« first day (2309 days earlier)      last day (2716 days later) » 

user228700
5:00 AM
No .__. Can u please elaborate?
 
what does g(f(x)) even mean for a particular value of x, if f(x) is not in the domain of g?
 
user228700
Oh, right.
 
user228700
Yeah, OK, I was just confused.
 
5:12 AM
Hi people, how do I determine a parametric equation for this? i.stack.imgur.com/XaCx7.png
 
@Steve for what? the points in the plane?
if so, r(s,t)=b+su+tv
 
Heya tern, @PVAL, @MikeM. I just stopped in to say hi.
 
@TedShifrin hiya
 
@arctictern it's for A
 
no hi for me ?
Hi @TedShifrin
 
5:15 AM
I didn't see you. Hello, Karim.
 
I am really sick today with fever
 
@Steve there is not enough information about A to parametrize it. you need to know something about it.
 
Oh dear. That's not good. Drink lots of tea and orange juice.
 
Hi @Ted
 
hello ted
 
5:16 AM
Hi @Balarka.
 
@TedShifrin yeah especially with exams coming soon. I will just power through it haha.
 
Hi @Ted. I should sleep soon since I have a flight in the morning and for once my legs are behaving.
 
@arctictern what do you think of the following argument. I am proving if H is subgroup of $S_4$ of order 8 then it must be $D_8$.
 
@arctictern it can be written as: $$\vec{OP}=b+xu+yv, x\in [a,b], y\in [c,d]$$
 
@MikeM: Does airplane travel make it worse?
 
5:17 AM
I have to determine $a,b,c,d$
 
No. Beinf somewhere other than my own bed does.
 
@arctictern first of all there is only 1 sylow 2-group $P_2$
 
I know the answer, but I don't understand it completely
 
@Steve using what information?
 
I just mean that if I don't sleep now maybe it'll be harder later.
 
5:18 AM
Aha @MikeM ... Good night!
 
@arctictern using the information from the figure
 
@Steve okay. let's make a reasonable guess that the grid on the plane is Zu+Zv. make sense?
(where Z = {integers})
 
Yeah the grid is for integers
 
the u component is between -2 and -1, while the v component is between -1 and 1
so there you have it
 
@arctictern but how can you tell that?
 
5:19 AM
by looking....
 
that's the answer btw
 
@arctictern So, suppose we consider $x = (1 2 3 4)$ then we need to construct a y such that $yxy{-1} = x^{-1}$ so we constructed and got $y = (1 4)(2 3)$ we consider $H = <x>$ and $K = <y>$. Then $HK = H \rtimes K = Z_4 \rtimes Z_2 = D_8$ so we are done.
 
I am not remotely surprised that tern got an answer correct :D
 
@Steve if that plane were literally the xy-plane and those two vectors were (1,0) and (0,1), you'd be able to tell just by looking right?
 
By construction the semi-direct product isn't trivial
 
5:21 AM
@Adeek looks fine. (you mean only one 2-sylow up to conjugacy I presume)
 
yeah @arctictern
 
@arctictern oh lol
 
@PVAL I see. That field is indeed somewhat troubled. I'm happy to be somewhere that feels safer.
 
Sleep well, @MikeM. Bye for now, all.
 
cya @TedShifrin
 
5:22 AM
that's enough abstract algebra for me today
I'll do the rest tomorrrow evening x.x!
 
@arctictern if we have $f(x) = x^4 + ax^2 + b \in Q[x]$ where $b \neq 0$ then if $\alpha$ is a root then $\sqrt(b) / \alpha$ is a root ?
 
yes
 
why ? is it just algebra ?
regular algebra I mean ?
 
If $u$ is a root of $u^2+au+b$ then $b/u$ is another root. apply with $u=\alpha^2$
vieta's
 
you mean sqrt(b) / u ?
 
5:33 AM
no
$\alpha$ is a root of $x^4+ax^2+b$
$\alpha^2$ is a root of $u^2+au+b$
$u^2+au+b$ factors as $(u-\alpha^2)(u-b/\alpha^2)$
$x^4+ax^2+n$ factors as $(x^2-\alpha^2)(x^2-b/\alpha^2)$
so $\sqrt{b/\alpha^2}=\sqrt{b}/\alpha$ is another root of $x^4+ax^2+b$
 
I see
thanks
 
5:46 AM
@arctictern if the polynomial f(x) is given as before I want to prove the galois group is either $\{e\},Z_2,Z_4 ,Z_2 x Z_2, or D_8$
is there a fast way to do it ?
 
cases: (a) u^2+au+b=(u-p)(u-q) so splitting field is sqrts of p and q adjoined to Q so extension has degree 1,2 or 4 so galois group has size 4. (b) u^2+au+b is irreducible, roots are p+/-sqrt(q) (go from there)
 
oke thanks
@arctictern maybe I have an idea. Does the field extension $Q(\alpha,\sqrt(b))$ contain all the roots of f(x) ?
 
it is the splitting field yes
 
why ?
I mean it contain the roots $\alpha$ and $-\alpha$ and $\sqrt(b) / \alpha$ but why does it contain all roots ?
 
