« first day (4342 days earlier)      last day (684 days later) » 

12:06 AM
and butterflies
 
And nuts (human, mayhaps).
 
ouch
 
Cuckoo’s Nest et al.
 
ah, yes
I was just discussing the 6 nuts in SCROTUS
I wonder if Amazon has any SCROTUS approved holsters left.
 
My FB post early in the morning remarked on the lack of activist judges.
 
12:12 AM
lots of treaty damage was done during the last presidency and the 3 appointees to SCROTUS are continuing to wreak havoc on the laws of the nation.
</rant>
 
12:30 AM
Rant on, McDuff. Wave bubye to democracy.
 
what is the R in SCROTUS?
urban dictionary to the rescue
I could have guessed
 
12:59 AM
that acronym is an insult to the scrotum
so weird that functional analysis is still on the screen
 
@JoeShmo there are two listed there. I am using the Supreme Court one.
 
I know
 
there it goes
 
generating functions are sorcery
and ought not to be practiced
or gazed upon
 
1:10 AM
Generating functions are wonderous.
 
witchcraft
 
wizardry
awful things happen to someone who meddles with generating functions - Dumbledore
what about Moment-generating functions?
 
no functions
none of that. no more.
 
what is math without functions!?
 
we go back to ordered pairs
 
1:33 AM
@geocalc33 Dysfunctional
 
🔥
 
:(
 
without functions - math would be absurd. without functions - math wouldn't fly, like an ostrich
without functions nobody would ever talk about twisted theta functions
 
1:49 AM
@geocalc33 Without radicals it's absurd
(Also - are ostriches absurd?)
 
I’ve never seen an ostrich
 
koro: they're great
they're.. temperamental, but show me a bird that isn't
 
Will it hit its beak on my head if I go near it?
 
i have approached multiple (farm) ostriches without incident
 
They’re tall as I can see from the images.
 
2:00 AM
yes. some cultures race them (as in, with people riding them). it doesn't always work
when a racing ostrich gets tired of racing they just sit down
it's pretty funny
 
ever seen an ostrich egg?
its the size of your head
if an ostrich hit its beak on your head it would crack it wide open
they seem like lovely birds. from a distance.
 
Birds are descended from a species of dinosaur
Certain birds remind you of that fact
 
why do they call the bald eagle bald?
 
Because it is bald?
@leslietownes haha
 
2:23 AM
i would be more worried about them kicking me than pecking me
 
they are NOT bald though
 
because it looks bald in relation to the rest of it, was my thought.
the adults, anyway.
 
thats what I thought
 
the juveniles do not look bald in any sense of the term.
 
but they don't actually look bald
youre trying to rationalize
the name comes from an old English word, "balde," meaning white. These graceful birds have been the national symbol of the United States since 1782.
-Google
 
2:34 AM
Bald eagles are not actually bald; the name derives from an older meaning of the word, "white headed". The adult is mainly brown with a white head and tail. The sexes are identical in plumage, but females are about 25 percent larger than males. The yellow beak is large and hooked. The plumage of the immature is brown
 
that makes less sense. they're not white eagles. unless 'bald' for hair has the same origin, in which case i'd bet the name came through that.
 
well their identifying feature is the white feathers on their head
(which if anything should make it clear that they are anything but bald)
but, as it turns out, they are balde.
 
well when i wrote "they look bald" above, i didn't mean literally bald.
 
Middle English: probably from a base meaning ‘white patch’, whence the archaic sense ‘marked or streaked with white’. Compare with Welsh ceffyl bal, denoting a horse with a white mark on its face.
origin of bald
 
most birds have more than one identifying feature. in many places you can identify juvenile bald eagles by their size and behavior. they are huge and they hunt fish and they are not ospreys. that's enough to narrow it down.
 
2:40 AM
they are truly a majestic animal
gorgeous bird
also lethal
hide yo dogs
 
someone, i think it was ben franklin? at least apocryphally? wanted to make a turkey the national bird.
it might have made more sense, but looked less cool on military and state logos.
 
come on would you take seriously a storming marine with a turkey emblem?
 
i'd have to judge that on an emblem-by-emblem basis.
 
indeed
 
Suppose I’m alone in a wide open space. Some 6 to 10 eagles are flying above. Should I worry?
 
2:44 AM
i wouldn't think so.
 
you're dinner.
 
only if your a baby
 
6-10 of them at a time could actually take you
(do they work in teams?)
in fact my money is on the eagles if youve got nowhere to run
 
good question they might cooperate in hunting to some degree
this somehow reminds me of the guys who dressed up as a zebra and ran around and got attacked by lions
 
as one does
 
 
1 hour later…
4:02 AM
@JoeShmo If they try to work in Teams for Windows, they usually crash in Windows.
 
