« first day (1587 days earlier)      last day (3436 days later) » 

6:02 PM
Is anybody else annoyed by Wikipedia asking for money?
As far as I know they are not even struggling.
Tensor product is cool
 
@Alizter No. I claimed something wrong, and Mike set up a bet on it.
@Alizter You got to study modules first.
@Alizter Me too. As well as Karl and anon. Those are the cool guys.
 
especially $V^n \to V^{\otimes n}$
 
@Alizter I wouldn't be annoyed if the requests for money weren't so intrusive, but holy cow, it's painful to use the damn website.
 
Wikipedia is asking for money?
 
Hi!!! Is $\mathbb{F}_p$ equal to $\mathbb{Z}_p$?
 
6:09 PM
I would be unsurprised if they did need the donation money yearly. But they could make the ads less intrusive. It stands to make me stop using Wikipedia when I need to look up a quick fact rather than get me to donate.
 
@evinda Usually one uses the former to denote the field, the latter to denote the additive part of the field.
 
@BalarkaSen Great!!! Thanks a lot!!! :)
 
Hello again @Kaj
 
Hey
 
@BalarkaSen They still ask even after donating.
 
6:13 PM
@Alizter They're not asking me though.
 
Really, @Alizter? That's super crude.
 
Country-based donation-asking?
 
@BalarkaSen I guess they don't want your money?
 
Thankfully, I don't have any money.
 
Moni plz
 
6:14 PM
We have a new catchy word here on MSE. Wolf refer to Wolfram Alpha :D
 
@Venus O_o where do you see that
 
They want more money to expand their organisation. They want to pay more managers.
 
@Alizter @BalarkaSen They need money to pay for their donation campaign :3
 
There are those Wikipedia contributers that don't even get any reward for their work.
 
LOL @Hippa
 
6:16 PM
@Hippalectryon See math110 and china math's posts.
 
If wikipedia had ads for a day it would be loaded.
 
@Alizter This is not quite true. Wikipedia does not have so many managers. Servers are not cheap, especially when you're one of the most-viewed sites on the internet, and they're not making money off it like google.
I think it's a noble goal to not have ads. But they could stand to keep the donation visible, but non-intrusive, all year.
 
@MikeMiller Because they are some charity type organisation, their finances are public. Apparently there are more than in the good.
Oh well
 
@Hippalectryon Did suspects they're both same users.
 
I do too
 
6:18 PM
Did did suspect right.
 
You're right, @Alizter; I'm wrong. Whoops. Screw them.
 
I imagine donators to be nervous humanitarian undergrads.
 
@Venus, It's true. I'm always cool like that
 
There are no "cool" mathematicians, @Kaj. Well, except Alexander Gruber.
 
Tunk-Fey and Cleo are the same user.
@BalarkaSen and @DanielFischer
 
6:20 PM
@Alizter Not sure
@Chris'ssis thinks so
 
@Alizter I assure you, Balarka and I are not the same user.
10
 
But I'm not 100% sure
 
@Hippalectryon There is evidence. Even on Brilliant.org
 
LOL @DanielFischer
 
Ah ok @Alizter
 
6:21 PM
Tunk-Fey randomly quotes Cleo
as if they personally talk
and gets really defensive and avoidy
 
Does anyone here know how to prove this $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(\zeta(4n)-1) = \frac78-\frac{\pi}{4}\coth\pi$$
 
I don't think he cross votes too much though
 
@KajHansen Boys should speak less & do more
 
@Venus Try writing it as $$\sum_{n \geq 1} \sum_{m \geq 2} \frac1{m^{4n}}$$
Then switch the order of the summation.
 
@Venus Girls should not make such generalising comments :P
 
6:23 PM
@Alizter I thought so at first, but no I doubt. I don't believe they're same users
 
Cleos bio is a bit weird
 
@Venus Girls shouldn't upload fake profile pics >:c
 
@Hippalectryon nice upside negation :P
 
Girls should be less silly. waits for a lot of bashes
 
6:24 PM
@BalarkaSen Could you elaborate?
 