6:02 AM
If $\alpha$ is a root then the polynomial factors as $(x+\alpha)(x-\alpha)(x+\sqrt{b}/\alpha)(x-b/\sqrt{\alpha})$. all roots are expressible in terms of $\alpha$ and $\sqrt{b}$ and conversely $\alpha$ and $\sqrt{b}$ are expressible in terms of roots.
 
how did you factor this so quickly ?
 
did you read the multiline derivation I gave above?
combine that with difference of squares
 
I see
I see very nice
 
6:17 AM
@arctictern I guess $[Q(\alpha) : Q] = 1,2,3 \ or\ 4$ can we eliminate 3 ?
 
yes
 
I mean if we can eliminate 3 then I think it follows smoothly
why does it follow smoothly ?
 
the splitting field is a tower of two quadratic extensions
first one adjoins a root of u^2+au+b, then one adjoins the square root of the first thing we adjoined
 
oh
oh I see we could also do it using that thing we proved before that irreducible poly of degree 3 is either all real or 1 real and 2 complex.
no that doesn't work
your method is better
 
6:45 AM
@arctictern can you give me an example of polynomial of degree 4 with trivial galois extension ?
 
x^4
 
with $b \neq 0$
 
(x^2-1)^2
 
this has trivial galois group ?
 
it factors over Z so...
 
6:47 AM
I see
 
7:20 AM
@arctictern I was trying to find polynomials of degree 4 which gives galois group $\{e\},Z_2,Z_2xZ_2,Z_4$ I found all but I can't seem to find one for $Z_4$
nvm I found it
$f(x) = x^4 + 4x^4 + 2$
 
7:46 AM
@Adeek are both exponents supposed to be $4$?
 
oh no I made a mistake @robjohn it should be 4x
$x^4 + 4x + 2$
 
8:36 AM
Hello, can someone tel me if i can write : $$
-div(\phi(|\nabla u|)\nabla u)+ \phi(|u|)u
$$
like this
$$\sum_{\alpha\in \mathbb{N}^n, |\alpha|=k}a_{\alpha}(D^{k-1}u(x),...,u(x),x)D^{\alpha}u(x)+G(D^{k-1}u(x),...,u(‌​x),x)=0$$
what is a and G ?
 
9:36 AM
Easy exercise: prove that $\varnothing\times\varnothing=\varnothing$
 
10:10 AM
got a 96/100 on my graph theory midterm! :D
 
More interesting exercise, if $A\times A=A$ must $A$ be empty?
 
10:43 AM
Do you define $=$ as really "contain the same elements", or as "isomorphic in the category of sets"?
 
@SteamyRoot Isomorphisms in Set are just the bijections, but certainly $\Bbb N \neq 2\Bbb N$ as sets.
 
@steamyroot assuming choice AxA is isomorphic to A in Set always
Since isomorphisms are just bijections
Ah, with A infinite of course
 
Yes, that's why I asked
 
oh
 
10:52 AM
@Alessandro $P_0 = \{\}$, $P_{n+1}=(P_n,P_n)$, $A=\{P_\omega\}$, $A\times A=A$
 
@DHMO If $A = \{X\}$ (whatever $X$ is), then $A\times A\neq A$.
 
So $P_0 = \varnothing$, and $P_1 = (\varnothing,\varnothing)$ which is now an element rather than a set?
 
@TobiasKildetoft why?
@SteamyRoot yes
 
@DHMO Because of the way we define ordered pairs.
 
@TobiasKildetoft what is the definition?
 
10:57 AM
@DHMO I can never recall which one behaves the best, but something like $(a,b) = \{a,\{a,b\}\}$.
 
@TobiasKildetoft My source has $(a,b) = \{\{a\},\{a,b\}\}$
 
@DHMO That works too (so we have that $a\neq (a,a)$).
 
@TobiasKildetoft Because (a,a) = {{a}}
 
But what if $A$ is infinite?
 
11:03 AM
Hmm, so you want to basically make $A$ contain all the elements of $A\times A$, right?
 
yes
 
so we need to somehow avoid ending up with a "minimal" element in $A$ since this could never be in $A\times A$
 
Axiom of foundation?
 
yeah, that might be what prevents this
 
Wait, why minimal? Aren't maximal elements the problem?
 
