« first day (1476 days earlier)      last day (3545 days later) » 

12:01 AM
Yes, you're almost half my age ...
 
Max
hello
can someone quickly help me out - i forgot what it is called when you have two integrals or sums where the bounds of the inner one depend on the value of the outer one i.e. integrate over x from 0 to 1 and y from 0 to x
ah, convolution is the word i was looking for :)
 
 
1 hour later…
1:24 AM
@skullpatrol @DanielFischer : Is it bad to take Calc I and II + Linear algebra + physics in the freshman semester of physics?
 
I don't know. Can you even take Calc I and Calc II in parallel?
 
@DanielFischer I can, I think
@DanielFischer I know the bone structure of calc I and II
I'm just no skillful in linear algebra and multi variable calculus.
@DanielFischer Does it harm?
 
I mean, "are they offered in the same semester?" I'd have thought they were offered in alternating semesters.
 
I would not recommend it.
 
@skullpatrol @DanielFischer They're offered in different semester, since I was late, most of the classes are closed, right now, I'm thinking of rescheduling the whole program.
I have to register right now !
I do really need your advices.
 
1:33 AM
Remember math builds on itself.
 
I can't advise on that @MrWho. Only generally, don't bite off more than you can chew, but enough that you have something to chew on.
 
@DanielFischer I know what you're saying,tell me your opinion about this : Calc I + Linear Algebra + Fundamentals of Chemistry + Lab + Social and behavioral sciences?
 
Sorry, no idea.
 
@DanielFischer The question is, does linear algebra rely on calc I and II?
Do I have to know the whole calc to take linear algebra in Uni?
 
@MrWho Linear algebra doesn't need Calc or anything. You need linear algebra for almost everything, however, so it's a good idea to learn that early.
 
1:40 AM
@DanielFischer So if I put linear algebra in First semester it's good?
 
And good night, everybody, I'm off to bed.
@MrWho Yes, that's fine.
 
@DanielFischer Oh thanks, bye :)
 
bonjourno
 
2:07 AM
goodbyeo
 
 
2 hours later…
3:51 AM
I wonder if this is the record for length of suspension on SE. Anyone seen longer?
 
4:06 AM
@900sit-upsaday I've seen five-year ones, but not 10
 
4:37 AM
@900sit-upsaday WAT.
That's amazing.
 
4:49 AM
Off topic: When defining the rationals by the cartesian product of the integers and the natural numbers modded out by ~ where $(a,b) ~ (c,d)$ if $ad=bc,$ how does one show transitivity without using division?
If $(a,b)~(c,d)~(e,f)$, then $ad=bc$ and $cf=ed$. I'd like to say $(a,b)~(e,f)$ since $e/f = c/d = a/b$, however, I don't feel like I should allow to divide since that would be using the fact that we already have rationals (while I'm in the process of defining the rationals).
 
if $(a,b)$ ~ $(c,d)$ and $(c,d)$ ~ $(e,f)$ then $ad = bc$ and $cf = de$, so $daf = adf = bcf = bde = dbe$ (I think?) implies $af = be$
 
5:07 AM
@MrWho It would be good to take linear algebra before multivariable calculus.
 
@AndrewG, yes, that's it
 
you may need to mention that there exists a g such that $(d,1) = (1,g)$ for that last implication
but that sort of is "using division"
 
5:27 AM
It's not using division. It is using cancellation law. (Which is valid in any integral domain.)
 
@MartinSleziak yes. thanks
 
6:04 AM
Morning
 
 
2 hours later…
7:45 AM
@DanielFischer I just found out that integrals of Banach-valued functions are called Bochner integrals, and that there are manifolds more general than Banach manifolds called Frechet manifolds.
 
 
1 hour later…
8:49 AM
@Alizter Ah, you told me, right. I forgot.
 
9:01 AM
I have just begun to integrate!
It feels like a new phase in my life.
 
