« first day (4343 days earlier)      last day (685 days later) » 
00:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

10:00 PM
that's my exact question
 
Well, I still suggest you write out a proof on $\Bbb R$ and try to generalize it.
I'm heading out now.
 
@TedShifrin You need only decide if $\sum_n \binom{1/2}{n}$ is convergent or not.
Think it is.
If $a_n = \binom{1/2}{n}$, $a_{n+1}/a_n = (n-1/2)/(n+1)$.
Ratio doesn't say anything.
 
@TedShifrin sorry I somehow don't see at which point in the unit disk this function is not analytic
so I know it converges on the unit disk but if I understood you correctly there are some points where it is not analytic
 
Ok but $a_n/a_{n+1} = (n+1)/(n-1/2) = 1 - (3/2)/(n-1/2)$. So $n(a_n/a_{n+1} - 1) = (3/2) n/(n-1/2)$ which is bounded below.
Raabe's test shows you $\sum_n \binom{1/2}{n}$ indeed does converge. Which means the Taylor expansion of $\sqrt{1 - z}$ at $z = 0$ does absolutely converge on $|z| \leq 1$ :)
Bounded below by $3/2 > 1$, I mean -- that's the important part.
@Wave What about at $z = 1$? Is it analytic there?
 
10:21 PM
btw is Cheeger geometric analysis or something else?
among other things
 
yes
 
cuz he has that famous inequality
among other things
 
yup
nice inequality
@TedShifrin: The reason I thought it ought to be true is that $z = 1$ is a branch point singularity, as you said. The coefficients don't grow nearly as badly enough as $1/(1 - z)$, where it has to for the pole at $z = 1$ to occur, which in turn is what destroys convergence at the circle of convergence.
 
10:38 PM
@BalarkaSen Raabe's test is too hard for Ted, but OK.
Yeah, there are probably some exercises in Polya-Szëgo relating to this stuff, too. I've stolen one or two before for graduate complex.
 
i'm pretty sure the hungarian dotlike thingies don't go there
 
@Wave No, you won't just be able to see it. But you can differentiate/integrate the series and actually solve for the function represented by this series. Then you can tell.
 
I should have a look someday. I remembered $\sqrt{1 - z}$ because a friend of mine asked me the same question you did in undergrad complex analysis, and another friend gave your example. I didn't like that, so I convinced him $\sqrt{1 - z}$ will work.
 
You're right. It's on the ö.
 
Nice!
 
10:42 PM
Well, there's some intuition that leads to some solid results (maybe) on distinguishing branch point from pole.
 
11:36 PM
I think I'm having trouble finding the proper mathematical allegory for something. I think way I have is closer to a relation than a map, but it's kind of both. I'm going to be abusing notation and concepts here as I figure out what I'm actually talking about, anyone feel free to correct me.

I have a case in which there are a set of tokens $T$ which can be used to buy products $P$, it's a one way process. The tokens themselves can be considered products $T \subseteq P$. Would I be able to say that $p_1 \geq p_2$ is a relation over $P$ describing "$p_1$ can be exchanged for $p_2$"? If so, t
 
00:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (4343 days earlier)      last day (685 days later) »