11:10 AM
@Alessandro I was thinking that if it is in some sense minimal then it could not be in $A\times A$ since it would have to come from something in $A$ which would have to be "smaller"
 
Ah, well, but if the minimal element is empty it's equal to its product with itself
 
@Alessandro the axiom of foundation says that if A is not empty then A has a minimal element.
 
An $\in$-minimal element, yep, that's right
 
@Alessandro Right, but the empty set is still not equal to the set $(\emptyset,\emptyset)$
 
I agree
 
11:15 AM
0
Q: Variation of nim game, where person to take last stone loses

sashaI am considering the following variation of nim Same as the original game of nim there are $n$ piles of stones. The person to take the last stone loses. Considering both players play optimally and a winning position is a position such that if one player ends up with this position he can win...

any hints ?
 
Maybe it's better to start by thinking if there can be an $A$ such that $A\times A\subseteq A$
 
@sasha Hmm, my initial guess would be that it would just correspond to adding $*$ and playing regular nim, but I didn't really check
 
Prove n^3 - n is divisible by 81 if n is a multiple of 3
Nevermind doned it
 
11:37 AM
hi
how are you?
 
@SylentNyte That doesn't seem true.
 
where do the values come from?
 
@Hey-men-whatsup They divided the one-degree terms by 2 and squared it, then added those values to both sides
 
ok thanks @Fargle..
 
12:36 PM
@Alessandro Is it proven?
 
I know the answer but I won't spoil it :P
 
Hi! How do I do the integral the domain of a semi-circle(top) radius 1, center (1, 0)? What is the radius integral limit and the theta? how can I discover this?
 
1:00 PM
@HiHello what is the function?
@Kaumudi hi
 
user228700
@DHMO Hey :-)
 
Hi chat
 
@Ramanujan hi
 
@DHMO the function is xy, but I cant write the limits of integral!
 
@HiHello just write $\oint_C xy\ \mathrm dx\ \mathrm dy$
 
1:14 PM
integral from 0 to 2(integral from 0 to sqrt(2x-x^2) of (xy)dy)dx
and I want to solve using polar coordenates
@DHMO where see the deffinition of your codes? I dont understand that
 
@DHMO ok. I know solve that using cartesian coordinates. I would like to know how to write the polar integral, because the circle isnt centered on (0, 0)
 
@HiHello translate it so that the circle is centered on (0,0)?
 
@DHMO but the function above this domain will change, no?
 
@HiHello I think you can understand what "translate" means
 
1:28 PM
@DHMO Thanks. I've never done that, Ill try
 
you are welcome
 
2:20 PM
hello all . can someone help me with fourier analysis?
 
@pingOfDoom just ask. those who can help would help.
 
so im asked to get the time domain representation of the signal cos(omega) + jsin(omega)
and so i apply the inverse fourier transform
oh wait it was cos(2omega) + jsin(omega)
anyway i put that into euler form and substitute that into the inverse fourier equation
getting e^(omega * j(2+n))
the textbook solutions then says that by orthogonality that equals delta(n+2)
and i dont know why
 
How do you put cos(2ω) + jsin(ω) into euler form?
 
e^(2omega*J)
 
that would equal cos(2ω) + jsin(2ω) instead
 
2:26 PM
it was that
not what i wrote originally
 
oh, n is π lol
 
come again??
no n is not pi
 
what is n?
 
discrete time variable
 
well, you get (1/(2π)) int_(-infty to infty) e^(2jω+jωn) dω right
 
2:29 PM
yes
and the integration would be from -pi to pi
because of periodicity
im just confused by the orthogonality part
 
It's #8 right
 
yeah
wait no
thats going forward
i want to go backward
from a sinusoidal frequency representation to a non periodic time domain representation
 
right
it's #8 here then
I mean #10
And don't ask me what the hell orthogonality means
 
lol i know that the word itself has to do with the fact that its perpendicular
but i dont know how that applies here
 
1 min ago, by DHMO
And don't ask me what the hell orthogonality means
 
2:36 PM
i mean i guess yeah in the complex plane cos(2w) + jsin(2w) represents a line
and in that context cos and sin are perpendicular bases
but i cant make the connection between that and how it only translates to an impulse in the time domain
and a time shifted impulse at that
 
2:58 PM
hi chat
I can probably help with this kind of thing, but I'll need to read what you've got
also, you can use Mathjax in chat (see the Latex in chat link in the room description)
 
@pingOfDoom The above should've been directed to you, btw
 
@Semiclassical what does "orthogonality" mean in this context?
 