@Ted! @Balarka!
I am looking for a proof of Chernoff-type bounds on lower and upper tail of bionmial distributions, specifically the one around the expectation. Anyone know where I can find one?
Gah, guess I will have to prove it myself
 
9:20 AM
Some illustrations added : mathoverflow.net/q/165038/14414
 
@Nick Do you mean antidifferentiate?
 
@Nick integrate what?
 
@JasperLoy: Yes :D
 
hello @Studentmath
hello @nick
 
How's it going @Balarka?
 
9:23 AM
@BalarkaSen: Simple baby stuff that's irrelevant to you.
 
@Studentmath not bad. how 'bout you?
 
Stuck trying to find some proof for what I am reading in a paper, but otherwise fine
Maybe I will ask for reference on the main site
 
@BalarkaSen: For example, this
 
@Nick you're doing good. keep going.
 
:D Yay
Btw, what is $\int{uv\cdot dx} = uv\cdot dx + \int{(\frac{du}{dx} \cdot \int{v\cdot dx})}\cdot dx$ called?
 
9:28 AM
@nick when i first learned how to antidifferentiate, i always used to amuse myself with $\int 1/\log(x) dx$
@Nick uv dx doesn't make sense.
 
@BalarkaSen: Does no one call it integration anymore?
@BalarkaSen: u and v are functions of x. Now, it makes sense?
 
@Nick call what?
 
@BalarkaSen: Antidifferentiation.. sigh
 
@Nick no, it still doesn't. $uv \cdot dx$ is an infinitesimal. how can i make sense of that without the int symbol?
4 mins ago, by Nick
Btw, what is $\int{uv\cdot dx} = uv\cdot dx + \int{(\frac{du}{dx} \cdot \int{v\cdot dx})}\cdot dx$ called?
 
Whoops
$$\int{uv\cdot dx} = u\int{v}\cdot dx - \int{(\frac{du}{dx} \cdot \int{v\cdot dx})}\cdot dx$$
 
9:33 AM
@Nick we call it integration when the limits are given.
 
Oh
 
@Nick Err... the product rule?
$$\int u dv = uv - \int v du$$
 
Oh
 
it is the product rule
just differentiate both sides, see what happens.
 
That's an easier way to remember it!
Hahaa
 
9:36 AM
there is nothing to remember when it comes to math
it follows logically
 
@BalarkaSen 2 times 2 is 4 is memory.
 
that's an axiom.
 
I get it: $uv = \int udv + \int vdu$
 
uh-huh.
 
It's natural
I should go apologize to Newton and Leibnitz now.
 
9:39 AM
 
@BalarkaSen: Could you lend me your copy of Spivak?
 
@Nick ever heard of blah?
look it up there.
 
Blah, Blah Blah or Blah Blah Blah may refer to: == Music == Blah Blah Blah (Iggy Pop album), 1986 Blah Blah Blah (Blahzay Blahzay album), 1996 Blah Blah (album), a 2006 EP and song by Lady Sovereign Blah...Blah...Blah...Love Songs for the New Millennium, a 2004 album by Scum of the Earth === Songs === "Blah Blah Blah" (Gershwin song), 1931 "Blah Blah Blah" by Nicola Paone, 1959 "Blah Blah Blah" (Iggy Pop song), 1986 "Blah Blah Blah" Longpigs B-side 1996 "Blah Blah Blah" by Heinz Erhardt "Blah Blah Blah" (Kesha song), 2010 == Other media == Bla Bla, a 2011 National Film Board of Canada...
 
@Nick Try en.bookfi.org.
 
right.
 
9:43 AM
No need to be so secretive.
 
Wait, should I be searching for Spivak or Blah?
 
@JasperLoy i don't want to take the responsibility for linking to an unofficial site, sorry.
 
@BalarkaSen: Sorry, Blah's not an author of any known book.
 
search for Spivak
 
Last night I did a bunch of amazing discoveries...
 
9:46 AM
The best calculus book is actually Lang's A first course in calculus and his Calculus of several variables.
 
I liked Piskunov however.
 
@JasperLoy: Jaspy, I'm trying single variable. Gotta take baby steps here.
 
