« first day (2350 days earlier)      last day (2664 days later) » 

10:00 PM
eh, sorry, I mean an odd number of terms
 
Don't be so difficult. Go back to basics.
 
good afternoon guys
happy birthday to me
6
 
Bon anniversaire, @GFauxPas.
 
Feliz cumpleaños
 
$\sum_k^{2n+1}\frac{(-1)^{k}}{(2n-k)k}$ converges for any n, but $\sum_k^{2n}\frac{(-1)^{k}}{(2n-k)k}$ does not?
 
10:12 PM
I will buy myself a snack in honor of your birthday
 
what kind of snack?
 
Chips probably
 
That makes no sense, @Null. You can't use $n$ in the terms themselves.
hmm, unhealthful snack. But, for a birthday, I suppose ...
You could go home and burn pizza again?
 
@TedShifrin that was the assignment here math.stackexchange.com/questions/2077990/… so, n can be in the terms
 
That's also unhealthy, no?
 
10:13 PM
but maybe it makes no sense in my counterexample, i tenmd to agree
 
Not if we're talking an infinite series, @Null.
 
@TedShifrin ah ok
 
Sure, DogAteMy — just pickin' on you.
@Null: Are you trying to create a counterexample or answer my question?
 
@GFauxPas My birthday present to you is the suggestion that you try pineapples on pizza.
 
@TedShifrin I try you question now, as my quest is doomed haha
 
10:17 PM
Akiva, that sounds absurd
 
@AkivaWeinberger Ugh, DogAteMy.
I know Hawaiian pizza is popular, but to me it is not pizza.
I'm much more a strict Italian.
 
my Italian friend says American pizza is not what they call pizza in Italy
 
right
 
it's much more cheesy in America
andbigger
 
just like most Chinese food in America doesn't resemble Chinese food.
 
10:19 PM
Whenever you put pineapples on pizza the ears of an Italian start ringing
 
I defend your honor, @Alessandro.
 
Yeah, but it's what the immigrants brought to us, I guess @GFauxPas
 
Most recently, I made my own pizza dough and pizza with chanterelles, garlic, and a bit of goat cheese.
 
My only experience with American pizza comes from a pizza hut in China so I guess that was the Chinese version of the American version of pizza?
 
Poor @Alessandro.
Some of us eat real food :D
 
10:20 PM
where are you Alessandro
 
I was just curious about pizza in China... I stuck to Chinese food after that experience though
In Italy now
 
@TedShifrin does it even matter with alternating series wether we have an odd or even top value?
 
Suppose $s_{2n+1}\to \ell$, @Null. Can you relate $s_{2n+1}$ and $s_{2n}$?
Forget about alternating for my question.
 
for large $n$, i guess $s_{n+1}\approx s_n$, maybe that is my misconception?
 
That is indeed a misconception, but my additional hypothesis makes it right. But I want you to be precise. What do I add to $s_{2n}$ to get $s_{2n+1}$?
 
10:25 PM
$a_{2n+1}$
 
No, $a_{2n+1}$.
There we go.
And what did I assume about the terms $a_k$?
 
that they approach 0
 
So if $s_{2n+1}\to\ell$, what about $s_{2n}$?
 
$s_{2n}=s_{2n+1}-a_{2n+1}$
 
Good. Proceed.
Not quite.
 
10:27 PM
mmh
 
It was right a moment ago. Put that back.
OK. Now what happens when $n\to\infty$?
 
@Null Yup
 
$s_{2n}\to l$?
@AkivaWeinberger timetraveler confirmed :D
 
The limit of the sum is the sum of the limits, right, @Null?
 
ah, and then we keep adding a limit
 
10:30 PM
Huh?
 
mmh
 
@TedShifrin Are you saying we can always interchange $\lim$ and $\sum$?? (jk)
 
DogAteMy: I have multivariable exercises to give you if you're being a troublemaker.
 
Sure, why not
Other than the ones in the book?
 
I gave my students additional ones not in the book, yes.
Have you gotten to the definition of the derivative?
 
10:32 PM
if the limit is 0, we have at the end 0-0+0-0...? @TedShifrin
 
No, @Null.
 
You just have small number plus/minus small number.
 
@TedShifrin ok
 
OK, DogAteMy. Using only the definition of the derivative, show me that $f(\mathbf x) = \|\mathbf x\|$ is differentiable at any $\mathbf a\ne \mathbf 0$ and find the derivative. (I.e., you will need to show that the appropriate error term goes to 0.) As you'll find out, this function is one of my favorites.
So, @Null, now you are armed to consider your original question and a quest for a counterexample. You know that you can't have the terms going to 0. What's the easiest series you can think of where the terms don't go to 0 but the odd partial sums converge?
 