4:30 AM
Hi. I have a symmetric system of four nonlinear equations which I could find one solution for by setting three terms equal; but I cannot solve it analytically
May I share? It is needed to answer a question
 
Good morning dear Friends
I have a question regarding Multilinear algebra,
 
Eagles consider humans as predators in general; so it would be rare for predator to get predated. That said, eagles are variable in size, and larger ones may hunt down; though going violent can deter them
 
4:49 AM
We defined the wedge product (outer product) of a linear mapping
$ \varphi: V \rightarrow W :\, V,W \text{Vectorspaces} \\ \bigwedge^2 \varphi :
\bigwedge^2 V \rightarrow \bigwedge^2 W \\ v_1 \wedge v_2 \mapsto \varphi(v_1) \wedge \varphi(v_2) $
Furthermore, we have stated that for such Function, we obviously recieve the Functionsrepresentative matrix in relation to some arbitary bases in the selected vector spaces. Let these be for example
$B,C \\$
It is now said that the wedge product of such matrix, (which i do not really understand, is it the same as taking the wedge product of a funct
I am trying to prove that statement, however, i am having difficulities since i do not have a grasp on the notation.
I believe the last statement should say less or equal than 1
 
@Mad Start with linear maps $\Bbb R^2\to\Bbb R^2$. Then do $\Bbb R^3$.
 
I have already showed (proved) that for a enodmorphism in any field of F^2, the defined operation is equivalent to multiplying the wedge product of two vectors with said determenant of a 2 x 2 matrix. ( so i am guessing thats what your suggesting, but before helping me with the proof, can you expand on the notation)
 
OK, next case.
What notation? That’s matrices with respect to bases …
 
An additional questions that arises, since it is not well written in my scriptum, is it a necessity that the vector spaces be of same dimension? IE $dim V = dim W = n $
 
5:02 AM
No, they need not.
Do 3 to 2 and 2 to 3.
 
Are you suggesting induction as a method of proof?
 
No. I’m suggesting you understand by working examples.
 
In the notation, we write $ \bigwedge^2 C$ i am not sure i understand this notation, we can take a wedge product of a vector space, $C$ is merly a basis (set bare of structure)
 
C is definitely a vector space. in fact, it is a number of them.
i'm late to this, i just wanted to make that clear.
 
Do you imply we take the "linear span" of C?
 
5:06 AM
They mean the basis for the exterior power you get from an ordered basis for the space….
No it’s a basis
Take $\{e_i\wedge e_j: i<j\}$
 
Oh Ted i believe i understand what you mean!
I see i see...
Now the notation makes more sense.
We are building the representing matrix of $\bigwedge^2 \varphi $ in relation to the basis in the outer product space.
 
Right.
 
What would be a good method to start a general proof of the statement mentioned? Brute forcing with indicies ?
 
Understand examples and you’ll have it.
 
Alright, thank you.

As a last note, i tried to search this on the web before asking teh question, i wrote terms like " Wedge prouct of a linear function " and what not , seems i never found what i looked for, are there some english terminology for said topic?
 
5:11 AM
Induced map on exterior algebra
 
exterior algebra is the biggie
oh ted is there
 
Thank you :=)
Have a good day, time to go to work :) or sleep tight i guess.
 
LOL
 
ted: was reading online today about the closure of a restaurant on college ave (shen hua near where ozzies soda fountain used to be, probably after your time, started late 90s) and it heartbreakingly mentioned as an aside that another restaurant on college (that my wife and i used to live next to and ate at) had already closed
 
One solution I found was $a=b=c=\frac{3}{2}$
But could not solve analytically
Tried analytically to get $96\frac{a+b}{c^2}+64\frac{a+b}{c}+\frac{96}{c}=24$, and other such combinations
 
5:17 AM
Is this a topic concerning laplacian border conditions ( initial conditions )
 
@MadSpaces IDK just Lagrangian Multipliers to solve an ineq.
 
sometimes it can be helpful to reparametrize the constraint set so that a constrained optimization problem becomes an unconstrained optimization problem in a smaller number of variables. it might help to state the original problem if you are posting on SE.
generally the lagrange multiplier equations just are what they are, and sometimes can be quite ugly to solve.
 
@leslietownes Actually I was trying to answer a question
about inequalities
 
Yes i meant Lagrangian, not laplacian.
I dont evn think such thingv as laplace border conditions exist. anyways, good day must run to work now.
 