@BalarkaSen No, @TedShifrin isn't here
 
speaking of the same users, did y'all see this?
 
@Alizter Girls are always correct
 
@BalarkaSen echo a{p,c,d,b}e
 
@Alizter Where do you see him quote Cleo?
 
6:26 PM
@MikeMiller ?
 
@Venus On brilliant.
 
@Venus $$\sum_{n = 1}^\infty \sum_{m = 1}^\infty \frac1{m^{4n}} = \sum_{m = 1}^\infty \sum_{n = 1}^\infty \frac1{(m^4)^n}$$
 
No point chasing it up. It is none of my buisness anyway.
 
@Hippalectryon Girls always have secrets ^^
 
Now do the inner sum by noting that's it's a geometric series.
 
6:26 PM
@Alizter Gimme link
 
@Venus That doesn't mean upload fake pic :c
 
@BalarkaSen Stop hating on analysis and then doing analysis.
 
@Alizter :P
It's just manipulation, not in the least any analysis
 
@BalarkaSen Then what? I still don't get it. Sorry ^^
 
@Hippalectryon You might notice the reputation change on dec 2
 
6:27 PM
@BalarkaSen Could you also explain me why these sets:

$$A=\{ x^2 | x \in \mathbb{Z}_p\} \text{ and } B=\{ 3-y^2| y \in \mathbb{Z}_p\}$$

contain both $\frac{p+1}{2}$ elements?
 
@Venus Well, compute the sum.
I am not gonna do it for you, partially because I am lazy.
 
@MikeMiller O_o
 
@Hippalectryon No restriction about that ^^
 
@evinda $\mathbb{Z}_p$ means $\mathbb{Z}/p\Bbb Z$, I presume, and not p-adics?
 
@Hippalectryon Besides, you have already known my cute face ^^
 
6:29 PM
:)
 
Although, I'm a bit chubby
 
You're looking at quadratic residues in the first case @evinda.
 
In response to Ruben Doornenbal: Cleo said this to me, "While asleep, I had an unusual experience. There was a red screen formed by flowing blood, as it were. I was observing it. Suddenly a hand began to write on the screen. I became all attention. That hand wrote a number of elliptic integrals. They stuck to my mind. As soon as I woke up, I committed them to writing."
She also said that the integral evaluates to
In my opinion, I think this integral is way too hard for kids. Can you elaborate your method on how you evaluate this integral? Preferably with a high school method (this word is r
 
Considering that this is one of the questions they deleted his 'accepted answer' points from, one is led to conclude that he was making other accounts to ask questions and then answer them himself, probably voting on his own answers that way as well.
 
6:29 PM
@BalarkaSen You act as if you're a cool guy :D
 
@BalarkaSen I mean $\mathbb{F}_p$.
 
@Venus I'm not, I assure you.
I stink.
 
So Cleo, who apparently has difficulty typing words, writes long eloquent sentences in a casual chat with Tunk-Fey.
 
And I'm proud of it.
 
Not only that but one time they both got a problem incorrect which you can ask @Chris'ssis about
The chance of making the same mistake is interesting
 
6:31 PM
@BalarkaSen So, in the first case, because of the fact that we 're looking at quadratic residues and there are $\frac{p+1}{2}$ in $\mathbb{Z}_p$ there are $\frac{p+1}{2}$ elements ?
 
@Alizter That's Anastasiya
 
prove why there are (p+1)/2 quadratic residues in Z_p
 
@Alizter That's a paraphrase of one of Ramanujan's utterings.
 
it's an easy exercise. do it.
 
She holds a contest there @Alizter?
 
6:32 PM
@Venus Nono. Scroll down.
Tunk-Fey has a comment which I quoted above
 
@Venus Hmm are you sure you have read the TOS ?
 
@DanielFischer Even more suspicion that Cleo does not exist.
 
@Alizter What problem?
 
@KajHansen ?
 
@Alizter I believe it's a joke. I can quote like that too :D
 
6:33 PM
@Chris'ssis Nothing. We are debating the existence of Cleo.
 
@BalarkaSen Ok, I will.. But why does the second set contain $\frac{p+1}{2}$ elements?
 