10:35 PM
Hrm. OK. Well, the Jacobian is $\frac1{x^2+y^2}\begin{bmatrix}x&y\end{bmatrix}$, right?
 
Not quite.
 
$\frac1{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}\begin{bmatrix}x&y\end{bmatrix}$, sorry
 
OK. So at $\mathbf a$ that's $\mathbf a/\|\mathbf a\|$.
 
Ah. Yes.
 
You'll need paper and pen/pencil to do this.
 
10:37 PM
So I need to show that $\bf(\|x+h\|-\|x\|-h\cdot x/\|h\|)/\|h\|\to0$?
 
Someone editing a post with "punctuation" by putting spaces within mathmode.
 
Well done, DogAteMy. Proceed.
 
Well $\|\bf x+h\|\le\|x\|+\|h\|$
 
I think that'll get you in trouble.
 
10:41 PM
Ah, yeah, probably.
 
Oh, and I just remembered another good question, which one of my students asked a few years ago.
@Null: What's the simplest sequence you can think of that does not go to 0?
 
@TedShifrin "Have you ever thought about how all the dogs that were alive when you were born are now dead?"
Probably wasn't the question, but could have been
 
DogAteMy: What about all my relatives and friends, for that matter?
Are you killing time at school now?
 
…oh, yeah, perhaps
Also, it's 5:43pm, school's been out for a while.
Zime tones.
 
I figured.
I know that. But sometimes you're there late and I can't tell.
When you talked about buying a snack, it threw me off.
 
10:44 PM
Fair.
 
@GFauxPas Joyeux anniversaire!
 
Oh! Do I use $\|\bf x+h\|=(x+h)\cdot(x+h)$?
 
I hope not, as you typed it.
 
No, I don't, since it's the square root.
 
LOL
 
10:45 PM
Derp.
 
why are most excercises about proofing and not "find a counterexample" :/ i find those nice
^unrelated
$a_n:=1$ for all $n$ is simple
 
@TedShifrin what was that? I'm curious now
 
My students used to hate it when I gave them "Prove or give a counterexample." But I did it a lot.
OK, @Null. Now play with that just a smidgeon.
 
@null sometimes (real analysis I'm looking at you) the counterexample is very contrived and ugly though
 
@Alessandro: If $f\colon\Bbb R^n$ is continuous along all curves coming into $0$, is it continuous at $0$? (We know it's false if it's known to be continuous only on lines or parabolas or .... ) Along those lines, can you give me a function that's continuous along all curves $|y| = |x|^n$ ($n\in\Bbb N$) but not continuous at $0$?
Alessandro: You keep blaming me for wasting your time when you have work to do ... and yet ... you ask for it!
 
10:50 PM
I'm blaming my curiosity, not you :P
 
I'm quite impressed by where you are mathematically now compared to when we started chatting. You're learning a lot.
 
@TedShifrin Oh god I hope so
 
Thanks! For the second part can't I use a function which is 0 on those curves and 1 everywhere else?
 
DogAteMy: Proof, then?
Oh, what if I ask you to make it continuous everywhere but at $0$, @Alessandro? Can you do that?
 
And I think part 1 is false, but that's just a wild guess and I'm going to think about it. A curve here is the continuous image of $(0,1)$?
 
10:54 PM
Sure ...
Or can you make it continuous everywhere except along one fixed curve? ... :D
@Null: Any ideas?
 
Ah, I see. Find an infinite sequence of points which go to $0$ but whose values don't go to $f(0)$. Make the curve visit these points one at a time, finishing at the point $0$.
 
Can you guarantee you can do that continuously, DogAteMy?
 
@TedShifrin uhm a function which is constant on $\Bbb R^n\setminus\{0\}$ and has a different value there?
 
Thinking of the curve as the image of $\phi:[0,1]\to\Bbb R^n$, we let $\phi(1/n)$ be $a_n$, $\phi(0)$ be $0$, and at all other points interpolate linearly.
@TedShifrin Sure. It maps limit points to limit points, no?
 
10:59 PM
Good, DogAteMy. Very snappily done.
@Alessandro: What you just suggested will not be continuous at $0$ along the given families of curves.
I'm getting too confuzled here.
 