 
1 hour later…
6:40 AM
Hi there, I posted the Q math.stackexchange.com/questions/4477140/… 2 days ago but haven't got any resonance as yet. Has someone some idea what I could improve with the question or on the topic itself?
 
 
2 hours later…
9:09 AM
Basic algebraic topology written in category theory language is hard to understand although I already know what that is.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:50 AM
anyone knows what that vertical line $x=0$ means?
 
evaluated at x=0 after differentiating
 
anyone knows what that vertical line $x=0$ means?
@CalvinKhor thanks
 
I am an engineering student so is there any advice for someone who is changing their major to mathematics.
I have like 50 page experience in rudin lol.
And recently started real group theory.
i am going to second yr
 
 
2 hours later…
1:01 PM
@NotTfue so assuming the series converges, the whole expression is $a_1$
 
1:50 PM
Hi. Is there a undergraduate math class that has differential geometry as prerequisite?
 
 
1 hour later…
 
2 hours later…
4:46 PM
I am confused about order statistics. In this explanation (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_statistic#Notation_and_examples), how is the transition made from observed values to random variables? When I see observed value notation ($x_{(1)}...x_{(n)}$), it makes sense to find the max, min, or any other function of the set of observations, but when I see random variable notation ($X_{(1)}...X_{(n)}$), this makes little sense.
Here it seems the goal is to define a meaning to the notion of order for the probability distributions associated with each random variable, just as one must manually define a meaning to the notion of order for objects of user created types in a programming language.
 
5:42 PM
@unit1991 Not typically. Perhaps a rare second course in differential geometry. More typically, graduate level material comes next. Differential topology is sometimes taught undergrad, but it is a parallel course depending more on multivariable analysis.
 
6:11 PM
Let $X$ be a topological space (compact Hausdorff if necessary). Let $Homeo(X)$ denote the group of all homeomorphisms of $X$ equipped with the compact open topology, and let $A$ be some subspace of $X$. Is it true that $\overline{ \{f \in Homeo(X) : f(A) = A\}} = \{f \in Homeo(X) : f(\overline{A}) = \overline{A}\}$? It's clear that the set on the LHS is contained in the RHS, but what about the other inclusion?
I tried proving it but it isn't clear that it is true (in fact, I am currently trying to find a counterexample).
 
Interesting question
Sounds plausible to me
 
Sounds plausible as in true, or plausible that there is a counterexample?
I would like for it to be true.
 
The former
 
I think I have a counterexample.
 
Let's think about the case in which $X$ is compact metric so that the compact open topology is metrized by $d(f,g)=\sup_{x\in X}\{d(f(x),g(x))\}$ because it's nicer
 
6:19 PM
I think you can have a homeo on $A$ whose extension to the closure is not bijective.
Oh, I don’t have it right.
 
@TedShifrin Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but $f$ is assumed to be a homeomorphism on the whole space.
Well, unfortunately the space I'm dealing with is not metrizable...but maybe it'll be clear how to generalize it by looking at the metrizable case.
 
Yeah, I messed up. But is the limit of homeos necessarily a homeo? That’s false.
 
@TedShifrin Limit in which topology? But yes that's usually false
 
Probably uniform convergence. I know compact-open topology can coincide with the topology of uniform convergence, so I guess $x^n$ on $[0,1]$ would be an example, right?
Oh, wait...
No, that doesn't converge uniformly...it converges pointwise, but that's no relevant.
 
I was thinking $f(z)=z/n$ on $\Bbb C$ or the Riemann sphere.
 
6:48 PM
Hey, can anyone help me locate terminology for operating on graphs?
Specifically, the formal names for operations of converting a node into two, and making two or more nodes into one.
 
7:13 PM
split, coalesce?
 
7:34 PM
how is the formula for $sign(\sigma)$ as a product derived?
$ \Pi_{1\leq i < j \leq n} \frac{\sigma(j)-\sigma(i)}{j-i}$
For $ \sigma \in S_n$
 
I've never seen such a formula. And it is clearly wrong, as typed. You can't have $i=j$.
 
Now its correct
Good evening Ted!
 
Maybe. Convince me that it's always $\pm 1$.
 
I want to convince myself. LOL!
 
One can convince himself of many wrong things, but it's harder to trick Ted
 
7:37 PM
If it was obvious that $\text{sign}(\sigma\tau) = \text{sign}(\sigma)\text{sign}(\tau)$, that would be helpful.
 
