« first day (2849 days earlier)      last day (2175 days later) » 

7:00 PM
If it's an $SU(2)$-bundle, @Semiclassic, on a $4$-manifold, there's only one of interest.
 
Yeah, it's the 3-volume book of Greub-Halperin-Vanstone I was thinking of. I recommend looking at it, too.
I haven't looked in years, but I had vague good feelings about it.
Oh, and @Balarka, "welcome back." :)
 
I'm back with a notepad lololol
@TedShifrin Thanks!
 
I tried it again:

$\frac{2-n^2}{-4n}=\frac{n^2-2}{4n}>\frac{n^2-2}{4n^2}=\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{2n^2}$

For $n>N$ we have that $n^2>N^2\Rightarrow 2n^2>2N^2\Rightarrow \frac{1}{2n^2}<\frac{1}{2N^2}\Rightarrow -\frac{1}{2n^2}>-\frac{1}{2N^2}\Rightarrow \frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{2n^2}>\frac{1}{4}-\frac{1}{2N^2}$

Is this correct?
 
one thing i like about chern classes is e.g. it gives a nice proof in showing that a smooth cubic is expected to contain 27 lines. (then there's a bit more to show that you do actually get 27 distinct lines) - where the essence is you're computing the top chern class of some bundle over the grassmannian G(2,4) (projective lines in $\mathbb{P}^3$), where a generic section corresponds to some cubic polynomial,

and its vanishing locus on the grassmannian gives you the points (i.e. lines in $\mathbb{P}^3$) s.t. your cubic polynomial vanishes, i.e. the line lies in the cubic.
 
7:05 PM
Your algebra is totally wrong, @MaryStar. Keep in mind that $n^2-2>n^2$. Now divide by $4n$. (Simplify as much as possible. You keep complicating.)
 
@Semiclassical pointwise a.e. you can get close to this idk what their norms will be tho
 
Chern classes are all about enumerating things, @loch. I've written numerous papers on that. :)
You can see very beautiful and subtle combinations of algebra-geometric and differential-geometric loci in terms of vector bundles and then count with Chern classes.
 
Weirdly, I'm finding that Gaussian convolution is preserving the L1 norm
 
@BalarkaSen How many topologies would it take to trade you for your current favourite atmospheric black metal album?
 
7:07 PM
I can't quite believe that's true though
 
Ahh, so we have: $\frac{2-n^2}{-4n}=\frac{n^2-2}{4n}>\frac{n^2}{4n}=\frac{n}{4}>\frac{N}{4}$
So the sequence is not bounded from above and so it douesn't converge, right? @TedShifrin
 
@loch cute
 
@BalarkaSen Also, remember hatcher's quick point set notes you linked me before? Would that be helpful to read along too? Unsure if related to the course I'm taking.
 
@TedShifrin i might come across your papers at some point then! I am also going into enumerative geometry side of things (assuming all goes well)
 
@Eulb yes those are great
 
7:08 PM
@MaryStar: That will show that the sequence tends to infinity, so doesn't converge. Right.
 
@MikeMiller I'm taking intro topo with munkres though, how much overlap is there?
 
complete and total but Hatcher has good exercises
I just think that one covers more topology in a usual course than necessary
 
Okay that's nice.
 
@loch: Not that I'm trying to coerce you, but I can send you .pdfs of a few if you're interested. Just email me at the address in my profile if you decide you want 'em.
 
@loch I wish you luck
It's not an easy path, and not one entirely determined by our force of will
 
7:10 PM
@Eulb Hatcher's notes are great! Also the answer to your first question is about 42
@MikeMiller Thanks let me have a look
 
I sure hope Balarka is keeping up with all his tasks. :)
BBIAB.
 
@TedShifrin That's great! I'm quite busy recently with some other stuff but I'll email you nonetheless :)
 
@BalarkaSen Hey that's my shoe size in EU. I guess "Remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet" doesn't apply if the answer to the universe lies below.
 
@TedShifrin Ok! Thank you!!
 
