« first day (918 days earlier)      last day (4102 days later) » 

9:01 PM
hi @AkramHassan
 
@Charlie I can't stop!!!
 
hi @user58512
 
what's up?
 
@skullpatrol don't stop
 
user19161
Hi @mariano good to give 5 answers to the same question for you! =)
 
9:06 PM
@user58512 upset :( just closed my question
 
@AkramHassan, don't be upset
 
@user58512 it was important question and i needed more insight on it
 
@AkramHassan, I don't think your question has an answer: Different people will be different
 
7, though :-)
 
user19161
9:08 PM
OIC =)
 
@user58512 you saw it already
 
@AkramHassan, I think a lot about meanings and how to see things
 
@user58512 what are your areas of interest?
 
I don't know
 
user19161
Guys, I am now Jacob Black. QED.
2
 
9:11 PM
@user58512 what do you like in math?
guys, Any analyst here?
 
I know undergrad level analysis
 
user19161
Hey @argon! It's Fri here!
 
isn't it better for mathematician to be unmarried .
 
@JacobBlack YAY! New name, eh?
 
@user58512 very good
 
9:12 PM
i mean to remain unmarried
 
@Theorem why?
 
user19161
@Argon Yes!
 
@Theorem depends
 
@Argon Aary!
 
Wiles was married
 
9:13 PM
@Charlie Hi M!
 
@user58512 any examples about your wondering of meaning?
 
GAuss was married twice
Julia Robinson was married
 
and charlie is not married :P
 
user19161
@argon It goes well with my new avatar.
 
Euler was married, and had 11 kids
 
9:13 PM
@Charlie
 
@JacobBlack hehe true!
 
oh ya .
 
@Theorem no, no,I'm forever alone
 
@Charlie thats good
u can do maths on valentines day
 
Emo Maths chat
 
9:15 PM
@Theorem I can do math everyday
 
Good evening (depending on your time zone)...
 
hi @Theorem
 
@draks... Guten abend
 
@JacobBlack Aha - Jacob Black!
 
@Charlie Hi how are you? Are you praticising foreign languages ?
 
9:16 PM
Hello @OldJohn!
 
@Argon hi there
 
guys can you give me more insight about my last closed question?
 
@Theorem I'm like Hypatia
@draks... sometimes I like to say the few things I know in other languages :P
 
user19161
@OldJohn Maybe you should change yours too. =)
 
@Charlie great
 
9:18 PM
@Charlie great
 
guys can you give me more insight about my last closed question?
 
@JacobBlack Narh - I am happy being just me
 
@AkramHassan which on is it?
 
@theorem @draks thanks
 
@AkramHassan John von Neumann supposedly said "Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them."If it worked for him, it can't be a real limitation. — Michael Greinecker 4 hours ago
 
9:20 PM
Are there any graph theorists around?
 
user19161
I draw the graph of $y=x$, LOL.
 
@draks... That's no..oh, wait, it is a moon...
 
too large for a moon
it's a space station, oh no right it's a moon
 
@draks... HAHAH
 
Hehehehehe
 
9:22 PM
;)
 
@AkramHassan, the most significant was the real numbers
 
I expected: hohoho
 
huhuhuhu
 
@Drakes : i only know what graph is and some matching :P
 
Goddammit all, I want to strangle the authors of every single one of these coding blogs I've come across
 
user19161
9:24 PM
Amazing, asker edited question again. I really hope they STOP this nonsense.
 
@EdGorcenski, have you seen coding horror
 
Yeah
 
hehe
 
It's not that it's bad. It's just that every single thing is presented from the mind of someone who knows what they're doing, and so they fail to explain the important parts.
 
@EdGorcenski, once his server crashed and turned out he didn't have any backups.. so he had to scrape his site of google archives
 
9:25 PM
It's like, "let me explain this elementary thing. Now here's this super complicated thing. Easy, right?!"
 
So does anybody know if "Finding a Hamiltonian cycle on bridgeless undirected planar 3-regular bipartite graphs with face bounds is still np-complete?" math.stackexchange.com/q/297508/19341
 
@AkramHassan I like your question, maybe if you reword it and make it more focused it will help.
 
@skullpatrol it's already closed
 
@Theorem sounds like you are the one I was looking for...
 
@skullpatrol what's your opinion
 
9:29 PM
@draks... : i don't think i am the right person . i have just started reading about some graph theory .
 
@AkramHassan That doesn't mean permanently you can still reword it and try again :)
 
@skullpatrol you mean rewrite it?
 
@Theorem do you have to?
or just out of interest...
 
@draks... : i am supposed to have to . because i will have to write exam sometime soon
:P
 
good luck then
 
@AkramHassan, do you know about platonism
 
i just saw platonism and formalism today
 
@AkramHassan, platonism is about a reality of mathematical objects outside our universe
 
No it's about holes, fire and shadows...
 