Ah, ok, I see what you meant now, a function which is continuous everywhere except at 0, but which is continuous along every curve going to 0
 
Not along every curve, no.
On these families.
Oh, I messed up. The original question should have had families. $|y|=c|x|^n$, as $c>0$ varies.
Warm up by considering continuous along all lines through the origin. Then all lines and parabolas. Then ...
It's hard keeping up with you and DogAteMy.
 
@TedShifrin so we are looking for a sequence which sum converges for all odd number of steps, but spazzes for even steps?
 
Right @Null.
 
I'm still trying to think of why $\bf\|x+h\|-\|x\|\approx_{\|h\|}(h/\|h\|)\cdot x$
 
11:05 PM
And I suggested you weren't far away with your constant sequence (and a tiny bit of previous ideas).
 
what is the "whom" for neutral things?
 
Hmm, something's missing there, DogAteMy.
 
@Null Example?
@TedShifrin By $\approx_{\bf\|h\|}$ I mean the difference, divided by $\|h\|$, goes to $0$
 
Double check, DogAteMy. I think you had it right earlier.
 
Null, example?
 
11:06 PM
to the person whom belongs the red car: drive it away please. i dont even know if this is english
 
to whom
although "to who" is used colloquially
 
29 mins ago, by Akiva Weinberger
So I need to show that $\bf(\|x+h\|-\|x\|-h\cdot x/\|h\|)/\|h\|\to0$?
 
Oh, you had it wrong before.
You got your letters muddled.
 
better, "to whom the red car belongs"
 
Whoever owns the red car, please come get it before I steal it.
 
11:08 PM
yes that's even better, but doesn't illustrate how to use "whom" :P
 
Would the owner of the red car please move it before it is towed away?
 
To the person who owns the car
 
Oh @GFauxPas.
 
To the person to whom the red car belongs
 
well basicly, the sequence "whose" sum converges??
i dont know which word should there be
 
11:09 PM
Yeah.
 
He's trying to use whom with the object, not the person.
 
oh
 
Yes, @Null. The sequence whose associated series converges.
 
Whose is also for inanimate things.
 
Yuppers. I wish I'd known what we were doing :D
 
11:09 PM
just make sure you pronounce it correctly or else you'll sound dumb, it's pronounce "wuh-hose"
 
Anyhow, DogAteMy, you have a letter wrong in that.
Say what? @GFauxPas
 
just kidding
 
$/\|x\|$ in the last term in the numerator?
 
right
 
So I need to show that $\bf(\|x+h\|-\|x\|-h\cdot x/\|x\|)/\|h\|\to0$.
 
11:11 PM
LOL, NO.
OK, YES.
:D
 
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2090955/integration-using-substitution-int-frac1-sqrt1-x2-arcsin3x-dx/2090961#2090961.
It seems like my least-effort posts always get the most upvotes.
 
I was complaining earlier about a random downvote, @Kaj. I don't think it was my arch-enemy back visiting.
 
Join the club.
 
Hey guys
4
Q: Basic proof that $GL(2, \mathbb{Z})$ is not nilpotent

Jessy CatI need to show that $GL(2,\mathbb{Z})=\left\{ \begin{pmatrix} a&b \\ c&d \end{pmatrix} \mid a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{Z}, ad-bc = \pm 1\right\}$ is not nilpotent. I have seen this question but the answer given there is too advanced for where I am currently in my studies. In order to show something is ...

 
But it's not surprising that the elementary ones get more upvotes, @Kaj. There's a much bigger audience than for graduate algebra/topology questions.
 
11:12 PM
I think I can construct one that works up to $|y|=c|x|^n$ for a fixed $n$, let's work with functions $\Bbb R^2\to\Bbb R$ because they're easy to visualize. If I want a function continuous in $0$ along every line I take the $2$ parabolas $y=x^2$ and $y=-x^2$ and define $f$ as $1$ if $(x,y)$ lies on or above the graph of the first or on or below the graph of the second and $0$ everywhere else
 
It's normal, though, @KajHansen. Usually, the least effort posts are those of a level or branch of mathematics more people can understand and value.
 
Right, @Alessandro.
 
What is meant by the "second center" of a group?
 
Ah, I also set it equal to $1$ on the $x$-axis because of annoying corner cases
 
@Steamy: You and I just said the same thing. We concur.
 
11:13 PM
Indeed we do.
 
That's a line through the origin, too, @Alessandro :D
 
I found he center of $GL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ to be $\pm$ the identity matrix
 
yep, but it's not above $x^2$ for any $x$ so I don't like it :P
 
Oh, gotcha.
 
@Jessy that's a good start.
 
