around with trying to equate them. Then magically limits might work?
$$\int_0^1 \frac{\log^2(x)\log(1+x)}{1+x} \ dx=2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+1}\frac{H_n}{(n+1)^3}$$ Q.E.D. (since I have at hand the proper generating function)
My point is somewhat different though, and it is related to another proof of this one that shows that one can avoid tough calculations when computing some ugly series.
Here is a solution that does not rely (too much) on softwares. I will be using the known values of the sums $\small{\displaystyle \sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{H_n}{n2^n},\ \sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{H_n}{n^22^n},\ \sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{H_n}{n^32^n}}$.
Let
$$\mathcal{S}=\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{H_n}{n^42^n}...
It seems he gave up the previous account (there were some answer to correct, that means a lot of work to do).
Now, here is an interesting thing to note ...
In this answer he says "I will gladly provide a detailed solution for $\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{H_n}{n^32^n}$ too if there is a need."
I will be using the following results:
$$2\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{H_n}{n^q}=(q+2)\zeta(q+1)-\sum^{q-2}_{j=1}\zeta(j+1)\zeta(q-j)\tag1$$
$$\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{H_n}{n^22^n}=\zeta(3)-\frac{\pi^2}{12}\ln{2}\tag2$$
$$\sum^\infty_{n=1}\frac{H_n}{n^32^n}={\rm Li}_4\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right)+\frac{\pi^4...
Update 1
This should be the final edit. Lots of typos have been corrected and the presentation in the section on existence has been greatly improved. It should be very close to a form that can be used as a basis for a project for students.
Update 2
Even more typos corrected. Added example of n...
he says "roofs of $(1)$, $(2)$ and $(4)$ can be found [here][1], [here][2] and [here][3] respectively. Unfortunately, there has not been a mathematically sound proof of $(3)$ on MSE as of now."
Also in some proofs in the previous account he had some problems with that series.
@Chris'ssis I have a feeling that it is the same person. Usually for upvotes. If a diamond mod cross references the ips of the account it will be clear that they are the same person. But moderators will only do this if there is serious abuse. Nothing major or provable here.
@TheGame It is time to get some then, lol. Or visit the library. 16 year olds should not be studying the Riemann Hypothesis anyway. They should be enjoying ice cream with their boy friends and girl friends, lol.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder predominantly inattentive (ADHD-PI), also called attention deficit disorder (ADD), is one of the two types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The term was formally changed in 1994 in the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV), to "ADHD predominantly inattentive" (ADHD-PI or ADHD-I) - though the term attention deficit disorder is still widely used. 'Predominantly Inattentive' is similar to the other subtypes of ADHD except that it is characterized primarily by inattentive concentration or a deficit...
I was very annoyed today, and I'm specially very annoyed when someone, no matter who, try to explain somehow the provenience of my work, even if that thing is done in a very elegant way. I understand that for some is hard to accept that someone with no background works on articles and try to publish things like a book, then come up with amazing proofs for some celebre problems, but this is the reality, and nothing can change that, I have no background in mathematics, and all my work is original.
Of course, I don't plan to convince anyone to believe what I say, but it's good to know that reality may be the way I present it.
Tell about me anything you want but not about my work. My work is saint to me.
Hi, I have one question please about the order of $\bar{p}$ in $Z/nZ$ is $n/gcd(p,n)$: I know that the order is the smallest integer such that $kp$ is divisible by $n$, so is $n/gcd(p,n)$ because is the smallest so we have to choose $gcd(p,n)$? Am-I right? Thanks