LOL
Hm, the external cup product is the map $H^*(X) \times H^*(Y) \to H^*(X \times Y)$ given by pulling back the classes from $X$ and $Y$ to $X \times Y$ by the projections, and taking the cup there?
I'd forgotten that.
 
7:20 PM
I hadn't thought of that
 
That description in Eric's answer is sick
I don't completely understand why the classifying map factors through the fibered product though
Oh, it's packaging that the classifying map is homotopic to $f \circ \text{flip}$, and that double of that homotopy is homotopic to the identity homotopy, and subsequent coherences of infinite order
Is it clear why the second sentence is true? (The first is true because both maps classify $a \otimes a$)
Yes, I think. The homotopy $h$ between $f$ and $f \circ \text{flip}$ is a map $X \times X \times S^1 \to K(\Bbb Z_2, 2n)$, so lives in $H^{2n}(X \times X \times S^1, \Bbb Z_2)$. In fact the element that it represents is $a \otimes a \otimes 1$. $2h$ represents the element $a \otimes a \otimes 2 = a \otimes a \otimes 0$.
So $h$ is homotopic to the "identity homotopy", which is just constant on the $S^1$ factor.
I see, so that's how they make this big ass map $f : X \times X \times_{\Bbb Z_2} S^\infty \to K(\Bbb Z_2, 2n)$, by putting all these informations togather cell-wise.
 
7:43 PM
Hello
 
helo
 
@BalarkaSen Indeed. That is precisely what this says.
 
Very very cool
 
A map X -> Y factors through the homotopy quotient (X x EG)/G iff the G-action is 'coherent trivial'
And a factorization is basically such a coherent trivialization
 
Ahh. So (1) the map is G-equivariant upto homotopy (2) That homotopy is G-equivariant upto homotopy (3) etc etc
 
7:48 PM
Yup
 
Very fucking cool
 
8:12 PM
Hello, guys. Let $M$ be a three-dimensional compact manifold (without boundary). A orientable surface $\Sigma$ in $M$ is Heegaard spliting if $M\backslash \Sigma$ has to open components homeomorphic to handlebodies (i.e. a "solid" (3d) ball with "solid" handles).
For any such $M$, is there always a Heegaard spliting? (I guess that the answer is "no").
When does it exist?
 
The answer is yes.
 
Yup. Well, when $M$ is connected and orientable anyway.
 
Any references?
Hahaha, ok $M$ is always connected
*and orientable also, sorry
 
Take a triangulation of $M$. Take an $\epsilon$-neighborhood of the 1-skeleton of the triangulation. This is a handlebody $H_1$. $M \setminus \text{cl}(H_1)$ is an $\epsilon'$-neighborhood of the 1-skeleton of the dual triangulation, so is again a handlebody $H_2$.
Well, their closures are.
So $M$ can be written as union of two handlebodies glued along their boundary surfaces.
(Dual triangulation = 0-simplices on the centroid of each 3-simplex of the original triangulation, edges transverse to each 2-simplex of the original triangulation, 3-simplices centered at each 0-simplex of the original triangulation)
 
8:21 PM
Oh, I thank you @BalarkaSen I think that's right
 
It's one of my favorite proofs of Heegaard decomposition
Of course, you need to know that 3-manifolds can be triangulated... that's not an easy theorem. :P
Moise, I think, proved that?
 
And that when $M$ is orientable compact, this is triangulation is finite, right?
 
Yep.
If it's compact, the triangulation is finite. Orientability is to ensure that the epsilon-neighborhood of the 1-skeleton doesn't become a "nonorientable handlebody"
 
9:03 PM
Not all manifolds have a triangulation?
 
Nope. :)
 
Surprising
 
In mathematics, the E8 manifold is the unique compact, simply connected topological 4-manifold with intersection form the E8 lattice. == History == The E8 manifold was discovered by Michael Freedman in 1982. Rokhlin's theorem shows that it has no smooth structure (as does Donaldson's theorem), and in fact, combined with the work of Andrew Casson on the Casson invariant, this shows that the E8 manifold is not even triangulable as a simplicial complex. == Construction == The manifold can be constructed by first plumbing together disc bundles of Euler number 2 over the sphere, according to...
 
