« first day (1476 days earlier)      last day (3842 days later) » 

00:01
Yes, you're almost half my age ...
Max
Max
hello
can someone quickly help me out - i forgot what it is called when you have two integrals or sums where the bounds of the inner one depend on the value of the outer one i.e. integrate over x from 0 to 1 and y from 0 to x
ah, convolution is the word i was looking for :)
 
1 hour later…
01:24
@skullpatrol @DanielFischer : Is it bad to take Calc I and II + Linear algebra + physics in the freshman semester of physics?
I don't know. Can you even take Calc I and Calc II in parallel?
@DanielFischer I can, I think
@DanielFischer I know the bone structure of calc I and II
I'm just no skillful in linear algebra and multi variable calculus.
@DanielFischer Does it harm?
I mean, "are they offered in the same semester?" I'd have thought they were offered in alternating semesters.
I would not recommend it.
@skullpatrol @DanielFischer They're offered in different semester, since I was late, most of the classes are closed, right now, I'm thinking of rescheduling the whole program.
I have to register right now !
I do really need your advices.
01:33
Remember math builds on itself.
I can't advise on that @MrWho. Only generally, don't bite off more than you can chew, but enough that you have something to chew on.
@DanielFischer I know what you're saying,tell me your opinion about this : Calc I + Linear Algebra + Fundamentals of Chemistry + Lab + Social and behavioral sciences?
Sorry, no idea.
@DanielFischer The question is, does linear algebra rely on calc I and II?
Do I have to know the whole calc to take linear algebra in Uni?
@MrWho Linear algebra doesn't need Calc or anything. You need linear algebra for almost everything, however, so it's a good idea to learn that early.
01:40
@DanielFischer So if I put linear algebra in First semester it's good?
And good night, everybody, I'm off to bed.
@MrWho Yes, that's fine.
@DanielFischer Oh thanks, bye :)
bonjourno
02:07
goodbyeo
 
2 hours later…
03:51
I wonder if this is the record for length of suspension on SE. Anyone seen longer?
04:06
@900sit-upsaday I've seen five-year ones, but not 10
04:37
@900sit-upsaday WAT.
That's amazing.
04:49
Off topic: When defining the rationals by the cartesian product of the integers and the natural numbers modded out by ~ where $(a,b) ~ (c,d)$ if $ad=bc,$ how does one show transitivity without using division?
If $(a,b)~(c,d)~(e,f)$, then $ad=bc$ and $cf=ed$. I'd like to say $(a,b)~(e,f)$ since $e/f = c/d = a/b$, however, I don't feel like I should allow to divide since that would be using the fact that we already have rationals (while I'm in the process of defining the rationals).
if $(a,b)$ ~ $(c,d)$ and $(c,d)$ ~ $(e,f)$ then $ad = bc$ and $cf = de$, so $daf = adf = bcf = bde = dbe$ (I think?) implies $af = be$
05:07
@MrWho It would be good to take linear algebra before multivariable calculus.
@AndrewG, yes, that's it
you may need to mention that there exists a g such that $(d,1) = (1,g)$ for that last implication
but that sort of is "using division"
05:27
It's not using division. It is using cancellation law. (Which is valid in any integral domain.)
@MartinSleziak yes. thanks
06:04
Morning
 
2 hours later…
07:45
@DanielFischer I just found out that integrals of Banach-valued functions are called Bochner integrals, and that there are manifolds more general than Banach manifolds called Frechet manifolds.
 