@Nick I am single and available.
2
 
@BalarkaSen Did you know that the series here math.stackexchange.com/questions/882621/… can be computed without pen and paper? (this is the art of solving problems)
 
@Chris'ssis nope.
 
9:49 AM
@JasperLoy: Jokes aside, how are you?
 
@Nick Same, still trying to get better.
 
@Chris'ssis that's nice.
 
@BalarkaSen Yeah, I worked a lot on it. I'm going to publish it in some article. I need some articles before publishing my book.
 
go ahead.
 
@Chris'ssis You can publish the book as 100 articles, lol.
 
9:51 AM
@JasperLoy :-))))))
 
@JasperLoy: That's a great idea!
I got to make lunch, any mathematical ideas?
 
@MikeMiller
I think I am unsure of why 1 --> Aut_H(G) --> Aut_N(G) --> Aut_N(H) is not exact at the right.
@Nick what ideas?
 
@BalarkaSen: for Lunch. PS: Spivaks a lot of fun!
 
mathematical ideas for lunch?
like deciding the probability of picking up a piece of tomato from your plate of noodles while eating randomly?
 
... No, like what I should make. Noodles sounds good.
 
10:00 AM
or the standard distribution of butter in your sandwich?
 
Sandwich is nice too.
...
 
great. have fun with those.
 
Wait, how the heck did you know that I only had Maggi and bread in the kitchen?
That was scary spot on.
 
science of deduction, i mean.
 
... Ofcourse Dr.Holmes
 
10:02 AM
=P
and AFAIK, I doubt Holmes had a doctorate.
 
I must have been thinking of someone else.
 
Of course. You were thinking of Dr. Watson.
i have to go and decide what to do -- do some math or read Sherlock.
 
@BalarkaSen: Both will give you the same amount of serotonin buzz.
 
wat
 
Also, I don't think Dr. Wilson is what came to mind when I said Dr.Holmes
 
10:10 AM
Wilson?
ok, i gotta run.
 
Yes, Wilson
@BalarkaSen: Bye :D
 
 
2 hours later…
12:06 PM
@Chris'ssis Chris, how did you become so good at solving integrals & sums?
 
@rehband I don't know how good I'm, but as it also happened in other areas, I always managed to get a high peak when I loved the things I did. Well, it was a time when I learned alone and had to answer all my questions alone. Then, I read some books, papers, I visited sites, and the most important thing I began to create my own questions, I was challenging myself.
@rehband I hope to be one day like Ramanujan or beyond. I worked a lot and I'll continue to work a lot, I'm a hard worker.
 
@Chris'ssis: And ofcourse you'll get to that level beyond doubt.
 
@rehband: just try to learn something every day.
 
@Chris'ssis Awesome, me too :D Long way to go for me haha. I shall continue doing exercises from that book now
@robjohn Will do
 
Could anyone please tell me if my answer is right?
 
12:17 PM
@rehband Well, I give you a point that is helpful. Try to solve each question there in more ways (where you can). Doing like that, you'll become pretty good after a while.
 
@Chris'ssis Ok, will do. I still need to at least look at hints for most of them.
 
@robjohn Yesterday I created & computed a mind-blowing series ...
 
@Chris'ssis which one?
 
@robjohn $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{ 1}{n^2} \left(1+\frac{1}{ 2}+ \cdots +\frac{1}{ n} \right) \left( \zeta(2)- \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k^2}\right)$$
 
I will take a look at it...
 
12:33 PM
@rehband Do you see $2.58.$ in that book? It's an open problem. I recommmend you the version when $n=3$. It's simply fantastic. The version in 3 variables I met it independently in my research, but glad I also saw it there.
 
@Chris'ssis Wow, looks crazy :O
 
@rehband It has a very nice closed form.
 
@Chris'ssis I wouldn't even know where to begin calculating it
 
@rehband Yeah, but it's crazy awesome too. :-)
 
@Chris'ssis For sure
 
12:36 PM
 
@rehband During the time I gave it some mathematicians, no one did it so far. Maybe some didn't do it because it simply looked too ugly to them. I was impressed by its beauty from the beginning.
 