Compact and s.c. But still no?! D:
That's uncomfortable
Delete it
 
Simple connectivity shouldn't really play a role in any case. But try to think how you would construct a triangulation
You triangulate as much of one chart as you can, and you pass to a neighboring chart
 
9:07 PM
@GFauxPas Reeeeally uncomfortable haha
 
@MikeMiller I really like that perspective
 
In this neighboring chart you see what the old triangulation became and try to extend jt
 
Evening
 
Does someone of you have an idea about my question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2793512/… ?
 
If it becomes an actual decomposition of R^n into simplices then all is well, but perhaps the simplices got really crinkly
And you don't know how to glue more simplices to the boundary of what you already have
 
9:09 PM
Sadface
 
The reason smoothness has a place here is that it essentially means "linear subspaces essentially go to linear subspaces". Up to a reparameterization, you can straighten out what you have already built
But for something not locally linear, who is to say?
 
(The conclusion is that smooth manifolds are always triangulable, just to write that down)
@MikeMiller So, if you can say that your manifold admits a locally flat structure (i.e, transition functions are locally flat diffeomorphisms of R^n), then it's triangulable.
By locally flat homeomorphism of R^n I really mean that it's restriction on linear subspaces are locally flat embeddings.
(In dimension 2 Jordan-Schoenflies guarantees that)
Not diffeomorphism, homeomorphism.
 
I see what you mean. I am a little skeptical
That sounds more like a foliation I guess
 
Yeah.
I was gonna say
 
I guess you're not demanding it preserves slices...
Just a regularity condition on all linear subspaces
 
9:15 PM
Right.
 
No this is tautological
The fact that it's a self-homeo of R^n means that the things are locally flat
I think you're more worried about crinkly intersections with the "boundary" of your small open set
 
Oh, duh.
I was thinking that under the transition function one of the faces of the triangulation on one chart becoming like the surface of Alexander's horned sphere and then I'm screwed
I don't understand what else can happen
@MikeMiller Yeah I see. The boundary of the open set is the issue
I don't know how to write down exactly what I want the transition functions of my atlas to be for your procedure to work, and I'm interested in doing that
 
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but I'm struggling to see why $X_n \to X$ almost surely implies $\mathbb{E}(\|X\| I_{\|X\| \geq M}) \leq \mathbb{E}(\liminf_{n \to \infty} \|X_n\|I_{\|X_n\|>M})$
 
@BalarkaSen I have never thought seriously enough about this to write out a proof. It should be something like "linearization at infinity".
 
I want the transition function to be a self-homeomorphism of the open n-ball which extends in the domain to the closed n-ball and it's a locally flat embedding at the boundary, or something.
 
9:25 PM
You need to know that every simplex is locally linear, and that you can do this in a compatible way for everything near the boundary of the chart
Think of the 2-chart case eg for the most obvious worry
 
I think we have similar pictures in mind.
I like "linearization at infinity"
 
There's not a good enough reward mechanism in place to have anybody write this proof out
You won't get better Geometry scores for it
 
lmao
I was wondering if you can recover the problem of having a simplicial structure as an obstruction class from this interpretation. Like, you're demanding a topological atlas to lift to a specific atlas. Or rather, the tangent microbundle to have structure group lift from TOP(n) to ???
Idk
 
I would work through the paper of Galewski-Stern where they construct the obstruction class with you, but I would not do it alone
 
Lmao
I'd love to do that after I learn some classical obstruction theory
 
9:30 PM
I think it should be a very clean paper but I have not spent time on it
 
Wow, those are names of people dear to me, @MikeM, @Balarka (one deceased about 10 years).
 
I did not know that Galewski had passed away, nor that he worked at UGA.
 
Yup to both.
He came to UGA in the 70s.
 
Very cool
 
9:59 PM
Hi @Ted
 
hi demonic @Alessandro
How goes it?
 
Guess who got his driving licence today? Pay attention when you cross the road ;)
 
Oh hell.
 