On $L^2$ you have a scalar product $\langle f,g\rangle=\int \overline{f(x)} g(x) dV$
Here fourier transform is a unitary map: $\langle \mathcal F(f),\mathcal F(g)\rangle=\langle f,g\rangle$
is this consistent with the context?
 
3:13 PM
@DHMO Consider what orthogonality means in the context of R^n. The simplest way to present that is to say that two vectors are orthogonal if their dot product vanishes.
 
(two functions are then orthogonal wrt scalar product)
 
Never mind
 
For L^2 you instead have the inner product that @s.harp just indicated, and then the definition of orthogonality is that said inner product vanishes.
The 'geometric' content is much the same, though: You can write any 'vector' in L^2 (i.e. a square-integrable function) as a linear combination of basis vectors (complex exponentials) which are orthogonal with respect to the inner product.
 
user227867
3:53 PM
@robjohn This month, I got new blue spectacles, blue watch, blue wallet, blue socks and blue umbrella =D
 
user227867
@meow-mix Have you studied calculus? I know you are studying algebra from Aluffi's book.
 
If I want to model a peak that has a known mean, a known "left-width" and a known "right-width", but these are not symmetrical, what are standard functions used to approximate this?
if the left and right width were the same I'd take a Gaussian for example
 
@s.harp Poisson?
 
(in the the object should be a probability distr., so polynomials are bad for this)
 
Binomial?
 
3:59 PM
@DHMO poisson has 1 free parameter, whicn can only tune the mean, I cant get the deviations to the left and right to match up with it
I dont know the paramters of the binomial tho
 
@s.harp n and p
mean = np, variance = np(1-p)
 
im looking for a continuous prob distr^
 
4:23 PM
Gamma distribution, maybe?
Or a skewed Student's t
I've probably forgotten everything about statistics that I could forget, but I'm pretty sure you want a skewed distribution. This kind of question will probably get more response on Cross-Validated, though
 
Could someone of you take a look at my question: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2035934/how-much-are-the-annual-contributions-to-be-paid
and tell me how we could continue?
 
4:48 PM
@WillHunting blue boy!
 
5:00 PM
do the maths chat room have regular chat sections?
 
sections?
 
@robjohn I proved those properties you told me but I haven't been able to prove that the convergents are solutions to the Pell equation
 
5:13 PM
.+
 
5:23 PM
e.g. something like what the h bar is doing every few weeks
 
5:47 PM
We have the set $\{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \mid y\leq f(x)\}$, where $y=f(x)$ is a concave function. That means that each line segment between two points of the graph of $f$ is completely below the graph. In that set there are all the elements that are below the function, right? For for all $x$ the $y=f(x)$ is below the graph. That means that all the points of a line segment belong to that set. Is this correct?
 
In solving Laplace's equation on a domain where $0<\theta<\pi$, $r>1$, how would I choose a form for the general solution for the equation in $r$?
 
morning guys
 
user227867
I was about to ask you if you have solved that Fourier problem lol @JessyCat
 
@WillHunting I did! Now I'm working on a polar Laplace equation on an unbounded semicircle.
 
user227867
@JessyCat Did you solve it yourself?
 
5:51 PM
Nice
 
No, I had a lot of help from @Semiclassical
But I've solved a bunch on my own since then.
 
If anyone has unique ideas for this question, I encourage you post your ideas.
2
Q: Methods to compute $\sum_{k=1}^nk^p$ without Faulhaber's formula

Simple ArtAs far as every question I've seen concerning "what is $\sum_{k=1}^nk^p$" is always answered with "Faulhaber's formula" and that is just about the only answer. In an attempt to make more interesting answers, I ask that this question concern the problem of "Methods to compute $\sum_{k=1}^nk^p$ wi...

 
6:10 PM
@BalarkaSen @AkivaWeinberger math.stackexchange.com/a/2036103/98602
 
Ah, right, Baire Category Theorem. Good show.
 
BCT doesn't solve it by itself, though. The interval statement was the hard part.
 
Hi everyone
 
Well, shows how much I know…
 
@DanielFischer will there be hats this year ?
 
6:22 PM
@AkivaWeinberger is that a joke about the interval
 
No, it's just me saying I clearly don't know much about the topic
 
oh, sure, but me neither
I knew that the BCT argument would work if I could get the density statement and then I waited until someone posted such a thing on mathoverflow
lol
 
6:39 PM
@LeGrandDODOM Looks quite so.
 
Oh, I forgot about that.
 
6:57 PM
@DanielF !!!
salut, @LeGrand
 

« first day (2309 days earlier)      last day (2716 days later) »