11:16 PM
in the same way if I want that to work for the families up to $c|x|^n$ I use the graphs of $y=|x|^{n+1}$ and $y=-|x|^{n+1}$ instead of the $2$ parabolas
 
Now, the second center is $Z_2 = \{ x \in \operatorname{GL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) \mid \forall y \in \operatorname{GL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) : [x,y] \in Z(\operatorname{GL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) )\}$.
 
Cool, @Alessandro. So what do we use when $n=\infty$? :D
 
Can you type that on the question page? I don't think there's chatjax for iPads.
 
You should ask @Ted for getting chatjax to work on an iPad, I think
 
I eventually got it working, but it was tricky to get the bookmark to load on the iPad and iPhone. I think robjohn put instructions on that page?
It's at the bottom "Troublesome Mobile Browsers"
 
11:20 PM
I'll try to figure out how to install it myself.
 
eh, that's a problem. Because I can't use a function which is smaller than $x^n$ for every $n$ in a neighbourhood of $0$ since that would have to be constant
 
@JessyCat Anyway, I'll type it out as an answer
 
The instructions are there. It's totally sneaky.
 
$x^{n+1}<x^n$ for 0<x<1
 
Are you sure, @Alessandro?
@Null: Smaller than $|x|^n$ for all $n$.
 
11:22 PM
@TedShifrin well, i'm working on mine, so I better butt out hehe
 
Yup. You shouldn't be taking so long on yours!
 
@SteamyRoot thanks.
 
ah, wait, $e^{\frac1x}$
 
I can't see how that is possible!
 
Almost, @Alessandro.
 
11:23 PM
no, not that one
change of variables are hard
 
you're missing the same idea that Null is missing now :D
 
@Ted Ko's syllabus this quarter is really ambitious.
 
Did he not do winter last year?
 
We changed the plan for Fall/Winter. Now it's manifold generalities in the fall instead of differential topology.
 
found a drooling thing: $a_1=1$, $a_2=2$, $a_{n+2}=\frac{a_n}{a_{n+1}}$
 
11:28 PM
$\frac{1}{e^{(1/x)}}$ should be smaller than $x^n$ for every $n$ and $x$ small enough
 
but this is obv not it!
 
A lot of analysis thrown in there, @MikeM. Good luck if they don't know a pile of real analysis.
@Alessandro: Yes, $e^{-1/|x|}$.
And DogAteMy already answered my initial question ...
So you can go back to what you're supposed to be doing :D
 
It worked!
thanks @robjohn
 
what means "final exam is take home"?
 
@JessyCat Posted an answer, let me know if it's unclear or needs more details.
 
11:30 PM
it took me embarassingly long to get that change of variables right from $\lim\limits_{x\to+\infty} e^x-x^n=+\infty$ for every $n\in\Bbb N$...
what was the initial question again?
 
If $f$ is continuous at $0$ along every curve through $0$, is $f$ continuous at $0$?
 
@SteamyRoot now, in general, what is meant by the "second center"? I thought it was $C(G/C(G))$ where I'm using $C$ to denote the center.
 
@Ted I'm there for them.
 
Not quite, actually.
 
hmm.
 
11:33 PM
The second center is the group $Z_2$ in my answer; although there's an equivalent definition close to yours
 
lemme go see what you wrote
 
yeah, but you're mean, @MikeM :D
 
$Z_2$ is the group such that $Z_2/Z(G) = Z(G/Z(G))$
(I'm very used to denoting the center as $Z$, if that wasn't clear yet >.<)
 
Did @AlessandroCodenotti solve his problem?
 
It's quite customary, @Steamy.
Yes, but he's thinking about the part you got now.
 
11:34 PM
@SteamyRoot the center is not trivial. It's plus and minus the identity
 
What was your answer @AlessandroCodenotti
 
Ohhh
I misread, then. Hmm.
That invalidates my proof, I'm afraid
 
Otherwise it would be Z2 and we'd all live happily ever after (it's very nice when it's Z2).
 
that a function can be continuous in $0$ along all curves $|y|=c|x|^n$ without actually being continuous in $0$ @Akiva
 
Better delete it then
 
11:35 PM
Yeah, already did.
 
ok
I'm r
 
Should've thought it through.
Wonder if it's salvageable, though
 
trying to show that it's not nilpotent
 
@AlessandroCodenotti …Right, but what was the function
 
but without all the fancy crap.
i just want to do something with the upper central series b/c at this point, that's all I really have at my disposal.
the second guy's answer I would need to prove a preliminary result, and I'd rather not have to do that if at all possible.
 