@draks... : u got an answer to ur question
 
9:37 PM
nice picture...
 
@draks... where ?
in the answer ?
 
by henning
yes
 
user19161
Ladies and gentlemen, I have capped for today. Thank you for your support.
 
@JasonBourne : we support u .
for changing ur name
 
user19161
@Theorem Sorry, I am now Jacob Black.
 
9:40 PM
@JasonBourne : i know but i can't send a message to jacob black
may be i need to refresh
Mr. Black
@JacobBlack : Ya now it workd
 
I'm too tired to work on my math :(
it's been along day
 
@user58512 go rest
 
@user58512 dream about it
@Charlie your word seems to work like a command to everybody...I feel tired
 
@draks... sorry
 
9:49 PM
can someone explain to me this part"k={....}"
 
i can hardly read it...
 
click
 
@pourjour, it's just that tan gives the same values for multiple different angles
 
@Charlie ahhh
 
;)
 
9:51 PM
@pourjour, so atan isn't enough alone to invert tan - you also have to add in the information about which quadrant (x,y) is int
 
@user58512 but why they specifies exatly those three valeus {1,2,0}
 
@pourjour, because those are the ones which work for the arctan function they have in mind
@pourjour, if you have a definition of arctan, you should be able to find these k values
 
@user58512 any courses about that?
 
@pourjour, you just solve it
 
@user58512 ok thanks, I will try
 
9:54 PM
@pourjour, $$\arctan x = \int_0^x \frac{dx}{x^2+1}$$
do you use this?
 
@user58512 not yet we just have general idea about integral
 
oh ok
what is your arctan?
 
@user58512 which arctan ?
 
@user58512 $x$ as limit and inside the integral? bah...
 
@draks..., tell me sooner so I can fix it!!
I dont know why I did that
 
10:01 PM
@user58512 I'll star it for the transcript...
I would really say "I waited" but I was offline
@Theorem the answers needs an update...
 
10:24 PM
$\theta = arctan(\frac{y}{x})+k\pi$
how can I find the values of k
 
@pourjour, if arctan only gives angle in a certain range, then k=0 for (x,y) in that range..
@pourjour, and now if (x,y) is in the next place, you will need k=1,
 
can u specify
which range
 
any how to solve it with calcul?
 
@pourjour, so arctan will always be between -pi and pi
 
10:28 PM
@user58512 yep
how can I relate that with k
uisng some inequality !
 
@pourjour, so if (x,y) is in the part: -x < y < x then k=0
@pourjour, because that's where theta = arctan(y/x) is between -pi and pi
 
user19161
@draks You like graph theory?
 
yes, do you?
 
user19161
Nope.
 
why not?
 
user19161
10:36 PM
Well, I am not really into combinatorial stuff.
 
why not?
 
user19161
Well, just doesn't turn me on as much as analysis.
 
ouuhhh ...wait...
 
user19161
But there are people who do graph theory and functional analysis, haha.
 
user19161
Like the great Bela Bollobas, LOL.
 
10:39 PM
there's a place for everybody
So what's Jacob's favorite recently?
@JacobBlack "Alice Bourne" was not an option for a new name?
 
user19161
@draks... Nope. Why would it be? =)
 
I just "wonder"
 
@draks... hahaha
@draks... 2Xhahahaha
 
user19161
Who is Alice Bourne?
 
@pourjour Soufian , sorry, how are you?
 
10:44 PM
@Charlie What does your hebrew(?) symbol mean?
 
@draks... letter m
 
@Charlie I'm fine thanks and u?
 
@pourjour can't complain, i think
 
user19161
@draks... I see some beautiful women when I google Alice Bourne.
 
@Charlie means not bad :)
 
10:46 PM
@pourjour or "not so good"
 
user19161
@draks... Not very nice of you...
 
@Charlie :(
 
depends on your taste (not mine as well)
 
@pourjour :/
 
@Charlie any news?
 
10:47 PM
@pourjour none
 
@JacobBlack you're right, sorry Alice
 
I'm too boring
 
user19161
@draks... Haha, why "Alice"?
 
5 mins ago, by draks...
I just "wonder"
 
Some days ago I proposed this to Jason Bourne
because he wondered a lot
Do you know him?
 
10:49 PM
@draks... Jasper?
 
I thought Jason...
Jasper Jason Jacob who's next?
 
@draks... Jason=Jacob=Jasper
 
Bourne is Black is?
 
user19161
Shh...
 
shh...
 
10:51 PM
shh...
 
user19161
I just realised your background is black as well.
 
the space...
 
join the dark side
we've got cookies
 
user19161
I fight the dark side...
 