Oh god
 
Now I can never visit Europe again
 
10:01 PM
Alessandro is officially Arturo Beneditto Giovanni Giuseppe Pietro Archangelo Alfredo Cortafelli da Milano now
 
The standards on driving licenses in Italy are even slacker than the standards on mathematics diplomas. :(
LOL, you left out a few, Balarka.
 
how long does it take to get a license there
 
depends how many time you run over the examiner and fail.
 
@BalarkaSen yeah the Assassin's Creed games have really gone downhill
 
Oh, Eric. A question for you and @0celo. ...
 
10:05 PM
I have heard of ass creed but never played it
 
@MikeMiller they went uphill again!
@TedShifrin i would look if my life werent a living hell of work rn
 
I was just making a long Italian name joke
@Ted Interesting, seems plausible
 
i get it
 
@TedShifrin mathematics diplomas where?
 
I dunno, @MikeM. I don't see why the star doesn't mess it up.
 
10:08 PM
@EricSilva a few months if you don't have to the exam three times like me
 
I said in Italy @Alessandro :P
 
i think the total time i spent getting my license was collectively under 2 hours lol
 
we have to take some mandatory driving lessons (6 hours), but I actually took waaaaaaaaaaaaaay more
 
@Ted I don't see any way to prove it but his intuition seems plausible to me
 
10:09 PM
Well anyway now that this is done I can think about maths
 
In my day, we had driver training in high school ... it was probably a dozen hours of experience.
 
i prefer walking
 
i waited in a line and parked and was done
but i lived in florida the land where you can be blind and get a license
 
You didn't bother passing the written test, Eric? That still petrifies me more than any math exam I ever took.
 
i took no written test
 
10:11 PM
Say what?
Every state requires a written test, I thought.
 
I should have gone to Florida to take my test
 
Presumably someone should just write down a smooth map from R^n to R^n with some metrics on each and write down the PDE "preserving bi-closed" gives
 
And those don't transfer. I've had to take those in every state I've lived in (and redo it in CA, obviously).
 
oh it was on the comp
 
Right, now it's on the computer.
@MikeM: Or think about Poincaré duality. Didn't we talk once about John Millson's paper on harmonic P.D. on R.S.?
 
10:12 PM
it was reeeeeaaaal easy in FL
 
@TedShifrin There is a probability strictly bigger than 0 that I'll be in the US for a week or so in December
 
I never remember how far from a hydrant you must park or how far ahead one must signal (not that 90% of the drivers do) ...
Oh yeah, @Alessandro, you coming to visit?
 
I don't remember it but my brain is mush
 
no clue
 
He wants to work locally, mind
 
10:13 PM
A friend from Italy who now lives in the US is getting married
 
Oh @MikeM ...
 
oh it looks like in FL at least you dont have to retake it when you get your license if you just have a learners permit youve gotten recently
 
I wonder if this is answered on MO.
Where is the wedding, @Alessandro?
 
Salt Lake City
or somewhere in Utah
 
Oh, Mormon land.
 
10:14 PM
@AlessandroCodenotti Ah, so he has two countries to be frustrated with!
 
what a weird state
 
@TedShifrin yep
 
Well, if you wanna come visit CA, I will probably be here.
And, unlike you, I won't threaten to run you over.
 
Wow that's much further from Utah than I thought
 
Italy is smaller than a number of our states.
 
10:18 PM
I don't really understand how big the USA are
 
the us is like 30 times the size of italy
 
Does that count Alaska and Hawaii?
 
USA is thrice the size of India. And India is very fucking huge
 
Very.
 
and how many people are there in the US compared to Italy?
 
10:20 PM
We're over 325 million.
What's Italy?
60 million.
 
im p sure it counts alaska @Ted
if u throw in hawaii nothing changes
 
Wow ... Only 5 times the population. Italy is crowded.
 
Apparently India is 1 billion
Rip
 
Yeah, and China?
 
1.3 billion. India is 1.2 I think
 
10:22 PM
the US has a very low pop density away from the coasts
 
Right ... we won't discuss education density ... :)
 
Asia (without Russia) is quite overcrowded I think
 
Apparently the surface are aof the US is close to that of the whole of Europe wtf
 
I might have thought more, actually.
 