1 hour later…
08:49
@Alizter Ah, you told me, right. I forgot.
09:01
I have just begun to integrate!
It feels like a new phase in my life.
@Ted! @Balarka!
I am looking for a proof of Chernoff-type bounds on lower and upper tail of bionmial distributions, specifically the one around the expectation. Anyone know where I can find one?
Gah, guess I will have to prove it myself
09:20
Some illustrations added : mathoverflow.net/q/165038/14414
@Nick Do you mean antidifferentiate?
@Nick integrate what?
@JasperLoy: Yes :D
hello @Studentmath
hello @nick
How's it going @Balarka?
09:23
@BalarkaSen: Simple baby stuff that's irrelevant to you.
@Studentmath not bad. how 'bout you?
Stuck trying to find some proof for what I am reading in a paper, but otherwise fine
Maybe I will ask for reference on the main site
@BalarkaSen: For example, this
@Nick you're doing good. keep going.
:D Yay
Btw, what is $\int{uv\cdot dx} = uv\cdot dx + \int{(\frac{du}{dx} \cdot \int{v\cdot dx})}\cdot dx$ called?
09:28
@nick when i first learned how to antidifferentiate, i always used to amuse myself with $\int 1/\log(x) dx$
@Nick uv dx doesn't make sense.
@BalarkaSen: Does no one call it integration anymore?
@BalarkaSen: u and v are functions of x. Now, it makes sense?
@Nick call what?
@BalarkaSen: Antidifferentiation.. sigh
@Nick no, it still doesn't. $uv \cdot dx$ is an infinitesimal. how can i make sense of that without the int symbol?
4 mins ago, by Nick
Btw, what is $\int{uv\cdot dx} = uv\cdot dx + \int{(\frac{du}{dx} \cdot \int{v\cdot dx})}\cdot dx$ called?
Whoops
$$\int{uv\cdot dx} = u\int{v}\cdot dx - \int{(\frac{du}{dx} \cdot \int{v\cdot dx})}\cdot dx$$
09:33
@Nick we call it integration when the limits are given.
Oh
@Nick Err... the product rule?
$$\int u dv = uv - \int v du$$
Oh
it is the product rule
just differentiate both sides, see what happens.
That's an easier way to remember it!
Hahaa
09:36
there is nothing to remember when it comes to math
it follows logically
@BalarkaSen 2 times 2 is 4 is memory.
that's an axiom.
I get it: $uv = \int udv + \int vdu$
uh-huh.
It's natural
I should go apologize to Newton and Leibnitz now.
@BalarkaSen: Could you lend me your copy of Spivak?
@Nick ever heard of blah?
look it up there.
Blah, Blah Blah or Blah Blah Blah may refer to: == Music == Blah Blah Blah (Iggy Pop album), 1986 Blah Blah Blah (Blahzay Blahzay album), 1996 Blah Blah (album), a 2006 EP and song by Lady Sovereign Blah...Blah...Blah...Love Songs for the New Millennium, a 2004 album by Scum of the Earth === Songs === "Blah Blah Blah" (Gershwin song), 1931 "Blah Blah Blah" by Nicola Paone, 1959 "Blah Blah Blah" (Iggy Pop song), 1986 "Blah Blah Blah" Longpigs B-side 1996 "Blah Blah Blah" by Heinz Erhardt "Blah Blah Blah" (Kesha song), 2010 == Other media == Bla Bla, a 2011 National Film Board of Canada...
@Nick Try en.bookfi.org.
right.
09:43
No need to be so secretive.
Wait, should I be searching for Spivak or Blah?
@JasperLoy i don't want to take the responsibility for linking to an unofficial site, sorry.
@BalarkaSen: Sorry, Blah's not an author of any known book.
search for Spivak
Last night I did a bunch of amazing discoveries...
09:46
The best calculus book is actually Lang's A first course in calculus and his Calculus of several variables.
I liked Piskunov however.
@JasperLoy: Jaspy, I'm trying single variable. Gotta take baby steps here.
@Nick I am single and available.
2
@BalarkaSen Did you know that the series here math.stackexchange.com/questions/882621/… can be computed without pen and paper? (this is the art of solving problems)
@Chris'ssis nope.
09:49
@JasperLoy: Jokes aside, how are you?
@Nick Same, still trying to get better.
@Chris'ssis that's nice.
@BalarkaSen Yeah, I worked a lot on it. I'm going to publish it in some article. I need some articles before publishing my book.
go ahead.
@Chris'ssis You can publish the book as 100 articles, lol.
09:51
@JasperLoy :-))))))
@JasperLoy: That's a great idea!
I got to make lunch, any mathematical ideas?
@MikeMiller
I think I am unsure of why 1 --> Aut_H(G) --> Aut_N(G) --> Aut_N(H) is not exact at the right.
@Nick what ideas?
@BalarkaSen: for Lunch. PS: Spivaks a lot of fun!
mathematical ideas for lunch?
like deciding the probability of picking up a piece of tomato from your plate of noodles while eating randomly?
... No, like what I should make. Noodles sounds good.
10:00
or the standard distribution of butter in your sandwich?
Sandwich is nice too.
...
great. have fun with those.
Wait, how the heck did you know that I only had Maggi and bread in the kitchen?
That was scary spot on.
science of deduction, i mean.
... Ofcourse Dr.Holmes
10:02
=P
and AFAIK, I doubt Holmes had a doctorate.
I must have been thinking of someone else.
Of course. You were thinking of Dr. Watson.
i have to go and decide what to do -- do some math or read Sherlock.
@BalarkaSen: Both will give you the same amount of serotonin buzz.
Also, I don't think Dr. Wilson is what came to mind when I said Dr.Holmes
10:10
Wilson?
ok, i gotta run.
Yes, Wilson
@BalarkaSen: Bye :D
 
