« first day (1494 days earlier)      last day (3823 days later) » 

22:00
@TedShifrin Do you know of a single nice $K(G, n)$ with $n>2$? Or $n=2$ and $G \neq \Bbb Z$? Or are the spaces necessarily so silly at that point you just can't describe them in any pleasant geometric way?
It even confused you for a moment there, @Mike
I'm always confuseed
@Khallil, you know your name means flute in hebrew?
Damn, @Mike, you're gonna turn into an old-style algebraic topologist! No, offhand, I don't know ...
I'm afraid of how you're going to end that
@TedShifrin Who knows... Probably not, since nobody does that here :)
22:04
I had no idea, @Studentmath. I know that it means "the most loyal of friends" in Arabic, but that's about it.
That's pretty cool!
Nice change, I don't know many pleasent words that start with c in english.
Smacks @Studentmath
Hahahah @Ted
22:05
@Khallil Yes, also pretty
If it makes you feel worse, I promise I won't be doing analytic geometry.
(in Arabic)
Celery, cumin, carcinogen @Studentmath
I thought he was going to say category theorist @Studentmath
@Ted @Mike hahaha
22:06
I could see myself becoming a carcinogen
Celery is fine, sure
You already are @Mike
How rude!
$\mathbb{Celery}$
I excel @ rude
4
22:07
The urban dictionary entries for my name are pretty funny!
@Hippa méchant
@TedShifrin Comment ça ???
Toujpurs méchant, toi
Don't you mean toujours?
$\mathcal{Celery}$
22:09
Yes ... Typing on iPad sucks
iPad... ewwwww
Is méchant the slang version of wicked, as in good, or does it mean evil?
It's not on fire, @Hippa!
That could've been Galaxy too
22:11
Where are you getting these from, @Hippa!
Hahahahahahaha!
Some apple-hating website I guess
sigh gonna try to reverse engineer their result in the proof, maybe that will work..
Better ? @Khallil
Lenny makes everything better.
Now you just need the epic sax guy in there as well!
Uh I closed paint.NET :c
Hah. This paper states that for small enough $\epsilon>0$ and very large $n$, $n^2*e^{-\frac{\epsilon^2 (1-\epsilon)}{3}*\frac{7}{\epsilon^2} ln(n)}=o(1)$
22:24
gross
There are so many papers that I think many of them must be trivial.
I really can't see why. But let's follow their logic.
$n^2*e^{-\frac{7ln(n)}{2(1-\epsilon)}+\frac{\epsilon 7ln(n)}{2(1-\epsilon)^2}}$
Could just as well be..
You can read a paper and chat at the same time?
he's a computer
I have never read any paper.
The look of any paper frightens me.
22:28
I am extremely talented @Will.
If we rewrite it as $n^2*e^{\frac{7ln(n)}{\epsilon}*\frac{2\epsilon^2-\epsilon}{2(1-\epsilon)^2}}$ would be o(1) too. Right?
The only paper I have is toilet paper.
Gahrahgh.
George Orwell, in his famous 1946 essay, “Politics and the English Language,” argued that the battle against poor English wasn’t frivolous because “the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.”
@Will Were you called differently before?
@Studentmath Yes.
22:34
@r9m I don't know how they got in there in the first place. Are they supposed to be regular dashes, minus signs, what?
@Will should I bother asking what it was?
@Studentmath Jasper. Most people know that by now.
Ahh yes, Jasper!
Most of the starred jokes in this room are too sophisticated for me.
In fact it is less clear why their's is $o(1)$ then mine. I stick with my proof.
22:38
I think Microsoft Word is much easier to use than LaTeX.
Was just thinking the same
It is more intutive
How is it easier -___-
WYSIWYG
But doing huge math expressions matrices etc is way easier with latex
I never managed to do matrices with Latex. With Word I just enlargen the matrix to the right side and throw the numbers in.
22:40
$\LaTeX$ is awesome. Everything looks so much cleaner. Calibri and Arial just don't do it for me.
3
Fonts can be changed.
$$\begin{pmatrix} a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i \end{pmatrix}$$ $$^_^$$
The eye of the great anon is always looking.
I am going back to think and then sleep.
Ohh, that's how you do matrices. Yeah that's simple.
My god my limit actually is o(1)!!!!
Mine goes there $^2$ faster, too!
I am proud.
r9m
r9m
23:10
@robjohn idk .. I don't have a clue :|
@r9m How did you write the text to go there?
something inserted those charaters.
r9m
r9m
@robjohn might have been the image(latex links) that I drag dropped from AoPS
@robjohn might have been the image(latex links) that I drag dropped from AoPS .. but last night I removed all of them .. and wrote them down myself .. is it still not working ? :o
@r9m Did you try that problem?
r9m
r9m
@BalarkaSen nope .. but I will .. later :) I have a lot on my plate atm :(
23:25
Be sure that everything goes inside.
Especially the vegetables.
=P
@r9m don't get fat
r9m
r9m
@BalarkaSen don't remind me boy .. I haven't had non veg for almost a month now :( .. the hostel food sucks :(
23:42
@Hippalectryon I have a problem for you.
@BalarkaSen what is it ?
@Hippa NT. Interested?
@TedShifrin Am I still on ignore?
tapping fingers on the table
@BalarkaSen NT ??
number theory.
23:46
in Number theory, Aug 29 at 19:28, by Balarka Sen
Let $S$ be a nonempty set of positive nonzero integers such that if $x$ is in $S$ then both $4x$ and $\lfloor \sqrt{x} \rfloor$ are in $S$. Prove that $S = \Bbb N \setminus \{0\}$.
The way I solved it used almost no NT though. Mostly analysis.
@Hippalectryon You can't work with absolutely nothing! Prove that $1 \in S$
That's obvious -___-
What else can you deduce from that?
r9m
r9m
@BalarkaSen thats an interesting problem :D
@r9m Indeed it is.
@BalarkaSen That I just need to fill the 4k+1,4k+2,4k+3
23:56
@r9m let me look...
@BalarkaSen Obviously 2 is there too
Yes
And?
Nothing
Just noticed that
@Hippalectryon All the powers of 2 are in there man.
Obviously
23:59
@Hippalectryon Proof by intimidation, as members of this chat should know now, is not a proof.
@MikeMiller Uh ? Who am I intimidating ?
Thanks @Mike

« first day (1494 days earlier)      last day (3823 days later) »