Das Vorzeichen, auch Signum, Signatur oder Parität genannt, ist in der Kombinatorik eine wichtige Kennzahl von Permutationen. Das Signum einer Permutation kann die Werte + 1 {\displaystyle +1} oder − 1 {\displaystyle -1} annehmen, wobei man im ersten Fall von einer geraden und im zweiten Fall von einer ungeraden Permutation spricht. Es gibt mehrere Möglichkeiten, gerade und ungerade Permutationen zu charakterisieren. So ist eine Permutation genau dann gerade, wenn die Anzahl der Fehlstände in der…
I know its german, but the english version does not have the Formula
Obviously, because we germans are mathematically superior
 
Yeah, right.
 
Scroll to the part where it says "Darstellung als Produkt"
Ted i found your proof, and in doing so, i found my proof
 
I find it less convincing that their example has only $n=3$, so that all the terms are $\pm 1$ to start with.
 
Since you can go the other direction ))
Also German, but its obvious
 
7:39 PM
Anyhow, your wiki link proves the product formula. From that it should follow immediately by checking a transposition.
 
Well, thats done!
Nice
 
It's curious that in my 50+ years of being a mathematician, I've never encountered that formula. I wonder if it's useful for some reason.
 
Well Ted, now you did. Thanks to me. surrender old man, its time for the young and dumb
 
There's lots of useless stuff out there. One can't be bothered to know all of it.
 
7:55 PM
Hallo leute
wie gehts euch
 
Hallo Kamerad
 
your name is GREAt dude!
kuddos!
 
Ich kann dich nicht verstehen. Ist es wirklich so dass die titel nicht in die Englischen artikel gibt?
Wirklich? Kommst du aus Kerala?
 
Your german is not bad.
But Flawed.
 
7:59 PM
hahahahahaha :D
Bitte korriegieren mich
 
I am not sure what you meant to be honest
 
I can't understand you, is it really so that the title isn't there in the English article?
second message: Please correct me
 
but what do you mean with title?
 
I should have said formular
 
anyways it is "der Titel" und "in dem englischen Artikel"
 
8:02 PM
Noting that down
 
more colloqually you would say "aufm englischen"
 
The noun gender is the hardest part of this language xD
 
Yes yes, it is not easy.
Gotta run, gladly talk later. See you.
 
are you a native speaker?
Okie see u
 
8:29 PM
@TedShifrin it is curious
 
8:58 PM
@robjohn I gather you've encountered. Have you used it for something interesting?
 
Hello. Suppose that $a$ and $b$ are $1\times d$ real vectors and $U_1,U_2$ are $d\times d$ orthonormal matrices (potentially $U_1=U_2$). I am looking for operations $\star$ such that $(aU_1)\star(bU_1) = c(a\star b)U_2$ for a constant $c$. So far I only see that $\star$ can be the addition operator. Am I right that that is all?
 
I don't think so. Certainly $a\star b = ma+nb$ works for any real numbers $m,n$, doesn't it? Provided $U_2=U_1$ and $c=1$.
 
Ah yes, sure. And apart from that? It doesn't seem like any nonlinear operations are possible.
 
Well, there aren't many nonlinear operations you can do on vectors in the first place.
 
For instance, for my purposes the Hadamard (elementwise) product would be great, but it doesn't seem to satisfy this property.
 
9:09 PM
The Hadamard product is very basis-dependent. It is not, as we like to say, intrinsic.
But I have no idea how to prove any of this.
 
I see. Thanks.
 
suppose I have a root finding algo
can anyone think of anything that will give me the first root?
 
Huh?
 
suppose $f \in C^0[0, 1]$ has multiple roots
 
@MadSpaces lmao
 
9:13 PM
What does "first root" even mean?
 
first root $= inf\{f = 0\}$
 
Ah, smallest. Inf = min. It's a closed set.
 
yes
youll also have finitely many 0s
 
I will?
 
this is a practical question, not a math question
hence first
 
9:17 PM
So, look at the output and take the smallest number.
 
the output converges on an arbitrary root
not all of them
(false position)
 
No clue.
I suppose you could, with a "real-world function," divide by some power of $x-c$ and do it again. But who knows what power will give you a continuous quotient.
 
o I like that
what is c?
 
(By continuous quotient I meant, of course, to remove the removable singularity .... once you know it's removable.)
$c$ is the root you found.
 
nah too slow
 
9:22 PM
I revert to my "no clue."
 
9:44 PM
I mean the other way of doing this is just rerunning the algo on $[0, x_0)$ $x_0$ being the root you found, and repeating until you dont have any more
 
ny general rule of thumb to when functions commute under Composition? Biliniarity, or something idk?
 
you would generally not expect them to commute
 
the domain and hypotheses matter. carl cowen had a good paper on commuting analytic maps of the disc to itself called "commuting analytic functions." it gives a taste of what is out there.
lots of papers cite that paper.
 