@Alizter Ah, OK.
 
Wait, let me think for a sec.
 
@Alizter I mean I saw Annastasiya there
 
@Chris'ssis He quoted Cleo on another website and yeah. It is suspicious.
@Venus It is a reply to the top comment
 
6:34 PM
@evinda B and A have the same cardinality.
it's 3 minus the squares, and there are precisely |A| many squares
 
@Hippalectryon No. In which sentence exactly?
 
@KajHansen I dunneven know what you're talking about.
 
@Venus Nothing :) It was just a joke about those weird TOS
 
Wait, here we go. Sorry.
 
@BalarkaSen Could you explain me further why the two sets have the same cardinality?
 
6:36 PM
What's their to explain, @evinda? Take the bijection a \to 3 - a from A to B.
 
@Alizter It seems a fun contest. Let me take a look
 
@Balarka, $\phi:\mathbb{Z}_p^\times \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_p^\times$ defined such that $\phi(x) = x^2$. Then $\ker(\phi) = 2$ since only $2$ elements map to $1$.
 
@Venus See the picture above
cheesy as stilton
Anyway. Enough skeptics for one day.
 
@Alizter Where is the another website? I&S?
 
6:37 PM
So by isomorphism theorems, there are $\frac{p-1}{2}$ quad. residues $\pmod{p}$, not including $0$.
 
oh, ok.
 
@Venus No brilliant
 
yeah that's a possible way to do it.
 
Yeah. It's early for me. I'm very tired.
 
@BalarkaSen So, what f do we take? We cannot take $f(x)=x^2$.. What else could we take?
 
6:38 PM
@KajHansen magics up espresso
 
@evinda what?
are you trying to prove that |A| = (p+1)/2?
 
@BalarkaSen Which bijective function could we take?
@BalarkaSen No, I wanted to understand why the two sets have the same cardinality..
 
I have already told you. Take the bijective function $x \mapsto 3 - x$
 
@Alizter I see it, but I don't believe he is Cleo. Anyway, what is the highest level on brilliant?
 
@BalarkaSen So, we take this function : $f(x)=3-x$?
 
6:40 PM
@Venus 5 but I do brilliant for the fun.
 
yes
 
I am level 5 in everything but Combinatorics, Mechanics and Electricity & Magnetism.
 
@Alizter He has level 5 in many subjects there
Is he a soldier?
 
@Venus It is not too difficult
@Venus Probably national service
 
I see his profile, he has a gun
 
6:42 PM
in some countries it is compulsory to serve for the army for some time
 
@Alizter No way. Indonesia has no military service like Israel or Singapore
 
@Venus I don't care too much for military services.
Don't get me into politics
It is a mess
 
@BalarkaSen A ok.. So if we would have for example the sets $A=\{ 3x^2| x \in \mathbb{Z}_p\}$ and $B=\{ 7-5y^2| y \in \mathbb{Z}_p\}$ would we take the bijective function $f(3x)=7-5x$ ?
 
@Alizter I just ask. I love boys with guns. They look cool! ^^
 
6:44 PM
No.
 
@BalarkaSen I am getting a book on lie theory for christmas. If I am god awful at understanding it I will probably pick up a linear algebra text as well to get up to speed which means modules.
 
@BalarkaSen But..? :/
 
@evinda I'll let you figure out.
 
So cool @Venus
 
@Alizter You also need a lot of topology to study Lie theory.
AFAIK.
 
6:46 PM
@BalarkaSen nope. That is if you approach from manifolds
 
I promise youy don't need to understand modules to read Stilwell's book, @Alizter.
 
Which Ted says is not necessary
 
Interesting, maybe.
 
@BalarkaSen $f(x)=\frac{7-5x}{3}$ ?
 
@MikeMiller Modules are more for tensory things.
I can't imagine why I would need modules for Lie
 
6:46 PM
AFAIK, @Alizter, the most natural way to look at Lie groups is as manifolds.
 
unless a Lie module?
hmm
 
You don't need modules to understand what tensor products are, either... one obtains a vector space when taking the tensor product of two vector spaces.
 