@draks... no, you killed my father
 
10:52 PM
 
@draks... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
you have allowed this, the dark lord twisted your mind until now, and now you became the very thing you swore to destroy
 
@Charlie I AM YOUR FATHER...
 
@draks... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE
 
damn I only know the german version by heart. Help me Obiwan Kenobi
 
@draks... quote the german version, i'd love to hear
 
10:55 PM
Gemeinsam können wir den Imperator stürzen und als Vater und Sohn über die Galaxis herrschen!
 
Nicee!
Ich bin dein Vater
is the only thing i know
i don't even know if this is right
 
user19161
@cha You are black too LOL
 
yes, fo shizzle my nizzle
 
@Charlie It's "Vater" but very nice
 
@draks... the letter sounds like f, right?
 
10:58 PM
right
 
my german is a lame
 
as my hebrew
 
hehe
@draks... what part of germany are you from?
 
why M?
 
@draks... the first letter of my name
 
11:00 PM
I live in Munich, but I'm from the northern part of Bavaria
where are you from?
 
@draks... Ah Munchen
@draks... Brazil
 
let me help you with some special characters: ü ä ö
 
@draks... I don't have them in my keyboard
 
copy-past'em
 
I like to say Leipzig
schlüssel
 
11:02 PM
Then scream it till your neighbors show up...
@Charlie wunderschön
 
@draks... yes, it's nice!
Ich bin ein wunderkind
 
yes you are
 
:D
Danke
 
hey not bad
your "wortschatz" is quite large
 
@draks... you think?? you made my day!
 
11:06 PM
In my opinion, the most important thing in a foreign country is to order a beer in the corresponding language...
 
@draks... hahahaha
 
hey guys. just passing bye , cant stay :/
just saying I edited my last question
@Charlie hi
 
@mick Hi.
 
@mick very good
@Charlie I made yours, but mine is over now
 
@draks... ow
 
11:07 PM
it's late here, so good nite folks
 
deutsch bier
@draks... Guten nacht
 
was sollen wie machen ? :)
 
deutsches bier. Gute Nacht.
 
spass ?
 
CU
 
11:09 PM
@mick passing BY
 
@Charlie you like number theory ?
 
@mick I kind like, but i don't know anything about it
 
@Charlie Im like a frenchmen who speaks no french ...
 
@mick please, tell me what's your first language
 
@Charlie my last question was about number theory ... maybe you like it
hehe I speak alot of languages but im not very good at any :) @Charlie
 
11:16 PM
@mick the first you learned
 
@Charlie If you insist , Im not very fond of giving personal info
 
@mick ??? it's not personal info
 
@Charlie it is personal. But I will make an exception for you. Its dutch
2
 
@mick aah
i had that in mind
 
Did you look at my last question (about polynomials) ? @Charlie
 
11:21 PM
@mick url?
 
2
Q: Counting primes of the form $S_1(a_n)$ vs primes of the form $S_2(b_n)$

mickLet $n$ be an integer $>1$. Let $S_1(a_n)$ be a symmetric irreducible integer polynomial in the variables $a_1,a_2,...a_n$. Let $S_2(b_n)$ be a symmetric irreducible integer polynomial in the variables $b_1,b_2,...b_n$ of the same degree as $S_1(a_n)$. Let $m$ be an integer $>1$ and let $S^...

 
@mick ok
 
gotta run now srr
 
@mick bye bye
 
@Charlie sweet dreams
 
11:27 PM
@mick so to you!
 
Yes.
Sweet dreams.
 
yao
anybody know if there's a proof online anywhere of stellmacher's theorem on $\Sigma_4$-free groups?
 
user19161
11:51 PM
Hello @ethan.
 
hi
 
Quick question: If I want to convert coordinates like (x - a, y - a) into polar coordinates, what do I do? How do I deal with the offsets?
 
$$2\sum_{k=1}^n\ln(\sigma_0(k))(\frac{2k}{n}-1)=\sum_{k=1}^{[\log_2(n)]}\ln(1+\frac{1}{k})\pi(n^{\frac{1}{k}})+O(\ln(n)^a?)=\‌​frac{ \pi(n)}{\ln(2)}+O(\frac{\sqrt n)}{\ln(n)})$$
seems to be true
lol
 
user19161
@ethan Are you Ramanujan incarnate?
 
Don't say stuff like that
lol
 
user19161
11:54 PM
I am not sarcastic. I think you will be famous one day.
 
what is $\sigma_0$?
 
the divisor function
$$\sum_{d\mid n} 1$$
 
number of divisors?
 
yes
 
ah kk
anybody not terrible with analysis here able to help me prove that if $f:\mathcal{D}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ is analytic and $f[D]$ is contained in a line, then $f$ is constant? (where $\mathcal{D}\subset \mathbb{C}$ is a domain)
 

« first day (918 days earlier)      last day (4102 days later) »