Okay thank you this is then out o the scope of this proof and thus for me momentarily not relavant
 
operator theorists love learning when things commute with other things. sometimes it ain't easy.
 
9:50 PM
I prefer skew-commutativity.
 
Teddy bear help me plS
 
we should enjoy it while it lasts, most states are going to outlaw things commuting or skew-commuting with other things.
 
I never found commuting enjoyable to begin with
skew-commuting sounds intriguing, however
 
I am trying to prove the universal property of the Tensor product for higher dimensions.
We had it defined for 2 Dim. i am trying to do it iteratively for n dimensions. So i was thinking of for example combining sets for example V x V x... x V n times to be V^n-1 x V and then i can do the properity, and then i thought maybe something like
V^n-2 x (V^n-1 ^V^n)
an then iteratively use the properity, i was then trying to think of a way of reaching the final function that is supposed to satisfiy it
with v^n-1 i mean like the vector space that is contrsucted by X ing the V, notationabuser begone
 
@leslietownes And you haven’t started on associating!
Mad … are you misusing dimension?
 
10:03 PM
No no.. with n i meant the times i am taking the cross or the tensor product
Because as said, we defined it on two vector spaces, every bilinar map has only one linear map such that yadda yadda? i am trying to show this for n vector spaces
 
Same vector space?
 
yes
 
Your use of language is very sloppy, mr superior.
 
Sigh.. i will write it CLEARLY...
 
It must be induction ….
 
10:07 PM
thank you, o benevolent kind sir
 
Ted, can I share sth random?
 
Only if you answer Mad’s question.
 
$\text{Let $V,W$ be vector spaces, then the universal properity is} \forall \varphi \in Bilin(V \times W , M) \exists! \mu \in Hom(V \otimes W,M) \varphi = \mu \circ \tau $ where as $\tau$ is the tensor product
 
yea my brain is just (algebraic) topology atm
 
Yes, so you need to use it for different $W$, namely the $(n-1)$-fold tensor product of $V$.
 
10:10 PM
Exactly thats what i meant
But then , you get only a bilinear mapping, between some vector of the n-1 and $V$
But we want to be multilinear, so i thought iteratively and some composition mumbo jumbo would do the trick
 
Tu has a nice section in his book DiffGeo on tensor products, but I suppose that's cheating
 
My experiance with these subjects, it is more time efficient to prove it alone then to look up books and get a grasp of what the hell the author is talking about and whats his notation.
 
Inductive hypothesis … Start with a multilinear, then get a bilinear thing with the tensor product and $V$. In other words, think about a multilinear map and fix the nth input.
 
why not just stop at 2? let's not be greedy. think of icarus and daedalus.
 
2 is higher than I can count. And no more associating.
 
10:14 PM
maybe in the short term, but having books as your "extended brain" in the long run defo works efficiently for me
(though I'm ofc pro proving things yourself)
 
i can't find tensor products anywhere in the constitution.
 
The constitution itself is sufficient to make you tensor.
 
I can confirm that my reading of the US constitution does not protect tensor products either.
tensor products, beware.
 
i'm going to hassle my state representatives to ban n-fold tensor products higher than n=2.
 
that sounds like a good idea
and the national anthem clearly indicates that this is the land of the free and home of the brave.
it doesn't say anything anywhere about tensors.
so I'm with you. it should all be outlawed
and can somebody bring back the Ohio law that writes into law that $\pi=3.14$? in practice you only need 2 decimal places anyway
 
10:19 PM
Nah, 22/7 in Alabama.
 
Ah, The Indiana Pi Bill !
The Indiana Pi Bill is the popular name for bill #246 of the 1897 sitting of the Indiana General Assembly, one of the most notorious attempts to establish mathematical truth by legislative fiat. Despite its name, the main result claimed by the bill is a method to square the circle, although it does imply various incorrect values of the mathematical constant π, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. The bill, written by a physician who was an amateur mathematician, never became law due to the intervention of Professor C. A. Waldo of Purdue University, who happened to be present...
think about how many conjectures we could settle this way !
The constitution doesn't say anything about pi
 
my second grade teacher told me $\pi=3.14$ and my third grade teacher told me $\pi=22/7$, and I was so confused that whole year because $22/7\neq 3.14$
 
i don't have memories of pi until high school
you must have had good teachers, to lie to you about pi so early on
 
Time to crawl up in bed and cry myself to sleep
Good night!
 
10:32 PM
sweet dreams! come back to visit us soon!
 
This is why you became a geometer … so you could just divide out by that dratted pi.
 
10:55 PM
the worship of satan was just a side benefit?
 

« first day (4342 days earlier)      last day (684 days later) »