2 hours later…
12:06
@Chris'ssis Chris, how did you become so good at solving integrals & sums?
@rehband I don't know how good I'm, but as it also happened in other areas, I always managed to get a high peak when I loved the things I did. Well, it was a time when I learned alone and had to answer all my questions alone. Then, I read some books, papers, I visited sites, and the most important thing I began to create my own questions, I was challenging myself.
@rehband I hope to be one day like Ramanujan or beyond. I worked a lot and I'll continue to work a lot, I'm a hard worker.
@Chris'ssis: And ofcourse you'll get to that level beyond doubt.
@rehband: just try to learn something every day.
@Chris'ssis Awesome, me too :D Long way to go for me haha. I shall continue doing exercises from that book now
@robjohn Will do
Could anyone please tell me if my answer is right?
12:17
@rehband Well, I give you a point that is helpful. Try to solve each question there in more ways (where you can). Doing like that, you'll become pretty good after a while.
@Chris'ssis Ok, will do. I still need to at least look at hints for most of them.
@robjohn Yesterday I created & computed a mind-blowing series ...
@Chris'ssis which one?
@robjohn $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{ 1}{n^2} \left(1+\frac{1}{ 2}+ \cdots +\frac{1}{ n} \right) \left( \zeta(2)- \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k^2}\right)$$
I will take a look at it...
12:33
@rehband Do you see $2.58.$ in that book? It's an open problem. I recommmend you the version when $n=3$. It's simply fantastic. The version in 3 variables I met it independently in my research, but glad I also saw it there.
@Chris'ssis Wow, looks crazy :O
@rehband It has a very nice closed form.
@Chris'ssis I wouldn't even know where to begin calculating it
@rehband Yeah, but it's crazy awesome too. :-)
@Chris'ssis For sure
@rehband During the time I gave it some mathematicians, no one did it so far. Maybe some didn't do it because it simply looked too ugly to them. I was impressed by its beauty from the beginning.
@Chris'ssis Haha :D
@rehband I worked for some days (2, 3?) on it.
@Chris'ssis What did you find?
@rehband Here
user image
3
12:39
@Chris'ssis Wow, it looks like magic, I applaud you
Have you thought of a corresponding $[0,1]^n$ version @Chris'ssis?
@Chris'ssis You are a genius.
Let's all star it.
@rehband yeah, it's about magic there ... :-)
@BalarkaSen Sure, you can find such a version in Ovidiu Furdui's book.
@JasperLoy A genius that fails many job interviews ... :-)
@Chris'ssis The interviewers are not fit to judge you.
12:42
I was under the impression that they were not fit to judge anyone.
@BalarkaSen: What do you usually mean by $\zeta (x)$
@Nick $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{n^x}$$ mostly
@JasperLoy At the last interview I felt like the most stupid person in my country. They seemed like some gods that knew everything.
@Chris'ssis What jobs are you applying for?
@Nick If you are talking about $\Re[x] > 1$
12:43
@BalarkaSen: Now, what is $\Re[x]$?
Real part of a complex number
do we know the rank of the additive subgroup of $\Bbb Z[\zeta]$ generated by the primitive roots of unity? since the sum of primitive roots is an integer, it can't be freely generated by them.
Oh
@blue!
@rehband FMEA coordinator (en.wikipedia.or/wiki/Failure_mode_and_effects_analysis) It's similar to the mathematical analysis, but where you analyze processes, not functions. It's a very hard job.
12:44
ah drats I have to go on laptop to pin the star thing
responsibilities.
@BalarkaSen: And if it's not?
@Nick then things get a wee bit complicated.
... I'll take your word for it.
@Chris'ssis Ok, nice
12:46
@BalarkaSen ..and $\{x\} = x - \text{floor}(x) $?
what about it
@rehband So, when you are ready, try to find a solution to that integral. You'll be impressed by its beauty. The way to go (at least my way) is absolutely fascinating.
@Balarka: What is $\int{\{x\}}\cdot dx$ ?
@Chris'ssis I'll work frantically, but it's gonna take a while regardless :) Can't wait though
@Nick I am not the integral guy here. But it should be relatively easy. Start by integrating $\lfloor x \rfloor$
12:47
.... How do we do that?
Well, I'd see it's behavior on piecewise intervals to begin with.
Its not continuous... I think we need limits
maybe, maybe not. i don't usually think about integrals much, ask @Chris'ssis
@Chris'ssis: Doth this silly mortal be wrong in asking thy lordship a silly query?
@Nick Haha
12:53
@Chris'ssis I have reduced it to $$\sum_{j,k,n=1}^\infty\frac1{kn(k+n)(j+n)^2}$$ I will work on it again in a bit...
@Chris'ssis: $$\int{\lfloor x \rfloor}\cdot dx\space =\space ?$$
@BalarkaSen: I just looked into differentiating ${\lfloor x \rfloor}$ as well.
Differentiating that is pretty straightforward.
13 mins ago, by blue
ah drats I have to go on laptop to pin the star thing
12:58
@BalarkaSen: Yeah, nice series, ugly graph
@DanielFischer @blue can pin too but he needs to do it as @anon, lol.
@JasperLoy Didn't see blue was here.
@blue: You're @anon !??
Grr @Jasper, you leaked the facts.
@Nick No, they only share a body.
12:59
Ah, here is he.
grumbles

« first day (1476 days earlier)      last day (3842 days later) »