@Hippalectryon I mean the one who has a gun & he uses it wisely.
 
@BalarkaSen The book is called Naive Lie theory which approaches it
 
Anyways, I don't know anything about it.
 
6:47 PM
It's just that the construction works just as well (and is even more useful) in the more general setting.
 
And I don't want to know at the moment either.
@MikeMiller Vector spaces are modules over fields.
 
@MikeMiller I will need to study it more. I hope it doesn't end up as something I kind of get. Like Galois theory has.
 
Modules, modules, modules.
 
require(vectorSpace.lua)
 
@BalarkaSen Or am I wrong? :/
 
6:48 PM
@BalarkaSen grows wings and turns into a seagull
 
And no, there's no such thing as a Lie module (that's widely studied), though one could make the notion precise.
It's a pretty simple concept, @Alizter, I bet you'll grasp it just fine after studying it some more. And Galois theory can go to hell.
 
@MikeMiller You're on ignore now.
 
@MikeMiller Did you not like Galois theory?
 
Galois must be given respect.
 
I think it is interesting but very cognitively demanding.
 
6:49 PM
@Alizter Galois theory is super interesting.
 
@BalarkaSen Anyway. Let me study my Lie
 
Especially what I am studying now, i.e., the topological aspect.
 
don't drag me anywhere :P
 
Lie be damned.
 
Topology looks fun
especially algebraic topology
 
6:50 PM
@Alizter In broad strokes I like it. The details are tedious and ugly to my taste.
 
@Alizter That's what I am studying.
 
@BalarkaSen I think I will improve my algebra before diving into topology
and Lie is appealing to me
 
The cake is a Lie
 
Yes, you need to study a little more algebra.
 
Speaking of Algebra, finally back to studying it :) I really enjoy this course.
Probably will fail the test since I just hoaxed it
 
6:51 PM
@Studentmath Are you going to study Lie things?
They come up in quantum physics
or no time left?
 
Algebra means abstract algebra, @Alizter
 
@BalarkaSen of course. What did you think I meant?
I know how to solve quadratics. I think.
I learnt how to solve cubics.
very briefly
 
@Alizter I mean Algebra doesn't contain "Lie things"
 
But it feels really dirty
@BalarkaSen Lie algebras are part of algebra.
 
@Balarka any good resources on geometric group theory?
 
6:53 PM
Lie groups are groups which is algebra
 
@Alizter It's hundred times easier to solve the cubic using Lagrange resolvents, again Galois theory.
 
@Alizter I am not sure yet, I don't think so though.
 
@Studentmath None. I have been learning that stuff from my prof's lectures.
If you get to know of one, ping me.
 
@BalarkaSen I found Ferraris quartic method more fun to do than the cubic
 
Will do
 
6:54 PM
@Studentmath Teds book :P
 
@Alizter Ted wrote a book on geometric group theory?
 
@BalarkaSen Yeah. Group theory a geomtric approach
 
@BalarkaSen, his abstract algebra text is geometric
 
Oh right
 
"Abstract Algebra: A Geometric Approach"
 
6:55 PM
oh. but that's not geometric group theory.
is it?
i mean the stuff gromov did.
coarse algebra, in short.
 
well no
Abstract algebra a geometric approach
ahh memory serves me incorrect
 
i guess that will contain symmetry groups and whatnots i guess. like Artin.
what i am referring to is the coarse study of cayley graphs, using geodesic metric spaces.
 
Yeah but Ted wrote it so expect some slaps @BalarkaSen
even though the time frames are a bit different
@BalarkaSen Of course. Yes. I understand that.
 
That stuff is cool. Hyperbolicity in groups is a very cool notion. I hope to study more about it in near future.
 
@BalarkaSen So do you go to college lectures?
 
6:58 PM
No.
 
I thought you did something like that?
 
I visit a university often to meet a mathematician.
 
Ah
There are only bad universities around me
 
That guy's a hyperbolic geometer ;)
 
These are the only mathematicians I talk to
 

« first day (1587 days earlier)      last day (3436 days later) »