11:37 PM
Hmmm, well, I think I can fix it rather easily
 
Ooh, you upvoted me too b/c you're awesome.
 
No, I upvoted the question because it's a well-written question
 
I did it for a function $\Bbb R^2\to\Bbb R$ because it's nicer to visualize. You draw the graph of $g(x)=e^{-1/|x|}$ and $h(x)=-e^{-1/|x|}$ and define $f(x,y)$ as $1$ if $(x,y)$ lies on or above the graph of $g$, on or below the graph of $h$ or on the $x$-axis. $f(x,y)=0$ in all other cases @Akiva
 
@TedShifrin can you give me a hint?
 
Well, still. It warmed my cockles.
 
11:39 PM
Ha, nice to hear :)
 
@Null: Take your original constant sequence and consider changing some signs.
 
@TedShifrin but then the sum doesnt converge, even for odd upper values of n
 
Try it ...
 
I started with doing it for lines and $c|x|^n$ up to a bounded $n$ here @Akiva
 
you mean $\sum(-1)^k$?
 
11:41 PM
Almost, @Null.
 
I gotta get dinner on the table. Brb
 
@Ted Maybe so, but I try to be a good help.
 
I know, @MikeM :) If they come to your recitations ... Are this year's kids better?
heya @heather
 
hello @TedShifrin
it's been a bit
 
Happy New Year to you, heather.
 
11:49 PM
and to you as well =)
i come with not some calculus/topology/abstract algebra question but with a geometry question =/
 
Are you channeling Caesar?
 
er...no?
 
I actually answered a high school geometry question on main the other day.
 
i just found the situation ironic
how do you find the centroid of a triangle when given the coordinates of the vertices of the triangle?
 
What's your definition of centroid?
 
11:51 PM
::checks notes::
"The medians of a triangle are concurrent and intersect each other in a ratio of 2:1."
where medians basically are midpoints, as far as I can tell
 
Medians are line segments from a vertex to the midpoint of the opposite side.
Do you know how to work with vectors?
 
oh, that makes sense
@TedShifrin yes...?
 
So go 2/3 down a median and figure out where you are :P
When you're done, I'll tell you a cool secret.
 
Hrmf. Cba to boot to Linux; I'll just download GAP for Windows.
 
so...wait, you basically find a perpendicular line to one of the coordinates, and go 2/3rds of the way down?
i'm just confused as to the exact procedure here
 
11:54 PM
no perpendicular!
take a vertex, take the midpoint of the opposite side ... go 2/3 the way along the median.
 
erm...i know i need to find the midpoint of at least one of the lines. oh, wait, duh...
 
you know how to find midpoints!
 
yeah
i feel like an idiot now, lol
 
Nah.
 
@Ted What was wrong with last year's kids?
 
11:55 PM
When you finish your problem, tell me and I'm gonna tell you a surprise.
 
this makes sense now, i think ::goes to give it a shot::
 
Hey, I think I figured it out, but it'll take a while to type up @TedShifrin
 
okay
 
@MikeM: Didn't you complain (or was it this fall?) that very few of 'em came to your problem sessions?
 
Other than @AlexW, of course. He's fundamentally broken.
 
11:55 PM
But the idea is $\|x+h\|-\|x\|=2x\cdot h/(\|x+h\|+\|x\|)$
 
Good, DogAteMy :)
Typo, though.
You meant $-\|x\|$.
You seem to have a recurring issue with that.
 
Indeed I did. / Indeed I do.
Equation was still right, though.
 
LOL
No, it wasn't.
pouts
 
No? Interchange $x$ and $h$ in the formula
 
Yeah, but look at the denominator on the RHS.
 
11:57 PM
I don't think so... numbers dwindled a bit but whatever. Also, I don't do probl k sessions.
 
No, DogAteMy, dammit :D
 
They were both switched
 
OK, @MikeM, I remembered your complaining at some point. I don't know what to call them — I said recitations earlier.
Oh, they were both switched? I missed the second one. sulks for being wrong again
 
pats on head
 
@TedShifrin do you mean, that at the $2n+1$th term the sum is zero, but one after that it is -1? (or 1, and 0) but that wouldnt be convergent. thatswhy i ask
 
11:59 PM
Huh? @Null ... We're trying to give an example where the odd partial sums converge but the whole series does not.
You wrote down $-1+1-1+1-1+1-\dots$. So the even partial sums are all $0$.
 

« first day (2350 days earlier)      last day (2664 days later) »