2 big
 
10:24 PM
The US is massive dude
it would take like months to hitchhike across if you walked a decent chunk of the way
 
But less than 3 days to drive across if you drive nonstop.
 
yeah dont do that it's horrible
 
I think it's not hard to drive from the southern tip of France to the northern in one day.
 
how is that possible
 
I didn't quite do that after grad school, Eric. The car died a few times and I stopped in Chicago for a day.
 
10:26 PM
what's the total length you'll be driving
 
My uncle used to drive from NY to CA for work
 
ive made the drive from florida to chicago nonstop like 7 or 8 times and it makes me wanna die every time
 
He liked to pump red bull and get it all done in one push
 
about 3000 miles, Balarka. Average 60 mph that's only 50 hours. :P
Right now, San Diego to San Francisco non-stop is all I'm willing to do.
But I'm old.
And LA makes it miserable. (Nothing person to Mike.)
 
@TedShifrin Oh ok. The diameter of India is like 2000 miles and I've heard stories of people driving through the national highways for two days to get across.
So that makes sense
 
10:28 PM
LA traffic is not good. I think it hubris for any other city to think they won't see this in 10-20 years
The urban sprawl is the limiting model
 
The Bay Area is almost as bad now, Mike, and Atlanta is horrific.
 
@EricSilva y
 
Yup
 
do you have the mOtIoN SiCknEss
 
San Diego can be bad at certain times, too. I'm lucky I can choose to avoid that for the most part.
 
10:29 PM
Symptoms of the market floor's successful war on mankind.
 
@BalarkaSen i did a bunch of jobs that involved making the drive when i was broke in hs
 
Ah. Ugh.
 
plus i drove when i moved here so that was 1 of them
@MikeMiller snaps fingers in agreement
 
Cars will eat transportation but I can't digest cars because I have motion sickness - some tankie rapper
 
"I can't digest cars"
I would hope not
 
10:39 PM
Hi Demonark
 
How's everything going?
 
You missed our comparisons of sizes of countries and populations.
 
i would hope you can digest cars
that's a super cool ability
 
Yeah that's true
@TedShifrin anything surprising discovered?
 
i eat lamborghinis with peanut butter as breakfast - lyrics taken from the same rapper's repertoire
 
10:43 PM
People who aren't in the US don't realize how humongous it is.
 
people who are the us dont realize how small other places are either
 
Well, lots of US people also have very bad attitudes — say, regarding languages people speak. We won't even mention such things.
 
oh you dont gotta tell me that
 
American is a language of plebians
 
I still love telling the story about the Texans who came into a cafe in Paris after I was sitting there sipping my pastis. It was a hot summer day (back in the 80s). They asked for ice tea in their drawl. The waiter didn't understand (or perhaps feigned not understanding). I called him over and asked him (in French) to bring a pot of tea and all the ice in the kitchen. He laughed, but he did close to that. The Texans doffed their hats at me.
Well, Balarka, we can't all speak the Queen's English.
 
10:48 PM
Neither can the British
 
i got in trouble in my elementary school for speaking portuguese on the phone once
p bad
 
Verily.
 
@EricSilva Portuguese is such a beautiful language
 
Only Irish and Scottish people can speak English
 
Well, now we have a president and representatives who can't even speak American.
 
10:48 PM
LOL
 
@LeakyNun i agree
 
Does a complete properly embedded surface mean that the parameterization is its proper map? That is, what inverse image of compact is compact by parameterization?
 
There needn't be a global parametrization, @Mancala.
But if there is one, yes, it'll be a proper map.
 
Thanks! @TedShifrin
 
11:19 PM
@Eulb 'Sup
 
11:33 PM
Could someone tell me a good introductory book to study hyperbolic space?
 
11:47 PM
Just take one about regular space and exaggerate every theorem
2
 
hahaha
 
So that's how differential geometry works!
 

« first day (2849 days earlier)      last day (2175 days later) »