@Chris'ssis Haha :D
 
@rehband I worked for some days (2, 3?) on it.
 
@Chris'ssis What did you find?
 
@rehband Here
user image
3
 
12:39 PM
@Chris'ssis Wow, it looks like magic, I applaud you
 
Have you thought of a corresponding $[0,1]^n$ version @Chris'ssis?
 
@Chris'ssis You are a genius.
 
Let's all star it.
 
@rehband yeah, it's about magic there ... :-)
@BalarkaSen Sure, you can find such a version in Ovidiu Furdui's book.
@JasperLoy A genius that fails many job interviews ... :-)
 
@Chris'ssis The interviewers are not fit to judge you.
 
12:42 PM
I was under the impression that they were not fit to judge anyone.
 
@BalarkaSen: What do you usually mean by $\zeta (x)$
 
@Nick $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{n^x}$$ mostly
 
@JasperLoy At the last interview I felt like the most stupid person in my country. They seemed like some gods that knew everything.
 
@Chris'ssis What jobs are you applying for?
 
@Nick If you are talking about $\Re[x] > 1$
 
12:43 PM
@BalarkaSen: Now, what is $\Re[x]$?
 
Real part of a complex number
 
do we know the rank of the additive subgroup of $\Bbb Z[\zeta]$ generated by the primitive roots of unity? since the sum of primitive roots is an integer, it can't be freely generated by them.
 
Oh
 
@blue!
 
@rehband FMEA coordinator (en.wikipedia.or/wiki/Failure_mode_and_effects_analysis) It's similar to the mathematical analysis, but where you analyze processes, not functions. It's a very hard job.
 
12:44 PM
ah drats I have to go on laptop to pin the star thing
 
responsibilities.
 
@BalarkaSen: And if it's not?
 
@Nick then things get a wee bit complicated.
 
... I'll take your word for it.
 
@Chris'ssis Ok, nice
 
12:46 PM
@BalarkaSen ..and $\{x\} = x - \text{floor}(x) $?
 
what about it
 
@rehband So, when you are ready, try to find a solution to that integral. You'll be impressed by its beauty. The way to go (at least my way) is absolutely fascinating.
 
@Balarka: What is $\int{\{x\}}\cdot dx$ ?
 
@Chris'ssis I'll work frantically, but it's gonna take a while regardless :) Can't wait though
 
@Nick I am not the integral guy here. But it should be relatively easy. Start by integrating $\lfloor x \rfloor$
 
12:47 PM
.... How do we do that?
 
Well, I'd see it's behavior on piecewise intervals to begin with.
 
Its not continuous... I think we need limits
 
maybe, maybe not. i don't usually think about integrals much, ask @Chris'ssis
 
@Chris'ssis: Doth this silly mortal be wrong in asking thy lordship a silly query?
 
@Nick Haha
 
12:53 PM
@Chris'ssis I have reduced it to $$\sum_{j,k,n=1}^\infty\frac1{kn(k+n)(j+n)^2}$$ I will work on it again in a bit...
 
@Chris'ssis: $$\int{\lfloor x \rfloor}\cdot dx\space =\space ?$$
@BalarkaSen: I just looked into differentiating ${\lfloor x \rfloor}$ as well.
 
Differentiating that is pretty straightforward.
 
 
13 mins ago, by blue
ah drats I have to go on laptop to pin the star thing
 
12:58 PM
@BalarkaSen: Yeah, nice series, ugly graph
 
@DanielFischer @blue can pin too but he needs to do it as @anon, lol.
 
@JasperLoy Didn't see blue was here.
 
@blue: You're @anon !??
 
Grr @Jasper, you leaked the facts.
 
@Nick No, they only share a body.
 
12:59 PM
Ah, here is he.
 
grumbles
 

« first day (1476 days earlier)      last day (3545 days later) »